`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`IMMERVISION, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00179
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,844,990
`____________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`DB1/ 117902155.1
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2020-00179
`U.S. Patent No. 6,844,990
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order of May 26,
`
`
`
`2020 (Paper 7) (the “Scheduling Order”), Petitioner LG Electronics Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) respectfully requests oral argument in connection with this
`
`proceeding (IPR2020-00179). Per the Scheduling Order, the oral argument will
`
`take place on February 8, 2021.
`
`Petitioner is mindful of the USPTO’s March 13, 2020 notice that all oral
`
`hearings will be conducted remotely until further notice
`
`(https://www.uspto.gov/aboutus/news-updates/uspto-update-person-meetings).
`
`Accordingly, to the extent that all hearings continue to be conducted remotely as of
`
`February 8, 2021, Petitioner is willing and able to participate in a remote hearing.
`
`Petitioner requests one (1) hour in which to present its arguments for this
`
`proceeding.
`
`To comply with 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)’s requirement that this request “must
`
`specify the issues to be argued,” and without waiving argument on any issue not
`
`specifically identified below, Petitioner specifies at least the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`• That per 35 U.S.C. § 103, claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,844,990 is
`
`unpatentable under as obvious over Tada;
`
`DB1/ 117902155.1
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Case IPR2020-00179
`U.S. Patent No. 6,844,990
`
`• That per 35 U.S.C. § 103, claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,844,990 is
`
`unpatentable as obvious over Tada in view of Nagaoka;
`
`• That per 35 U.S.C. § 103, claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,844,990 is
`
`unpatentable as obvious over Tada in view of Baker;
`
`• Rebuttal to issues raised by Patent Owner;
`
`• Any other motions filed by either party; and
`
`• Any other issues that the Board deems necessary for issuing a final
`
`written decision in this proceeding.
`
`
`Dated: December 28, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
` /Dion M. Bregman/
`Dion M. Bregman (Reg. No. 45,645)
`Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
`1400 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`T: +1.650.843.7519
`F: +1.650.843.4001
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`LG Electronics Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DB1/ 117902155.1
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Argument was served on December 28, 2020 via email on Patent
`
`Owner’s counsel at the email addresses below:
`
`Stephen E. Murray
`smurray@panitchlaw.com
`Keith A. Jones
`kjones@panitchlaw.com
`PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO
`& NADEL LLP
`Two Commerce Square
`2001 Market Street, Suite 2800
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`(215) 965-1307
`(215) 965-1331 (Fax)
`
`John D. Simmons
`jsimmons@panitchlaw.com
`Dennis J. Butler
`dbutler@panitchlaw.com
`PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO
`& NADEL LLP
`Wells Fargo Tower
`2200 Concord Pike, Suite 201
`Wilmington, DE 19803
`(302) 394-6001
`
`
`
`Dated: December 28, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Dion M. Bregman/
`Dion M. Bregman (Reg. No. 45,645)
`
`
`
`DB1/ 117902155.1
`
`
`
`