`U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., DELL INC., and APPLE INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00140
`Case No. IPR2020-01059
`U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450
`____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHBIT LIST
`
`i
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00140
`U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450
`
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Description
`Declaration of Richard A. Flasck
`Curriculum Vitae of Richard A. Flasck
`Excerpts of Fundamentals of Microfabrication and
`Nanotechnology (3rd ed. 2012)
`Declaration of Adam Fontecchio, Ph.D. in IPR2020-
`00320
`Transcript of September 10, 2020 Deposition of Dr.
`Adam Fontecchio
`Supplemental Claim Construction Order dated Septem-
`ber 23, 2020
`Declaration of Richard A. Flasck (corrected)1
`Patent Owner’s Oral Hearing Demonstratives
`
`Exhibit No.
`2001
`2002
`2003
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`2008
`
`
`
`
`1 Immediately after submitting its Patent Owner’s Response, Solas discovered that it had
`mistakenly filed an unsigned copy of the Flasck declaration as Exhibit 2001. It immedi-
`ately (and prior to the deadline for filing the Response) filed a new copy of the Flasck
`declaration with his signature, which was recorded in the E2E system as Exhibit 2007,
`but which is stamped as Exhibit 2001. There is no difference between these two docu-
`ments other than the addition of the signature in the filing recorded as Exhibit 2007. To
`reduce confusion, the parties have agreed to consistently refer to the Flasck declaration
`as Exhibit 2001. Samsung has not disputed the admissibility of the Flasck declaration or
`suggested that it should be given less than its full weight due to this filing error.
`
`ii
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00140
`U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450
`
`Dated: February 8, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Neil A. Rubin/
`Neil A. Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Telephone: 310-826-7474
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner,
`SOLAS OLED LTD.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00140
`U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that “Patent Owner’s Updated Exhibit List” (Paper No. 40)
`
`was served on February 8, 2020 by email sent to:
`
`David A. Garr
`Jeffrey H. Lerner
`Jared Frisch
`David J. Cho
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Telephone: 202-662-6000
`Email: dgarr@cov.com
`Email: jlerner@cov.com
`Email: jfrisch@cov.com
`Email: djcho@cov.com
`
`Peter P. Chen
`Robert T. Haslam
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Telephone: 650-632-4700
`Email: pchen@cov.com
`Email: rhaslam@cov.com
`
`Adam P. Seitz
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Blvd.
`Suite 700
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`Telephone: 913-777-5600
`Email: adam.seitz@eriseIP.com
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00140
`U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450
`
`Paul R. Hart
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`5299 DTC Blvd.
`Suite 1340
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`Telephone: 913-777-5600
`Email: paul.hart@eriseIP.com
`
`Email: Samsung-Solas@cov.com
`
`
` /Neil A. Rubin/
`Neil A. Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
