throbber

`
`lAUJHdeu
`,
`i’lt'it.
`l
`"‘
`ll‘l _‘
`
`,l‘l‘i'wli'll' {lit-r
`‘f‘V'l
`‘
`l, :1
`-:
`Writer/w :
`
`‘
`
`>4
`
`1
`
`American Heart
`
`Assomattom
`
`Fighting Heart Disease and Stroke
`
`; Circulation
`
` " ‘ ‘_..-.‘.. .‘ ‘
`
`\
`
`.
`
`|' ‘g
`\
`
`'t' 77,.
`1‘
`‘
`.
`7‘
`o
`‘
`‘
`4»
`“.‘IAM‘SW‘M’
`
`.
`
`‘v
`
`I
`'5’“! '1
`a
`' $54.15/an ‘
`\r'ff
`
` you ’-I.
`-
`I '
`.
`|’( l
`in Patients With Renal Failure
`(‘ glrculanon Electronic Pages
`
`Mar/r l1" It’tt/wns/ein, MI), e/ til..,
`(i'uuusll‘l'kleiiee
`......................
`:u'tllovaseular News
`iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
`
`,
`
`,
`
`,
`
`, 3066
`
`i.
`
`(Witt/Ali
`
`Morbidity and lvlortality in Dialysis Patients llayiug ('AlKi
`Jam )1 Liu, HI), (’I u/ ..................................................... 307}
`
`‘-
`N r
`I Editorial
`Inrlstonal vs Routine Stenilnu
`. lr'rtmu .vluz/t'l'wu. All); If/mul ('u/‘u/n'l/H, Ml) ------- jU/U
`I
`-
`.
`.
`’HErief Rapid Communications
`I Basic Science Reports
`.ltllilllnll lor lirxtent Resteuosis
`Acute antl (‘lironie l€lleets
`ol‘ listiogen Following MI
`r
`~.://).‘// .........
`7‘
`“""l‘ V ”ll/Ill”
`l
`’
`I’m/Iii .1115 Mull/I, I’M),
`t’] u/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, WAC;
`l [Hi ‘I ("ll , /\
`.
`l
`(I
`""""" ,""""""""""""""" ’ H"
`,
`i
`,
`\,,
`L
`-‘
`figlmate .Mlieroselerosis
`11strogen antl Human ( ytomegulovrrus
`. [trig/“m /V/,,,,L Ml), PM) (,I u/
`”9/9
`”(Iii/I S/Jt‘ii; MS. L’/ 11/ ........................................................ 39W}
`I Clin'
`_
`,
`e
`y
`.
`Ical
`‘
`Siltlenalil and L orouary Blood l‘low
`l"l‘( /\
`,
`'Umllllllcg (‘1'.2‘l/Pefi'lflgfitlgn and Elepfrltsl)
`.
`,
`.
`‘
`'4
`“1ng
`,
`y
`1/
`t
`v
`a
`eeeptor
`oe 'iltL‘
`Jul
`ll. [mu N, All). it u/............................................... _W7
`(‘ Vt MH'l/ue/ Hum/t Jill), M u/
`39:;
`H
`y
`‘.
`...
`,
`,
`..................................
`( ltemokiue and NO I iotluetion liy ( aitliouiyoeytes
`lyi'll‘l'm” ol Primary Stealing untl l’rox‘isiouul Atteiopluslv
`l‘rl/Iltllltl S .’\/tl(‘/Irlt/(), MS, ('1 u/ ....... ,
`,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
`turn A ”j ‘g'(.,.,ilm\. All) U, (I,
`“
`N) W
`‘
`_
`4
`_
`y
`Y
`..
`‘
`‘
`.
`.
`............................................
`.
`Marmobulagcuui and ()uabain in Salkloatled Dulil Rats
`‘Lllplu ,( turtletl l) ]'(‘/\ H l’leetiye Steuting
`(Mutt (Ilia/11mm, I’M), (‘I (I/ .........................................{00‘}
`.,,,
`(NIH/)1 \lu/‘t'u, ,i/Ir H,” (y, [,/__
`‘‘‘‘‘
`ltmlotoxiu—lntlueetl Mortality in [l()-l Null Miee
`l‘)::::ll';t(l;lI5f oronary Intervention III the ('urrent ltl'Ll
`Philip/1e l’l'l'm‘t'l, MI), ('I a/..................................................{0/5
`lil‘lil‘l
`(
`' I'M/“m” M” I” 41/ ------------------------------------------ 3945
`X‘
`' “1|th and ( ‘oronary Artery Bypass Surgery
`i.
`.
`(y;
`.'
`.
`‘
`,
`‘
`_
`,
`(31? m, I.’/'l/(II'.\'H, All), t'itl/
`“hangar l Images In Cardlovascular MBdiCine
`Milli/it'll: I‘lleulitttou ui ( ltronie ( orouary ()eelustous Thisn-pteriai Lgigg'lclgggy‘allmlfi'AOI'HUS lil'C-‘C‘ll'l‘g ”5 AM]
`‘
`-
`(Hm; till), ('I u/ .........................................atgHJAMMaangu/tygl //. (tn/tlttlmr MI), ('I a/ .......................................WU
`Subject U5 Copvri gl‘it Laws
`
`(‘liagus' Disease in Patients Having ( 'artltae Surgery
`Dar/(Isl, Lei/{i1 I’ll/J. el u/ ............................................... 3075’
`
`”393x
`
`31W}
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`)
`
`I
`
`P
`
`¥ P
`
`age 1
`
`Page 1
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`Circu]atiOn
`
`JOURNAL or ,TIIE'AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
`
`
`
`
`
`Volume 102 I Number 24
`
`December 12, 2000
`
`Circulation Electronic Pages
`
`Correspondence
`Fen/I’hen and Valvular Heart Disease: The Final Link Has Now Been Established
`Letter ..... Trimg 0. Chang, MD Web Site Feature ............................................... *e180
`
`The Naming of .Iugular Venous Valves
`Letter ......Icffrey Fisher, MD
`Response .......... Charles F. Bab/2x, MD, PhD Web Site Feature ................................. *e181
`
`Ventilatory and Heart Rate Responses to Exercise: Better Predictors of Heart Failure Mortality Than Peak
`Exercise Oxygen Consumption
`Letter ..... Guy A. MacGowan, Ml), I’ACC; Srinivas Mara/i, MD, FACC
`Response ..... Michael S. Latter, MD; Mark Robbins, MD; Fredric Pashkow, MD; Kathy Hoerclzer, RN;
`Claire E. Snadcr, MA; James B. Young, MD; Gary Francis, MD Web Site Feature ...................... *0182
`
`Smoking and Aldosterone Synthase Polymorphism
`Letter ..... Pitt 0. Lim, MD
`’
`Response ..... Aarno Nauru/zen, MD; M. Miinttiiri, MD; Mark/(u Kupari, MD; V. Man/linen, MD;
`1’)!”- 7001111811, PhD; Leena Ten/amen, PhD; Kathleen M. Kayes, PhD; Scott Rosenfeld, BS; Perrin C White, MD
`.................................................................. * 0183
`
`Editorial
`
`
`Provisional Versus Routine Stenting: Routine Stenting Is Here To Stay
`H. WWW” Anderson, MD; Blase A. Carabel/o, MD .................................................. 2910
`
`Brief Rapid Communications——\____—___—
`Effect of Intracoronary y-Radiation Therapy on In-Stent Restenosis: An lntravascular Ultrasound Analysis
`from the Gamma-I Study
`Gary S. Mintz, MD; Neil J. Weiss/nan, MD; Paul S. Teirstein, MD; Steven G. Ellis, MD; Ron Waksman, MD;
`Robert J. Russo, MD; lssam Moussa, MD; Prabhaker Tripuraneni, MD; Shrish Jani, MD;
`Yoshio Kobayashi, MD; Joseph A. Giorgianni, BA; Chrysoula Pappas, MD; Richard A. Kmttz, MD;
`Jéilh‘fly Matt’s: MD; Marlin 13- Leon, MD ........................................................... 2915
`
`Transfer of CD4+ T Cells Aggravates Atherosclerosis in Immunodeficient Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice
`Xinghua Zhou, MD, PhD; Antonino Nicoletti, PhD; Rima Elhage, PhD; Goran K. Hansson, MD, PhD ,,,,,,,, 2919
`
`Clinical Investigation and Reports*M
`Economic Assessment of Platelet Glycoprotein lib/Illa Receptor Blockade With Abciximab and Low-Dose
`Heparin During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: Results From the EPILOG Randomized Trial
`A. Michael Lincojl,‘ MD; Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH; James E. Tcheng, MD; Robert M. Califfi MD;
`Mohan V. Bala, PhD; Keaven M. Anderson, PhD; Linda Davidson-Ray, BA; J. David Knight, MS;
`Catherine F. Cabot. MD; Eric J. Topal, MD: for the EPILOG Investigators .............................. 2923
`
`*Supporled in concept by an unrestricted gilt l‘rom Merck & Co. Pfizer provides an unrestricted gilt for subscriptions to Circulation for Cardiology
`I’cllows in training.
`
`
`CIRCULATION (ISSN 0009—7322) is published weekly except combined the first two weeks in January and the last two weeks in December by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins at 12107
`Insurance Way, Hagerstown, MD 21740, Business offices are located at 227 East Washington Square, Philadelphia, PA 19106-3780. Production offices are located at 351 West
`Camden Street, Baltimore, MD 21201-2436. Individuals may subsaibe for their personal use at the following rates: 5177 for members of an American Heart Association scientific
`council and $236 for nonmembers;
`international: $314 for members of an American Heart Association scientific council and $418 for nonmembers. Periodicals postage paid at
`Hagerslown, MD, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to CIRCULATION, American Heart Association, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 12107 Insurance
`Way, ,Hageétfim' MD 21740
`This materialwasccrpied
`attire qun a rid may be ’
`Eu bject U3 {isapy‘rigltt Laws
`
`
`
`\
`
`Page 2
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`Page 2
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`Randomized Comparison of Primary Stcnting and Provisional Balloon Angioplasty Guided by Flow
`Velocity Measurement
`Patrick W. Serrays, MD; Bernard de Bruyne, MD; Stéphane Carlier, MD; Jose Eduardo Sousa, MD;
`Jan Pick, MD; Toshiya Maramatsu, MD; Chris Vrints, MD; Peter Probst, MD; Ricardo Seabra—Gomes, MD;
`Ian Simpson, MD; Vasiiis Voudris, MD; Olivier Gurné, MD; Nico Pijis, MD; Jorge Beiara’i, MD;
`Gerrit—Anne van Es, PhD; Erie Boersma, PhD; Marie-Angéle Morel, MS; Ben van Hout, PhD; on behalf of the
`Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) [I Study Group .......................... 2930
`
`Randomized Comparison of Elective Stent Implantation and Coronary Balloon Angioplasty Guided by
`Online Quantitative Angiography and lntracoronary Doppler
`Carlo Di Mario, MD, PhD; Jeffrey W. Moses, MD; Todd J. Anderson, MD, MRCP; Raoul Bonan. MD;
`Toshiya Muramatsa, MD; Abuaslz Chander Jain, MD; Jose Suarez de Lezo, MD; Seung Yun Cho, MD;
`Morton Kern, MD; Ian T. Meredith, MBBS. PhD; David Cohen, MD, MSe; Issam Moussa, MD;
`Antonio Colombo, MD; on behalf of the DESTINI Study Group (Doppler Endpoint STenting INternational
`Investigation) ................................................................................. ..
`
`Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Current Era Compared With 1985—1986: The National Heart,
`Lung, and Blood Institute Registries
`David 0. Williams, MD; Richard Holubkov, PhD; Wanlin Yeh, MS; Martial G. Bourassa, MD;
`Mahdi Al-Bassam, MD; Peter C. Block, MD; Paul Coady, MD; Howard Cohen, MD; Michael Cowley, MD;
`Gerald Dorros, MD; David Faxon, MD; David R. Holmes, MD; Alice Jacobs, MD; Sheryl F. Kelse ', PhD;
`Spencer 8. King 11/, MD; Richard Myler, MD; James Slater, MD; Vladimir Stanek, MD; Helen A. Vlaehos, MS;
`Katherine M. Detre, MD, DrPH; for the Coinvestigators .............................................. 2945
`
`Enhanced Efficacy of Eptifibatide Administration in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Requiring
`ln-Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
`Steven P. Marso, MD; Deepak L. Bhatt, MD; Matthew T. Roe. MD; Penny L. Houghtaling, MS;
`Marina Labinaz, MD; Neal S. Kleiman, MD; Cornelius Dyke, MD; Maarten L. Simmoons, MD;
`Robert M. Calijf, MD; Robert A. Harrington, MD; Eric J. Topol, MD;_/or the PURSUIT Investigators ,,,,,,,, 2952
`
`Immediate Changes of Collateral Function After Successful Reeanalization of Chronic ’l‘otal
`Coronary Occlusions
`Gerald S. Werner, MD; Barbara M. Richartz, MD; Oliver Gastmann, MD; Markus Ferrari, MD;
`Hans R. Figulltt. MD ........................................................................... 2959
`Are Patients With Renal Failure Good Candidates for Pereutaneous Coronary Revascularization in the
`New Device Era?
`Mark H. Rubenstein, MD; Lari C. Harrell, MS; Boris V. Sheynberg, MD; Heribert Schuukert. MD;
`Hasan Bazari, Ml); Igor/'1 l’a/acios. MD ..........................................................
`Risks of Morbidity and Mortality in Dialysis Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
`Jean Y. Liu, MD; Nancy J.(). liirkmeyer, PM); John I]. Sanders, MI); Jeremy R. Morton, MD;
`Horace F. Henrir/ues, MD; Stephen J. Lahey. MD; Richard W. Dow, MD; Christopher Maloney, MD;
`Anthony W. DiScipio. MD; Robert Clough, MI); Bruce J. Leavitt, MD; Gerald T. O'Connor, PhD, DSc; for the
`Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 2973
`Evidence of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection (Chagas’ Disease) Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
`David A. Leiby, PhD; Francisco J. Rentas, MS; Kenrad E. Nelson, MD; Veronica A. Stambolis, MA;
`Paul M. Ness, MD; Cheryl Parnis, RN; Hugh A. Me/lllister, Jr, Ml); David II. Yawn, MD;
`Robert J. Stump/I BS; Louis V. Kirchhoff MD ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 2978
`
`2966
`
`Basic Science Reports
`
`Effects of Estrogen Replacement on Infarct Size, Cardiac Remodeling, and the Endothelin System After
`Myocardial Infarction in Ovariectoniized Rats
`Paula .I.W. Smith, PhD; Olga Ornatsky, PhD; Duncan J. Stewart, MD; Pierre Ricard, PhD;
`Fayez Dawood, DVM; Wen-Ha Wen, MD; Peter P. Liu, MD; David J. Webb, MD; Juan Carlos Mange, MD .
`Antioxidant Effect of Estrogen on Cytomegalovirus-lndueed Gene Expression in Coronary Artery
`Smooth Muscle Cells
`Edith Speir, MS; Zu-Xi Ya, MD, PhD; Kazayo Takeda, MD, PhD; Victor J. Ferrans, MI), Phi);
`Richard 0. Carmen III. MD ..................................................................... 2990
`
`. 2983
`
`,
`
`Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Activity Limits Blood Flow to Ilypoperfused
`Myocardium During Exercise
`Jay H. Traverse, MD; Ying .lie Chen, MD, PhD; Ruisheng Du, PhD; Robert J. Bache, MI)
`
`................. 2997
`
`Page 3
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`Page 3
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`Trypanosoma cruzi—Infccted Cardiomyocytes Produce Chemokines and Cytokines That Trigger Potent
`Nitric Oxide—Dependent Trypanocidal Activity
`Fabiana S. Machado, MS; Gisldine A. Martins. PhD; Jillio C.S. Aliberti, PhD; Fabiola L.A.C. Mestriner, BS;
`Fernando Q. Cunhn, PhD; 10:70 5. Silva, PhD ...................................................... 3003
`
`Endogenous Na,K Pump Ligands Are Differentially Regulated During Acute NaCl Loading of Dahl Rats
`Olga V. Fedorova, PhD; Edward G. Lakatta, MD; Alexei Y. Bagrov, MD, PhD ........................... 3009
`
`Endotoxin-Induced Mortality Is Related to Increased Oxidative Stress and End-Organ Dysfunction, Not
`Refractory Hypotension, in Heme Oxygenase-l—Deficicnt Mice
`Philippe Wiesel, MD; Ammd P. Patel, MS; Nicole DiFonza, BS; Pooja B. Marria, BS; Chc'ing U. Sim, BS;
`Andrea I’ellacani, MD, PhD; Koji Maemura, MD, PhD; Brian W. LeBlanc, BS: Kathryn Marina, BS;
`Claire M. Doerschuk, MD; Shaw-Fang Yet, PhD; Mil-En Lee, MD, PhD; Mark A. Perrella, MD ............. 3015
`
`‘
`‘
`1
`
`Images in Cardiovascular Medicine
`
`
`Granulomatous Aortitis Presenting as an Acute Myocardial Infarction in Crohn’s Disease
`Michael H. Goldman, MD; Bechara Akl. MD; Shayryar Mafi, MD; Lucia Pastore, MD ..................... 3023
`
`
`Annotated Table of Contents ...........................................................
`Classified Advertising .................................................................
`
`A8
`B2
`
`inhibited fluorescence, as determined by confocal laser microscopy. See page 2990.
`
`The cover figure is from the article in this issue by Speir et a]. Figure l: SMCs were pretreated for 1 hour with indicated
`doses of E2, 17ct-Ez (17a), 3-ME, or tamoxifen (TAM). Cells were then infected for 1 hour with CMV at 5 M01, followed
`by addition of DCFH-DA fluorescent dye. Both stereoisomers of estradiol and tamoxifen, but not 3—ME, dose-dependently
`
`Page 4
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`Page 4
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`
`
`Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Current Era
`Compared With 1985—1986
`
`The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registries
`
`David 0. Williams, MD; Richard Holubkov, PhD; Wanlin Yeh, MS; Martial G. Bourassa, MD;
`Mahdi Al-Bassam, MD; Peter C. Block, MD; Paul Coady, MD; Howard Cohen, MD;
`Michael Cowley, MD; Gerald Dorros, MD; David Faxon, MD; David R. Holmes, MD; Alice Jacobs, MD;
`Sheryl F. Kelsey, PhD; Spencer B. King III, MD; Richard Myler, MD; James Slater, MD;
`Vladimir Stanek, MD; Helen A. Vlachos, MS; Katherine M. Detre, MD, DrPH; for the Coinvestigators
`
`Background—A1though refinements have occurred in coronary angioplasty over the past decade, little is known about
`whether these changes have affected outcomes.
`Methods and Results—Baseline features and iii-hospital and I-year outcomes of 1559 consecutive patients in the
`1997—1998 Dynamic Registry who were having first coronary intervention were compared with 2431 patients in the
`1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. Compared with patients in the 1985—1986 Registry,
`Dynamic Registry patients were older (mean age, 62 versus 58 years; P<0.001) and more often female (32.1% versus
`25.5%; P<0.001). In the Dynamic Registry, procedures were more often performed for acute myocardial infarction
`(22.9% versus 9.9%; F<0.001) and treated lesions were more severe (84.5% versus 82.5% diameter reduction;
`I’<0.001), thrombotic (22.1% versus 1 13%; P<0.001) or calcified (29.5% versus 10.8%; P<0.001). Stents were used
`in 70.5% of Dynamic Registry patients, whereas 1985—1986 patients received balloon angioplasty alone. Procedural
`success was higher in the Dynamic Registry (92.0% versus 81.8%; P<0.()0l) and the rate of iii-hospital death,
`myocardial infarction, and emergency coronary bypass surgery combined was lower (4.9% versus 7.9%; P=0.001) than
`in the 1985—1986 Registry. The 1-year rate for CABG was lower in the Dynamic Registry (6.9% versus 12.6%; P<0.()Ol).
`Conclusions—Althottgh Dynamic Registry patients had more unstable and complex coronary disease than those in the
`1985—1986 Registry, their rate of procedural success was higher whereas rates of complications and subsequent CABG
`were lower. Results of percutancous coronary intervention have improved substantially over the past decade.
`(Circulation. 2000; 102:2945-2951.)
`
`Key Words: angioplasty I coronary disease I arteries I balloon I stents
`
`
`the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
`n 1979.
`(NHLBI) established a voluntary registry to characterize
`coronary angioplasty, at the time an emerging technique of
`pcrcutaneons coronary rcvascularization.l Patients were en-
`rolled from 19774980 and subsequently frorn 19854986.
`These 2 registries provided the first comprehensive descrip-
`tion of technical and clinical results, and in the mid-19805
`identified that angioplasty had matured to the point
`that
`clinical trials were necessary to resolve the genuine dilemma
`as to potential comparability to CABG.
`
`
`
`See p 2910
`
`These trials, including Bypass Angioplasty Revasculariza-
`tion Investigation (BARI)Z and EAST,3 found that
`in most
`patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
`balloon angioplasty did not compromise survival and proved
`to save costs slightly relative to CABG btit many patients
`who received PTCA required repeat revascularixation. Since
`that
`time, new devices have been developed as potential
`adjuncts or replacements for the balloon catheter.4 Although
`
`
`
`Received May 22, 2000; revision received July 20, 2000: accepted July 25. 2000.
`From the Division of Cardiology (D.O.W.), Rhodc Island Hospital. Brown University. Providence, RI; the Department of Epidemiolrwy (R.ll. W Y
`S.I".K., ll.A.V., K.M.D.). University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh; Lankenau Hospital (I’.C.). Philadelphia. Pa; Montreal Heart Institute (M.C°I.B.) Montreal
`Quebec. Canada; Cardiovascular Medical Associates (M.A-B.), Houston. Tex; Providence/St. Vincent Hospitals (PCB). Portland. Ore: University of
`Pittsburgh Medical Center (H.C.), Pittsburgh. Pa; Medical College of Virginia (M.C.), Richmond. Va; Arizona Heart Institute (G.D.), Phoenix Ar
`University of Southern California Medical Center (DP). Los Angeles. Calif: Mayo Clinic Foundation (D.R.}I.). Rochester, NY; Boston University
`Medical Center (Al). Boston, Mass; Emory University Hospital (SILK. Ill), Atlanta. Ga: Seton Medical Center (R.M.), Daly City Calif‘ St
`Luke‘s/Roosevelt Hospital U.S.). New York, NY; and Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (VS), P
`l
`‘
`rague. Czech Republic.
`Additional coinvcstigators are listed in the Appendix.
`Correspondence to Katherine M. Detre. MD. DrPll, University of I’ittshurgh/GSI’H, I30 DeSoto St. 127 Parran Hall. Pittsburgh. PA 1526]. E-mail
`I)ctrc(modegsph.pittedu
`© 2000 American Heart Association. Inc.
`Circulation is aurilahle at http:l/wu‘u‘xircnlationaha.org
`
`.
`
`This material was copied
`at the NLIr/anay be
`Subject US Copyright Laws
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`2946
`
`Circulation
`
`December 12, 2000
`
`a few randomized clinical trials have helped to clarify the
`value of these new devices in limited patient stlbgmtlpsf’“
`little is known of the extent of their use in overall clinical
`
`practice or of their effect on patient selection and outcomes.
`The primary goal of the recently established Dynamic
`Registry is to characterize percutaneous coronary intervenv
`tion in the new device era. The Registry provides the optimal
`design to assess and to compare with the l985—l986 Registry
`the following: (1) contemporary patients and disease charac-
`teristics selected for perctrtaneotls coronary intervention, (2)
`types of devices used in various settings, and (3) changes in
`interventional strategy as well as iii-hospital and l-year
`outcomes. The present report describes the findings from
`these comparisons.
`
`Methods
`
`Design and Study Population
`The Dynamic Registry includes 15 clinical centers (10 participants in
`the 1985—1986 Registry and 5 added to augment enrollment of
`minorities) and a Coordinating Center. Three sequential waves of
`2000 patients, spaced 18 months apart, are to be enrolled. Each
`patient who is having percutaneous coronary catheter-based inter-
`vention performed by a Dynamic Registry investigator is registered.
`Informed consent is obtained to collect
`information after hospital
`discharge. The first wave of enrollment. which began July 1997 and
`was completed February 1998. recruited 2526 patients. of whom
`2206 were consecutively enrolled. Because patients with prior
`angioplasty were excltrded from the 1985—1986 Registry. for the
`sake ofcomparability, 647 Dynamic Registry patients with history of
`prior pcrcutaneous coronary intervention are excluded from this
`report.
`
`Data Collection
`Registry research coordinators responsible for data collection partic-
`ipated in a training session before patient enrollment. Data collection
`included demographic infortmttion. tnedical history, anti risk factor
`profile. Coronary angiographic information before and after inter-
`vention was obtained according to definitions developed in previous
`registries and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investiga-
`tion.” Procedural strategy data included device use, procedural
`staging, and success of each corollary lesion attempted. Successful
`lesion dilatation was defined as an absolute 20% rcdrrction in lesion
`severity with final stenosis <5t)%. Angiographic success was clas»
`sified as either partial (some but not all attempted lesions success-
`fully treatcd) or total (all attempted lesions successfully treated).
`Untoward events included death front any cause, myocardial infarc-
`tion (Ml), or CABG. MI was defined as evidence of 22 of the
`following:
`(1)
`typical chest pain >20 tnimrtes not
`relieved by
`nitroglycerin,
`(2) serial ECG recordings showing changes from
`baseline or serially in ST-T and/or Q-waves in 2” contiguous leads,
`or (3) serutn enzyme elevation of CK-MH>5% of total CK (total
`CK>2>< normal: LDll subtype l>LDll subtype 2). Congestive
`heart
`failure was defined as presence of paroxysmal nocturnal
`dyspnca, dyspnea on exertion, or radiographic pulmonary conges-
`tion. Risk for CABG was classified as low, moderate, high, or
`inoperable according to judgment of the interventionist. Procedures
`were classified according to clinical circumstances: emergent when
`required immediately because of clinical
`instability, urgent when
`required within 24 hours to minimize cardiac risk, and elective when
`deferrablc >24 hours without cardiac risk. Procedural success was
`defined as achievement of either partial or total angiographic success
`without death. Q—wave Ml, or emergency CABG.
`
`TABLE 1. Patient Demographics, Disease History, and
`Angiographic Characteristics
`
`Registry
`
`Dynamlc-
`Consecutive
`
`1985—1986
`PTCA
`
`Total patients, n
`Mean age, y
`Female,
`"/0
`Race, %t
`White
`Black
`Asian
`
`Hispanic
`Other
`
`Prior CABG, %
`Prior Ml, %
`History of diabetes, %
`History of congestive heart failure, “/a
`History of hypertension, D/u
`Smoking, %*
`Never
`Current
`Former
`
`Patient Risk of CABG assessed by
`operator, %
`High/inoperable
`Not recorded
`
`Mean left ventricular ejection fraction, %
`Vessel disease. %
`
`Single
`Double
`
`1559
`621
`32.1
`
`83.6
`5.3
`2.7
`
`6.9
`1.6
`
`11.9
`33.7
`25.8
`8.2
`56.3
`
`33.6
`28.9
`37.5
`
`15.0
`8.7
`
`55.3
`
`45.9
`323
`
`2431
`58.2:
`25.5:
`
`91.6
`4.4
`1.3
`
`1.3
`1.4
`
`11.2
`38.41
`1351
`581
`45.51
`
`29.2
`30.9
`39.9
`
`8.81
`14.4
`
`58.01
`
`476
`31.9
`
`20.6
`21.9
`Triple
`
`Mean significant lesions, n 2.6 2.7
`
`‘P<0.05; tP<0.01; tP<0.001 for comparison of patients in Dynamic Vs
`1985—1986 PTCA Registry.
`
`outcomes were reported with Kaplan‘Meier estimates and log rank
`statistics. Standard stepwise procedures were used with Cox propor»
`lional hazards models to obtain adjusted relative risks comparing the
`2 registries. Consent
`to collect
`follow—up information after initial
`procedure hospitalization was not obtaitted for 253 of the 155‘)
`Dynamic patients, who were censored at
`the time of hospital
`discharge in analyses of l-ycar event rates.
`
`Results
`Although rrrost of the consecutively enrolled patients in both
`registries were white men of middle age, prevalence of
`certain baseline characteristics differed between the 2 (Table
`1). Dynamic Registry patients were older; more often female
`and nonwhite; more often had history of diabetes mellitus,
`congestive heart failure, or hypertension; and more often
`were considered to be at high risk for CABG. Dynamic
`Statistical Methods
`Registry patients were less likely to have history of prior MI
`Differences between proportions were assessed by X2 test or Fisher‘s
`or cigarette smoking. No differences were noted iii the extent
`Exact Test when the number of patients in a group was small.
`of coronary disease.
`Continuous variables were compared by Student's t test. Qne- ear
`Th IS ma arial was-{earpieed
`at the NLM and may be
`Subject US Copyright. Laws
`
`Page 6
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`Page 6
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`TABLE 2.
`
`Procedural Data
`
`TABLE 3. Characteristics of Attempted Lesions and Outcome
`
`Williams ct al
`
`NHLBI Dynamic Registry
`
`2947
`
`Registry
`
`Dynamic-
`Consecutive
`
`1985—1986
`PTCA
`
`Total patients, n
`Primary reason for revascularization, %t
`Asymptomatic CAD
`Stable angina
`CCSC W
`CCSC III/lV
`
`Unstable angina
`Acute MI
`
`Cardiogenic shock
`Thrombolytic therapy
`Other
`
`Circumstances of procedure. %1
`Elective
`
`1559
`
`2.1
`24.5
`11.8
`12.3
`
`42.8
`22.9
`
`2.1
`5.5
`7.7
`
`63.1
`
`2431
`
`26
`37.7
`16.8
`20.2
`
`47.7
`9.9
`
`N/A
`3.9‘
`2.1
`
`75.4
`
`Registry
`
`Dynamic-
`Consecutive
`
`1985—1986
`PTCA
`
`2224
`
`3787
`
`34.2
`09
`38.3
`21.9
`4.3
`
`1.9
`10.2
`31.2
`41.1
`15.6
`
`84.5
`
`29.4
`0.4
`45.6
`21.4
`3.2
`
`1.5
`15.0
`37.2
`34.2
`12.2
`
`62.5T
`
`Total lesions, n
`Lesion location, %T
`Right coronary artery
`Left main coronary artery
`Left anterior descending coronary artery
`Left circumflex artery
`Graft
`Diameter "4: stenosis, %t
`<50
`50-70
`70—90
`90—99
`Total occlusion
`
`Mean
`Lesion characteristics, %
`
`11.3t
`22.1
`Evidence of thrombus
`10.8T
`29.5
`Calcification
`33.11
`11.0
`Mean final % stenosis
`80.9T
`93.7
`Angiographic success. %
`2.6T
`11.6
`Dissection, %
`0.4T
`3.2
`Side-branch occlusion, %
`
`Abrupt in-Iaboratory closure, % 3.1‘ 1.9
`
`
`*P<0.D1; TP<0.001 for comparison of patients
`1985—1986 PTCA Registry.
`
`in the Dynamic vs
`
`sion procedures than in the 198541986 Registry. Multivessel
`attempt was 9% in the Dynatnic compared with 20.7% ill the
`19854986 Registry (P<(l.001). Balloon angioplasty,
`the
`only percutaneous intervention at the time of the 1985—1986
`Registry, was used as the sole device in 24.7% of Dynamic
`Registry patients, concomitantly with stent placement
`in
`63.7%, rotational athercctomy in 3.1%, and both stent and
`rotational athcrectomy in 5.9% of patients.
`(Directional
`atherectomy, extraction atherectomy, and laser each were
`used in < 1% of patients.)
`Although the left anterior descending coronary artery was
`the most common location for an attempted lesion in both
`registries,
`lesions in other locations were more often at-
`tempted in the Dynamic compared with the 19854986
`Registry (Table 3). Attempted lesion stenosis in the Dynamic
`Registry was more severe, and lesions were more often total
`occlusions. These differences were independent of sex of the
`patient or whether AMI was the indication for intervention.
`Thrombus and calcification were reported far more fre-
`quently in the Dynamic Registry, yet angiographic success
`was achieved more often (93.7% versus 80.9%; P<0.()01)
`and final lesion narrowing was less severe. Although abrupt
`artery closure was less common in the Dynamic Registry,
`side-branch occlusion and local coronary dissection were
`more common.
`
`Iii-hospital mortality was not significantly different be-
`tween the registries (Table 4), whereas MI and need for
`
`23.9
`13.0
`
`0.3
`67.5
`23.9
`6.6
`1.7
`1.4
`
`18.8
`5.8
`
`0.0
`62.8
`24.6
`5.1
`4.3
`1.61
`
`Urgent
`Emergent
`No. of lesions attempted, "/o'l'
`0
`1
`2
`3
`24
`Mean
`No. of vessels attempted, %T
`0.2
`0.4
`O/Unknown
`76.6
`86.5
`1 Native
`17.0
`7.9
`2 Native
`2.3
`0.2
`3 Native
`1.2
`0.8
`1 Native and 1 graft
`0.2
`0.1
`2 Native and 1 graft
`0.0
`0.0
`3 Native and 1 graft
`Graft only 2.6 4.1
`
`
`CCSC indicates Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification.
`“P<0.05;
`tP<0.001 for comparison of patients in
`the Dynamic vs
`19854985 PTCA Registnj.
`
`Unstable angina was tlte most common procedural indica-
`tion for intervention in the Dynamic Registry (Table 2).
`Compared with the 1985—1986 Registry, procedures were
`more likely to be performed for acute M] (22.9% versus
`9.9%; P<().()()l) and less frequently for stable angina. Also,
`interventions were more often emergent (13.0% versus 5.8%;
`1’<().{)()l) for Dynamic titan for 1985—1986 Registry patients.
`Among the 357 Dynamic patients with AMI as indication for
`intervention, 48.7% had emergent intervention. Glycoprotein
`llb/llla receptor inhibitors. not available in the 1985—1986
`Registry, were administered to 25.3% of Dynamic Registry
`patients.
`Comparison of interventional strategy revealed some inter-
`esting trends. Most patients had procedures attempted on only
`1
`lesion. and fewer Dynamic Registry patients had multile-
`
`Page 7
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`Page 7
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1236
`
`

`

`2948
`
`Circulation
`
`December 12, 2000
`
`TABLE 4. Adverse Events and ln-Hospital Outcomes
`Registry
`
`Dynamic-
`1985—1986
`Consecutive
`PTCA
`
`
`Total patients, n
`Death, %
`Mi
`
`Clinical symptoms
`ECG
`
`Enzymes (>2xnormal)
`CABG, %
`Elective/urgent
`Emergency
`Major entry-site complication,
`Death/any MI/any CABG, %
`Death/any Ml/emergency CABG, “/o
`Overall angiographic success, “/ot
`None
`Partial
`Total
`
`"/o
`
`Procedure success (partial or total angiographlc
`success without death/O-wave Ml/emergency
`CABG). %
`
`1559
`1.9
`2.8
`
`1.7
`1.6
`
`2.4
`1.5
`1.0
`0.4
`3.5
`5.9
`4.9
`
`3.7
`4.3
`92.0
`
`92.0
`
`2431
`1.4
`4.9T
`
`3.9T
`3.5T
`
`4.5T
`5.01
`2.3‘
`3.7T
`3-3
`9.8T
`7.9T
`
`13.7
`12.1
`74.2
`
`81.81
`
`4.1T
`2.7
`Mean length of stay after procedure, daysi
`*P<0.01; tP<0.001 tor comparison of patients in Dynamic vs 1985—1986
`PTCA Registry.
`iFor patients alive at discharge.
`
`emergent CABG were significantly lower in the Dynatnic
`Registry. Both total angiographic success and procedural
`success were achieved significantly more often in the Dy-
`namic Registry.
`In addition. mean length of hospital stay
`decreased significantly, frotn 4.l
`to 2.7 days. Overall
`inci-
`dence of repeat revaseularixation during initial hospitalization
`was 5.6% (4.2% repeat pcrcutaneous intervention and 1.5%
`CABG).
`‘
`Crude mortality during 1 year of follow—up was higher tn
`the Dynatnic Registry compared with the 1985-1986 Regis—
`try (l-year rate. 5.4% versus 3.6%), whereas l~year death or
`Ml rate was similar (Figure l). After controlling for important
`baseline differences between registries (Table 5). death rates
` 40%
`
`EventRate 10%
`
`30%
`
`20%
`
`0% .
`0
`
`300
`240
`“50
`l20
`60
`Days after Study Entry
`. . -l"]‘CA - llealh
`— Dynamic - [Math
`- -
`.
`- PTCA - Death/MI
`
`—— Dynamic - Death/MI
`
`360
`
`became comparable. Lower adjusted mortality was not sig-
`nificant, although the 30% lower l-ycar risk for combined—
`cndpoint death or Ml achieved significance. Similarly, l-ycar
`CABG and repeat pcrctttaneous procedure rates were signif—
`icantly lower in the Dynamic Registry both before and after
`adjustment for baseline inequalities (Figure 2). These find—
`ings were uniform regardless of number of lesions or vessels
`attempted during the initial procedure.
`Within the Dynamic Registry, differences were seen in
`unadjusted l-year event rates within several clinically impor-
`tant subgroups. Women had higher l-year tnortality (7.6%
`versus 4.4%; I’<0.05) and need for CABG (9.5% versus
`5.6%; P<().05)
`than men. Patients whose indication for
`intervention was AMI had higher
`l-year mortality (9.2%
`versus 4.3%; P<().00l) than those with other indications,
`primarily due to higher in-hospital mortality (5.9% versus
`0.7%; l’<().00l). Use of GP llb/llla receptor inhibitor was
`associated with increased l-ycar Ml rate (9.5% versus 4.0%;
`P<0.00l), due in part
`to more iii-hospital events (5.1%
`versus 2.0%; P<0.001). No differences were seen in l-yeat‘
`death, M1, or revascularization by stcnt use during initial
`procedure.
`
`Discussion
`In the contemporary Dynamic Registry, patients were older
`and more often had extensive cardiovascular morbidity com-
`pared with patients undergoing percutancous coronary inter—
`vention a decade ago. Some of these observed differences
`may relate to the larger proportion of women in the Dynamic
`Registry, given that women presenting with CAD and symp—
`toms requiring revascularization tend to be older and have
`tnore coronary risk factors than inert do.“’“'2
`Coronary intervention was more often performed in the
`setting of unstable coronary disease in the Dynatnic Registry.
`in fact, AMI was reported as the pritnary indication for
`intervention tnore than twice as often as in [985—1986.
`
`Because coronary angioplasty can be performed quickly and
`as an immediate adjunct
`to coronary angiography,
`it
`is
`part

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket