`
`IPR2020-00129, -00132, -00135, -00136, -00137, -00138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`190
`
`
`
`Double Incline Claims
`
`27. The system of claim 26, wherein the side opening includes at least two different inclined slopes. 2020IPR-00129,
`Ex-1001 (RE45,380)
`
`32. The system of claim 25, wherein the segment defining the side opening includes at least two inclined slopes.
`2020IPR-00132, Ex-1001 (RE45,760)
`
`52. A guide extension catheter for use with a guide catheter, comprising: a substantially rigid segment; a tubular
`structure defining a lumen and positioned distal to the substantially rigid segment; and a segment defining a partially
`cylindrical opening positioned between a distal end of the substantially rigid segment and a proximal end of the
`tubular structure, the segment defining the partially cylindrical opening having an angled proximal end . . . wherein
`the segment defining the angled proximal end of the partially cylindrical opening includes at least two inclined
`regions. 2020IPR-00135, Ex-1001 (RE45,776)
`
`44. The method of claim 38, wherein defining the side opening portion includes forming a first inclined sidewall,
`forming a second inclined sidewall, and separating the first inclined sidewall and the second inclined sidewall by a
`non-inclined region. 2020IPR-00137, Ex-1001 (RE47,379)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`191
`
`
`
`PO’s Inventor and Expert Agree: No Difference in Inclines
`
`Guideliner V1
`
`Guideliner V2
`
`Guideliner V3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-2138, Appendix B (citing Ex-2139, -2140, -2141)
`See Paper No. 39 (PO’s Response) at 52, IPR2020-00130
`
`192
`
`
`
`PO’s Inventor and Expert Agree: No Difference in Inclines
`
`Ex-1108 (Inventor Sutton Dep. Tr.), 75:13-23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 39:1-18
`
`193
`
`
`
`PO’s Inventor and Expert Agree: No Difference in Inclines
`
`Ex-1813 (Graham Dep. Tr.), 98:6-15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`194
`
`
`
`Double Incline Claims
`
`Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`195
`
`
`
`Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`196
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1008
`
`
`
`Incline – PO’s Expert Says Incline is “Just Sort of By Eye”
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1800 (Keith Tr), 45:21-46:2; 47:3-8; Ex-1122 (color aded to arrows for visibility)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`197
`
`
`
`Incline – Petitioner’s Expert Uses PO’s Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`198
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.)
`
`
`
`Incline – Petitioner’s Expert Uses PO’s Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.)
`
`199
`
`
`
`Incline – Ressemann Has More Than Two Inclines
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.) ¶ 87 (con’t.)
`
`200
`
`
`
`Incline – PO’s Expert Says Ressemann’s Tip Has An Incline
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith. Dep. Tr.), 166:8-12
`
`IPR2020-00129, Ex-2138 ¶ 170
`See also Paper No. 43 (PO’s Response) at 29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith. Dep. Tr.), 168:9-19
`See Paper No. 82 (Petitioner’s Reply) at 15
`
`201
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`202
`
`
`
`Ressemann’s Proximal Opening Disclosure is Relevant to Itou
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 6:45-61
`see also Ex-1123 (Keith Patent), 7:54-60
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 149:3-18
`
`203
`
`
`
`Ressemann’s Collar 2141 “Reinforces” And Is the Proximal Opening
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann) Fig. 16J
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 24:47-58
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`204
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`Ex-1007 (Itou), Fig. 3
`
`Ex-1008, Fig. 16J (orientatiion reversed)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132
`
`205
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`206
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`Ex-1005 (Brecker Decl.)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1042 (Hillstead Decl.)
`IPR2020-00132
`
`207
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`208
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`209
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.), ¶ 125
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`210
`
`
`
`Ressemann’s Collar 2141 Reinforces the Proximal Opening
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), Fig. 16J
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 24:58-67
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`211
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`212
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`213
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.) ¶ 131
`
`214
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`215
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1805 (Brecker Decl.)
`
`216
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`217
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 29:17-22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`218
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 29:23-30:7
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 29:23-30:7
`
`219
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`220
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`Ex-1007 (Itou), 4:33-36
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 48:5-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`221
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`222
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`223
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.) ¶ 132 (con’t.)
`
`224
`
`
`
`Modifying Ressemann with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00138, Ex-1208
`
`225
`
`
`
`Incline – Ressemann Has More Than Two Inclines
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.) ¶ 87 (con’t.)
`
`226
`
`
`
`Modifying Ressemann with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00138, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`227
`
`
`
`Double Incline Claims
`
`Kataishi
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`228
`
`
`
`Kataishi
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`229
`
`Ex-1025 (Kataishi)
`
`
`
`Kataishi
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1025 (Kataishi), Figs. 2 & 10
`
`230
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry for Thrombus and Devices
`2.
`Improved Trackability
`B. Expectation of Success
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`231
`
`
`
`Ressemann Discloses Benefits of Distal and Proximal Openings
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 6:45-61
`see also Ex-1123 (Keith Patent), 7:54-60
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 149:3-18
`
`232
`
`
`
`Kataishi – Motivation to Combine
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`233
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`
`
`Kataishi – Motivation to Combine
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.), ¶ 145
`
`234
`
`
`
`PO Ignores the Explicit Teaching in Ressemann as “Hindsight”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`235
`
`IPR2020-00132, Paper No. 101 at 19
`
`
`
`PO’s Expert on Ressemann’s Benefits of Distal/Proximal Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`236
`
`Ex. 1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 142:4-143:4
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry for Thrombus and Devices
`2.
`Improved Trackability
`B. Expectation of Success
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`237
`
`
`
`Sakurada Confirms Benefits of Kataishi’s Shape
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1055, 6-7
`238
`
`
`
`Sakurada
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`239
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1055, 6, 8
`
`
`
`Sakurada
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`240
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1055, 7
`
`
`
`Kataishi’s Shape Has Better Trackability
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`241
`
`
`
`Kataishi’s Shape Has Better Trackability
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`242
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry for Thrombus and Devices
`2.
`Improved Trackability
`B. Expectation of Success
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`243
`
`
`
`Kataishi – Expectation of Success
`
`Ex-1764 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 31:16-21
`
`Ex-1025 (Kataishi), ¶ [0027]
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 66:6-20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`244
`
`
`
`SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS
`
`IPR2020-00126, -00127, -00128, -00129, -00130,
`-00132, -00134, -00135, -00136, -00137, -00138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`245
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 58-59 (-00126 IPR)
`
`246
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`247
`
`POR at 60 (-00126 IPR)
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-2155
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`248
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`249
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-2155
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Prior Art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`250
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1762 (Root Tr), 39:14-22
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, Fig. 1; 5:49-52
`251
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,604,612 (Ressemann)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`252
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1008, Fig. 1A
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,604,612 (Ressemann)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1008, 6:18-26, 29-34
`
`253
`
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,736,355 (Itou)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1007, Abstract; Fig. 3
`
`254
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`IPR2020-00127
`(Itou), Ex-1007,
`Fig. 3
`
`IPR2020-00127,
`Ex-2155
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`255
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`“Where the offered secondary consideration[s] actually results
`from something other than what is both claimed and novel in the
`claim, there is no nexus to the merits of the claimed invention.”
`In re Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1068 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
`
`“So to if the feature that creates the commercial success was
`known in the prior art, the success is not pertinent.”
`Ormco Corp. v. Align Tech, Inc.,
`463 F.3d 1299, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`256
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`Guideliner V1
`
`Guideliner V2
`
`Guideliner V3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-2138, Appendix B (citing Ex-2139, -2140, -2141)
`See Paper No. 39 (PO’s Response) at 52, IPR2020-00130
`
`257
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`258
`
`IPR2020-00127, Ex-1813 (Graham Tr), 91:1-7
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations — Nexus — Side Opening
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`|PR2020-00127, EX-1823 at 11
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Copying
`
`“Our primary concern in each of these cases has been to avoid
`treating mere infringement as copying simply because the claims of
`a patent arguably read on a competitor product.”
`
`“[M]ore is needed than merely showing that similarity exists
`between the patent and the competitor’s accused product.”
`
`Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.,
`941 F.3d 1133, 1137-38 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`260
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Copying
`
`“Not every competing product that arguably falls within the scope of
`a patent is evidence of copying. Otherwise every infringement suit
`would automatically confirm the nonobviousness of the patent.
`Rather, copying requires the replication of a specific product.”
`
`Iron Grip Barbell Co. v. USA Sports, Inc.,
`392 F.3d 1317, 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2004)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`261
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – ’379 Issuance
`
`IPR2020-00137, -138, Ex-1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`262
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – ’379 Issuance
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-2069
`
`263
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations — ’379 Issuance
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations — Copying
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`Guideliner V3
`
`Telescope
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-2070
`See Paper No. 43 (PO’s Response) at 64, IPR2020-00132
`
`266
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00127, Ex-1830 ¶ 18
`
`267
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00127, Ex-1830 ¶ 19
`
`268
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`Patent
`’760
`
`IPR
`-132**
`
`-134
`
`-135**
`-136
`
`’776
`
`One French Claim Language
`30. … wherein the guide catheter includes a lumen … wherein a cross-sectional
`inner diameter of the lumen of the tubular structure is not more than one French size
`smaller than a cross-sectional inner diameter of a lumen of the guide catheter.
`53. … a tubular structure defining a lumen ..the lumen having a uniform cross-
`sectional inner diameter that is not more than one French size smaller than the
`cross-sectional inner diameter of the lumen of the guide catheter; and
`53. … a tubular structure defining a lumen and positioned distal to the substantially
`rigid segment, the lumen having a uniform cross-sectional inner diameter that is not
`more than one French size smaller than the cross-sectional inner diameter of the
`lumen of the guide catheter
`33. … wherein providing the reinforced segment includes forming or obtaining a
`reinforced segment including a lumen having a uniform inner diameter that is about
`one French smaller than an inner diameter of the continuous lumen of the guide
`catheter.
`**Denotes IPR where only alleged secondary consideration is alleged “copying”
`
`’379
`
`-138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`271
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`272
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1082 Ex-A at 39
`
`
`
`MEANS-PLUS-FUNCTION PETITION
`
`IPR2020-00129
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`273
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`RE45,380
`claims
`25-27, 29-33, 35-37, 41-
`45, 47-49
`27
`27
`27
`32-33
`38
`25-26, 28-30, 32-37, 39
`31
`27
`27
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Instituted
`Ground
`1
`
`References
`
`Ressemann
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`
`Ressemann and knowledge of a POSITA
`Ressemann, Kataishi
`Ressemann, Enger
`Ressemann, Takahashi
`Ressemann, Berg
`Itou
`Itou and knowledge of a POSITA
`Itou, Kataishi
`Itou, Berg
`
`274
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`275
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim Language
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`
`276
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`277
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`278
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`3
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`279
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`4
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`280
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex Argues that Lumen is Missing
`
`POR at 11 (-00129 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`281
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Side Opening Has Lumen
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`282
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Keith Agrees that Side Opening Fully Circumferential
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`283
`
`Ex-1825, ¶ 82 (Keith)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Side Openings do not Terminate into Lumenless Portion
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 31 (Brecker)
`
`284
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s Construction of “side opening”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1212 at 17-18
`
`285
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s Construction of “side opening”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 11:14-23 (Graham)
`
`286
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Lumen is Present Distal to Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 11:24-12:13 (Graham)
`
`287
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`288
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Reinforcement is to Protect Lumen
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 32 (Brecker)
`
`289
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Not Necessary, but Appropriate to Consult Specification
`
`“[W]here the claims recite the term ‘means,’ we have considered the
`written description to inform the analysis of whether the claim
`recites sufficiently definite structure to overcome the
`presumption that § 112, ¶ 6 governs the construction of the claim.”
`Inventio AG v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Ams. Corp.,
`649 F.3d 1350, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
`
`“The written description also supports this choice by stating that
`‘the spring 46 is an example of spring means tending to keep the
`door closed.’”
`
`Unidynamics Corp. v. Automatic Prods. Int’l,
`157 F.3d 1311, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`290
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: No Example of Lumenless Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 34 (Brecker)
`
`291
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`292
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Standard for Corresponding Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision at 19-20 (-00129 IPR)
`
`293
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Institution Decision Rejected Teleflex’s Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision at 19-20 (-00129 IPR)
`294
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s Additional Proposed Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 36 (Brecker)
`
`295
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Coaxial and Single Lumen are Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶¶ 37-38 (Brecker)
`
`296
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`297
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25
`Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25:
`− Means-Plus-Function Presumption is Overcome
`− The Corresponding Structure is an Extension
`Catheter
`− Ressemann is an Equivalent Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`298
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25
`Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25:
`− Means-Plus-Function Presumption is Overcome
`− The Corresponding Structure is an Extension
`Catheter
`− Ressemann is an Equivalent Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`299
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25
`Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25:
`− Means-Plus-Function Presumption is Overcome
`− The Corresponding Structure is an Extension
`Catheter
`− Ressemann is an Equivalent Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`300
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Discloses an Equivalent Structure
`
`Structural equivalence under § 112, ¶ 6 is met when the
`“differences are insubstantial … that is, if the assertedly
`equivalent structure performs the claimed function in
`substantially the same way to achieve substantially the
`same result as the corresponding structure described in
`the specification.”
`
`Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Tech. Corp.,
`185 F.3d 1259, 1267 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`301
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s “way”
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 23-24 (-00129 IPR)
`
`302
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: “Close-Fitted Mating” is Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`303
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 130 (Brecker)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: “Close-Fitted Mating” is Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 130 (Brecker)
`304
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Graham Confirms that Close Fitting is Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 25:13-23 (Graham)
`
`305
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s “way”
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 23-24 (-00129 IPR)
`
`306
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s “way”
`
`3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 23-24 (-00129 IPR)
`
`307
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`308
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Relevant Inquiry
`
`Whether the identified structure is “capable of
`performing the functional limitation of the ‘means.’”
`In re Mott, 557 F.2d 266, 269 (C.C.P.A. 1977)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`309
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`310
`
`
`
`KONTOS
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130, -00136
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`311
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`
`8,048,032
`claims
`1-7, 9, 11-16, 18-19
`8, 17
`20
`
`RE45,380
`claims
`1-4, 6-7, 9, 12-17, 19-20
`8, 18
`21
`
`Instituted
`Ground
`1
`2
`3
`
`References
`
`Kontos, Adams
`Kontos, Adams, Takahashi
`Kontos, Adams, Berg
`
`Instituted Ground References
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`Kontos, Adams
`Kontos, Adams, Takahashi
`Kontos, Adams, Berg
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`312
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`313
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409
`
`314
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, 2:51-54, Fig. 1
`
`315
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`316
`
`Ex-1409, 3:45-49
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`Ex-1409, 5:49-52
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`317
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, 2:16-32
`
`318
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, Figs. 6B-C
`
`319
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 161 (Jones)
`
`320
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`321
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 161 (Jones)
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`Ex-1409, 9:47-50
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`322
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`323
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1401, claim 1 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`324
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`Ex-1401, 1:17-21 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`325
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`326
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 165 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision, Paper 20 at 10 (-00130 IPR)
`
`327
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶¶ 153-54 (Brecker)
`
`328
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Keith Gave No Thought
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800, 122:4-12 (Keith)
`
`329
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶¶ 155-57 (Brecker)
`
`330
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`331
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Representative Back-Up Claim
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`332
`
`Ex-1401, claim 2 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: What Patents Teach About Backup Support
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1401, 7:61-8:5 (ʼ032 patent)
`333
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: How Patents Teach Backup Support
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Paper 1 at 40 (-00127 IPR)
`
`334
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`335
`
`Reply at 6 (-00127)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Shorter Distance
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 20 (Jones)
`
`336
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Increased Moment of Inertia
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 23 (Jones)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`337
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Increased Moment of Inertia
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`338
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 24 (Jones)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Increased Moment of Inertia
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 25 (Jones)
`339
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Teleflex’s Argument
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Paper 41 at 23-24 (-00127 IPR)
`
`340
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Jones Addresses Teleflex’s Argument
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`341
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 154 (Jones)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`342
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Representative Side Opening Claim
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1401, claim 3 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`343
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Adams
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1435, Fig. 3A
`344
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Adams
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1435, Figs. 2C, 2E
`
`345
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130: Motivation for Side Opening
`1. Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter Through
`Guide Catheter
`2. Safe Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`3. Maximize “Real Estate” Inside Catheter Assembly
`4. Smooth Receipt of Interventional Cardiology
`Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`346
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 199 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`347
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`348
`
`Ex-1408, 6:52-57 (Ressemann)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`Ex-1123 (Keith)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`349
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`350
`
`Ex-1123, 7:54-60 (Keith)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`Ex-1819, ¶ 113 (Keith)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`351
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130: Motivation for Side Opening
`1. Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter Through
`Guide Catheter
`2. Safe Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`3. Maximize “Real Estate” Inside Catheter Assembly
`4. Smooth Receipt of Interventional Cardiology
`Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`352
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, Fig. 7
`
`353
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 201 (Brecker)
`
`354
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`Ex-1435, [0066]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`355
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 72:21-73:6 (Graham)
`356
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 79:14-21 (Graham)
`357
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130: Motivation for Side Opening
`1. Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter Through
`Guide Catheter
`2. Safe Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`3. Maximize “Real Estate” Inside Catheter Assembly
`4. Smooth Receipt of Interventional Cardiology
`Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`358
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`359
`
`Ex-1813, 92:19-24 (Graham)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Transition from 7 French to 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 194 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`360
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Transition from 7 French to 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 194 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`361
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Teleflex Argues Kontos Already Used in 6 French GC
`
`Ex-2138, ¶ 179 (-00127 IPR) (Keith)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`362
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Funnel Height is 0.005 Inches in 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 166 (Jones)
`
`363
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: No Funnel Function in 6 French GC
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 167 (Jones)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`364
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Danger of Advancing Assembly in 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`365
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 170 (Brecker)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Graham “would not expect it to go” in 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 116:20-117:7 (Graham)
`
`366
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Small Extension Catheter can Hinder Entry of Therapy
`Catheter
`
`Paper 1 at 44 (-00127 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`367
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Small Extension Catheter can Hinder Entry of Therapy
`Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 195 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`368
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Motivation to Increase ID of E