DOUBLE INCLINE CLAIMS
`
`IPR2020-00129, -00132, -00135, -00136, -00137, -00138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`190
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129, -00132, -00135, -00136, -00137, -00138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`190
`
`
`
`Double Incline Claims
`
`27. The system of claim 26, wherein the side opening includes at least two different inclined slopes. 2020IPR-00129,
`Ex-1001 (RE45,380)
`
`32. The system of claim 25, wherein the segment defining the side opening includes at least two inclined slopes.
`2020IPR-00132, Ex-1001 (RE45,760)
`
`52. A guide extension catheter for use with a guide catheter, comprising: a substantially rigid segment; a tubular
`structure defining a lumen and positioned distal to the substantially rigid segment; and a segment defining a partially
`cylindrical opening positioned between a distal end of the substantially rigid segment and a proximal end of the
`tubular structure, the segment defining the partially cylindrical opening having an angled proximal end . . . wherein
`the segment defining the angled proximal end of the partially cylindrical opening includes at least two inclined
`regions. 2020IPR-00135, Ex-1001 (RE45,776)
`
`44. The method of claim 38, wherein defining the side opening portion includes forming a first inclined sidewall,
`forming a second inclined sidewall, and separating the first inclined sidewall and the second inclined sidewall by a
`non-inclined region. 2020IPR-00137, Ex-1001 (RE47,379)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`191
`
`
`
`PO’s Inventor and Expert Agree: No Difference in Inclines
`
`Guideliner V1
`
`Guideliner V2
`
`Guideliner V3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-2138, Appendix B (citing Ex-2139, -2140, -2141)
`See Paper No. 39 (PO’s Response) at 52, IPR2020-00130
`
`192
`
`
`
`PO’s Inventor and Expert Agree: No Difference in Inclines
`
`Ex-1108 (Inventor Sutton Dep. Tr.), 75:13-23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 39:1-18
`
`193
`
`
`
`PO’s Inventor and Expert Agree: No Difference in Inclines
`
`Ex-1813 (Graham Dep. Tr.), 98:6-15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`194
`
`
`
`Double Incline Claims
`
`Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`195
`
`
`
`Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`196
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1008
`
`
`
`Incline – PO’s Expert Says Incline is “Just Sort of By Eye”
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1800 (Keith Tr), 45:21-46:2; 47:3-8; Ex-1122 (color aded to arrows for visibility)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`197
`
`
`
`Incline – Petitioner’s Expert Uses PO’s Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`198
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.)
`
`
`
`Incline – Petitioner’s Expert Uses PO’s Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.)
`
`199
`
`
`
`Incline – Ressemann Has More Than Two Inclines
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.) ¶ 87 (con’t.)
`
`200
`
`
`
`Incline – PO’s Expert Says Ressemann’s Tip Has An Incline
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith. Dep. Tr.), 166:8-12
`
`IPR2020-00129, Ex-2138 ¶ 170
`See also Paper No. 43 (PO’s Response) at 29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith. Dep. Tr.), 168:9-19
`See Paper No. 82 (Petitioner’s Reply) at 15
`
`201
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`202
`
`
`
`Ressemann’s Proximal Opening Disclosure is Relevant to Itou
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 6:45-61
`see also Ex-1123 (Keith Patent), 7:54-60
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 149:3-18
`
`203
`
`
`
`Ressemann’s Collar 2141 “Reinforces” And Is the Proximal Opening
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann) Fig. 16J
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 24:47-58
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`204
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`Ex-1007 (Itou), Fig. 3
`
`Ex-1008, Fig. 16J (orientatiion reversed)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132
`
`205
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`206
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`Ex-1005 (Brecker Decl.)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1042 (Hillstead Decl.)
`IPR2020-00132
`
`207
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`208
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`209
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.), ¶ 125
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`210
`
`
`
`Ressemann’s Collar 2141 Reinforces the Proximal Opening
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), Fig. 16J
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 24:58-67
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`211
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`212
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`213
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.) ¶ 131
`
`214
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`215
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1805 (Brecker Decl.)
`
`216
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`217
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 29:17-22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`218
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 29:23-30:7
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 29:23-30:7
`
`219
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`220
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann is Routine Engineering
`
`Ex-1007 (Itou), 4:33-36
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 48:5-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`221
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry
`2. Provide a Flexibility Transition
`B. Expectation of Success
`1. Taper Pushwire and Put Collar 2141 On Top
`2. Weld Collar Directly to Itou’s Pushwire
`3. Patent Owner’s Interpretation of Tab
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`222
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`223
`
`
`
`Modifying Itou with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.) ¶ 132 (con’t.)
`
`224
`
`
`
`Modifying Ressemann with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00138, Ex-1208
`
`225
`
`
`
`Incline – Ressemann Has More Than Two Inclines
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1806 (Brecker Supplemental Decl.) ¶ 87 (con’t.)
`
`226
`
`
`
`Modifying Ressemann with Ressemann Collar
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00138, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`227
`
`
`
`Double Incline Claims
`
`Kataishi
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`228
`
`
`
`Kataishi
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`229
`
`Ex-1025 (Kataishi)
`
`
`
`Kataishi
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1025 (Kataishi), Figs. 2 & 10
`
`230
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry for Thrombus and Devices
`2.
`Improved Trackability
`B. Expectation of Success
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`231
`
`
`
`Ressemann Discloses Benefits of Distal and Proximal Openings
`
`Ex-1008 (Ressemann), 6:45-61
`see also Ex-1123 (Keith Patent), 7:54-60
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 149:3-18
`
`232
`
`
`
`Kataishi – Motivation to Combine
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`233
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`
`
`Kataishi – Motivation to Combine
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.), ¶ 145
`
`234
`
`
`
`PO Ignores the Explicit Teaching in Ressemann as “Hindsight”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`235
`
`IPR2020-00132, Paper No. 101 at 19
`
`
`
`PO’s Expert on Ressemann’s Benefits of Distal/Proximal Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`236
`
`Ex. 1800 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 142:4-143:4
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry for Thrombus and Devices
`2.
`Improved Trackability
`B. Expectation of Success
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`237
`
`
`
`Sakurada Confirms Benefits of Kataishi’s Shape
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1055, 6-7
`238
`
`
`
`Sakurada
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`239
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1055, 6, 8
`
`
`
`Sakurada
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`240
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1055, 7
`
`
`
`Kataishi’s Shape Has Better Trackability
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`241
`
`
`
`Kataishi’s Shape Has Better Trackability
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1807 (Jones Decl.)
`
`242
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine and Expectation of Success
`A. Motivation to Combine
`1. Larger Area of Entry for Thrombus and Devices
`2.
`Improved Trackability
`B. Expectation of Success
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`243
`
`
`
`Kataishi – Expectation of Success
`
`Ex-1764 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 31:16-21
`
`Ex-1025 (Kataishi), ¶ [0027]
`
`Ex-1922 (Keith Dep. Tr.), 66:6-20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`244
`
`
`
`SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS
`
`IPR2020-00126, -00127, -00128, -00129, -00130,
`-00132, -00134, -00135, -00136, -00137, -00138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`245
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 58-59 (-00126 IPR)
`
`246
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`247
`
`POR at 60 (-00126 IPR)
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-2155
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`248
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`249
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-2155
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Prior Art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`250
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1762 (Root Tr), 39:14-22
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, Fig. 1; 5:49-52
`251
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,604,612 (Ressemann)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`252
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1008, Fig. 1A
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,604,612 (Ressemann)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1008, 6:18-26, 29-34
`
`253
`
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,736,355 (Itou)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-1007, Abstract; Fig. 3
`
`254
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`IPR2020-00127
`(Itou), Ex-1007,
`Fig. 3
`
`IPR2020-00127,
`Ex-2155
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`255
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus
`
`“Where the offered secondary consideration[s] actually results
`from something other than what is both claimed and novel in the
`claim, there is no nexus to the merits of the claimed invention.”
`In re Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1068 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
`
`“So to if the feature that creates the commercial success was
`known in the prior art, the success is not pertinent.”
`Ormco Corp. v. Align Tech, Inc.,
`463 F.3d 1299, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`256
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`Guideliner V1
`
`Guideliner V2
`
`Guideliner V3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-2138, Appendix B (citing Ex-2139, -2140, -2141)
`See Paper No. 39 (PO’s Response) at 52, IPR2020-00130
`
`257
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`258
`
`IPR2020-00127, Ex-1813 (Graham Tr), 91:1-7
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations — Nexus — Side Opening
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`|PR2020-00127, EX-1823 at 11
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Copying
`
`“Our primary concern in each of these cases has been to avoid
`treating mere infringement as copying simply because the claims of
`a patent arguably read on a competitor product.”
`
`“[M]ore is needed than merely showing that similarity exists
`between the patent and the competitor’s accused product.”
`
`Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.,
`941 F.3d 1133, 1137-38 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`260
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Copying
`
`“Not every competing product that arguably falls within the scope of
`a patent is evidence of copying. Otherwise every infringement suit
`would automatically confirm the nonobviousness of the patent.
`Rather, copying requires the replication of a specific product.”
`
`Iron Grip Barbell Co. v. USA Sports, Inc.,
`392 F.3d 1317, 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2004)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`261
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – ’379 Issuance
`
`IPR2020-00137, -138, Ex-1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`262
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – ’379 Issuance
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00126, Ex-2069
`
`263
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations — ’379 Issuance
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations — Copying
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations – Nexus – Side Opening
`
`Guideliner V3
`
`Telescope
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-2070
`See Paper No. 43 (PO’s Response) at 64, IPR2020-00132
`
`266
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00127, Ex-1830 ¶ 18
`
`267
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020-00127, Ex-1830 ¶ 19
`
`268
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`Patent
`’760
`
`IPR
`-132**
`
`-134
`
`-135**
`-136
`
`’776
`
`One French Claim Language
`30. … wherein the guide catheter includes a lumen … wherein a cross-sectional
`inner diameter of the lumen of the tubular structure is not more than one French size
`smaller than a cross-sectional inner diameter of a lumen of the guide catheter.
`53. … a tubular structure defining a lumen ..the lumen having a uniform cross-
`sectional inner diameter that is not more than one French size smaller than the
`cross-sectional inner diameter of the lumen of the guide catheter; and
`53. … a tubular structure defining a lumen and positioned distal to the substantially
`rigid segment, the lumen having a uniform cross-sectional inner diameter that is not
`more than one French size smaller than the cross-sectional inner diameter of the
`lumen of the guide catheter
`33. … wherein providing the reinforced segment includes forming or obtaining a
`reinforced segment including a lumen having a uniform inner diameter that is about
`one French smaller than an inner diameter of the continuous lumen of the guide
`catheter.
`**Denotes IPR where only alleged secondary consideration is alleged “copying”
`
`’379
`
`-138
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`271
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`272
`
`IPR2020-00132, Ex-1082 Ex-A at 39
`
`
`
`MEANS-PLUS-FUNCTION PETITION
`
`IPR2020-00129
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`273
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`RE45,380
`claims
`25-27, 29-33, 35-37, 41-
`45, 47-49
`27
`27
`27
`32-33
`38
`25-26, 28-30, 32-37, 39
`31
`27
`27
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Instituted
`Ground
`1
`
`References
`
`Ressemann
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`
`Ressemann and knowledge of a POSITA
`Ressemann, Kataishi
`Ressemann, Enger
`Ressemann, Takahashi
`Ressemann, Berg
`Itou
`Itou and knowledge of a POSITA
`Itou, Kataishi
`Itou, Berg
`
`274
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`275
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim Language
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`
`276
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`277
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`278
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`3
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`279
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Recites Extensive Structure
`
`4
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`280
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex Argues that Lumen is Missing
`
`POR at 11 (-00129 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`281
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25 Side Opening Has Lumen
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`282
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Keith Agrees that Side Opening Fully Circumferential
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`283
`
`Ex-1825, ¶ 82 (Keith)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Side Openings do not Terminate into Lumenless Portion
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 31 (Brecker)
`
`284
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s Construction of “side opening”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1212 at 17-18
`
`285
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s Construction of “side opening”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 11:14-23 (Graham)
`
`286
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Lumen is Present Distal to Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 11:24-12:13 (Graham)
`
`287
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Claim 25
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1201, claim 25 (-00129 IPR)
`288
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Reinforcement is to Protect Lumen
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 32 (Brecker)
`
`289
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Not Necessary, but Appropriate to Consult Specification
`
`“[W]here the claims recite the term ‘means,’ we have considered the
`written description to inform the analysis of whether the claim
`recites sufficiently definite structure to overcome the
`presumption that § 112, ¶ 6 governs the construction of the claim.”
`Inventio AG v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Ams. Corp.,
`649 F.3d 1350, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
`
`“The written description also supports this choice by stating that
`‘the spring 46 is an example of spring means tending to keep the
`door closed.’”
`
`Unidynamics Corp. v. Automatic Prods. Int’l,
`157 F.3d 1311, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`290
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: No Example of Lumenless Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 34 (Brecker)
`
`291
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`292
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Standard for Corresponding Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision at 19-20 (-00129 IPR)
`
`293
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Institution Decision Rejected Teleflex’s Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision at 19-20 (-00129 IPR)
`294
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s Additional Proposed Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 36 (Brecker)
`
`295
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Coaxial and Single Lumen are Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶¶ 37-38 (Brecker)
`
`296
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`297
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25
`Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25:
`− Means-Plus-Function Presumption is Overcome
`− The Corresponding Structure is an Extension
`Catheter
`− Ressemann is an Equivalent Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`298
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25
`Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25:
`− Means-Plus-Function Presumption is Overcome
`− The Corresponding Structure is an Extension
`Catheter
`− Ressemann is an Equivalent Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`299
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25
`Ressemann Anticipates Claim 25:
`− Means-Plus-Function Presumption is Overcome
`− The Corresponding Structure is an Extension
`Catheter
`− Ressemann is an Equivalent Structure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`300
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Ressemann Discloses an Equivalent Structure
`
`Structural equivalence under § 112, ¶ 6 is met when the
`“differences are insubstantial … that is, if the assertedly
`equivalent structure performs the claimed function in
`substantially the same way to achieve substantially the
`same result as the corresponding structure described in
`the specification.”
`
`Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Tech. Corp.,
`185 F.3d 1259, 1267 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`301
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s “way”
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 23-24 (-00129 IPR)
`
`302
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: “Close-Fitted Mating” is Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`303
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 130 (Brecker)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: “Close-Fitted Mating” is Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 130 (Brecker)
`304
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Graham Confirms that Close Fitting is Unnecessary
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 25:13-23 (Graham)
`
`305
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s “way”
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 23-24 (-00129 IPR)
`
`306
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Teleflex’s “way”
`
`3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`POR at 23-24 (-00129 IPR)
`
`307
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`308
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129: Relevant Inquiry
`
`Whether the identified structure is “capable of
`performing the functional limitation of the ‘means.’”
`In re Mott, 557 F.2d 266, 269 (C.C.P.A. 1977)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`309
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00129
`1. Claim Construction: Means for “receiving . . . and
`guiding”
`− Presumption is Overcome
`− Corresponding Structure
`2. Claim 25
`− Ressemann Anticipates
`− Itou Anticipates
`Itou: Configured to Receive a Stent/Balloon
`3.
`4. Ressemann: Achieve 1 French
`5.
`Itou/Ressemann: Double-Incline Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`310
`
`
`
`KONTOS
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130, -00136
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`311
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`
`8,048,032
`claims
`1-7, 9, 11-16, 18-19
`8, 17
`20
`
`RE45,380
`claims
`1-4, 6-7, 9, 12-17, 19-20
`8, 18
`21
`
`Instituted
`Ground
`1
`2
`3
`
`References
`
`Kontos, Adams
`Kontos, Adams, Takahashi
`Kontos, Adams, Berg
`
`Instituted Ground References
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`Kontos, Adams
`Kontos, Adams, Takahashi
`Kontos, Adams, Berg
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`312
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`313
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409
`
`314
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, 2:51-54, Fig. 1
`
`315
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`316
`
`Ex-1409, 3:45-49
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`Ex-1409, 5:49-52
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`317
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, 2:16-32
`
`318
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, Figs. 6B-C
`
`319
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 161 (Jones)
`
`320
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`321
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 161 (Jones)
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,439,445 (Kontos)
`
`Ex-1409, 9:47-50
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`322
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`323
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1401, claim 1 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`324
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`Ex-1401, 1:17-21 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`325
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`326
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 165 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision, Paper 20 at 10 (-00130 IPR)
`
`327
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶¶ 153-54 (Brecker)
`
`328
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Keith Gave No Thought
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1800, 122:4-12 (Keith)
`
`329
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: “interventional cardiology devices”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1806, ¶¶ 155-57 (Brecker)
`
`330
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`331
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Representative Back-Up Claim
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`332
`
`Ex-1401, claim 2 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: What Patents Teach About Backup Support
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1401, 7:61-8:5 (ʼ032 patent)
`333
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: How Patents Teach Backup Support
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Paper 1 at 40 (-00127 IPR)
`
`334
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`335
`
`Reply at 6 (-00127)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Shorter Distance
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 20 (Jones)
`
`336
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Increased Moment of Inertia
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 23 (Jones)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`337
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Increased Moment of Inertia
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`338
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 24 (Jones)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Increased Moment of Inertia
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 25 (Jones)
`339
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Teleflex’s Argument
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Paper 41 at 23-24 (-00127 IPR)
`
`340
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Jones Addresses Teleflex’s Argument
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`341
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 154 (Jones)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130
`1. Overview of Kontos
`2. Kontos Receives “interventional cardiology
`devices”
`3. Kontos Necessarily Provides Back-Up Support
`4. Obvious to Replace Kontos’s Funnel with a Side
`Opening
`5. Obvious to Achieve 1 French
`6. Kontos has “flexible cylindrical reinforced portion”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`342
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Representative Side Opening Claim
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1401, claim 3 (ʼ032 patent)
`
`343
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Adams
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1435, Fig. 3A
`344
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Adams
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1435, Figs. 2C, 2E
`
`345
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130: Motivation for Side Opening
`1. Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter Through
`Guide Catheter
`2. Safe Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`3. Maximize “Real Estate” Inside Catheter Assembly
`4. Smooth Receipt of Interventional Cardiology
`Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`346
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 199 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`347
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`348
`
`Ex-1408, 6:52-57 (Ressemann)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`Ex-1123 (Keith)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`349
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`350
`
`Ex-1123, 7:54-60 (Keith)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter
`
`Ex-1819, ¶ 113 (Keith)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`351
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130: Motivation for Side Opening
`1. Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter Through
`Guide Catheter
`2. Safe Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`3. Maximize “Real Estate” Inside Catheter Assembly
`4. Smooth Receipt of Interventional Cardiology
`Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`352
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1409, Fig. 7
`
`353
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 201 (Brecker)
`
`354
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`Ex-1435, [0066]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`355
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 72:21-73:6 (Graham)
`356
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 79:14-21 (Graham)
`357
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127 & IPR2020-00130: Motivation for Side Opening
`1. Smooth Passage of Extension Catheter Through
`Guide Catheter
`2. Safe Retrieval of Extension Catheter
`3. Maximize “Real Estate” Inside Catheter Assembly
`4. Smooth Receipt of Interventional Cardiology
`Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`358
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Side Opening
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`359
`
`Ex-1813, 92:19-24 (Graham)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Transition from 7 French to 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 194 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`360
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Transition from 7 French to 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 194 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`361
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Teleflex Argues Kontos Already Used in 6 French GC
`
`Ex-2138, ¶ 179 (-00127 IPR) (Keith)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`362
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Funnel Height is 0.005 Inches in 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 166 (Jones)
`
`363
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: No Funnel Function in 6 French GC
`
`Ex-1807, ¶ 167 (Jones)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`364
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Danger of Advancing Assembly in 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`365
`
`Ex-1806, ¶ 170 (Brecker)
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Graham “would not expect it to go” in 6 French GC
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1801, 116:20-117:7 (Graham)
`
`366
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Small Extension Catheter can Hinder Entry of Therapy
`Catheter
`
`Paper 1 at 44 (-00127 IPR)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`367
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Small Extension Catheter can Hinder Entry of Therapy
`Catheter
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex-1405, ¶ 195 (-00127 IPR) (Brecker)
`
`368
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00127, -00130: Motivation to Increase ID of E
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
