`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 34
`Entered: September 10, 2020
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.À.R.L.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00126 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00129 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137 (Patent RE47,379 E)
` IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)1
`____________
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`CHRISTOPHER G. PAULRAJ, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TORNQUIST, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`1 This Order applies to all of the above-identified proceedings. We exercise
`our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00126, IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128, IPR2020-00129, IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132, IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135, IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137, IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`
`
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motions for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice of Joseph W. Winkels
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00126, IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128, IPR2020-00129, IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132, IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135, IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137, IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`
`
`On August 19, 2020, Patent Owner filed motions for admission pro
`hac vice of Joseph W. Winkels in each of the above-identified proceedings
`(collectively “Motions”). Paper 31.2 Patent Owner also filed declarations of
`Mr. Winkels in support of the Motions (collectively “Declarations”).
`Ex. 2087.3 Patent Owner attests that Petitioner does not oppose the Motions.
`Paper 31, 1. For the reasons provided below, Patent Owner’s Motions are
`granted.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In its notice
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear in this proceeding. See Paper 6, 2 (citing Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013)
`
`
`2 For purposes of expediency, we cite to Papers filed in IPR2020-00126.
`Patent Owner filed similar Motions in IPR2020-00127 (Paper 28), IPR2020-
`00128 (Paper 31), IPR2020-00129 (Paper 31), IPR2020-00130 (Paper 28),
`IPR2020-00132 (Paper 31), IPR2020-00134 (Paper 28), IPR2020-00135
`(Paper 31), IPR2020-00136 (Paper 28), IPR2020-00137 (Paper 31), and
`IPR2020-00138 (Paper 28).
`3 We cite to Exhibits filed in IPR2020-00126. Patent Owner filed similar
`Declarations in IPR2020-00127 (Ex. 2087), IPR2020-00128 (Ex. 2087),
`IPR2020-00129 (Ex. 2087), IPR2020-00130 (Ex. 2087), IPR2020-00132
`(Ex. 2087), IPR2020-00134 (Ex. 2087), IPR2020-00135 (Ex. 2087),
`IPR2020-00136 (Ex. 2087), IPR2020-00137 (Ex. 2087), and IPR2020-
`00138 (Ex. 2087).
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00126, IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128, IPR2020-00129, IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132, IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135, IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137, IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`
`(representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission”)).
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motions and the accompanying
`Declarations,4 we conclude that Mr. Winkels has sufficient legal and
`technical qualifications to represent Patent Owner in these proceedings, that
`Mr. Winkels has demonstrated sufficient familiarity with the subject matter
`of these proceedings, and that Patent Owner’s intent to be represented by
`counsel with litigation experience is warranted. Accordingly, Patent Owner
`has established good cause for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Winkels. Mr.
`Winkels will be permitted to serve as back-up counsel only. See 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(c).
`A Power of Attorney has not been submitted for Mr. Winkels.
`Accordingly, Patent Owner must submit a Power of Attorney for Mr.
`Winkels in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b), and must update its
`Mandatory Notices as required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3).
`
`
`
`4 Unified Patents indicates that “A motion for pro hac vice admission must:
`. . . Be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear attesting to the following: . . . All other proceedings before the
`Office for which the individual has applied to appear pro hac vice in the last
`three (3) years.” See Unified Patents, Paper 7 at 3. The Declaration of Mr.
`Winkels fails to identify any other proceedings before the Office for which
`Mr. Winkels has applied to appear pro hac vice. See Ex. 2087. For the
`purposes of this Order, we treat this omission as a representation that Mr.
`Winkels has not applied to appear pro hac vice in any proceedings before the
`Office in the last three years.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00126, IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128, IPR2020-00129, IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132, IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135, IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137, IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`of Mr. Joseph W. Winkels are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the above-identified
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Winkels is authorized to represent
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in the above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Winkels is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)), and the
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code
`of Federal Regulations;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Winkels shall be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et.
`seq.;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, within ten (10) business days of the date
`of this Order, Patent Owner must submit Powers of Attorney for Mr.
`Winkels in each of the above-identified proceedings in accordance with 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(b); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file updated
`Mandatory Notices in each of the above-identified proceedings in
`accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3), identifying Mr. Winkels as back-up
`counsel.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00126, IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128, IPR2020-00129, IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132, IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135, IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137, IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`
`For Petitioner:
`
`Cyrus Morton
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`
`Sharon Roberg-Perez
`sroberg-perez@robinskaplan.com
`
`Christopher Pinahs
`cpinahs@robinskaplan.com
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`Derek Vandenburgh
`dvandenburgh@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`Dennis Bremer
`dbremer@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`