throbber
232
`
`Bioconjugate Chem. 1991, 2, 232-241
`Chemical Modification of Hyaluronic Acid by Carbodiimides
`Jing-wen Kuo,* *-* David A. Swann,* and Glenn D. Prestwich*·*
`Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-3400, and
`MedChem Products, Inc., 232 West Cummings Park, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801. Received February 14,1991
`
`Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a linear polysaccharide with repeating disaccharide units of glucuronic acid
`and IV-acetylglucosamine and is found in the extracellular matrix of connective tissues. Reaction of
`2 X 106) with EDC at pH 4.75, either in the
`high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate (NaHA, MW ~
`presence or absence of a primary diamine, gave the N-acylurea and O-acylisourea as NaHA-carbodi-
`imide adducts. None of the expected intermolecular coupling with the amine component was observed.
`On the basis of this new observation, this method for chemical modification of HA was used in conjunction
`with new synthetic carbodiimides to prepare HA derivatives bearing lipophilic, aromatic, cross-linked,
`and tethered functional groups. The degree of conversion to NaHA-acylurea products appears to
`depend upon both the characteristics of various carbodiimides and the conformational structure of
`NaHA.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Hyaluronic acid (HA), a naturally occurring linear
`polysaccharide, is composed of repeating disaccharide units
`of glucuronic acid and IV-acetylglucosamine (2,2). Both
`monosaccharides have the /3-D-anomeric configuration at
`C-l. The linkage from glucuronic acid to N-acetylglu-
`cosamine is (l-»3) and the linkage from N-acetylglu-
`cosamine to glucuronic acid is (l-*-4). The nomenclature
`for this repeating disaccharide unit is [-*4)-0-(/3-D-glu-
`copyranuronosyl)-(l->3)-0-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy-/3-D-glu-
`copyranosyl)-(l->] (2) (Figure 1). HA is widely distributed
`in animal tissues, present in high concentrations in syn-
`ovial fluid and the vitreous body of the eye, and in loose
`connective tissues of rooster comb, umbilical cord, and
`dermis (3). All HA molecules are thought to have the
`same primary structure, but differences occur
`in the degree
`of polymerization of the HA polysaccharide chains ob-
`tained from different tissues (4). Sodium hyaluronate
`(NaHA) is characterized by its large hydrodynamic volume
`(5). NaHA with a molecular weight of 1 million has an
`It absorbs water,
`intrinsic viscosity of 3000 mL/g (6).
`cushions cells, and lubricates the soft tissues of joints.
`The wide application of the purified, high molecular weight
`HA in eye surgery is an example of the utility of HA as
`a noninflammatory, viscoelastic biomaterial (7).
`Studies on the chemical modification of hyaluronic acid
`have been mainly concerned with its cross-linking and
`coupling. Divinyl sulfone, bisepoxides, formaldehyde, and
`bishalides have been used to cross-link HA to produce
`highly swollen gels or virtually insoluble, plastic materials,
`depending upon the degrees of cross-linking (So,b, 9,10,
`11a). Coupling reactions, on the other hand, can also alter
`the properties of HA. For example, extensive esterifica-
`tion of HA with monofunctional organic halides can
`produce water-insoluble films (lib). These chemically
`modified HA are thought to have surgical and medical
`value as long-lasting biomaterials, and as potential drug-
`delivery vehicles.
`The generation of a free amino group on HA for further
`coupling reaction has been a subject of much interest, both
`at the polymer and oligosaccharide level. Preparation of
`an alkylamine derivative of HA oligosaccharide modified
`
`* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
`f State University of New York.
`* MedChem Products.
`
`Figure 1. Hyaluronic acid is a linear polysaccharide, with
`repeating disaccharide units of glucuronosyl-ß-1,3-N-acetylglu-
`cosamine linked by 0-1,4-glycosidic bonds.
`at its reducing end was used for radioactive labeling (22).
`For high molecular weight HA, alkaline N-deacetylation
`of its glucosamine moiety produced a free amino group on
`HA polymer chain, but concomitant degradations of HA
`via /3-elimination in the glucuronic acid moiety was
`observed (23). Hydrazinolysis of high molecular weight
`HA (>2 x 106 Da) was performed at 100 °C, to give a
`partially N-deacetylated HA, but the molecular weight
`was decreased by 1 order of magnitude (14).
`It was reported that the carbodiimide-catalyzed reaction
`of HA with monofunctional amines such as glycine meth-
`yl ester led to the formation of an amide linkage (25).
`Since carbodiimide-carboxylate reactions could be per-
`formed in aqueous solutions under mild conditions, we
`chose to explore carbodiimide-promoted coupling of HA
`carboxylic acid group with simple aliphatic diamines.
`When we began our studies using HA, difunctional amines,
`and carbodiimides, we expected to obtain an undegraded
`HA derivative with a free amino group. This was not
`realized, however, and only products from coupling of the
`carbodiimide to HA were observed. We now report the
`evidence for this reaction and the exploitation of this
`unexpected observation to prepare functionalized and
`cross-linked derivatives of HA.
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`General Experimental.
`Infrared spectra were taken
`on a Perkin-Elmer 1430 spectrophotometer. Only im-
`portant, diagnostic peaks are reported. UV-vis spectra
`were taken on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 4B spectropho-
`tometer. Gas chromatography (GC) was performed on a
`Varían 3700 gas chromatograph (programmable temper-
`ature control) equipped with a flame ionization detector
`(FID), connected to helium carrier gas and interfaced to
`a HP 3380A integrator. The column used was DB-5 meg-
`abore (15 m x 0.5 mm) fused silica, at 30 psi He pressure.
`Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with
`
`1043-1802/91/2902-0232302.50/0
`
`© 1991 American Chemical Society
`
`Downloaded via ABBVIE INC (IDPW) on July 24, 2020 at 13:52:24 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`ALL 2085
`PROLLENIUM V. ALLERGAN
`IPR2019-01505 et al.
`
`

`

`Modlficaton of Hyaluronic Acid by Carbodiimldes
`Macherey-Nagel Polygram Sil G/UV254 (40 x 80 mm, 0.25-
`mm silica gel) plastic TLC plates. Spots were visualized
`under UV light and / or under visible light by spraying the
`TLC plate with a ninhydrin spray solution (0.5% w/v of
`ninhydrin in water-saturated 1-butanol) or by dipping the
`TLC plate into a phosphomolybdic acid (10% w/w solution
`in EtOH) followed by heating with a heat gun. Flash
`column chromatography was performed under nitrogen
`pressure on Merck silica gel G (400-230 mesh). Low-
`resolution electron-impact mass spectra were obtained by
`using a Hewlett-Packard Model 5980A mass spectrometer
`interfaced to a HP 5710A GC. Only molecular ions (M+)
`are listed. NMR spectra were obtained on a GE QE-300
`spectrometer operating at 75 MHz for 13C and 300 MHz
`for  . Unless otherwise specified the chemical shifts for
`compounds dissolved in organic solvents are reported as
`ppm ( ) with CDCI3 as standard. Chemical shifts of
`modified HA are reported as ppm ( ) with 3-(trimeth-
`ylsilyl)-l-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt as the standard.
`The pH of the HA or modified HA samples was raised to
`about 14 by adding NaOD. The following abbreviations
`are used for peak multiplicities: s, singlet; d, doublet; t,
`triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet. Concentration of HA
`was measured by the carbazole assay using glucurono-
`Intrinsic viscosity (IV) of HA
`lactone as standard (16).
`and modified HA was measured with Cannon-Ubbelohde
`semimicro dilution type viscometer (size 75) at 37 °C. Hy-
`aluronic acid was provided by MedChem Products, Inc.,
`as its sodium salt, NaHA, which was purified from rooster
`comb by modifications of procedures described elsewhere
`(17). Unless otherwise stated, the molecular weight of
`HA used was from 1.5 to 2 million. Denatured ethanol
`containing 5% of methanol and 5% of 2-propanol was
`used in the purification of HA and its derivatives. The
`ninhydrin test was used to quantify the free primary amino
`groups of the amine-functionalized HA and D-glucosamine
`was used as the standard. The ratios of the reagents were
`the ratios of the molar equivalents based on the reacting
`In the case of NaHA, it was the molar
`functional groups.
`equivalents of its dissacharide units.
`Procedures for Chemical Reactions JV-(Benzylox-
`ycarbonyl)- 1,6-hexanediamine (8). Toa solution of 1,6-
`hexamethanediamine (11.6g, 100 mmol) inSOmLofCHCls
`was added dropwise at room temperature a solution of
`benzyl chloroformate (1.83 g, 10 mmol) in 50 mL of CHCI3.
`The addition proceeded for 1 h, during which a white
`precipitate of
`formed. The
`the amine chloride was
`agitation was continued at room temperature for 5 h, the
`reaction mixture filtered, and the filtrate washed with
`water. The removal of the excess unreacted diamine was
`monitored by silica gel thin-layer chromatography (CHCI3/
`MeOH/EtsN = 90/10/5). The ninhydrin spray showed
`the disappearance of the purple spot at the bottom line
`on TLC plate, indicative of the complete removal of the
`unreacted 1,6-hexanediamine. The dried residue was
`weighed as 2.0 g. The crude product (1.2 g) was purified
`by column chromatography (silica gel, 0.8% MeOH, 5%
`EtsN in CHCI3) to provide 486 mg of the pure product
`  1.26-1.43 (8  ), 2.60 (t, J
`  NMR (CDCI3):
`(40.5%).
`= 6 Hz, 2 H, CH2NH2), 3.11 (m, 2 H, -CH2NHCOO-), 5.08
`(s, 2 H, Ctf2Ph), 7.35 (m, 5 H, Ph). 13C NMR (CDCI3):
`  26.48 and 29.93 (-CH2-) 33.60 (CH2NH2), 41.03 (-CH2-
`NHCOO-), 66.58 (CH2Ph), 128.03,128.47, and 136.70 (Ph),
`156.38 (C=0).
`JV-[3-(Dimethylamino)propyI]-jV-[6-[(benzyloxy-
`carbonyl)amino]hexyl]thiourea (9). To a solution of
`N-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-l,6-hexamethylenediamine (8) (50
`mg, 0.20 mmol) in 5 mL of CHCI3 was added isothiocy-
`
`233
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 2, No. 4, 1991
`anate 7 (40 mg, 0.28 mmol) predissolved in 5 mL of CHCI3.
`After stirring for 6 hat room temperature, the solvent was
`evaporated to give 77 mg of the crude product (91 %, GC).
`  NMR (CDCI3):
`  1.27-1.68 (10 H, -CH2-), 2.19 (6 H,
`R-NAÍe2), 2.30-2.39 (2 H, CH2NMe2), 3.11 (2 H, -CHr
`NHCOO-), 3.13-3.52 (4 H, -CH2NH-), 5.00 (s, 2 H, CH2-
`Ph), 7.27 (m, 5 H, Ph). 13C NMR (CDC13):
`  26.02,28.64,
`and 29.54 (-CH2-), 40.59,44.31 (NMe2), 44.41,44.47,66.20
`(CH2Ph), 127.70,127.75,127.84,128.22, and 136.45 (Ph),
`156.24 (C=0), 181.80 (CHS).
`JV-Ethy 1-JV-octylthiourea (5). The experimental pro-
`cedure of the synthesis of 9 was adopted. Thus octylamine
`(402 mg, 3 mmol) and ethyl
`isothiocyanate (270 mg, 3
`mmol) gave 660 mg of thiourea 5, which was 97.5%
`  NMR (CDC13):
`  0.86 (t, J = 6.2
`homogenous (GC).
`Hz, 3 H, (CH2)7Me), 1.24 (t, 3 H, CH^),
`1.35-1.47 (10
` ), 1.58 (m, 2 H, -CH2CH2NH-), 3.38-3.45 (4 H, -CH2Cff2-
`NH-), 5.77-5.80 (2  , NH). 13C NMR (CDC13):
`  13.97,
`14.20,22.51, 26.81, 28.91, 29.05,29.11,39.08,44.34,44.42,
`181.12 (CHS).
`JV-Ethyl-JV-[6-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]hexyl]-
`thiourea (12). The experimental procedure of the
`synthesis of 9 was adopted. Thus N- (benzyloxycarbonyl)-
`1,6-hexamethylenediamine (8) (100 mg, 0.4 mmol) and
`ethyl isothiocyanate (40 mg, 0.44 mmol) were combined
`in CHCI3 to give 150 mg of the crude product with a purity
`  NMR (CDC13)   1.18 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3
`of 86% (GC).
`H, CH3), 1.32 (4  ), 1.45-1.57 (4  ), 3.14 (t, J = 6.6 Hz,
`2 H, -CH2NHCOO-), 3.41 (4 H, -Ctf2NH-), 4.96 (2 H,
`Ctf2Ph), 7.26-7.33 (5H,Ph). 13C NMR (CDC13):   14.17,
`25.81, 25.94, 28.64, 29.56, 38.94, 40.47, 43.91,66.39 (CH2-
`Ph), 127.66,127.90,128.30, and 136.28 (Ph), 156.52 (C=0),
`181.19 (CHS). MS: m/e 337.1 (M+).
`JV-Ethyl-)V’’-(6-cyanohexyl)thiourea (15). The ex-
`perimental procedure of the synthesis of 9 was adopted.
`Thus 6-aminohexanenitrile (2.856 g, 22.8 mmol) and ethyl
`isothiocyanate (2.05 g) were combined in CHCI3 to give
`  NMR
`4.90 g of thiourea (15) (89.2% purity by GC).
`(CDCI3):   1.23 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.52-1.73 (6 H),
`2.37 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, Ctf2C=N), 3.41-3.51 (4 H, -CHr
`NH-), 5.77-5.80 (2 H,-NJf-). 13C NMR (CDC13):   13.68,
`13.73,16.39,24.30,25.19,27.64,38.45,43.27,119.32 (CssN),
`180.51 (O-S).
`l,6-Hexamethylenebis(ethylthiourea) (23). To a
`solution of 1.351 g of ethyl isothiocyanate (15 mmol) in 10
`mL of CHClg was added dropwise 874 mg of 1,6-diami-
`nohexane (7.5 mmol) predissolved in 10 mL of CHCI3.
`The agitation continued for 2 h at room temperature as
`the reaction mixture gradually turned milky and viscous.
`The formed white solid was not soluble in hexane or Et20,
`poorly soluble in ethyl acetate and CHCI3, and freely
`soluble in acetone and MeOH. Recrystallization of the
`crude product in MeOH improved its purity from 40% to
`over 75% (GC), and it was identified by 1H NMR as bisthio-
`  NMR (CDC13):   1.19 (6 H, CH3), 1.22 (4 H),
`urea 23.
`I. 56 (4 H), 3.46 (8 H, -CH2NH-), 6.26-6.32 (4  , NH),
`This material was used without further purification.
`p-Phenylenebis(ethylthiourea) (26). To a solution
`of 811 mg of p-phenylenediamine (7.5 mmol) in 15 mL of
`acetone was added 1.351 g of ethyl
`isothiocyanate (15
`mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred 12 hr at room
`temperature and the formed precipitate was isolated by
`filtration, washed with cold methanol, and dried. The
`light brown precipitate was soluble in MeOH and DMSO,
`but not soluble in acetone, benzene, or CHCI3. The solid
`product (510 mg) showed UV absorbance on silica gel TLC
`(Rf 0.6, CHsCl/MeOH/EtsN = 90/10/5), and was homo-
`  NMR (DMSO-de):
`  1.10 (t, J = 7.2
`geneous by GC.
`
`

`

`234 BloconJugate Chem., Vol. 2, No. 4, 1991
`Hz, 6 H, CH3), 3.45-3.49 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 4 H, -CH2NH-),
`7.31 (s, 4 H, Ph).
`Ethyl[6-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]hexyl]carbo-
`diimide (13). To a suspension of mercuric oxide (100 mg)
`in dry acetone (15 mL) was added thiourea 12 (77 mg)
`predissolved in 5 mL of dry acetone and refluxed for 3 h.
`Black mercuric sulfide was formed and was removed by
`filtration through Celite, dried (MgSOJ, and concentrated
`to give 60 mg of the product with a purity of 93% (GC).
`  1.11-1.45 (8  ), 3.06-3.16 (6 H,
`  NMR (CDCla):
`-CH2N=C=N- and CH2NHCOO), 4.98 (2 H, Cff2Ph),
`7.24 (5 H, Ph). 13C NMR (CDCI3):
`  16.58, 26.13, 26.29,
`29.73, 31.00, 40.79, 41.34, 46.44, 66.38 (Cif2Ph), 127.91,
`128.34, and 136.50 (Ph), 156.30 (C=0) IR: 2120 (s,
`-N=C=N-) cm-1. MS: m/e 303.2 (M+).
`[3-(Dimethylamino)propyl][6-[(benzoyloxycarbon-
`yl)amino]hexyl]carbodiimide (10) was prepared as
`described for carbodiimide 13, except that the crude
`product was chromatographed with a column packed with
`silica gel (CHCla/EtaN = 95/5). Thus, 77 mg of the
`thiourea 3 gave 15 mg of pure carbodiimide 6. 1H NMR
`  1.24-1.74 (10 H), 2.22 (s, 6 H, N(CH3)2, 2.34
`(CDCla):
`(t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2  ), 3.16-3.26 (6 H, -CH2N=C=N- and
`CH2NHCOO), 5.08 (s, 2 H, benzyl methylene), 7.34 (5 H,
`benzene). 13C NMR (CDC13):   26.23,26.42,29.28,29.89,
`31.11,44.80,45.47,46.51,66.55 (CH2Ph), 128.04 and 128.46
`(Ph), 156.38 (C=0). IR: 2126 (s, -N=C=N-) cm"1. MS:
`m/e 360 (M+).
`Ethyltridecylcarbodiimide (3) was prepared as de-
`scribed for carbodiimide 13. Thus 320 mg of N-ethyl-
`N'-tridecylthiourea (2) gave 180 mg of carbodiimide 3,
`which was 97.4 % homogeneous by GC. 1H NMR (CDC13):
`  0.87 (t, 3 H, CH3(CH2)i2), 1.21-1.33 (20  , 1.57 (2 H,
`-CH2CH2N=C=N-), 3.17-3.24 (4 H, -CH2N=C=N-).
`IR: 2120.1 cm'1 (s, -N=C=N-).
`Ethyl-3-octylcarbodiimide (6) was prepared as de-
`scribed for carbodiimide 13. Thus 600 mg of N-ethyl-
`N'-octylthiourea (5) gave 434 mg of carbodiimide 6, which
`  NMR (CDC13):
`  0.87 (t, 3
`was 97.2% homogeneous.
`H, CH3(CH2)7), 1.20-1.26 (12  ),
`1.56 (2 H, -CH2-
`CH2N=C=N-), 3.19-3.24 (4 H, -CH2N=C=N-).
`IR:
`2128.5 cm’1 (s, -N=C=N-).
`Ethyl[6-(trifluoroacetamido)hexyl]carbodiimide
`(18) was prepared as described for carbodiimide 13. Thus
`108 mg of jV-ethyl-N'-[6-(trifluoroacetamido)hexyl]thio-
`urea (17) gave 90 mg of carbodiimide (18). GC showed the
`compound decomposed at elevated temperature. 1H NMR
`(CDC13):   1.23 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CHs), 1.25-1.58 (8 H),
`3.19-3.26 (m, 4 H, -CH2N=C=N-), 3.35-3.77 (2 H, CHr
`IR: 2128.5 cm"1 (s, -N=C=N-).
`NHCOCFs).
`l,6-Hexamethylenebis(ethylcarbodiimide) (24). The
`dehydrosulfurization of bisthiourea 23 with mercuric oxide
`in acetone was performed for 2 h, with the oil bath at 72
`°C. Higher temperature and longer reaction time may
`cause polymerization. Thus, the crude product after the
`reflux of 76.8 mg of bisthiourea 23 and 192 mg of HgO (in
`acetone) was purified by extracting with cold hexane to
`  NMR (CDC13):   0.87 (6  ), 1.21—
`give 22.5 mg of 24.
`I. 41 (4  ), 1.54-1.61 (4  ), 3.19-3.27 (m, 8 H,
`IR: 2124 cm-1 (s,-N=C=N-).
`-CH2N=C=N-).
`p-Phenylenebis(ethylcarbodiimide) (27) was pre-
`pared following the method above for biscarbodiimide 24,
`using 108 mg of the aromatic bisthiourea 26. The crude
`product was filtered through a silica gel column to give 45
`mg of aromatic biscarbodiimide 27, which was 97.3%
`homogeneous (GC). The compound was stored in a

`refrigerator and used within 3 days of preparation.
`NMR (CDC13):
`  1.33 (t, 6 H, methyls), 3.41-3.44 (4 H,
`
`Kuo et al.
`
`-CH2N=€=N-), 6.98 (s, 4 H,-C4H4-).
`IR: 2120.1 cm"1
`(s, -N=C=N-). MS: m/z 214.1 (M+), intensity 100.
`General Procedure of Carbodiimide Reactions with
`NaHA. Sodium hyaluronate was dissolved in water to a
`concentration of ca. 4 mg/mL. For some reactions, as
`indicated below, amine was mixed with NaHA. The pH
`of the mixture was adjusted to 4.75 by 0.1 N HC1. The
`designed carbodiimide or commercially available carbo-
`diimide was dissolved in water or 2-propanol, depending
`upon its solubility. After mixing HA and carbodiimide
`solutions, a pH increase was immediately observed. The
`reaction was monitored by pH meter and 0.1 N HC1 was
`added dropwise to keep the pH at 4.75. The reaction was
`allowed to proceed for 2 h at room temperature. Then
`NaCl was added to make 5% w/vof the reaction mixture.
`Ethanol equal to 3 volumes of the reaction mixture was
`added and a stringy precipitate was obtained. The
`precipitate was redissolved for a second and third pre-
`cipitation, thus removing all the unreacted or produced
`small organic compounds. The final precipitate was
`dissolved in deionized water to a concentration of no more
`than 6 mg/mL and was then lyophilized. The NMR
`sample solution of NaHA or modified NaHA was prepared
`by dissolving 5-10 mg of the lyophilized product into 1
`mL of D20. The dissolution could be expedited by vor-
`texing the sample and adding NaOD (sample pH —14).
`The ratio of the reagents is defined as the molar equiv-
`alency ratio based upon the reaction of the carboxyl (HA)
`and carbodiimide functional groups.
`IV-Acylurea Products of HA and [3-(Dimethy!ami-
`no)propyl]ethylcarbodiimide (EDC) (la-e). The above
`procedure was adopted in making these JV-acylurea
`derivatives. The amount of reactants used and the
`analytical results are summarized as follows.
`la: The ratio of 1,6-diaminohexane/EDC was 3/1. The
`ratio of EDC/HA was 1/10. Thus NaHA (247.9 mg, 0.618
`mequiv) and EDC (11.98 mg, 0.062 mmol) gave 221 mg of
`the lyophilized product (85 % recovery). No amide linkage
`between HA and diaminohexane was formed. The purified
`product gave a negative ninhydrin test result. 1H NMR
`  1.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3CH2N), 1.64 (m, 2
`(D20):
` ), 2.18 (s, 6 H, (Ctf)3N), 2.34 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2  ), 3.11
`(m, 4 H, CH2N).
`lb: The ratio of 1,6-diaminohexane/EDC was 5/1. The
`ratio of EDC/HA was 1/10. Thus NaHA (246.4 mg, 0.615
`mequiv) and EDC 11.78 mg, 0.062 mmol) gave 226 mg of
`the lyophilized product (88% recovery). The analytical
`results of ninhydrin and   NMR are identical with those
`of la.
`lc: The ratio of 1,6-diaminohexane/EDC was 10/1. The
`ratio of EDC/HA was 1/10. Thus NaHA (247.7 mg, 0.618
`mequiv) and EDC (11.84 mg, 0.062 mmol) gave 232 mg of
`the lyophilized product (89.5% recovery). The analytical
`results of ninhydrin and 1H NMR are identical with use
`of la.
`Id: The ratio of 1,6-diaminohexane/EDC was 100/1.
`The ratio of EDC/HA was 1/10. Thus NaHA (122 mg,
`0.304 mequiv) and EDC (11.78 mg, 0.062 mmol) gave 114
`mg of the lyophilized product (85.4 % recovery). The nin-
`hydrin test result was negative.
`le: Thermally degraded NaHA with molecular weight
`of 60 000 was used in this reaction. The ratio of NaHA/
`1,6-diaminohexane/EDC was 1/1/1. Thus NaHA (264
`mg, 0.66 mequiv) and EDC (126.5 mg, 0.66 mmol) gave
`735 mg of the product which included le and NaCl co-
`precipitate. No amide linkage between NaHA and di-
`aminohexane was detected from NMR. The purified
`product showed less than 1% of the free amino group
`
`

`

`Modificaton of Hyaluronic Acid by Carbodllmktes
`  NMR showed no amine
`during the ninhydrin test.
`  NMR (D20):
` -methylene protons expected at   2.6.
`  1.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, CHs of N-acylurea), 1.21 (t, CHs of
`O-acylisourea) (  1.12/  1.21 > 4/1), 2.21 (s, (CH3)2N),
`2.37, 3.15 (m,  -CH2 of acylureas).
`O-Acylurea Product of NaHA and EDC (If). The
`above procedure was also followed. The reaction condition
`was the same as for le, except that NaHA was not thermally
`degraded. Thus NaHA (250.8 mg, 0.627 mequiv) and EDC
`(120.2 mg, 0.627 mmol, in 20 mL of water) gave 873 mg
`of the product which included If and NaCl coprecipitate.
`No amide linkage between NaHA and diaminohexane was
`detected from NMR. The purified product showed less
`than 1% of the free amino group during the ninhydrin
`  NMR (D20):   1.12 (t, CH3 of N-acylurea), 1.21
`test.
`(t, J = 7.2 Hz, CHs, of O-acylisourea) (  1.21/  1.12 > 5/1),
`2.21 (s, (CH3)2N), 2.38 (t, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.15 (m, ct-CH2 of
`acylureas).
`Acylurea Product of NaHA and Carbodiimide 6 (7a-
`c). The above procedure was followed. 2-Propanol (3
`mL) was used to dissolve the carbodiimide.
`7a: The ratio of carbodiimide/NaHA was 1/20. Thus
`NaHA (454 mg, 1.13 mequiv) and carbodiimide 6 (10.82
`mg, 0.056 mmol) gave 440 mg of 7a (94.6% recovery). The
`Intrinsic viscosity (IV):
`proton uptake was 0.02 mmol.
`2866 mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`7b: The ratio of carbodiimide/NaHA was 1/10. Thus
`NaHA (381 mg, 0.95 mequiv) and carbodiimide 6 (18.2
`mg, 0.095 mmol) gave 388 mg of 7b (95.6 % recovery). The
`IV: 2730 mL/g (starting
`proton uptake was 0.04 mmol.
`NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`7c: The ratio of carbodiimide/NaHA was 1/5. Thus
`NaHA (477 mg, 1.19 mequiv) and carbodiimide 6 (45.6
`mg, 0.238 mmol) gave 465 mg of 7c (89.0% recovery). The
`IV: 2534 mL/g (starting
`proton uptake was 0.1 mmol.
`NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`Acylurea Product of HA and Carbodiimide 3 (4a-
`c). The above procedure was followed. 2-Propanol (3
`In all three
`mL) was used to dissolved the carbodiimide.
`reactions, the proton uptake was less than 0.005 mmol.
`4a: The ratio of carbodiimide/HA was 1/20. Thus
`NaHA (444 mg, 1.1 mequiv) and carbodiimide 3 (15.4 mg,
`IV:
`0.055 mmol) gave 397 mg of 4a (89.5% recovery).
`2401 mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`4b: The ratio of carbodiimide/HA was 1/10. Thus
`NaHA (400 mg, 1.0 mequiv) and carbodiimide 3 (25.8 mg,
`IV: 2591
`0.1 mmol) gave 386 mg of 4b (90.8% recovery).
`mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g). Additional proton
`to HA from 4b was not observed, but acid hy-
`resonance
`drolysis of 4b (pH = 1, boiling water bath, 4 h) produced
`  NMR signals as follows.
`  NMR (D20):   1.34,1.37,
`and 2.14 (br band, aliphatic protons), 3.12 (a-CH2 of ac-
`ylureas).
`4c: The ratio of carbodiimide/HA was 1/5. Thus NaHA
`(529 mg, 1.32 mequiv) and carbodiimide 3 (66 mg, 0.264
`IV: 2651
`mmol) gave 573 mg of 4c (96.3% recovery).
`mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`Acylurea Products of NaHA and Carbodiimide 10
`(11a,b). The above procedure was followed.
`11a: The ratio of carbodiimide/NaHA was 1/10. Thus
`NaHA (252 mg, 0.63 mequiv) and carbodiimide 10 (25.2
`mg, 0.063 mmol) gave 232 mg lyophilized product 1 la (92 %
`IV: 2760 mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`recovery).
`  NMR (D20):   1.25,1.58,2.12 (N(CJ¥3)2), 3.07 (a-CH2
`of acylureas), 7.39 (Ph).
`lib: The ratio of carbodiimide/NaHA was 1/5. Thus
`NaHA (126 mg, 0.315 mequiv) and carbodiimide 10 (25.2
`mg, 0.063 mmol) gave 119.1 mg of the lyophilized product
`
`236
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 2, No. 4, 1991
`lib (94.5% recovery). The aqueous solution of lib was
`accidentally left stirring overnight without cooling. The
`IV:
`temperature of the solution was measured as 42 °C.
`2323 mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g).   NMR (D20):
`  1.26,1.42,1.62,2.21,3.09 (a-CH2 of acylureas), 7.41 (Ph).
`Acylurea Product of NAHA and Carbodiimide 13
`(14). The above procedure was followed. The ratio of
`carbodiimide/NaHA was 1/5. Thus NaHA (90.6 mg, 0.225
`mequiv) and carbodiimide 13 (18 mg, 0.045 mmol) gave
`105 mg of the lyophilized product 14. The degree of
`coupling was measured as 16% by UV (240 nm). The
`IV: 2734 mL/g (starting
`proton uptake was 0.035 mmol.
`NaHA,2354mL/g). xHNMR(D20): 60.93(Cff3ofN-ac-
`ylurea), 1.33, 1.56, 3.15 (a-CH2 of acylureas), 7.43 (Ph).
`Acylurea Product of HA and Carbodiimide 18 (19).
`The above procedure was followed. The ratio of carbo-
`diimide/NaHA was 1/5. Thus NaHA (400 mg, 1.0 me-
`quiv) and carbodiimide 18 (60 mg, 0.2 mmol) gave 392 mg
`of 19 (85.2 % recovery). The proton uptake was 0.06 mmol.
`  NMR
`IV: 3115 mL/g (starting NaHA, 2966 mL/g).
`(D20):   1.11 (t, CHs of JV-acylurea), 1.21 (CHs of O-acyl-
`isourea) (  1.11/  1.21 > 5/1), 1.36, 1.49, 2.61 (CH2NH2
`from decomposition of CH2NHCOCF3 in NaOD), 3.12 (a-
`CH2 of acylureas).
`NaHA Cross-Linked by Biscarbodiimide 24 (25a,b).
`The general procedure of the carbodiimide reaction with
`NaHA was adopted. The ratio of carbodiimide/NaHA
`was 1/10.
`25a: The NaHA concentration was adjusted to 3.2 mg/
`mL and the carbodiimide concentration in 2-propanol was
`2.75 mg/mL. Thus NaHA (423 mg, 1.05 mequiv) and bis-
`carbodiimide 24 (11 mg, 0.05 mmol) gave 382 mg of 25a
`(88% recovery). The proton uptake was 0.04 mmol.
`During the purification process, the precipitated NaHA
`  NMR
`derivative was only partially soluble in water.
`  1.11 (t, CHs of N-acylurea), 1.36, 1.51, 3.12 (a-
`(D20):
`CH2 of N-acylurea).
`25b: The NaHA concentration was adjusted to 5.2 mg/
`mL and the carbodiimide concentration in 2-propanol was
`0.92 mg/mL. Thus NaHA (416 mg, 1.04 mequiv) and bis-
`carbodiimide 24 (11 mg, 0.05 mmol) gave 400 mg of 25b
`(93.6 % recovery). The proton uptake was 0.03 mmol. IV:
`2554 mL/g (starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g).
`NaHA Cross-Linked by Biscarbodiimide 27 (28a,b).
`The general procedure of the carbodiimide reaction with
`NaHA was adopted.
`28a: The NaHA concentration was adjusted to 4.2 mg/
`mL and the carbodiimide concentration in 2-propanol was
`1.5 mg/mL. The ratio of carbodiimide/HA was 0.18. Thus
`sodium hyaluronate (386 mg, 0.96 mequiv) and biscar-
`bodiimide 27 (18 mg, 0.084 mmol) gave 389 mg of 28a
`(96.4 % recovery). The proton uptake was 0.12 mmol. The
`dried polymer from the first precipitation swelled in 200
`volumes of water at 4 °C to form a cross-linked insoluble
`gel. The absorption of water appeared to reach an equi-
`librium after 5 days. Part of the gel was cut and stored
`in water at room temperature.
`28b: The NaHA concentration was adjusted to 4.2 mg/
`mL and the carbodiimide concentration in 2-propanol was
`0.89 mg/mL. The ratio of carbodiimide/HA was 0.10.
`Thus NaHA (404 mg, 1.01 mequiv) and biscarbodiimide
`27 (10.7 mg, 0.05 mmol) gave 393 mg of 28b (95 % recovery).
`IV: 3073 mL/g
`The proton uptake was 0.08 mmol.
`(starting NaHA, 2354 mL/g). XH NMR (D20):
`  1.09 (t,
`C/f3CH2 of N-acylurea), 1.19 (t, CH3CH2 of O-acylisourea)
`(  1.19/  1.09 > 2/1), 1.62, 3.04 (a-CH2 of acylureas).
`jV-Ethyl-JV-(6-aminohexyl)thiourea (16). To a so-
`lution of 1.327 g of nitrile 15 (6.6 mmol) in 50 mL of dried
`
`

`

`236 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 2, No. 4, 1991
`THF was added 600 mg of borane-dimethyl sulfide (7.92
`mmol). The reactor was heated to reflux, and dimethyl
`sulfide was distilled off. After 3 h, the mixture was cooled
`to room temperature and quenched with 3 mL of 1N HC1.
`Then pH was adjusted to 9 with 1N NaOH and saturated
`with K2CO3. Et20 was added to separate the layers. The
`aqueous layer was extracted twice with CHCI3, and the
`combined organics were concentrated to give crude thio-
`urea 16 (52%). The   NMR spectrum showed the ratio
`of the amine  -methylene protons over nitrile a-methyl-
`  1.21 (t, J
`ene protons as over 10/1. 1H NMR (CDCI3):
`= 7.2 Hz, 3 H, C/i3CH2NH), 1.24-1.64 (8 H, 2.66 (t, J =
`6.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2NH2), 3.44 (4 H, -CH2NH-), 5.92 (2 H,
`NH). 13C NMR (CDCI3):   14.29 (CH3CH2), 26.37,26.58,
`28.95, 33.34, 39.02, 41.87 (-CH2NH-), 44.20 (CH2NH2),
`181.25 (C=S).
`JV-Ethyl-jV'-[6-(trifluoroacetamido)hexyl]thio-
`(17). To an aqueous solution of 350 mg of thiourea
`urea
`16 (1.5 mmol) mixed with 5 mL of 0.2 M NaHCOs was
`added 480 mg of ethyl thiotrifluoroacetate (3 mmol). The
`reaction was continued at room temperature overnight
`and a white precipitate was formed. The product was
`isolated by ether extraction to give 317 mg of a white solid,
`which was 84.4 % homogeneous by GC.   NMR (CDCI3):
`  1.24 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3CH2), 1.37-1.40 (m, 4 H),
`1.58-1.64 (m, 4 H), 3.38 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 2 H, Ctf2NHCOCF3),
`3.47 (4 H, -CH2NH-). 13C NMR (CDC13):
`  14.18 (CH3-
`CH2) 25.99, 28.62,28.77,39.06, 39.65,44.08, 65.79,117.74
`(CF3), 157.22 (C=0), 181.22 (C=S).
`Detrifluoroacetylation of HA Derivative 19 to
`Amine-Functionalized HA (20a). HA-trifluoroaceta-
`mide (19) (12.6 mg) was treated for 14 h at room tem-
`perature and pH 11. Then 0.1 N HC1 was added to adjust
`the pH to 7.0-7.5. NaHA reaction products were pre-
`cipitated with ethanol as described above. The precipitate
`was collected after centrifugation. The ethanol precipi-
`repeated three times and the final aqueous
`tation was
`solution was lyophilized to give 11.9 mg of a white, fibrous
`material. To test the amount of free amino group attached
`to the NaHA polymer chain, an aqueous solution of the
`NaHA-trifluoroacetamide (19) (1 mg/mL) was prepared
`and a quantitative ninhydrin test was performed. The
`percentage ratio of the detected free amine over NaHA
`IV: 2865 mL/g (starting material (19), 3115
`was 3.1%.
`mL/g).
`Detrifluoroacetylation of HA Derivative 19 to
`Amine 20b. The experimental procedure for 20a was
`adopted except that the pH of the reaction mixture was
`adjusted to 11.5-12.0. Fourteen milligrams of the starting
`material (19) was used. The precipitate of 20b was less
`stringy than that of 20a. The lyophilized solid weighed
`19.3 mg. Apparently, NaCl coprecipitated with and
`adhered to the NaHA derivative and was therefore also
`collected. The percentage ratio of the detected free amine
`IV: 2286 mL/g (starting material
`over NaHA was 4.2%.
`(19), 3115 mL/g).
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Commercially available carbodiimides have been widely
`used for carboxyl activation, such as in protein modification
`(18, 20). EDC, [3-(dimethylamino)propyl]ethylcarbodi-
`imide, for example, is a water-soluble carbodiimide. The
`following mechanism of the carbodiimide reaction in
`protein modifications is generally accepted: carbodiim-
`ide reacts with carboxyl groups to form an unstable,
`intermediate O-acylisourea, which, in the absence of nu-
`cleophiles, rearranges to a stable N-acylurea “by way of
`In the presence of
`a cyclic electronic displacement” (21).
`
`RCOOH
`
`RCOCT + H+
`
` ·
`. R2"’
`o^n'H
`IR1"2
`
`r>n.c.nr2
`
`0—*N migration
`
`0
`
`Rl~.
`
`NH HN
`
`Kuo et al.
`

`
`O
`
`/R,0,i
`
`N
`
`O-acylurea
`
`0
`
`,
`
`/R2 R/A„/ R
`
`  R
`
`NH
`
`amide
`N-acylurea
`Figure 2. Mechanism of reaction between carboxylic acid and
`carbodiimide with and without primary amines.
`a primary amine as nucleophile, the O-acylisourea for-
`mation is followed by a nucleophilic attack, forming an
`amide linkage between the amine and the acid (18) (Figure
`2). An acidic environment is needed to catalyze the
`reaction, presumably through the protonation of the car-
`bodiimide nitrogen. The reduced electron density at the
`carbodiimide central carbon is favorable to the nucleo-
`philic attack of the carboxylate anion. At pH 4.75, car-
`bodiimide nitrogens appear to be sufficiently protonated,
`while HA mainly exists as the carboxylate. The proton
`is not only a catalyst, but also a reagent. The stoichi-
`ometry of this process shows that one proton is consumed
`to form the urea compound. Thus the reaction can be
`monitored by the observed increase of pH and the
`consumption of hydrochloric acid during the reaction
`necessary to keep the reaction pH at 4.75.
`Amidation reactions of glycosaminoglycans and primary
`amines catalyzed by carbodiimides have been reported.
`One example by Danishefsky and Siskovic is the reaction
`between glycine methyl ester (the amine component) and
`hyaluronic acid. The mechanism of the reaction was
`reported to be the same as mentioned above, i.e., the
`“condensation of the uronic acid moiety with EDC to form
`the O-acylurea followed by the displacement of the
`substituted urea by the amino group” (15). Similarly, we
`attempted to use diaminohexane and EDC to build an
`amide linkage between HA and the diamine.
`The concentration of NaHA aqueous solution was
`adjusted to ca. 4 mg/mL, so that the solution would not
`be too viscous for thorough mixing with the added
`chemicals. A preliminary study without primary amine
`showed that carbodii

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket