throbber
ELSEVIER
`
`0141-3910(95)00041-0
`
`48 (I 995) 269-273
`
`Polymer Degradacion and Stability
`
`© 1995 Elsevier
`
`Science Limited
`
`
`
`Printed in Northern Ireland. All rights reserved
`
`0141-3910/95 /$09.50
`
`
`
`Hydrolytic degradation of hyaluronic acid
`
`
`
`
`
`Y.Tokita & A. Okamoto
`
`
`
`
`
`Research Center, Denki Kagaku Ko?,yo Co. Ltd., 3-5-1 Asahimachi, Machida, Tokyo 194, Japan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Received 24 January 1995; accepted 8 February 1995)
`
`
`
`
`
`The hydrolytic degradation of hyaluronic acid (HA) was investigated through
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`kinetic measurements. The first-order rate constants were obtained under
`
`
`
`
`different pH conditions on the basis of the decrease in the molecular weight.
`
`
`
`
`The mechanism of the hydrolytic degradation of HA was also investigated by
`
`
`
`theoretical calculations (MNDO-MO) on model compounds of HA.
`
`
`
`
`It was speculated that hydrolysis occurs in acid solution on the glucuronic
`
`
`
`
`acid residue and the hemiacetal ring remains, while the destruction of the
`
`
`N-acetylglucosamine residue takes place in basic solution.
`
`
`
`
`These speculations are consistent with the structurnl analysis of the
`
`
`degradation products by 13C-NMR.
`
`1.INTRODUCTION
`
`2.1. Materials and methods
`
`NMR structure analysis of degradation products,
`
`
`
`
`
`we have predicted the reaction sites and
`
`mechanisms of the hydrolysis.
`
`
`Hyaluronic acid (HA) is an unbranched high
`
`
`
`molecular weight polysaccharide. It consists of
`
`
`2-acetamide-2-deoxy-,B-D-glucose and /3-D­
`
`
`glucuronic acid residues linked 1-3 and 1-4,
`2.EXPERIMENTAL
`
`
`alternately. It is widely distributed in the
`
`
`
`connecting tissuest of the human body as well as
`
`
`
`2 One of the interesting features is
`in bacteria.
`High molecular weight sodium hyaluronate
`
`
`
`that HA has an extremely high molecular weight
`3 Aqueous solutions
`
`
`
`samples were extracted from the culture broth of
`among glucosaminoglycans.
`
`
`by Denki Kagaku Streptococus equi and purified
`
`of HA show very high viscosity due to its high
`
`Kogyo Co. Ltd. One weight percent aqueous
`molecular weight.
`
`
`
`solutions of HA were prepared by stirring for 3 h
`
`
`On the other hand, taking advantage of some
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`useful features (keeping humidity, high viscosity to dissolve completely. The HA solution was
`
`
`
`and the nature of decomposition etc.), there have
`
`divided into equal parts and sealed in 1 ml
`
`been developments of new drugs using HA.
`
`
`
`ampoules followed by heating in an oil bath at
`
`
`
`constant temperature. The number-average mol­
`
`
`Therefore, the basic investigation of HA
`
`
`ecular weight was determined by gel-permeation
`
`
`
`degradation is very important including the
`
`
`chromatography (column: Shodex OHpak SB806
`
`
`
`kinetics of degradation, degradation product
`
`X2, solvent: 0.1M NaNO3 aq, flow rate:
`
`
`
`analysis and reaction mechanism. It has been
`
`
`1.2 ml/min, detector: J ASCO830RI, column
`
`
`reported that the degradation of HA is caused by
`
`
`
`with standard HA temperature: 40°C, calibrated
`4 and active oxygen in the form of
`hydrolysis
`
`hydroxyl radicals.
`
`
`
`
`s;imples of different intrinsic viscosity). The pH
`
`5 7 Recently, the energy barrier
`
`
`conditions were controlled by a wide buffer9
`
`
`
`of glycoside bond cleavage with hyaluronane in
`
`
`
`acidic condition has been calculated by Pratt et
`
`
`which was prepared as follows: A-Solution
`8 In the
`al. by means of the MNDO-MO method.
`
`(tris-(hydroxylmethyl)-aminomethane 0.1M, KCI
`
`
`
`0.lM, potassium phosphate monobasic 0.lM,
`
`
`
`present study, we have investigated the rate of
`
`
`
`pH HA hydrolytic degradation under different
`
`
`citric acid anhydrous 0.lM, and sodium tetrabor­
`ate 0.lM); B-Solution (HCI aq 0.4M or NaOH aq
`
`
`
`conditions. Furthermore, on the ba_sis of quantum
`
`chemical calculations (MNDO-MO)10 and 13C-
`
`
`0.4M). pH solutions were prepared by adding the
`
`
`269
`
`ALL 2038
`PROLLENIUM V. ALLERGAN
`IPR2019-01505 et al.
`
`

`

`270
`
`
`
`Y.Tokitu, A. Okumoto
`
`
`
`
`
`Integrating eqn ( 4), we obtain
`
`A-Solution diluted 4 times to the appropriate
`
`
`
`amount of B-Solution. The samples for 11C-NMR
`
`
`
`analysis of degradation products were prepared
`
`as follows: the acidic sample (pH 1.44) was
`According to eqn (5), l/[DP]n-1/[DP]no plotted
`
`
`
`
`prepared using aqueous HCl solution and heated
`
`
`against t gives a straight line as shown in Fig. 1.
`at 60°C for 10 days, the basic sample (pH 13.30)
`
`The values of the first-order rate constant
`kh
`
`
`was prepared using NaOII solution and heated at
`
`
`were evaluated from the slopes of the straight
`60°C for 7 days.
`
`
`
`
`lines obtained under different conditions. These
`
`
`linear plots show that the degradation reaction of
`
`
`2.2. Rate constant of the hydrolysis reactions of
`
`HA is due to random chain scission and
`
`
`accordingly obeys first-order kinetics.
`
`1/[DP],, -1/[DP],,0 = kh · t
`
`(5)
`
`
`HA
`
`The rate of the hydrolytic degradation of HA in
`
`
`
`
`aqueous solution was followed by the measure­
`
`
`
`ment of the number-average molecular weight.
`
`
`Assuming the rate of the main chain scission is
`13C normal and DEPT11•12 spectra were measured
`
`
`
`proportional to the number of glycoside bonds
`on a modified JNM-ALPHA 500 (JEOL).
`
`(first-order), we obtain
`
`2.3. NMR measurement
`
`(1)
`2.4. Calculation
`
`Nb: number of main chain scissions, M0: total
`
`number of monomer units, P: number of polymer
`The semi-empirical SCF MO method, MNDO
`
`
`molecules, I' = I'0 I Nb (I'0: number of polymers
`
`was employed using the MOPAC 5.01 package."
`at t = 0), M0 - P: number of glycosidc
`bonds, kh:
`
`
`first-order rate constant of main chain scission.
`
`The number of main chain scissions at time t is
`
`expressed by the number average degree of
`3.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`zation [DP]" at time t and [DP]no at
`polymeri
`t =0.
`
`The rate of the hydrolytic degradation of HA in
`
`
`Nb= M0/[DP],, - M0/[DP],,
`(2)
`
`
`
`aqueous solution is strongly dependent on pH.
`of kt, at 40°C
`Table 1 shows the pH dependence
`From eqns (1) and (2):
`
`and 60°C. It is clear that HA is most stable at pH
`d(l/[DP],,)/(1 - 1/[DP],,) =kb· dt (3)
`
`
`
`values around neutrality and more labile in acidic
`
`
`
`conditions than basic conditions. In addition, HA
`Further, 1 « /[DP],, for HA with high molecu­
`
`is less stable at higher temperature.
`lar weight,
`
`
`
`For the theoretical molecular orbital calcula­
`(4)
`
`tion of the HA hydrolysis, two model compounds
`were chosen as shown in Fig. 2. In order to
`
`
`reduce end-group effects, we focused only upon
`
`
`
`the central residue, a glucuronic acid residue in
`
`the model A and a N-acethylglucosamine residue
`de bonds are
`
`in model B, and terminal glycosi
`
`substituted by methoxy groups in the model
`
`0
`
`•
`
`6
`
`�
`
`5
`
`4
`
`•
`
`3
`
`0
`
`-1
`0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
`Time (h)
`plot al pH 11. 80°C.
`Fig. 1. 1/(DP]n·l/[DP]no vs time (h)
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 1. Rate constant (kb) VS pH at 40°C and 60°C
`
`Temperature
`(degree)
`pH3
`
`----·-··-------
`
`k, (s ')
`
`pH7
`
`pHll
`
`40
`
`bU
`
`.S.OX 10 10 :'i.9 X 11 II 'i.3X 10-'"
`"
`10 7.6 X I()
`b.l X 10 g 2.5 X 10
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Hydrolytic degradation of hyaluronic acid
`
`271
`
`A
`
`
`
`
`
`3.1. Acidic hydrolysis of hyaluronic acid
`
`The results of the calculation clearly show that
`
`
`
`
`the electron density of LUMO on the glucuronic
`
`acid (HA units) is localized and that the
`
`
`hydrolytically active sites are on the Cl, C4 and
`
`
`
`
`carbonyl carbons. Among these, hydrolysis at Cl
`
`
`or C4 contributes to chain scission. In addition,
`
`
`hydrolysis at Cl might involve 2 reaction
`
`
`
`processes, glycoside bond cleavage 1-3 and ring
`
`
`
`opening, while hydrolysis at C4 results in a one
`
`
`
`step reaction for glycoside bond cleavage (1-4)
`
`(Fig. 3). On the other hand, from the results of
`
`
`13C-NMR (Fig. 5), the hemiacetal ring structure is
`
`
`maintained during the degradation of HA. Thus,
`for MNDO-MO calculations.
`
`
`the reaction mechanisms predicted from MNDO
`
`
`calculation were supported experimentally.
`
`NHCOCHs
`o�OH
`B xooc O
`0
`0 OH HO
`,,c,0{;)
`0 ."°(v""'
`CH2OH COOX
`OH
`Fig. 2. Model compounds
`
`3.2. Basic hydrolysis of sodium hyaluronate
`
`compounds. The molecular orbital calculation
`
`
`
`
`
`shows that the lowest unoccupied molecular
`
`
`
`orbital (LUMO) is localized on a glucuronic acid
`From the results of the calculation, it was clear
`
`
`
`
`
`residue and the highest occupied molecular
`
`
`that the electron density of HOMO on the
`
`orbital (HOMO) on a N-acethylglucosamine
`
`
`N-acethylglucosamine (HA units) was localized
`
`residue irrespective of the two model
`
`
`and the hydrolytically active sites are on the Cl,
`compounds.
`
`
`0 (ring) and amide nitrogen. Among them, only
`
`
`This result implies that HA hydrolysis under
`
`
`the Cl position contributes to the lowering of the
`
`
`acid conditions occurs on a glucuronic acid
`
`molecular weight of HA. In this case, the
`
`
`
`residue because of the nucleophilic nature of
`
`
`
`glycoside bond cleavage reaction on the Cl might
`
`acidic hydrolysis.
`On the other hand, the basic hydrolysis of HA
`
`
`is anticipated to start on a N-acethylglucosamine
`A
`
`
`
`residue because of the electrophilicity of basic
`
`
`hydrolysis. The mechanisms of HA hydrolysis
`
`under acidic and basic conditions will be
`
`discussed in detail.
`
`y
`
`(2)
`
`HOQOHHO 0---..._
`'-oH\ HO O
`
`B
`
`Fig. 3. Hydrolysis
`
`Fig. 4. Hydrolysis
`
`reaction mechanism of HA in the basic
`
`
`reaction mechanism of HA in acidic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`condition: figures are electron densities of HOMO.
`
`
`
`conditions: figures arc electron densities of LCMO.
`
`

`

`272
`
`
`
`Y. Tokita, A. Okamoto
`
`B
`
`',rH,. 1'
`
`A
`
`200
`
`150
`
`50
`JOO
`Chemical shift (ppm)
`
`[)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`products of hyaluronic acid (pH 1 ·44. aflcr 10 days). acid. (B) degradation Fig. 5. "C-NMR spectra (vs TSP): (A) hyaluronic
`
`involve two steps (contrary to acidic hydrolysis):
`
`
`
`pendent functional groups (Fig. 4), and this was
`
`
`by 13C-NMR (Fig. 6).
`
`
`the first step is the cleavage between Cl and C2,
`also confirmed
`
`and the second step is glycoside bond cleavage
`
`(1-4) (Fig. 4). In the first reaction, the production
`
`of methylene groups is to be expected.
`4.CONCLUSIONS
`
`The 13C-NMR spectrum of the basic hydrolysis
`
`
`products is shown in Fig. 6. In order to
`(1)The hydrolytic degradation of HA can be
`
`
`
`
`attributed to random chain scission and
`
`
`discriminate carbon species, the samples were
`
`measured by means of the DEPT method,ir>-
`
`
`accordingly obeys first-order kinetics.
`
`which confirmed the existence ot methylene
`
`(2)From the MNDO calculation on model
`
`
`compounds of HA, it was speculated that
`
`
`
`carbon. In addition, the production of sodium
`
`
`acetate was expected from the hydrolysis of
`
`
`acid and base catalysed hydrolyses occur
`
`12
`
`B
`
`0
`
`jl.
`
`A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 6.
`
`
`(0) CH,COONa, (0) methylene carbon.
`
`13C-NMR spectra (vs TSP): (A) hyaluronic acid, (B) degradation products of hyaluronic acid (pH 1 �-30. after 7 days),
`
`0
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Hydrolytic degradation of hyaluronic acid
`
`
`
`273
`
`
`
`
`5.Weissmann, B., Rappurt, M. M., Linker, A. & Meyer,
`on glucuronic acid and N-acethyl­
`
`K., J. Biol. Chem., (1953)
`205.
`
`
`
`glucosamine moieties, respectively. These
`
`
`
`
`
`speculations were supported by the results
`121.
`
`
`
`7.Sakashita, H., Maeda, K., Tokita, Y. & Miyoshi, T.. J.
`of 13C-NMR spectroscopy.
`
`
`
`Action Oxygen Free Radicals, 5 (1994) 211.
`
`
`8.Pratt, L. M. & Chu, C. C.. I Com put. Chem , 15 (1994)
`241.
`
`
`I.Casadaban, M. J. & Cohen, S. N., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.
`
`
`(1977) 4899,4907.
`
`
`U.S.A., 76 (1979) 4530.
`10.Davies, M., Analyst, 84 (1959) 248.
`
`
`
`659.2.Babior, B. M., New Engl. J. Med., 298 (1978)
`
`
`
`
`Phys., 77 (1982) 2745.
`
`
`
`3.Cleland, R. L., Biopolymers, 23 (1984) 647.
`
`
`
`4.Inoue, Y. & Nagasawa, K., Carbohydr. Res., 141 (1985)
`
`99.
`
`
`Reson., 48 (1982) 323.
`
`999.Dewar, M. J. S. & Thiel, W., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
`
`6.Jeanloz, R. W. & Jeanloz, D. A., Biochemiwy, 3 (1964)
`
`11.David, T. P., David, M. D. & Robbin, B., J. Chem.
`
`12.David, M. D., David, T. P. & Robbin, B., J. Magn.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket