throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROLLENIUM US INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ALLERGAN INDUSTRIE, SAS,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01505, Patent 8,450,475 B2
`IPR2019-01506, Patent 8,357,795 B2
`IPR2019-01508, Patent 9,238,013 B2
`IPR2019-01509, Patent 9,358,322 B2
`IPR2019-01617, Patent 8,822,676 B2
`IPR2019-01632, Patent 8,357,795 B2
`IPR2020-00084, Patent 9,089,519 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER ALLERGAN INDUSTRIE, SAS’S
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 13551-0081IP1
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`2001
`2002
`2003
`2004
`
`2005
`2006
`2007
`2008
`2009
`2010
`2011
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit Description
`Juvéderm Ultra™ XC Label
`Juvéderm Ultra Plus™ XC Label
`Juvéderm Voluma®XC Label
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0101959 to Marko et al,
`published May 27, 2004
`Excerpts from U.S. 8,822,676 file history
`Excerpts from U.S. 9,089,519 file history
`About Juvéderm Ultra Plus™ XC
`About Juvéderm Volbella® XC
`About Juvéderm Voluma® XC
`RESERVED
`Declaration in support of unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Elizabeth Flanagan
`
`i
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 13551-0081IP1
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Patent Owner (“Allergan Industrie,
`
`SAS”) respectfully requests that the Board recognize Elizabeth M. Flanagan as
`
`counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding. Patent Owner seeks the counsel of
`
`Elizabeth M. Flanagan due to her experience in representing Allergan Industrie,
`
`SAS in other patent-related matters and particularly due to her familiarity with the
`
`substantive and technical issues involved in these proceedings. This motion is
`
`authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response that was mailed on September 19, 2019.
`
`Patent Owner conferred with Petitioner, and Petitioner confirmed on June 2, 2020
`
`that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`Where the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a non-registered
`
`practitioner may be permitted to appear pro hac vice “upon a showing that counsel
`
`is an experienced litigating attorney and has established familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in the proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`
`Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (setting
`
`forth requirements for pro hac vice admission). As set forth in her declaration
`
`submitted herewith (Exhibit 2011), Ms. Flanagan is a Principal at Fish &
`
`Richardson P.C. and a patent litigation attorney with significant experience
`
`advising clients regarding patent matters, including as counsel in litigation. More
`
`specifically, Ms. Flanagan has represented Patent Owner in district court litigation
`
`1
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 13551-0081IP1
`
`involving two of the six patents at issue in these IPR proceedings, U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`8,357,795 and 8,450,475. Based on this underlying litigation and the other facts
`
`detailed below and in her declaration, Ms. Flanagan has significant familiarity with
`
`the particular subject matter in this IPR proceeding. Additionally, Ms. Flanagan
`
`concurrently applying to appear pro hac vice in all captioned cases.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`Ms. Flanagan is a patent litigation attorney with more than 11 years of
`
`experience representing clients in cases involving pharmaceuticals and medical
`
`devices. Ms. Flanagan regularly litigates patent cases before various federal
`
`district courts and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`Through her practice in such cases, Ms. Flanagan has gained substantial experience
`
`in jury trials, bench trials, discovery, Markman hearings, and appeals. Allergan
`
`Industrie, SAS provides Exhibit A, as evidence, Elizabeth M. Flanagan’s
`
`biography.
`
`Ms. Flanagan also has particular experience and familiarity with the
`
`substantive and technical issues involved in this inter partes review proceeding.
`
`Ms. Flanagan served as counsel for Allergan Industrie, SAS in district court
`
`litigation over U.S. Patent Nos. 8,357,795, which is at issue in IPR2019-01506 and
`
`IPR2019-01632, and U.S. Patent No. 8,450,475, which is at issue in IPR2019-
`
`01505. That litigation, Allergan USA, Inc. and Allergan Industrie, SAS v. Medicis
`
`2
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 13551-0081IP1
`
`Aesthetics Inc., et al., Case No. SACV 13-1436 AG (JPRx) (C.D. Cal.), settled
`
`during the course of expert discovery. In that case, Ms. Flanagan participated in
`
`many phases of the litigation, including fact discovery, expert discovery, and claim
`
`construction proceedings. Through her representation in this related matter,
`
`Allergan Industrie, SAS has developed a particular relationship with Ms. Flanagan
`
`such that it desires to continue that relationship for the purpose of these
`
`proceedings.
`
`Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a Declaration
`
`of Elizabeth M. Flanagan as required by the Order Authorizing Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice mailed September 19, 2019. As Ms. Flanagan stated in her
`
`accompanying Declaration, she has read, will comply with, and agrees to be
`
`subject to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice
`
`for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations. As also set forth
`
`in her Declaration, Ms. Flanagan is a member in good standing of the Bars of the
`
`State of Minnesota, Delaware, and Michigan, and is admitted to practice in
`
`numerous federal courts.
`
`Accordingly, Allergan Industrie, SAS submits that there is good cause under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for the Board to recognize Elizabeth M. Flanagan as counsel
`
`pro hac vice during these proceedings.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 13551-0081IP1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Dorothy P. Whelan/
`Dorothy P. Whelan
`Reg. No. 33,814
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 8, 2020
`
`
`Customer Number 26171
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Telephone: (612) 337-2508
`Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
`
`4
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 13551-0081IP1
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned
`
`certifies that on June 8, 2020, a complete and entire copy of this Unopposed
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission with supporting exhibit were provided via
`
`electronic service, to the Petitioner by serving the correspondence address of
`
`record as follows:
`
`Christopher L. Curfman
`William W. Cutchins
`Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC
`999 Peachtree St, NE
`Suite 1300
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Email:
`ccurfman@mcciplaw.com
`wcutchins@mcciplaw.com
`mcc.prollenium.ipr@mcciplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`/Jessica K. Detko/
`Jessica K. Detko
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(612) 337-2516
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket