throbber

`
`Brown LeMay Bursten
`
`CHEMISTRY
`
`lSE‘d Eighth Ed.UOfl
`
`
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 001
`
`

`

`Chemistry
`
`The Central Science
`
`Eighth Revised Edition
`
`Theodore L. Brown
`
`University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
`
`H. Eugene LeMay, Ir.
`
`University of Nevada, Reno
`
`Bruce E. Bursten
`
`The Ohio State University
`
`With contributions by Julia R. Burdge, University of Akron
`
`PRENTICE HALL
`
`Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458
`
`
`
`
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 002
`
`

`

`1
`
`. C
`__ .1 _
`~1- 4-
`._. 'h'
`"‘
`13‘
`
`Editor: John Challice
`Development Editor/Editor in Chief, Development: Carol Trueheart
`Associate Editor: Mary Hornby
`Editorial Assistants: Amanda K. Griffith, Gillian Buonanno
`Media Editor: Paul Draper
`Editorial/ Production Supervision: Bob Walters
`Art Director: Joseph Sengotta
`Assistant Art Director: John Christiana
`Page layout: Richard Foster, Karen Noferi, Karen Stephens, Amy Peltier, Jeff Henn,
`Joanne Del Ben, Donna Marie Paukovits
`Art Studios: Academy Artworks/Michael Goodman/BioGrafx/Wellington
`Editor in Chief: Paul F. Corey
`Director of Marketing: John Tweeddale
`Assistant Vice President ESM Production and Manufacturing: David W. Riccardi
`Executive Managing Editor: Kathleen Schiaparelli
`Art Manager: Gus Vibal
`Art Editor: Karen Branson
`Assistant Art Editor: Adam Velthaus
`Senior Marketing Manager: Steve Sartori
`Marketing Assistant: Dorothy Marrero
`Director, Creative Services: Paul Belfanti
`Associate Creative Director: Amy Rosen
`Interior Design: Judith A. Matz-Coniglio
`Manufacturing Manager: Trudy Pisciotti
`Photo Editor: Melinda Reo
`Photo Researcher: Yvonne Gerin
`Cover Illustration: ©Kenneth Eward /BioGrafx, 1999
`
`Copy Editor: Fay Ahuja
`
`© 2002, 2000, 1997, 1994, 1991, 1988, 1985, 1981, 1977 by PrenticeHall, Inc.
`Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this book may be
`reproduced, in any form or by any means,
`without permission in writing from the publisher.
`Printed in the United States of America
`10
`9
`8
`7
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`
`ISBN EI-luEI-EIE-llllIE-S
`
`Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London
`Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney
`Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., Toronto
`
`Prentice-Hall Hispanoarnericana, S.A., Mexico
`Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Driiii
`Prentice-Hall of Japan, Inc., Tokyo
`Prentice-Hall (Singapore) Pte. Ltd, Singapore
`Editora Prentice-Hall do Brasil, Ltda., Rio de ereiro
`
`
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 003
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`x2 = (0.0037)(4.3 X 10‘?) = 1.6 X 10—9
`Solving for x, we have
`x = [Pr] = [HCO3‘] = «11.6 x 10—9 = 4.0 x 10‘5M
`
`16.7 r‘ Weak Bases
`
`615
`
`4'0 X 1‘."
`
`4.2 X 35'
`
`'
`
`
`
`The small value of 3: indicates that our simplifying assumption was justified. The
`pH is therefore
`
`pH = -log [H+] = —log (40 x 10-5} = 4.40
`
`If we were asked to solve for [COaz‘], we would need to use Kfl. Let’s illustrate
`first calculation. Using the values of [HCOf] and [H+] calculated above, and setting
`:COf‘] = y, we have the following initial and equilibrium concentration values:
`
`._
`
`HCOs‘iaq)
`
`v——‘ WW)
`
`+
`
`(3032—060
`
`Lply as “13.";
`:tprotorL;
`ht:
`
`
`
`
`(4.0 x 10-5 — y) M
`
`(4.0 x 10-5 + y) M
`
`zation}
`
`harming that y is small compared to 4.0 X 10—5, we have
`
`Kaz =
`
`IH-‘Hcoatl
`[HCOa‘]
`
`=
`
`-u
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(4.0 x 10—59(3)
`< 10“?
`
`4.0 x 10—5
`= 5.6 x 10
`.1 constants '
`_
`-
`as from the '
`
`y = 5'6 x 10 11 M = [C032 ]
`factor of 22‘
`nae value calculated for y is indeed very small in comparison to 4.0 X 10—5, showing
`[301},me
`
`2 our assumption was justified. It also shows that the ionization of HC03‘ is neg-
`hide in comparison to that of H2C03 as far as production of H“ is concerned. How-
`
`-
`-.
`it is the only source of C0321 which has a very low concentration in the solution.
`Our calculations thus tell us that in a solution of carbon dioxide in water most of
`
`C02 is in the form of C02 or H1C03, a small fraction ionizes to form H+ and HCOS',
`, ‘ an even smaller fraction ionizes to give C03 _.
`
`37M. The .
`f carbonic -
`CTICE EXERCISE
`
`'mlate the pH and concentration of oxalate ion, [©0421, in a 0.020 M solution of ox-
`
`" acid, Hzczo4 (see Table 16.3}. Answcrs: pH = 1.80; [(220421 = 6.4 x 10‘5M
`
`
`
`
`1‘2..ng _
`." Weak Bases
`
`0
`”M
`x M
`
`[16.30]
`
`[NHHIOH‘]
`K =W [16.32]
`
`
`he 8 '
`-
`--
`substances behave as weak bases in water. Such substances react with
`
`---*r. removing protons from H20, thereby forming the conjugate acid of the
`
`and OH‘ ions:
`
`Weak base + H20 = conjugate acid + OH‘
`most commonly encountered weak base is ammonia:
`
`[16.31]
`NH3(sq) + H200) = NI-I4+(sq) + 0H*(aq}
`
`The equilibrium-constant expression for this reaction can be written as
`
`
`__0 x 10-5
`
`mation ..- ‘
`
`
`
`- sse the concentration of water is essentially constant, the [H20] term is in-
`. stated into the equilibrium constant, giving
`[NH4+][OH-I
`{NHal
`
`K, = K[H20] =
`
`[16.33]
`
`Toe constant Kb is called the base-dissociation constant, by analogy with the
`association constant, K“, for weak acids. The Wawfmmjotfimm EX. 101 6 p_ 004
`
`
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 004
`
`

`

`616
`
`Chapter 16 {Acid-Base Equilibria
`
`
`
` ail-v. .
`
`Base
`
`Ammonia
`
`(NHs)
`
`Pyridine
`(CsHsN)
`
`Hydroxylamine
`(HzNOHJ
`
`Methylamine
`(NHZCHB)
`
`Hydrosulfide ion
`(H5?)
`
`Carbonate ion
`
`(C032?
`
`Hypochlorite ion
`(ClO‘)
`
`Lewis
`Structure
`
`H—I'il—H
`H
`
`Conjugate
`Acid
`
`NH;
`
`Equilibrium Reaction
`
`NH3 + H20 :NH; + OH‘
`
`Kg,
`
`1.3 x 10'
`
`‘
`
`< O N:
`
`C5H5NH'
`
`C5HSN + H20 :CSH5NH+ + OH“
`
`1.7 x 10--
`
`H—fTT—QH
`H
`
`H—I'xi—CH3
`H
`
`H3NOH‘
`
`HZNOH + H20 =H3NOH+ + on-
`
`1.1 x 10.
`
`'
`
`NH3CH3*
`
`NHZCHa + H20 = NH3CH3+ + 0H"
`
`4.4 x 10--
`
`[H—{sfl—
`
`H23
`
`HS" + H20: H25 + 0H-
`
`1.8 x 11‘"
`
`2—
`
`:'C|3:
`__ /C\\ -.
`-.Q.
`.9
`
`Hcog—
`
`cof- + H20 : HCOS" + OH"
`
`13 x 19'-
`
`|::¢'1—0::|_
`
`HCIO
`
`00* + H20 =Hc10 + OH‘
`
`3.3 x 1::-
`
`‘
`
`liimium in which a base reacts with H20 taform the conjugate acid and OH‘. Tab:
`16.4 A lists the names, formulas, Lewis structures, equilibrium reactions, and vs..-
`ues of Kb for several weak bases in water. Appendix D includes a more extensive 13-.
`Notice that these bases contain one or more lone pairs of electrons. A lone pair is rte:-
`essary to form the bond with H”. Notice also that in the neutral molecules the lore
`pairs are on nitrogen atoms and that the other bases are anions derived from wee.
`acids.
`
`SAMPLE EXERCISE 16.14
`
`Calculate the concentration of OH" in a 0.15 M solution of LII-I3.
`
`Solution We use essentially the same procedure here as used in solving problems-
`involving the ionization of weak acids. The first step is to write the ionization reaction
`and the corresponding equilibrium-constant (Kb) expression:
`
`NH3(aa) + H200) = NHJQaq} + OH'(aa)
`
`Kb
`
`2 [NHFHOH‘I
`[NH3]
`
`= 1.8 x 10—5
`
`We then tabulate the equilibrium concentrations involved in the equilibrium:
`
`NH3{aa)
`
`+
`
`H200) : NH4+[aq) + OH‘Iaa}
`
`
`
`[Notice tha
`libriurn—cor
`
`expression
`
`Because Kb
`compared -
`0.15 M. Th:
`
`Notice that
`0.15 M. Th:
`
`PRACTICE
`Which of ti
`
`Son: pyrid:
`
`Types of 11
`How can in
`role to beh.
`
`i-st catego
`:air of elet
`finding all
`These subs
`amines. In
`3 3th a bon
`
`RH; with
`CH3NH2).
`smiling an
`
`the chemi:
`
`CHQIHJ.
`The so
`weak acids
`
`ate, NaClC
`Dr} is alwa
`fee 00‘ it
`
`raently, thl
`
`C10"
`
`
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 005
`
`

`

`
`
`16.7 ,e’ Weak Bases
`
`617
`
`(Notice that we ignore the concentration of H20 because it is not involved in the equi-
`librium-constant expression.) Inserting these quantities into the equilibrium-constant
`expression gives the following:
`
`Kb:
`
`(WI)
`[NHIIIOH—I
`—— = —— = 1. x
`[NH3]
`0.15 — x
`8
`
`10
`
`-5
`
`Because K, is small, we can neglect the small amount of NH3 that reacts with water, as
`compared to the total NH3 concentration; that is, we can neglect x in comparison to
`3.15 M. Then we have
`
`.12
`——= . x
`0.15
`18
`
`‘5
`
`10
`
`x2 = (0.15)(1.8 x 10“) = 2.7 x 10-6
`
`x = [NI-14+] = [OH’] = m x 10'6 = 1.6 x 10‘3M
`
`Notice that the value obtained for x is only about 1 percent of the NH; concentration,
`3.15 M. Therefore, our neglect of x in comparison with 0.15 is justified.
`
`PRACTICE EXERCiSE
`
`Which of the following compounds should produce the highest pH as a 0.05 M solu-
`s'on: pyridine, methylamine, or nitrous acid? Answer: methylamine
`
`1.7X1C '
`
`1.1 X 1C '
`
`4.4 X If"
`
`1.8X1C -
`
`1.8><1C '
`
`3.3 X 1'."-
`
`Types of Weak Bases
`
`d OH‘. Table
`
`ions, and vs.-
`extensive is.
`
`ne pair is he;-
`cules the lore
`ad from wees
`
`ng problems
`ition reacticr.
`
`Jilibriurn:
`
`01-1—03?)
`
`How can we recognize from a chemical formula whether a molecule or ion is
`xle to behave as a weak base? Weak bases fall into two general categories. The
`test category contains neutral substances that have an atom with a nonbonding
`:air of electrons that can serve as a proton acceptor. Most of these bases, in-
`;.-_:ding all the uncharged bases listed in Table 16.4, contain a nitrogen atom.
`.‘rtese substances include ammonia and a related class of compounds called
`mines. In organic amines, one or more of the N—H bonds in NH3 is replaced
`a 1th a bond between N and C. Thus, the replacement of one N-H bond in
`‘ii—I; with a N—CH3 bond gives methylamine, NHZCHs (usually written
`:E-I;NH2). Like NH3, amines can extract a proton from a water molecule by
`:rming an additional N—H bond, as shown here for methylamine:
`
`‘ Acids and Bases
`simulation
`
`H
`..
`|
`H—hll—CHafizq) + H200) = H—I\Ii-CH3 (sq) + OH‘Qflq)
`
`H
`
`H
`
`[16.34]
`
`The chemical formula for the conjugate acid of methylamine is usually written
`:HNHJ.
`The second general category of weak bases is composed of the anions of
`weak acids. Consider, for example, an aqueous solution of sodium hypochlo—
`:te. NaClO. This salt dissolves in water to give Na+ and C10" ions. The Na+
`no is always a spectator ion in acid—base reactions.
`:Sectinn 4.11 However,
`:e C10“ ion is the conjugate base of a weak acid, hypochlorous acid. Conse-
`.jsently, the C10‘ ion acts as a weak base in water:
`
`Clo—(fig) + H20(1)=HC10(“q) + OH‘WIanfiFfiiOfifiEOBES?EX. 1016 p. 006
`
`-
`
`A
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 006
`
`

`

`618
`
`Chapter 16 f Acid-Base Equilibria
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMPLE EXERCISE 16.15
`
`A solution is made by adding solid sodium hypochlorite, NaClO, to enough water r.
`make 2.00 L of solution. If the solution has a pH of 10.50, how many moles of NaCJC!
`were added to the water?
`
`Solution NaClO is an ionic compound consisting of Na+ and C10" ions. As such 2
`is a strong electrolyte that completely dissociates in solution into Na 1', which is a spec-
`tator ion, and CIO‘ ion, which is a weak base with Kb = 3.3 X 10‘7 (Equation 16.33.
`We wish to determine the concentration of ClO‘ in solution that would gene-rm
`enough OH‘ ion to raise the pH to 10.50.
`We first calculate the concentration of OH‘{aq) at equilibrium. We can calculz:
`[OH'] by using either Equation 16.14 or Equation 16.17; we will use the lam:
`method here:
`
`pOH = 14.00 — pH = 14.00 — 10.50 = 3.50
`
`[OI-1‘] = 10‘350 = 3.2 x 10-4M
`
`This concentration is high enough that we can assume that Equation 16.35 is the «is
`source of OH'; that is, we can neglect any OH‘ produced by the autoionization :1'
`H20. We now assume a value of x for the initial concentration of C10' and solve £1
`E equilibrium problem in the usual way:
`
`C10'(aq)
`+
`H200) = HClO(aq)
`
`——
`
`s... "—
`-—— -
`
`+ OH_(aq)
`
`
`
`
`
`We now use the expression for the base-dissociation constant to solve for x:
`
`K.
`
`_ [HClOJIOH‘] m (3.2 x 10*4)2
`_
`[Clo-1
`' x — 3.2 x 10—4
`
`= 3.3 x 10-7
`
`Thus,
`
`x = (3.2 x 10-4)2
`3.3 x 10—7
`
`+ (3.2 x 10‘4) = 0.31 M
`
`We say that the solution is 0.31 M in NaClO, even though some of the C10" ions
`have reacted with water. Because the solution is 0.31 M in NaClO and the total \‘ce-
`. tune of solution is 2.00 L, 0.62 mol of NaClO is the amount of the salt that was adder.
`' to the water.
`
`I PRACTICE EXERClSE
`
`A solution of NH3 in water has a pH of 10.50. What is the molarity of the soluticr.‘
`' Answer: 0.0058 M
`
`16.8 Relationship Between Kn and Kl,
`
`Ad
`
`Many amine
`fishy” odor
`.i-ic (abseno
`matter. Two
`
`H:N(CH2}41\
`known as re
`
`Many d
`mphetamil
`guinea, thes
`gas is readily
`asulting pn
`fitneviation
`
`nth hydrocl
`sometimes i
`:‘rochloride.
`the acid salt .
`
`@.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Each of these
`
`New notice 54
`mi 16.37 are
`
`rah just the e
`
`To deterrr.
`aided reactio:
`
`;t-_nciples gov
`:icvj reaction, i
`n: equilibrium
`
`We’ve seen in a qualitative way that the stronger acids have the weaker con".—
`gate bases. The fact that this qualitative relationship exists suggests that we mar.
`be able to find a quantitative relationship. Let’s explore this matter by conside—
`ing the NH: and N113 conjugate acid—base pair. Each of these species rear:
`with water:
`
`
`N'H3{aq) + H200) =NH4+(aq) + OH‘(aq)
`
`NI-I4+(aq)=NI-13(aq) + H""(aq)
`
`[16.3w
`
`
`
`
`[16?"
`
`Mylan (IPR2020-00040) Ex. 1016 p. 007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket