throbber
91
`
`7
`
`H' H 1
`92
`mle 183
`Scheme VI-Fragmentation of the mle 183 ion
`
`the spectrum of oxyphenbutazone, analogous peaks were seen at
`mlc 108 (7.6%). (CGHGNO)+, and at mle 107 (11.2%), (CsHsNO)+.
`A characteristic fragmentation of all pyrazolidinediones studied
`was the loss of the elements of phenyl isocyanate either to form the
`radical ion (CGHaNCO)+, m / e 119 [(HOC~HSNCO)+, m / e 135 in
`the case of II] or as a neutral molecule. These pathways have been
`observed in the mass spectrum of aminopyrine (12). Fragmenta-
`tions involving the loss of phenyl isocyanate as a neutral molecule
`are listed in Table 11.
`The ions (X, Table 11) resulting from the loss of the elements of
`phenyl isocyanate as a neutral molecule may then lose CO to give
`
`ions C ~ H ~ N C R I R ~ (Table 111).
`The remaining peaks in the low mass range, below mle 100, are
`common to substituted aromatic systems, and the fragmentations
`observed are illustrated in Figs. 1-6.
`
`REFERENCES
`(1) J. Slingsby and D. A. Zuck, Can. J. Pharm. Sci., 7,
`115( 1972).
`(2) D. V. C. Awang, A. Vincent, and F. Matsui, J. Pharm. Sci.,
`62, 1673(1973).
`
`( 3 ) €3. Unterhalt, Arch. Pharm., 305,334(1972).
`(4) V. G. Pesin, A. M. Khaletskii, and T. Jun-Hsiang, J.
`Gen. Chem. USSR, 28,2841(1958).
`(5) J. Buchi, J . Ammann, R. Lieberherr, and E. Eichenberger,
`Helu. Chin. Acta, 36, 75(1953).
`(6) A. M. Khaletskii, V. G. Pesin, and T. Jun-Hsiang. J.
`Gen. Chem. USSR, 28,2393(1958).
`(7) H. Stenzl, U.S. pat. 2,562,830; through Chem. Abstr., 47,
`1 191 ( 1953).
`(8) J. H. Bowie, G. E. Lewis, and R. G. Cooks, J . Chem. Soc.,
`B, 1967,621.
`(9) J. M. Desmarchelier and R. B. Johns, Org. Mass. Spec-
`trom., 2,697(1969).
`(10) D. P. Maier, G. P. Happ, and T. H. Regan, ibid., 2.
`1289( 1969).
`(11) E. Larsen, I. H. Qureshi, and J. Mdller, ibid., 7,89(1973).
`(12) W. Arnold and H. F. Grutzmacher, 2. Anal. Chem., 247,
`179( 1969).
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND ADDRESSES
`Received April 30, 1974, from the Faculty of Pharmacy and
`Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Al-
`berta, Canada, T6G 2H7
`Accepted for publication June 21,1974.
`Presented at the 21st Annual Canadian Conference on Pharma-
`ceutical Research, Ottawa, Canada, 1974.
`Supported in part by Grant MA 3078 from the Medical Re-
`search Council of Canada.
`* Recipient of a Medical Research Council of Canada Summer
`Scholarship.
`To whom inquiries should be directed.
`
`Kinetics of Dehydration of Epitetracycline in Solution
`
`BETTY-ANN HOENER, THEODORE D. SOKOLOSKI x, LESTER A. MITSCHER, and
`LOUIS MALSPEIS
`
`Abstract 0 The dehydration kinetics of epitetracycline in solution
`to form epianhydrotetracycline were studied using UV and visible
`spectrophotometry. The reaction was found to be first order with
`respect to epitetracycline and hydronium-ion concentrations. The
`activation energy for the reaction was 28.3 kcal/mole at pH 2.0 in
`0. I M potassium chloride solutions. Dehydration of epitetracycline
`at pH 2.0 and 70" was found to be slower than that for tetracycline
`under similar solution conditions, although the activation energy
`for both reactants is essentially the same. This result is explicable
`on the basis of conformational differences in the molecules. This
`paper represents a portion of studies of the rates of various degra-
`dation reactions of tetracycline that lead to the toxic material epi-
`anhydrotetracycline.
`kinetics in solution,
`Keyphrases Epitetracycline-dehydration
`activation energy, UV and visible spectrophotometry 0 Dehydra-
`tion-epitetracycline
`to epianhydrotetracycline kinetics in solu-
`tion, activation energy, UV and visible spectrophotometry Epi-
`from epitetracycline, dehydration
`anhydrotetracycline-formation
`kinetics in solution, activation energy, UV and visible spectropho-
`in solution
`tometry Kinetics, dehydration-epitetracycline
`
`Studies show that commercially available tetracy-
`cline products contain significant amounts of degra-
`dation products of the antibiotic (1-3). This might be
`expected because tetracyclines can degrade through
`
`at least four different pathways: epimerization, dehy-
`dration, hydrolysis, and oxidation. Since the first two
`reactions are the most commonly encountered, they
`have been of specific interest for study. In solution at
`acid pH, two pathways connect tetracycline and 4-
`epianhydrotetracycline, as shown in Scheme I.
`Epimerization about carbon-4 in tetracycline leads
`to inactive, nontoxic epitetracycline (4). The kinetics
`of this reaction were studied by other workers (4-7).
`Epimerization, which is a reversible first-order pro-
`cess, occurs most rapidly between pH 3 and 5. Dehy-
`dration and aromatization of the C-ring of tetracy-
`cline follow pseudo-first-order kinetics, leading to
`anhydrotetracycline, which is inactive in viuo and
`nontoxic. This reaction occurs in solution at very low
`pH (8) and in the solid state under thermal condi-
`tions (9).
`There are two important steps in the overall degra-
`dation of tetracycline, whose kinetic characteristics
`have not as yet been studied in solution or in the
`solid state. These are the epimerization of anhydrote-
`tracycline and the dehydration of epitetracycline.
`Both reactions lead to the inactive, but toxic, epi-
`
`Vol. 63, No. 12, December 1974 / 1901
`
`Merck Exhibit 2249, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`3.0 c
`
`_ - \
`
`"
`
`200
`
`250
`
`450
`
`500
`
`350
`300
`400
`WAVELENGTH, nrn
`and visible spectra of epitetracycline (-1
`Figure 1-UV
`and epianhydrotetracycline (- - -) at a concentration of 1 X
`M in 0.1 M KC1,pH 2.0, using a 1-cm cell.
`anhydrotetracycline. To supply some of the missing
`kinetic parameters, studies on the effects of pH and
`temperature on the dehydration of epitetracycline
`solutions were conducted.
`Epianhydrotetracycline formation may be conve-
`niently and accurately studied by the appearance of
`an absorption peak at 427 nm or through the loss of
`epitetracycline, as reflected by the decrease in the
`absorption peak at 356 nm (Fig. 1). Analogous to the
`dehydration of tetracycline, epianhydrotetracycline
`formation is the only reaction occurring at pH 2 or
`less (8). In addition to the effects of pH and tempera-
`ture, the influence of citric acid on the rate of dehy-
`dration of epitetracycline is reported, since citric acid
`has been shown to enhance markedly the degradation
`of tetracycline powder (1).
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Authentic samples of 4-epitetracycline1, 4-epianhydrotetracy-
`cline2, and tetracycline{ were used as obtained. All other chemicals
`were reagent. grade. Solutions were prepared in demineralized,
`double-distilled water, again distilled over ethylenediaminetetraa-
`cetic acid. All reaction solutions were 0.1 M in potassium chloride,
`and hydrochloric acid was added to adjust the pH4. In one experi-
`ment, citric acid a t a concentration of 0.001 M was added to the
`0.1 M KCI solution before adjusting the pH.
`Solutions of 4-epitetracycline were sealed in ampuls for the
`studies carried out at 70.7" and pH 2.00. All other reactions were
`carried out in a sealed reaction vessel (Fig. 2). The 98.5" reaction
`was carried out using a boiling water bath, and those a t 89.8 and
`70.7" were carried out using an oil bath5. For those reactions car-
`ried out in the reaction vessel (Fig. 2), samples of about 4 ml were
`withdrawn oia the syringe and placed in test tubes immersed in ice
`to stop the reaction. The time of the sample was taken as the time
`of placement in the test tube.
`The absorbances of the samples were determined6 after warming
`to room temperature. When ampuls were used, they were removed
`from the constant-temperature bath at appropriate time intervals
`and chilled in an ice bath. The ampuls were then opened, 5 mi was
`withdrawn and diluted to 10 ml with cold 0.1 M KCl-HC1 solution,
`and the absorbance was measured at room temperature.
`The absorbances of all epitetracycline solutions at concentra-
`
`I Ammonium salt, Batch 430, British Pharmacopoeia Commission.
`Hydrochloride salt, Batch 429, British Pharmacopoeia Commission.
`:' Hydrochloride salt, Lot 48379-171, Lederle Laboratories.
`The pH was determined using a Sargent-Welch pH meter, model DR,
`standardized using pH 4.00 buffer, Lot 69M 388C 6471. Ohio State Reagent
`Laboratory.
`Sargent Thermonitor model ST.
`Cary model lfi spectrophotometer.
`
`1902 / Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`
`RUBBER SEPTUM -9
`
`18 GAUGE NEEDLE
`
`TEFLON TUBING
`
`/
`
`Figure 2-Schematic
`the reaction vessel
`representation of
`used to study the dehydration of epitetracycline and tetra-
`cycline. The flask is immersed in a constant-temperature bath.
`M were read at ambi-
`tions ranging from 8.3 X 10W to 1.82 X
`ent temperatures at 356 and 427 nm, using a 1-cm cell. These ab-
`sorbances measure the content of epitetracycline ( ~ 5 6 = 13,800,
`(427 = 0) and epianhydrotetracycline ( ~ 4 2 7 = 5190, 6356 = 736). The
`absorption spectra for these conipounds are given in Fig. 1. For the
`tetracycline solutions, absorbances at 356 nm measure the content
`of tetracycline and those at 433 nm measure the content of anhy-
`drotetracycline (8).
`
`RESULTS
`Semilogarithmic plots of the difference between absorbance a t a
`given time and absorbance at infinite time (determined after about
`10 half-lives) a t 356 nm and vice versa at 427 nm of the epitetra-
`cycline solutions gave an excellent linear relation. Figure 3 shows
`the results obtained a t pH 2.00 and 70.7' for both wavelengths.
`
`tetracycline
`
`I
`
`epitetracycline
`
`I
`
`anhydrotetracycline
`
`epianhydrotetracycline
`
`Scheme I
`
`Merck Exhibit 2249, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Table I-Pseudo-First-Order Rate Constants for Dehydration of Epitetracycline or Tetracycline at Various
`Temperatures at pH 2.0
`
`Reactant"
`
`Epitetracycline
`Epitetracycline
`Epitetracycline
`Epitetracycline +
`Epitetracycline
`0.001 M citric acid
`Tetracycline
`
`Temperature
`9 8 . 5 + 0 . 2 "
`8 9 . 8 f 0 . 2 "
`8 0 . 0 =k 0 . 2 O
`70.7 =k 0 . 2 "
`70.7 f 0 . 2 "
`70.7 f 0 . 2 "
`
`Rate Constant. min-I x lo2 f SDb
`at 427< or 433 nmcL
`at 356 nm
`
`5.59,' f 0.09
`3.08 f 0.04
`1 . 1 8 f 0 . 0 2
`0.395, f 0.079
`0.424 f 0.023
`0.553,' f 0.039
`
`5.59, j= 0 . 0 6
`3 . 2 1 + 0 . 0 6
`1 . 2 7 f 0 . 0 3
`0 . 4 2 6 + 0.084
`0.460 f 0.073
`0.599 +C 0.069
`
`' 1 In 0.1 M KCI-HCI, pH 2.00. *Determined by linear regression analynis from the data of a semilogarithmic plot. For epitetracycline. d For tetracycline.
`Average of two delerminalions. The average precision obtained between all pairs of determinations was 3~6.5'12.
`
`Also included in Fig. 3 are the results of an experiment under the
`same conditions utilizing tetracycline.
`The pseudo-first-order rate constants a t various temperatures at
`pH 2.0 are. given in Table I. Also included in Table I is the study
`made in the presence of citric acid. An Arrhenius plot of the epite-
`tracycline dehydration data gave an activation energy, E,, of 28.3
`f 2.4 kcal/mole. The pseudo-first-order rate constants for the
`reaction at 70.7O at three different pH values are presented in
`Table 11. A log (rate constant) uersus pH plot gave a slope of -0.91
`f 0.1.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The dehydration of epitetracycline in solution at low pH to form
`epianhydrotetracycline has been shown to be first order with re-
`spect to epitetracycline. A pH-rate profile also has shown the reac-
`tion to be first order with respect to hydronium ion at below pH
`2.0. The error limits found for the log rate constant-pH relation
`(Table 11) may be due to the limited number of pH values that
`could be used and the change in total ionic strength over the pH
`range used.
`Unlike the situation with tetracycline powder (I), citric acid at
`this low concentration had no catalytic effect on the dehydration
`of epitetracycline solutions. A most interesting result was that the
`rate of dehydration of epitetracycline was significantly less than
`that of tetracycline under similar conditions (Fig. 3). The rate con-
`stant obtained in this study for tetracycline is in agreement with
`that of Pryves (8). These epimers differ in the configuration of the
`dimethylamino group on carbon-4 in the A-ring of tetracycline. It
`seems likely that the explanation for the considerable difference in
`the rate for the two tetracycline epimers can be found in either the
`difference in electrostatic screening provided by the protonated di-
`methylamino function which is oriented differently in space rela-
`tive to the 66-hydroxy group in the two isomers or through the op-
`eration of the "Barton effect," i.e., conformational transmission
`( 10- 12).
`The transition state for dehydration is favorable in either isomer
`because the elements of water are located antiparallel and trans to
`each other and the 6B-hydroxy group is tertiary, benzylic, and
`axial. Furthermore, the canonical form of the /3-diketo system at
`
`I
`
`1.0
`0.8
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`1.0
`0.8
`0.6
`
`7 ' 0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`0
`
`120
`
`480
`
`600
`
`240
`360
`MINUTES
`Figure 3-Semilogarithmic
`plot of absorbance change versus
`time for epitetracycline (0 a t 356 nm and 0 a t 427 nm) and
`tetracycline (@ a t 356 n m a n d 0 a t 433 nm) a t 70" and p H 2.0.
`
`C-11, lla, and 12, in which C-11 is olefinic, gives the C-ring a
`naphthaleneoid geometry at the outset (I).
`As in the conformation adopted by chlortetracycline hydrochlo-
`ride in the crystal and supported by solution NMR and circular di-
`chroism studies, the dimethylamino function in tetracycline (11) is
`axial and it is located on the side of the molecule opposite the 60-
`hydroxy group and screened from it by the sigma framework (13,
`14).
`In 4-epitetracycline (III), the equitorial dimethylamino group is
`much closer to the 60-hydroxy group (14) and would be expected
`to inhibit the approach of a hydronium ion more successfully than
`would tetracycline itself. Depending on the extent to which this ef-
`fect would be operative, it would decrease the rate of dehydration
`of 4-epitetracycline relative to tetracycline and thus be in accord
`with the experimental findings.
`The Barton, or conformational transmission, effect has been
`thoroughly substantiated over the years with numerous examples
`(10-12). It has been found in numerous steroids that, in addition
`
`H+
`
`I
`
`I1
`
`I11
`
`6, ,.o,
`H'
`
`. a 0
`
`H'
`
`6, H ,,.o,H,..o
`
`Vol. 63, No. 12, December 1974 1 1903
`
`Merck Exhibit 2249, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Table 11-Pseudo-First-Order Rate Constants for
`Dehydration of Epitetracycline at Several pH
`Values at 70.7"
`
`Rate Constant, min-' X lo2 f SD"
`at 427 n m
`at 356 nm
`0 . 3 9 5 + 0.O7gc
`1 . 0 3 f 0.01
`3 . 1 9 i 0 . 0 3
`
`0 . 4 2 6 f 0.084c
`1 . 0 4 =t 0 . 0 1
`3 . 1 5 & 0 . 0 1
`
`PHa
`2 .oo
`1 . 5 3
`1 . 0 4
`
`Q
`
`In 0.1 M KC1. *Determined b y linear regression analysis from the data
`of a semilogarithmic plot. C Average of two determinations. The average
`precision obtained for these data sets was +l.!5yc.
`
`to expected electronic effects, conformational distortion in remote
`portions of a molecule, caused by epimeric constituents and the
`like, can be transmitted through the sigma framework of as many
`as four rings and significantly affect the rate and even steric out-
`come of reactions occurring at relatively great distances from the
`site of isomerization (15-25).
`Detailed X-ray, NMR, and circular dichroism studies (13, 14)
`have shown that the A-ring of tetracyclines is somewhat distorted
`in acidic solutions because of the necessity of relieving a transan-
`nular 1,3-diaxial interaction between the 12a- hydroxy and proton-
`ated dimethylamino group at C-4. This apparently provides the
`driving force for epimerization at C-4, since epimerization relieves
`the interaction and releases the strain distortion of ring A. Trans-
`mission of the different strain in these two isomers from the A-ring
`through three to four carbon atoms to the 5a-hydrogen and 6p-
`hydroxy groups, whose geometry relative to one another plays a
`dominant role in the dehydration reaction, could conceivably re-
`sult in rate differences of the magnitude observed in this study
`(Table I).
`The involvement of steric effects in rationalizing the differential
`rates of dehydration of tetracycline and epitetracycline is further
`supported by noting that the activation energy for epitetracycline
`dehydration (28 kcal/mole) is essentially the same as that for the
`dehydration of tetracycline (27 kcal/mole) (8).
`These studies reporting the solution kinetics of the dehydration
`of epitetracycline represent one factor in the overall degradation
`processes available to tetracycline in dilute aqueous solutions and
`in the solid state. Studies are underway to determine the rate of
`epimerization of anhydrotetracycline in solution to complete the
`solution phase picture.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`(1) V. C. Walton, M. R. Howlett, and G. B. Selzer, J . Pharm.
`Sci., 59, 1160(1970).
`(2) W. W. Fike and N. W. Blake, ibid., 61,615(1972).
`
`(3) R. F. Miller, T. D. Sokoloski, L. A. Mitscher, A. C. Bonacci,
`and B. Hoener, ibid., 62,1143(1973).
`(4) J. R. D. McCormick, S. M. Fox, L. L. Smith, B. A. Bitler, J.
`Reichenthal, V. E. Origoni, W. H. Muller, R. Winterbottom, and A.
`P. Doershuk,J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 79,2849(1957).
`(5) E. G. Remers, G. M. Sieger, and A. P. Doerschuk, J .
`Pharm. Sci., 52,752( 1963).
`(6) D. A. Hussar, P. J . Niebergall, E. T. Sugita, and J. T. Dol-
`uisio, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 20, 239(1968).
`(7) K. D. Schlecht and C. W. Frank, J. Pharm. Sci., 62,
`258(1973).
`(8) H. J. Pryves, M. S. thesis, Columbia University, New York,
`N.Y., 1957.
`(9) E. R. Garrett, J . Pharm. Sci., 51, 1036(1962).
`(10) D. H. R. Barton and A. J. Head, J . Chem. Soc., 1956,932.
`(11) D. H. R. Barton, A. J. Head, and P. J. May, ibid., 1957,935.
`(12) D. H. R. Barton, J. McCapra, P. J. May, and J. Thudium,
`ibid., 1960.1297.
`(13) J. Donohue, J. D. Dunitz, K. N. Trueblood, and M. S. Web-
`ster, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 85,851(1963).
`(14) L. A. Mitscher, A. C. Bonacci, and T. D. Sokoloski, Antimi-
`crob. Ag. Chemother., 1968,78(1969).
`(15) H. J. Geise, C. Altona, and C. Romers, Tetrahedron, 23,
`439( 1967).
`(16) H. B. Henbest and W. R. Jackson, J. Chem. Soc., 1967,
`2459.
`(17) Ibid., 1967, 2465.
`(18) M. G. McCombe, H. B. Henbest, and W. R. Jackson, J.
`Chem. Soc., 1967,2467.
`(19) R. T. Blickenstaff, K. Atkinson, D. Beraux, E. Foster, Y.
`Kim, and G. C. Wolf, J. Org. Chem., 36, 1271(1971).
`(20) M. B. Rubin, E. C. Blossey, A. P. Brown, and J. E. Vaux, J.
`Chem. Soc., 1970,57.
`(21) V. V. Egorova, A. V. Zakharychev, and S. N. Ananchenko,
`Tetrahedron, 29,301(1973).
`(22) M. J. T. Robinson and W. B. Whalley,
`2123(1963).
`(23) R. Bucourt, Bull. Chim. Sac. Fr., 62, 1983(1963).
`(24) R. Baker and J. Hudec, Chem. Commun., 1967,891.
`(25) Ibid., 1967,479.
`
`ibid., 19,
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND ADDRESSES
`Received March 5, 1974, from the College of Pharmacy, Ohio
`State University, Columbus, OH 43210
`Accepted for publication June 28, 1974.
`Presented to the Basic Pharmaceutics Section, APhA Academy
`of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chicago meeting, August 1974.
`Supported in part by Research Grant l R O l FD-00689-01A1
`from the Food and Drug Administration, U S . Department of
`Health, Education, and Welfare, Rockville, MD 20852
`To whom inquiries should be directed.
`
`1904 /Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`
`Merck Exhibit 2249, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket