throbber
Anhydrotetracycline and 4-Epianhydrotetracycline in
`Market Tetracyclines and Aged Tetracycline Products
`
`VERNON C. WALTON, MARGARET R. HOWLETT, and GEORGE B. SELZER
`
`Abstract 0 A large number of tetracycline samples were tested for
`the presence of anhydrotetracycline and 4-epianhydrotetracycline
`when they were fresh and after being stored under normal and ad-
`verse conditions. It was found that: (a) Newly manufactured tetra-
`cycline preparations contain only small amounts of anhydrotetra-
`cycline and 4-epianhydrotetracycline. (b) Storage under adverse
`conditions markedly increases the percentage of degradation
`products, but storage under normal conditions results in only a
`slow increase in anhydrotetracycline and 4-epianhydrotetracycline.
`In syrups, this can be correlated with loss in tetracycline potency.
`(c) Citric acid greatly increases the tendency of tetracycline to de-
`grade. (4 Tetracycline hydrochloride is more stable than tetra-
`cycline phosphate. (e) Demethylchlortetracycline is the most
`stable of the tetracycline derivatives studied. (f) Rolitetracycline is
`extremely unstable.
`Keyphrases 0 Anhydrotetracycline determination-tetracycline
`products [3 4-Epianhydrotetracycline determination-tetracycline
`products 0 Column chromatography-separation 0 UV spectro-
`IJ
`photometry-analysis
`Colorimetric analysis-spectrophotom-
`eter 0 Turbidimetric analysis-biological potency
`
`Degradation products of tetracycline (TC) and 4-
`epianhydrotetracycline (EATC), in particular, have been
`implicated in renal dysfunction (1-9). It was, therefore,
`of interest to determine the amount of degradation in
`TC products on the market. A large number of market
`TC products were examined for EATC content. Several
`lots were tested for stability under normal and adverse
`storage conditions to determine the amount of EATC
`that may reasonably be expected in newly manufactured
`TC products and to reveal what increase in EATC could
`be expected with time.
`Several analytical methods for the determination of 4-
`epitetracycline (ETC), anhydrotetracycline (ATC), and
`EATC have been described (10-17). The most conve-
`nient are those of Dijkhuis (15), Kelly (16), and Selzer
`and Wrisht (17); these have been adopted for use in this
`study.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Methods-Colrrtm Chromatdgraphy-The method of Kelly (16)
`is a column chromatographic separation of ATC and EATC from
`each other and from TC and other interfering substances. The
`column consists of acid-washed diatomaceous earth' moistened
`with 0.1 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer, pH
`7.8; the compounds are eluted with chloroform and determined
`spectrophotometrically. For this study, the method was modified
`to ensure that the sample was at pH 7.8 when it was applied to the
`column. A 5-ml. sample of TC syrup containing 25 mg. of TC/ml.
`or a 2-ml. sample of pediatric drops containing 100 mg. of TC/ml.
`was diluted to 10 ml. with 0.1 MEDTA buffer, pH 7.8 (prepared by
`dissolving 0.1 mole of EDTA disodium salt in 800 ml. of water,
`adjusting the pH to 7.8 with ammonium hydroxide, and diluting to
`1 1.). The sample was then brought to pH 7.8 with ammonium
`
`1 Celite 545, Johns-Manville, New York, N.Y.
`
`1160 IJ Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`
`Table I-Total Anhydrotetracyclines Present in Fresh
`Tetracycline Powder"
`
`Sample
`Number
`
`Manufacturer
`
`1-4
`5-8
`9-12
`13-18
`19-2 1
`22-25
`26-29
`3&33
`34
`35
`36-38
`
`A
`B
`C
`D
`E
`F
`G
`I
`J
`K
`L
`
`ATC + EATC, Z
`
`0.17,O. 14, 0.31, 0.17
`0.97.0.86.0.90.0.92
`0.47; 0.48; 0.57; 0.98
`2.06, 1.44, 1.98, 1.59
`1.69, 1.27
`0.25,0.71,0.62
`0.24,0.25,0.23,0.21
`0.39,0.46,0.36,0.34
`0.20,0.17,0.66,0.06
`0.11
`0.25
`0.41,0.09,0.81
`
`a Determined by the method of Dijkhuis (15).
`
`hydroxidewater (1 : 9) and diluted to 25 ml. with the EDTA buffer.
`One tablet containing 125 mg. of TC or capsule material containing
`125 mg. of TC was ground in a mortar and pestle with 10 ml. of 0.1
`M EDTA buffer, pH 7.8, brought to pH 7.8 with ammonium hy-
`droxidewater (1:9), and diluted to 25 ml. with the EDTA buffer.
`Each 250-mg. capsule was blended with 25 ml of 0.1 M EDTA
`buffer, pH 7.8, brought to pH 7.8 with ammonium hydroxide-water
`(1 : 9), and diluted to 50 ml. with the EDTA buffer. Difficultly soluble
`samples were dissolved first in 10 ml. of 0.1 N HC1, brought to pH
`7.8 with ammonium hydroxidewater (1 : 9), and then diluted to 50
`ml. with 0.1 MEDTA buffer, pH 7.8.
`A 1-ml. aliquot of the diluted sample was then mixed with 1 g.
`of dry diatomaceous earth, applied to the column, and covered with
`a 1-cm. layer of diatomaceous earth moistened with 0.1 M EDTA
`buffer, pH 7.8. The method was further modified in that no sup-
`porting circle of filter paper was used under the column, no layer
`of sand was used, and the 0.1 M EDTA buffer was not equilibrated
`with CHCb before use.
`Spectrophotometric Screening Method-The method of Dijkhuis
`total anhydrotetracycline content (ATC + EATC). The sample
`(15) was used to screen powder, tablet, and capsule samples for
`preparation was modified to ensure the dissolution of samples con-
`taining TC base or TC phosphate. A 50-mg. sample of TC powder
`was weighed into a SO-ml. volumetric flask, and 10 ml. of 0.1 N HCI
`was added. The flask was shaken until the sample dissolved; the
`contents were then diluted to the mark with water and assayed.
`Capsule powder or finely ground tablet powder equivalent to 250
`mg. of TC hydrochloride was placed in a 250-ml. volumetric flask;
`50 ml. of 0.1 N HC1 was added, and the flask was shaken on a
`mechanical shaker for 5 min. The sample was then diluted to
`volume with water and filtered through a fluted-filter paper. The
`fist 20 ml. of filtrate was discarded and the remainder was collected
`for assay. The calculations were modified in that the formula recom-
`mended by Dijkhuis (15) for the calculation of the percent ATC
`in dosage forms was also used for TC powder.
`Paper Chrontatography-The method of Selzer and Wright (17)
`was used. It is an ascending paper chromatographic method for the
`separation of TC compounds by a resolving solvent of chloroform-
`nitromethane-pyridine (10:20:3) on 20.3 x 20.3-cm. (8 X 8-in.)
`Whatman No. 1 paper moistened with McIlvaine's buffer, pH 3.5;
`the spots are observed by their fluorescence under UV light. To
`vary the relative positions of the different TC and degradation
`products on the chromatogram and to facilitate their identification,
`the chromatographic paper was moistened with any of three buffers:
`McIlvaine's buffer, pH 3.5; 0.1 M EDTA buffer, pH 4.5; or 0.1 A4
`EDTA buffer, pH 7.7.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2248, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Sample Number
`
`Manufacturer
`
`~~~
`
`Table 11-Total Anhydrotetracyclines Present in Fresh
`Tetracycline Phosphate Powder"
`ATC + EATC, %
`1.44
`1.58
`1.05
`1.07
`1.05
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`a Determined by the method of Dijkhuis (15).
`
`Potency Determination-The biological potencies of the samples
`of TC used in these studies were determined by the turbidimetric
`assay method (18) with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538P) as the
`test organism.
`standard mixture of 50: 50
`Standards-ATC-EATC Mixture-A
`ATC-EATC was prepared as follows: a mixture of 2 g. of TC HCI,
`1 ml. of glacial acetic acid, and 20 ml. of water was incubated over-
`night at 37". One milliliter of concentrated HCl was added, the
`mixture was heated on a steam bath for 30 min., and the liquids
`were removed by lyophilization. The dry powder was dissolved in
`methanol, and an aliquot was chromatographed on paper as
`described previously, using each of the three buffers mentioned to
`moisten the paper. In each case, two spots of equal intensity, cor-
`responding to ATC and EATC, were detected. Analysis of the
`powder by the column chromatographic method indicated that it
`contained 48.9% ATC and 50.9% EATC. Comparison of the 100.
`Mc.p.s. NMR spectrum of a CF2COOH solution with data in the
`literature (19) confirmed the identity of the mixture. The bands
`in a 100-Mc.p.s. spectrum were better resolved, and those bands due
`to H, and Ha* (Structures I and 11) could be integrated. Comparison
`
`anhydrotetracycline
`I
`
`4.epianhydrotetracycline
`11
`of the peak areas indicated that the powder contained 45% ATC
`and 55% EATC.
`Additional quantities of mixed ATC and EATC were prepared
`by heating TC HCl for 5 min. in 2 N HCl(l5). The compositions of
`these materials were determined by the method of Kelly (16) and by
`comparison of their absorptivities at 356 and 430 mp.
`Anhydrotetracycline HCI Hydrate-Anhydrotetracycline HCl
`hydrate (Lot No. 63 F 2052, Bristol Laboratories, Syracuse, N.Y.)
`was used. Paper chromatography in all three buffer systems indi-
`
`Sample
`Number
`1-15
`
`Manufacturer
`F
`
`Table 111-Total Anhydrotetracycline and 4-Epianhydrotetracycline
`Present in Fresh Tetracycline Hydrochloride Tablets"
`ATC + EATC, %
`0.50,0.46,0.53,0.52,
`0.54,0.46,0.47,0.63,
`0.59,0.59,0.57,0.58,
`0.63.0.49.0.54
`i.81; i.621 1.45, 1.59
`0.14,O. 11,0.69
`
`16-19
`B
`2&22
`G
`0 Determined by the method of Dijkhuis (15).
`
`Table IV-Total Anhydrotetracycline and 4-Epianhydrotetracycline
`Present in Tetracycline Capsules"
`
`Sample
`Typeof
`Number Tetracycline
`
`Manu-
`facturer
`
`1-3
`4-5
`6-15
`
`1618
`~~ 19
`20
`21-24
`25-28
`29-31
`32-33
`34
`35-38
`39
`4049
`
`HCl
`HCI
`PO4
`
`Po4
`HCl
`Base
`HCl
`HCl
`HCI
`HC1
`HCI
`HCI
`HCl
`HCI
`
`B
`G
`H
`
`M
`M
`N
`N
`0
`P
`
`3
`
`S
`T
`U
`
`ATC + EATC, %
`1.38, 1.28,0.83
`0.29,O. 27
`1.73, 1.66, 1.62, 1.50
`1.76. 1.44.2.89. 3.05
`1.13: 1.14'
`0.60, 1.32
`1.58;
`0.57
`0.65
`0.46,0.44
`0.57,
`0.50,
`0.12,o. 55
`0.23.
`0.32,
`0.21:
`0.29,
`0.24
`0.68
`0.85;
`0.33
`0.71,
`0.63,
`0.71,0.34
`0.68
`1.29, 1.35
`1.14,
`1.09,
`1.45,
`1.41, 1.24
`1.60,
`
`1.31 1.31,
`
`a Determined by the method of Dijkhuis (15).
`
`~~~~~
`
`cated that the sample contained only a trace of EATC; none could
`be detected by column chromatography. Integration of the bands
`corresponding to protons H, and H.1 (Structures I and 11) in the
`100-Mc.p.s. NMR spectrum of a DMSO-d6 solution of the sample
`indicated that the amount of ATC was on the order of 23 times as
`much as the amount of EATC.
`4-Epianhydroretracycline Sulfate-4Epianhydrotetracycline sul-
`fate (Lot No. 57 F 536, Bristol Laboratories) was used. Paper chro-
`matography of this compound in all three systems indicated that
`only a trace of ATC was present; none could be detected by column
`chromatography. Integration of the bands corresponding to protons
`H. and Ha1 (Structures I and 11) in the 100-Mc.p.s. NMR spectrum
`of a DMSO-ds solution of the sample indicated that the amount of
`EATC was on the order of 10 times as much as the amount of ATC.
`However, the presence of traces of one or more other compounds
`was indicated.
`of the TC samples used in this study had been
`Samples-All
`received as part of the antibiotic certification program.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Because pharmaceutical dosage forms of TC contain a number of
`other ingredients, the column chromatographic procedure and the
`screening method were tested for interference from such materials.
`Phenyltoloxamine, aspirin, phenacetin, caffeine, salicylamide, and
`chlorothen citrate did not interfere with either method. Ampho-
`tericin B, neomycin, nystatin, oleandomycin, and triacetyloleando-
`mycin had no detectable effect on the results of the column chro-
`matographic procedure. Although novobiocin caused the EATC
`band to follow the ATC band quite closely in the column chro-
`matographic procedure, it did not affect the results. However,
`
`Table V-Anhydrotetracycline and 4-Epianhydrotetracycline
`Found in Fresh Tetracycline Syrups"
`
`Sample
`Number
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`1 1
`12
`
`Manufacturer
`
`B
`B
`F
`H
`T
`T
`V
`V
`V
`V
`W
`0
`
`ATC, %
`0.27
`1.81
`0.06
`0.13
`0.13
`0.09
`0.39
`0.72
`0.11
`0.11
`2.93
`0.19
`
`EATC, %
`0.28
`1.12
`0.13
`0.13
`0.30
`0.26
`0.43
`0.70
`0.16
`0.12
`4.18
`0.47
`
`= Determined by the method of Kelly (16).
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~~~~
`
`Vol. 59, No. 8, August 1970
`
`1161
`
`Merck Exhibit 2248, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Table VI-Comparison of the Loss of Potency of Tetracycline
`Syrup after Storage" with the Amount of Anhydrotetracycline
`and 4-Epianhydrotetracyclines
`
`Sample
`Number
`
`Potency Lost, ATC Found,
`mg./dose
`mg./dose
`
`EATC Found,
`mg./dose
`
`1
`2
`3
`A
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16*
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2
`5
`5
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`13
`16
`17
`17
`23
`25
`~~ 28
`61
`32
`
`0.16
`0.26
`0.38
`3.7
`0.49
`0.53
`0.98
`. ..
`3.5
`0.35
`0.49
`1.2
`0.32
`0.38
`4.8
`0.44
`1.4
`1.2
`2.0
`~.
`2.0
`3.6
`5.3
`
`a Storage ranged from 12 to 20 months at 25".
`formula.
`
`0.25
`0.52
`0.30
`4.6
`0.62
`0.32
`i.29
`3.9
`0.50
`0.62
`0.72
`0.32
`0.59
`4.1
`0.82
`1.5
`0.99
`2.6
`2.1
`4.1
`5.1
`b An experimental
`
`amphotericin B and nystatin, both of which absorb light at 430 mp,
`caused unduly high results in the screening method when they were
`present in concentrations comparable to those found in commercial
`products. For this reason, TC products containing amphotericin B
`or nystatin were tested by the column chromatographic method.
`were present in fresh TC powder. As shown in Table I, the ATC +
`A survey was conducted to find out how much ATC and EATC
`EATC content of 38 samples of fresh TC HC1 bulk material from
`six results over 1 z were obtained with material from one manu-
`11 manufacturers ranged from 0.11 to 2.06%. However, all of the
`facturer. Table I1 shows the total ATC + EATC found in newly
`All of the five samples tested contained between 1 and 2 z ATC +
`manufactured TC PO4 analyzed by the method of Dijkhuis (15).
`EATC.
`Another survey was made of the ATC and EATC present in
`newly manufactured samples of various TC dosage forms. Table 111
`total ATC + EATC. These five samples were produced
`shows that of 22 TC HCl tablets tested, only five contained more
`by one manufacturer and contained less than 2% ATC + EATC.
`than 1
`tained less than 2 x total ATC + EATC. Table V shows that only
`As shown in Table IV, all but two of the 49 TC capsules tested con-
`
`two of the 12 fresh TC syrups tested contained more than 1% of
`either ATC or EATC.
`It can thus be seen that the amounts of ATC and EATC found
`in fresh TC products were quite low. On the basis of these results,
`limits of 2% EATC in TC powders and 3% EATC in finished TC
`products have been proposed for inclusion in the Code of Federal
`Regulations (20).
`Several studies were conducted to determine the stability of TC
`products under various conditions. In one study, TC syrups were
`examined for ATC and EATC after they had been stored for dif-
`ferent periods of time. The solid matter in the syrups was either in
`suspension or easily resuspendable. As shown in Table VI, there is
`some correlation between loss of biological potency and increase in
`ATC and EATC content.
`In another study, the ability of the TC antibiotics to resist un-
`favorable storage conditions of elevated temperature and high
`humidity was investigated. The TC samples were stored at 37" in
`desiccators containing water (100% relative humidity) or a saturated
`sodium bromide solution (66% relative humidity) in the desiccant
`chamber. The samples were tested for potency by the microbiologi-
`cal turbidimetric method (18) and for degradation products by the
`paper chromatographic method on paper moistened with McIl-
`vaine's buffer, pH 3.5, and by the column chromatographic method.
`Several conclusions may be drawn from the data presented in
`Tables VII and VIII. Demethylchlortetracycline (DMCTC) is the
`most stable of the TC derivatives when stored under 100% relative
`humidity at 37"; it showed no loss of potency after storage for 1
`month. Chlortetracycline (CTC) is somewhat less stable than
`DMCTC; after 1 month at 37" and 100% relative humidity, the
`potency of CTC powder had diminished by 17 % and that of capsule
`material by 1 4 z . Neither CTC nor DMCXC showed evidence of
`anhydrolike degradation products by the paper chromatographic
`method. However, TC was less stable; TC products stored 1 month
`at 37" and 100% relative humidity gave visible evidence of degrada-
`tion by becoming partially liquid and turning dark brown. Potency
`losses of from 17 to 7 9 x occurred, and the column chromato-
`graphic procedure revealed ATC levels ranging from 2.2 to 7.1 Z
`and EATC levels ranging from 3.3 to 14.1 %. Paper chromatography
`indicated that approximately one-half of the TC was converted to
`the inactive epimer form, ETC. Rolitetracycline (RTC) was even
`more unstable. Storage at 37" and 100% relative humidity resulted
`in almost complete destruction of this antibiotic; the only recog-
`nizable fragment was a small amount of the epimeric form of RTC.
`Paper chromatography of degraded oxytetracycline indicated the
`possible presence of an anhydrolike product.
`TC HCI powder and dosage forms were quite stable when stored
`2 months at 66% relative humidity and 37", as shown in Table IX.
`Only a small fraction of the TC was converted to the anhydro forms.
`However, TC HCI with added citric acid was almost completely
`inactivated and formed large amounts of ATC and EATC. Citric
`acid thus has an adverse effect on TC stability. TC POa is somewhat
`
`Table VII-Results of the Storage of Tetracycline Derivatives for 30 Days
`at 37" and 100% Relative Humidity
`
`Product
`
`Pooled demethylchlortetracycline
`hydrochloride powder
`Demethylchlortetracycline
`capsule powder
`Oxytetracycline hydrochloride
`powder
`Oxytetracycline base powder
`
`Rolitetracycline powder
`
`Description
`after Storage
`
`Brown powder
`Light-brown
`powder
`Dark-brown
`Dark-brown liquid
`with few solid
`particles
`Very dark-brown
`tar
`
`Yellow powder
`
`Chlortetracycline hydrochloride
`powder
`Chlortetracycline capsule
`powder
`a On paper moistened with McIlvaine's buffer, pH 3.5.
`1162 0 Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`
`-Potency, mcg./mg.-
`Before
`After
`Storage
`Storage
`
`1000
`490
`
`1000
`
`I000
`
`490
`
`1030
`480
`
`490
`185
`
`15
`
`420
`
`Paper Chromatography"
`
`Strong fluorescent spot (DMCTC)
`at RJ 0.63
`Two minor spots at R, 0.19 (Epi-
`DMCTC) and Rj 0.37
`Strong fluorescent spot (OTC)
`at RJ 0.20
`Strong blue-green fluorescent
`spot at origin; RJ 0.39 and 0.96
`
`No TC detected. Weak fluorescent
`spots at RJ 0.38, 0.20, and 0.96.
`Strong spot at origin.
`Strong fluorescent spot (CTC) at
`RJ 0.74
`Weak TC spot at R, 0.43. No
`degradation indicated
`
`Merck Exhibit 2248, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Table VLII-Results of the Storage of Tetracycline Powder and Capsule Materials for 30 Days at
`37" and 100% Relative Humidity"
`
`Product
`
`pH before
`Storage
`
`Description after Storage
`
`-Potency, mcg./mg.-
`Before
`After
`Storage
`Storage
`
`ATC,
`
`TC PO4 powder
`TC HCI powder
`TC HCI with glucosamine
`(capsule powder)
`TC PO4 capsule powder
`(Company H)
`TC PO4 capsule powder
`(Company M)
`
`2.38
`2.30
`
`2.58
`
`2.46
`
`Very dark-brown
`viscous liquid
`Dark- brown
`powder
`Partially liquid,
`yellow- brown
`powder
`Partially liquid,
`very dark-
`brown powder
`Very dark-
`brown liquid
`
`800
`550
`520
`
`620
`
`5 70
`
`215
`350
`430
`
`130
`
`160
`
`2.2
`2.2
`7. I
`
`2.3
`
`5.7
`
`EATC, X,
`3.3
`3.7
`6.5
`
`5.2
`
`14.1
`
`a Chromatography was done on paper moistened with McIlvaine's buffer, pH 3.5; strong fluorescent spots for TC at Rr 0.46 and Epi-TC at Rj
`0.14; spots for ATC at Rf 0.98 and EATC at R f 0.60.
`
`Table IX-Results of Storage of Tetracycline Powder and Capsule Materials at 37"
`and 66% Relative Humidity
`
`Product
`
`Days
`Stored
`
`Description
`after Storage
`
`Potency, mcg./mg. Loss in
`Before
`After Potency,
`Storage Storage
`
`ATC, % EATC, %
`
`TC HC1
`TC HCI capsule powder
`TC HCI with citric acid
`capsule powder
`TC PO4 powder
`
`TC PO4 capsule powder
`(Company H)
`TC PO4 capsule powder
`(Company M)
`
`70
`
`70
`70
`62
`
`62
`
`62
`
`Yellow-brown
`powder
`Yellow-brown
`powder
`Orange-brown
`cake
`Yellow-brown
`powder
`Yellow-brown
`powder
`Yellow-brown
`powder
`
`1000
`(est.)
`520
`480
`800
`
`680
`
`600
`
`900
`600
`35
`480
`
`450
`
`450
`
`10
`0
`93
`40
`
`34
`
`25
`
`0.02
`0.15
`18.5
`2 . 0
`
`1.3
`
`1.7
`
`0.2
`None
`56.7
`3.2
`
`1.8
`
`2.3
`
`Paper Chromatography"
`No ATC or EATC detected
`No ATC or EATC detected
`Large amount of ATC and
`EATC. No TC detected
`Spots for ATC and EATC
`visible; large TC and
`ETC spots
`Spots for ATC and EATC
`visible; large TC and
`ETC spots
`Spots for ATC and EATC
`visible; large TC and
`ETC spots
`
`a On paper moistened with McIlvaine's buffer, pH 3.5.
`
`less stable than TC HCI under conditions of 37" and 6 6 z relative
`humidity; TC POc products stored under these conditions had
`potency losses ranging from 25 to 40% and small amounts of ATC
`and EATC were present.
`The effects of other active ingredients on the stability of TC PO1
`were also investigated. Samples from two lots of TC PO4 capsules
`made by the same manufacturer were stored under adverse and
`control conditions for 3 years. One lot (A) contained TC POc and no
`other active ingredients; the other lot (B) contained TC PO4, phenyl-
`
`Table X-Percent of Labeled Potency Present as
`Anhydrotetracycline and Epianhydrotetracycline in Tetracycline
`Phosphate Capsule Powder Stored under Normal Conditions
`and at 32 O and 63 % Relative Humidity
`32" and 63 R.H.
`Months
`Normal Conditions
`ATC, %
`EATC, %
`EATC, % ATC,
`Stored
`
`0
`4
`9
`32
`
`0
`4
`9
`32
`
`0.52
`0.8
`1.4
`3.9
`
`1 . 5
`2.3
`2.6
`2.8
`5.1
`
`Lot Aa
`0.27
`0.3
`0.88
`2.9
`Lot Bb
`0.44
`0.6
`1.2
`1 . 1
`3.7
`
`2.0
`3.3
`8.6
`
`2.7
`5.7
`3.5
`13.0
`
`2.6
`3.4
`10.6
`
`2.2
`3.7
`4 . 0
`22.1
`
`5 No other active ingredients present. b Contained phenyltoloxamine
`citrate, aspirin, phenacetin, and caffeine.
`
`toloxamine citrate, aspirin, phenacetin, and caffeine. Control cap-
`sules were stored at room temperature in closed bottles, and the test
`capsules were stored under adverse conditions in open beakers in a
`desiccator at 32". The desiccant chamber was filled with a saturated
`solution of NasCr207 to ensure a constant relative humidity of 63 %.
`At intervals the capsules were tested for ATC and EATC content.
`As shown in Table X, the test capsules of both lots at all times con-
`tained greater amounts of ATC and EATC than the control cap-
`sules; and at all times, Lot B contained greater amounts of ATC and
`EATC than did Lot A. The final potency of Lot A after being stored
`under adverse conditions was 24.4% of the labeled potency; after
`being stored under control conditions, it was 80x of labeled po-
`tency. The final potency of Lot B after being stored under adverse
`conditions was 13.4z of labeled potency; under control conditions,
`it was 85 %. The combination of phenyltoloxamine citrate, aspirin,
`phenacetin, and caffeine apparently had some additional deteriorat-
`ing effect on the stability of TC PO4 capsules stored under adverse
`conditions.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`(1) J. M. Gross, Ann. Intern. Med., 58,523(1963).
`(2) G. W. Frimpter, A. E. Timpanelli, W. J. Eisenmenger, H. S.
`Stein, and L. I. Erlich, J. Amer. Med. Ass., 184, 11 l(1963).
`(3) S. R. Sulkowski and J. R. Haserick, ibid., 189,152(1964).
`(4) W. W. Cleveland, W. C. Adams, and J. B. Man, J. Pediat.,
`66,333(1965).
`(5) N. Fulop and A. Drapkin, New EngI. J. Med., 272,986(1965).
`(6) J. Brodehl, K. Gellissen, W. Hogge, and H. Schumacher,
`Helu. Paediat. Acta, 23,373(1968).
`(7) K. F. Benitz and H. F. Diermeir, Proc. SOC. Exp. Biof. Med.,
`115,930(1964).
`
`Vol. 59, No. 8, August 1970 0 1163
`
`Merck Exhibit 2248, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`(8) R. R. Lindquist and F. X. Fellers, Lab. Invest., 15,864(1966).
`(9) M. B. Lowe and E. Tapp, Arch. Pathol., 81,362(1966).
`(10) L. Rustice and M. Ferappi, Boll. Chim. Farm., 104, 305
`(1967).
`(11) D. L. Simmons, C. M. Koorengevel, R. Kubelka, and P.
`Seers, J. Pharm. Sci., 55, 219(1966).
`(12) D. L. Simmons, H. S. L. Woo, C. M. Koorengeval, and P.
`Seers, ibid., 55, 1313(1966).
`(13) B. W. Griffiths, ibid., 55, 353(1966).
`(14) A. A. Fernandez, V. T. Noceda, and E. S. Carrera, ibid.,
`58, 443(1969).
`(15) I. C. Dijkhuis, Pharm. Weekbl., 102, 1308(1967).
`(16) R. G. Kelly, J. Pharm.Sci., 53, 1551(1964).
`(17) G. B. Selzer and W. W . Wright, Antibiot. Cliemother., 7 ,
`2921957).
`(18) "Code of Federal Regulations," Title 21, Part 141c, Section
`141~.218(a).
`
`(19) M. Schach von Wittinau and R. K. Blackwood, J. Org.
`Chem., 31,613(1966).
`(20) Fed. Regist., 34,12286 (1969).
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND ADDRESSES
`
`Received January 13, 1970, from the National Center for Anti-
`biotics and Insulin Analysis, Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
`Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health, Education,
`and Welfare, Washington, DC 20204
`Accepted for publication March 4, 1970.
`The NMR work was done by Elizabeth Hansen of the Additives
`and Instrumentation Branch of the Division of Food Chemistry
`and Technology, Bureau of Foods, Pesticides, and Product Safety.
`The potency assays were performed by the Microbiological Assay
`Branch of the National Center for Antibiotics and Insulin Analysis.
`
`NMR Analysis of Synthetic Corticosteroids of the
`1,4-Dien-3-one Type
`
`HAJRO W. AVDOVICH, PAUL HANBURY, and BRUCE A. LODGE
`
`2 .o
`
`I
`
`"
`
`'
`
`1
`
`'
`
`~
`
`3.
`~
`'
`
`T
`
`
`
`1
`
`400
`
`I! L
`
`t
`
`Impurity
`
`Abstract A procedure for the analysis of synthetic corticosteroids
`of the 1,4-dien-3-one type is described. The method is based upon
`NMR spectroscopy. Spectra are determined in dimethyl sulfoxide
`containing an internal reference substance, fumaric acid. Both
`bulk drugs and formulations can be assayed using this method, and
`comparison is made with results obtained from official assays on
`the steroids and their formulations. The average deviation obtained
`in the NMR method was 0.6%. A procedure for water-soluble 1,4-
`dien-3-ones is also described. This method uses triethylamine hy-
`drochloride as an internal standard.
`Corticosteroids, 1,4-dien-3-one type-analysis 0
`Keyphrases IJ
`NMR spectroscopy-analysis 0 Fumaric acid-internal standard
`
`Synthetic corticosteroids of the lY4-dien-3-one type
`are at present assayed (1, 2) by colorimetric methods
`based on the reduction of certain tetrazolium deriva-
`tives by the a-ketol side chain at C-17. Such methods
`do not distinguish between 1,4-dien-3-ones and re-
`lated corticosteroids of the 4-en-3-one type, which
`may be present as impurities and which frequently
`possess different corticoid activity to that desired in the
`Iy4-dien-3-one. NMR spectroscopy affords a method
`of distinguishing easily between the two groups of
`steroids. 1 ,CDien-3-ones possess three vinylic protons,
`of which the chemical shift usually differs from that of
`the single vinylic proton of 4-en-3-ones. It is, therefore,
`theoretically possible to detect the two groups of com-
`pounds in the presence of each other and, hence, to
`develop a much more specific assay procedure.
`Present methods used in the determination of pred-
`nisolone sodium phosphate (PSP) (1, 2) are also rel-
`atively nonspecific. The BP method (1) for the bulk
`drug relies upon dissolution in water and measure-
`ment of the extinction of the solution at 247 mp; for
`
`1164 0 Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`
`)
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`,
`I
`
`.
`
`,
`.
`
`,
`
`.
`I
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`I
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`I
`PPM (6)
`P.0
`6.0
`7.0
`Figure 1-Partial NMR spectrum of steroidal 1,4-dieti-3-one in
`dimethyI sulfoxide containing fumaric acid and 2,5, or 10 2 of added
`steroidal 4-en-3-one.
`
`
`I
`
`.
`
`.
`
`L
`
`
`
`Merck Exhibit 2248, Page 5
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket