throbber
Dehydration of Risedronate Hemi-Pentahydrate:
`Analytical and Physical Characterization
`
`CATHY LESTER, GWEN LUBEY, MICHAEL DICKS, GREGORY ANDOL, DANA VAUGHN,
`R. THOMAS CAMBRON, KATHERINE POIESZ, NANCY REDMAN-FUREY
`
`Analytical Department, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mason, Ohio
`
`Received 25 January 2006; revised 22 March 2006; accepted 12 April 2006
`
`Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/jps.20662
`
`ABSTRACT: Dehydration of hydrates of pharmaceutical active ingredients (pharma-
`ceutical hydrates) may easily occur during storage or manufacturing. Loss of water may
`have little effect on the crystal lattice, produce less hydrated forms or possibly amorphous
`forms. Characterizing the effects of water loss on crystal hydrate forms is important for
`understanding the behavior of pharmaceutical hydrates throughout the manufacturing
`and storage processes. This study shows that exposure of the hemi-pentahydrate form of
`risedronate monosodium to gentle heating (608C) or conditions of low relative humidity
`(<10% RH) results in the loss of 1 mole of channel-type water. Upon removal of the
`channel-type water, the crystal lattice adjusts producing a distinct phase characterized
`by X-ray, thermal, IR, Raman, and NMR data. Adjustment of the crystal lattice appears
`to compromise crystal integrity and can result in reduced crystallite and particle sizes.
`ß 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 95:2631–2644, 2006
`Keywords: hydrate; dehydration; solid state; X-ray diffractometry; Risedronate;
`hemi-pentahydrate; FTIR; Raman spectroscopy; solid-state NMR; thermal analysis
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Environmental variables encountered during the
`drug manufacturing process may effect the for-
`mation of different crystalline states of hydration
`for the active pharmaceutical ingredient of a drug
`product.1 These different solid forms or hydrates
`can possess different physical properties such as
`differences in solubility, stability, bioavailability,
`dissolution rate, and particle habit. Water in
`pharmaceutical hydrates can be described by
`three different structural classes that include
`those residing in isolated lattice sites,
`lattice
`channel sites, or ion-coordinated sites.2,3 In iso-
`lated lattice sites, water molecules are isolated
`from other water molecules due to contact with
`drug molecules. Water molecules forming lattice
`channel sites are in contact with other water
`molecules of adjoining unit cells along an axis of a
`
`Correspondence to: Nancy Redman-Furey (Telephone:
`607-335-2601; Fax: 607-335-2300;
`E-mail: redmanfurey.nl@pg.com)
`
`Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 95, 2631–2644 (2006)
`ß 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association
`
`unit cell. It has been shown that some channel
`water containing hydrates may undergo dehydra-
`tion under conditions of low relative humidity
`(RH) or pick up water under conditions of high
`RH.3 Ion-coordinated water participates in an ion-
`water bond which usually is much stronger than
`any hydrogen bonds present. In addition to the
`formation of different hydrates, a single hydrate
`form of an API may contain more than one struc-
`tural class of water.2
`Characterization of different hydrate forms
`the bisphosphonate compound risedronate
`of
`[1-hydroxy-2-(3-pyridinyl)ethylidene] bis [phos-
`phonic acid] monosodium salt, which is prescribed
`for the treatment of osteoporosis, was recently
`reported.4 Three different hydrate forms were
`characterized including a monohydrate, a hemi-
`pentahydrate, and a variable hydrate containing
`between 4 and 6 moles of water. The hemi-
`pentahydrate form, which is the commercial form,
`was found to contain two classes of water mole-
`cules including at least 1 mole of lattice-type
`(possibly ion-coordinated) and 1 mole of channel
`water. Channel water is characteristically mobile
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`2631
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`2632
`
`LESTER ET AL.
`
`and may migrate into and out of the crystal lattice
`as a function of ambient humidity. This mobility
`was illustrated previously with vapor sorption
`data presented for the hemi-pentahydrate form
`of risedronate.4 Over a RH range of 20–90%,
`the water content remains stable. As the RH is
`decreased from 9% to 5%, a weight loss of 5% occurs
`corresponding to the loss of 1 mole of water. The
`channel water then reenters the lattice as the
`humidity is increased from 13% to 20% resulting in
`complete rehydration.
`In contrast to the removal of lattice water, the
`removal of channel water often leaves the crystal
`lattice relatively intact.3 However, upon the
`removal of channel water from risedronate hemi-
`pentahydrate, thermal and spectroscopic data
`indicate the lattice undergoes an adjustment and
`the crystal integrity appears to be compromised.
`This study describes the formation of dehydrated
`risedronate by removing 1 mole of channel water
`with heat or desiccation and discusses the asso-
`ciated physical and chemical changes that occur.
`These changes are shown to be reversible, and the
`crystal lattice returns to its original state as the
`sample rehydrates.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Materials
`
`The hemi-pentahydrate was sourced from P&G
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. commercial supply and
`used as received. The dehydrated material was
`prepared by desiccating hemi-pentahydrate over
`anhydrous calcium sulfate for at least 48 h.
`Rehydration was accomplished by exposing the
`dehydrated material to RH of >20% until rehy-
`dration was complete, typically within hours.
`
`Analytical Methodology
`
`Thermal Analysis
`
`Simultaneous thermogravimetry and differential
`thermal analysis curves (TGA/DTA) were gener-
`ated using a Seiko SSC/5200 custom equipped
`with a quartz glass window.5,6 Samples (approxi-
`mately 10 mg) were scanned under a dry nitrogen
`purge from 25 to 2508C at 58C/min. Photomicro-
`graphs were obtained by mounting a microscope
`with a video feed above the quartz glass window.
`Acceptable depth of field and focus was achieved
`using top illumination, a 0.5 objective on the
`
`microscopy, and 10 magnification in the eye-
`pieces and camera feed.
`
`Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy
`
`Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were
`obtained using a BioRad FTS-3000 spectrometer
`with 4/cm resolution. Sample desiccation was
`minimized by dispersing materials in both Fluor-
`olube (4000–1350/cm) and Nujol (1350–400/cm)
`mulling agents. This sample preparation techni-
`que enables the collection of infrared spectra from
`the hemi-pentahydrate and dehydrated forms of
`risedronate in their native states. Fourier trans-
`form Raman spectra (FT-Raman) were obtained
`using a Nicolet FT Raman 960 spectrometer at 8/
`cm resolution. Localized heating due to absorp-
`tion of the laser light is known to impact Raman
`spectra of the hemi-pentahydrate and dehydrat-
`ed forms of risedronate. The laser intensity
`employed for spectral acquisition (0.5 W) and
`cumulative sample exposure (16 scans) were
`below the threshold known to cause spectral
`changes due to localized heating.4 Samples were
`prepared by placing material to be analyzed into
`small quartz tubes and illuminating the sample
`with the laser only during spectral acquisition.
`
`Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
`
`Cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS)
`solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectra were obtained
`using a Varian UnityINOVA 300 NMR spectro-
`meter equipped with a Varian 7 mm CP/MAS
`probe.7 Each sample was
`characterized by
`121.4 MHz 31P, 75.4 MHz 13C, and 79.4 MHz
`23Na SSNMR spectroscopy. Chemical shifts were
`referenced externally for phosphorus to phospho-
`ric acid, 85 weight % (neat) at 0.0 ppm; for carbon
`to hexamethylbenzene at 17.3 ppm;7 and for
`sodium to 0.1 M NaCl (aq) at 0.0 ppm. The
`risedronate samples were not ground, and were
`packed into 7 mm silicon nitride rotors fitted with
`Torlon caps and spun at the rate of 5 kHz.
`Dehydration of hemi-pentahydrate was moni-
`tored first in situ by 31P SSNMR spectroscopy
`using a rotor with a vented cap. Spectra were
`collected during probe heating from 20 to 608C
`(108C increments) and then during a 608C hold,
`until no further changes were detected in the
`spectra. Dehydrated risedronate samples created
`by heating at 608C in an oven or by desiccation
`were packed using a glove box under a dry
`nitrogen gas purge. CP/MAS 31P and 13C spectra
`were obtained for each sample. 13C spectra were
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DEHYDRATION OF RISEDRONATE HEMI-PENTAHYDRATE: ANALYTICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION
`
`2633
`
`recorded with and without sideband suppression
`(TOSS8); also with and without proton dephas-
`ing.9 For each material, the same Hartman-Hahn
`match was used, and the contact time was optimi-
`zed for maximum signal intensity.10 23Na spectra
`were collected using a Bloch decay with a 308
`excitation pulse and a 10 s relaxation delay.
`31P sideband intensities were analyzed by the
`Herzfeld–Berger method11 using the HBA program12
`to obtain chemical shift tensor information.
`
`X-Ray Diffraction
`
`X-ray powder diffraction was performed on the
`samples using the Bruker D5000 X-ray diffract-
`ometer. The D5000 was equipped with a 2.2 kW
`Cu anode X-ray tube, an Anton Parr TTK-1 low
`temperature stage, and high-speed position sensi-
`tive detector (PSD). Cu Ka radiation (l¼ 1.5418 A˚ )
`was used to obtain all powder patterns. A dual
`foil, nickel filter was placed in the receiving path
`the X-rays to remove the Kb radiation.
`of
`Risedronate sodium, hemi-pentahydrate material
`was mounted and analyzed on a front loading
`sample holder, without any special sample pre-
`paration. Environmental conditions for the ana-
`lysis were manipulated to facilitate drying and
`rehydration of the sample without removing it
`from the instrument. The sample was dehydrated
`by heating the material to 608C and holding for
`duration of the analysis. After dehydration, it was
`re-hydrated by allowing the material to cool and
`stabilize at room RH for 20 min. All scans were
`performed over the range of 3.5–408 2 theta, at a
`0.028 step size for 0.2 s/step.
`
`Light Microscopy
`
`Light micrographs were obtained using a Nikon
`Eclipse e600 Polarizing Light Microscope (PLM)
`with an Optronics 3-Chip color camera. Slides
`were prepared by mixing the powdered sample
`with low viscosity immersion oil, and the result-
`ing dispersion placed between a clean glass slide
`and cover slip. Each prepared slide was examined
`using brightfield and slightly uncrossed polarized
`light using a Nikon PlanFluor 10/0.30 objective.
`
`Particle Size Analysis
`
`Particle size of the hemi-pentahydrate and dehy-
`drated forms of risedronate was determined using
`laser diffraction. Approximately 50 mg of each
`sample was introduced as a dry powder into
`
`Isopar V, a synthetic isoparaffinic oil. The result-
`ing dispersions were analyzed using a Horiba
`LA-920.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Thermal Analysis
`
`Comparing fully hydrated risedronate to desic-
`cated risedronate via thermal analysis cle-
`arly illustrates that desiccation results in loss of
`1 mole of channel water from the molecule while
`leaving the remaining 1.5 moles of water intact.
`Representative thermal curves are provided
`below in Figure 1. The only difference in the
`TGA curves (Fig. 1A) is the initial mass loss of
`5.2% observed from room temperature to approxi-
`mately 708C in the fully hydrated sample that is
`missing completely from the desiccated sample.
`This value is in agreement with theory for loss of
`1 mole of water from the hemi-pentahydrate
`(5.16%). The higher temperature mass losses of
`the two samples match in both temperature and
`magnitude. A detailed interpretation of the TGA
`losses was provided in an earlier publication.13,14
`In the earlier study, the dehydration was assign-
`ed to loss of channel water based upon the
`temperature of the water loss (below the boiling
`point of water) and the observed variation in the
`loss profile as a function of scan rate and venting.
`In this study, the assignment was confirmed by
`the disappearance of this first dehydration step in
`the desiccated sample. Collectively, these data
`show how the 1 mole of channel water may be
`quantitatively drawn out of the crystal lattice
`either by gentle heating (as demonstrated by
`the TGA curve of the fully hydrated sample) or by
`desiccation at room temperature.
`Unlike the TGA comparison, differences are
`observed in the DSC curves in addition to those
`anticipated for simple loss of the mole of channel-
`type water of hydration (Fig. 1B). The desiccated
`sample yielded a flat baseline through 908C, over
`the same temperature range that a broad endo-
`therm due to dehydration is observed for the fully
`hydrated sample,
`just as expected. At higher
`temperatures, additional changes are observed.
`The loss of the final mole of lattice-type water of
`hydration from the hemi-pentahydrate occurs just
`above 1408C.13,14 In the desiccated sample, this
`dehydration occurs as a much sharper and larger
`endotherm than that observed for the fully
`hydrated sample. Subsequent endotherms due to
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`2634
`
`LESTER ET AL.
`
`Figure 1. A: Comparison of TGA curves for untreated and desiccated samples of
`risedronate. Loss of 1 mole of channel water observed by 708C in untreated sample but not
`desiccated sample. B: Comparison of DSC curves. Note lack of initial dehydration
`endotherm and difference in dehydration endotherm near 1508C for the desiccated
`sample.
`
`dehydration of monohydrate formed in situ and
`degradation match between the untreated and
`desiccated samples.13,14 The change in dehydra-
`tion profile for loss of water from the isolated
`lattice site suggests that channel water loss upon
`desiccation results in a lattice adjustment in
`response to the missing water.
`Use of a TGA/DTA equipped with a quartz glass
`window within the furnace wall and a microscope,
`enabled visualization of the impact the loss of
`channel water from the crystal. The series of
`photomicrographs provided in Figure 2 visually
`illustrate the macroscopic impact of drying upon
`the crystal and correspond to the first mass loss
`step observed in Figure 1A. Initially (258C), the
`
`hemi-pentahydrate crystals are essentially clear
`with some noticeable internal fracturing. As the
`channel water is driven out of the crystal, it
`becomes more and more opaque, indicating some
`type of lattice adjustment to the loss of water and
`result fracturing. This is clearly beginning to occur
`with the initial onset of mass loss at 368C. As the
`last of the channel water exits the crystal, notice-
`able expansion can be seen as the result of
`continued fracturing (56–758C).
`
`Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy
`
`Infrared spectroscopy is particularly sensitive
`to the polar functional groups observed in
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DEHYDRATION OF RISEDRONATE HEMI-PENTAHYDRATE: ANALYTICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION
`
`2635
`
`Figure 2. TGA/DTA/Microscopy photos of the impact of drying upon the hemi-
`pentahydrate. As the channel water driven off the crystal becomes more opaque
`(beginning at 368C) and as the last of the channel water is driven off, the crystal expands
`in volume (56–758C).
`
`risedronate as well as water of hydration and its
`effect on hydrogen bonding. The infrared spec-
`trum of the dehydrated form of risedronate
`compared to spectra from the hemi-pentahydrate
`and monohydrate forms of the material exhibit
`significant differences.4 A comparison of infrared
`spectra from the hemi-pentahydrate and dehy-
`drated forms of risedronate is illustrated in
`Figure 3A. There are significant changes in the
`OH stretch region (3000 to 3600/cm) as well
`as throughout the spectra indicating significant
`differences in hydrogen bonding characteristics
`within the crystal lattice between the two dif-
`ferent hydration states. The hemi-pentahydrate
`form exhibits two sharp, distinct, OH stretch
`peaks at 3566/cm and 3618/cm. The shape and
`location of these peaks are indicative of con-
`strained water in the crystal
`lattice in two
`separate environments. Dehydration of the hemi-
`pentahydrate form results in the disappearance of
`the peak at 3618/cm producing spectral evidence
`indicating water was removed from discrete
`locations in the crystal lattice. These spectral
`changes associated with dehydration of the hemi-
`pentahydrate form are easily observed by repeat-
`ed spectral acquisition during sample dehydra-
`
`tion (Fig. 3B) and are reversible upon rehydration
`of the material.
`The O––POH group produces broad IR bands
`in the spectral region between 2000 and 2725/cm
`that are complex with multiple overlapping peaks
`due to multiple O––POH groups in the molecule.
`Changes observed upon dehydration of hemi-
`pentahydrate show shifting and changes in rela-
`tive peak intensities in this spectral region.
`The largest O––POH peak at 2105/cm is more
`intense in the hemi-pentahydrate spectrum than
`the dehydrated form possibly due to delocalization
`of hydrogen bonding associated with the hydrat-
`ion state of the material. The fingerprint region of
`the spectrum between 900 and 1215/cm is domi-
`nated by peaks characteristic of the phosphonic
`acid group overlapped with pyridine ring deforma-
`tion bands. Dehydration of the hemi-pentahydrate
`form produces a very large decrease in intensity at
`approximately 1150/cm associated with the asym-
`metric P––O stretch. The symmetric P––O stretch
`observed as an intense shoulder band at approxi-
`mately 1103/cm in the hemi-pentahydrate broad-
`ens and shifts in frequency due to dehydration.
`Differences observed in spectral features asso-
`ciated with the O––POH and P––O groups
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 5
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`2636
`
`LESTER ET AL.
`
`Figure 3. A: Infrared spectra of the hemi-pentahydrate and dehydrated forms of
`risedronate. B: Infrared spectra collected during the dehydration of risedronate hemi-
`pentahydrate.
`
`between the hemi-pentahydrate and dehydrated
`forms result from changes in hydrogen bonding
`due to loss of water.
`Raman spectroscopy is particularly sensitive
`to the underlying carbon-based skeleton of the
`risedronate molecule in addition to low frequency
`vibrational modes delocalized across multiple unit
`cells in the crystal lattice. The Raman spectrum
`from the dehydrated form of risedronate compared
`to spectra from the hemi-pentahydrate and mono-
`hydrate forms of risedronate exhibit significant
`differences.4 A comparison of Raman spectra from
`the hemi-pentahydrate and dehydrated forms is
`illustrated in Figure 4A. Raman spectra from
`risedronate are dominated by peaks associated
`with the substituted pyridine ring in the spectrum
`between approximately 1000 and 1075/cm. Spec-
`tral differences in peaks associated with the
`substituted pyridine ring exhibit numerous dif-
`ferences between the hemi-pentahydrate and
`dehydrated forms. Both spectral broadening and
`shifting in the pyridine degenerate ring mode
`between approximately 1610 and 1650/cm in
`addition to changes in relative peak intensity
`associated with the ring stretching/bending modes
`
`at 1024/cm and 1055/cm are observed due to
`dehydration. These spectral differences are con-
`sistent with a change in environment of the
`substituted pyridine ring induced by dehydration.
`Additional spectral evidence indicating different
`pyridine ring environments between these forms is
`also observed as splitting in the aromatic CH
`stretch region at approximately 3095/cm combined
`with a slight shift to lower frequency for a CH
`stretch from 3001 to 2995/cm (Fig. 4).
`Significant changes occur in the aliphatic CH
`stretch region of the Raman spectra as the hemi-
`pentahydrate form is dehydrated. The disappear-
`ance of the CH stretch at 2965/cm is inversely
`correlated to the appearance of a new peak at 2937/
`cm as illustrated in Figure 4B. Similar inverse
`correlations between the disappearance and
`growth of spectral peaks are observed throughout
`the Raman spectrum providing evidence for the
`presence of two discrete solid-state forms (hemi-
`pentahydrate and dehydrated) during the dehy-
`dration of hemi-pentahydrate. Spectral changes
`observed during the dehydration of hemi-penta-
`hydrate are reversible under conditions where
`hemi-pentahydrate is the equilibrium form.
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 6
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DEHYDRATION OF RISEDRONATE HEMI-PENTAHYDRATE: ANALYTICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION
`
`2637
`
`Figure 4. A: Raman spectra of the hemi-pentahydrate and dehydrated forms of
`risedronate. B: Raman spectra collected during the dehydration of risedronate hemi-
`pentahydrate.
`
`Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
`
`Chemical shift in NMR spectroscopy depends
`upon the electronic screening or local magnetic
`environment about the nucleus. Rapid molecular
`tumbling in solution state NMR spectroscopy
`creates a single average electronic or chemical
`shift environment for the nucleus. In contrast, the
`isotropic chemical shift in solid-state NMR spec-
`troscopy is sensitive to the asymmetry of the 3D
`electronic screening.7 Risedronate monohydrate
`and anhydrate forms were used as model com-
`pounds. The monohydrate contains 1 mole of
`lattice water and the anhydrate has no water of
`crystallization. Both risedronate hemi-pentahy-
`drate and dehydrated risedronate hemi-pentahy-
`drate display a distinct 31P, 13C, and 23Na
`spectrum providing a unique identity, as shown
`in Figures 5, 6, and 7, respectively. Spectra of
`dehydrated material are also unique from rise-
`dronate monohydrate and anhydrate forms. Both
`31P and 13C spectra are consistent with the
`dehydrated material containing two nonequiva-
`lent risedronate molecular environments within
`the unit cell. The 23Na spectra show that the
`sodium environment also has been altered.
`
`31P NMR Spectra
`The solid-state 31P NMR spectra of dehydrated
`risedronate are compared with spectra of risedro-
`nate hemi-pentahydrate, rehydrated desiccated
`material, monohydrate and anhydrate forms in
`Figure 5. Only the isotropic peaks in the central
`spectral region are shown. The substantial differ-
`ences seen between spectra of dehydrated mate-
`rial and hemi-pentahydrate arise from changes in
`the local electronic environments of the phos-
`phono groups created by removal of channel
`water. Changes in the hydrogen bonding network
`among the phosphono groups and neighboring
`water affect the local electronic environments of
`the 31P nuclei, resulting in isotropic chemical shift
`values that are sensitive to the type of water
`present in the risedronate hydrate form.4 An
`initial 608C in situ dehydration study (not shown)
`was undertaken to determine how well dehy-
`drated risedronate could be distinguished from
`hemi-pentahydrate. The temperature profile was
`optimized to remove 1 mole of channel water
`without removing the remaining 1.5 moles.
`The hemi-pentahydrate peaks did not undergo
`changes in chemical shift, but decreased in
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 7
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`2638
`
`LESTER ET AL.
`
`Figure 5. Solid-state 121.4 MHz 31P CP/MAS NMR spectra (top to bottom): hemi-
`pentahydrate (HPH); dehydrated by heat (DH-h); dehydrated by desiccation (DH-d);
`rehydrated desiccated material (RH); monohydrate (MH); and risedronate anhydrate
`(AH). The spectral region shown excludes spinning sidebands.
`
`intensity and disappeared over time. Concurrent
`with their disappearance, was the appearance
`and growth of new peaks. The final spectra
`showed only the new peaks from the dehydrated
`
`material. Spectra of hemi-pentahydrate dehy-
`drated in a 608C oven match those from the
`in situ study. Dehydrating risedronate hemi-
`pentahydrate either by heating or desiccation
`
`Figure 6. Solid-state 75.4 MHz 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra (top to bottom): hemi-
`pentahydrate (HPH); dehydrated by heat (DH-h); dehydrated by desiccation (DH-d);
`rehydrated desiccated material (RH); monohydrate (MH); and risedronate anhydrate
`(AH). Sideband suppression was used to aid in identifying isotropic peaks.
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 8
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DEHYDRATION OF RISEDRONATE HEMI-PENTAHYDRATE: ANALYTICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION
`
`2639
`
`Figure 7. Solid-state 79.4 MHz 23Na CP/MAS NMR spectra of (left to right): hemi-
`pentahydrate (HPH); dehydrated by heat (DH-h); dehydrated by desiccation (DH-d);
`rehydrated desiccated material; monohydrate (MH); and risedronate anhydrate (AH).
`
`creates materials with equivalent spectra. Rehy-
`drating desiccated risedronate produces material
`with spectra matching spectra of the original
`hemi-pentahydrate form.
`Risedronate hemi-pentahydrate exhibits one
`pair of isotropic peaks (19.2, 17.2 ppm), consistent
`with all risedronate molecules occupying a single
`electronically or magnetically equivalent environ-
`ment within the unit cell. In contrast, dehydrated
`risedronate shows two pair of isotropic peaks (20.9,
`19.6, 18.2, 11.5 ppm), consistent with nonequiva-
`lent risedronate molecules existing within two
`electronic environments within the unit cell.
`Risedronate can adopt a unit cell containing
`two nonequivalent electronic environments, as
`observed for the variable hydrate form.4 Compar-
`ing only isotropic chemical shifts shows one pair
`of peaks from dehydrated risedronate (19.6,
`18.2 ppm) consistent with monohydrate peaks
`(19.6, 18.2 ppm). Although not as closely aligned,
`the second pair of dehydrated risedronate peaks
`(20.9, 11.5 ppm) appears shifted toward the
`electronic environment of the anhydrate form
`(24.1, 10.7 ppm). Herzfeld–Berger analyses of
`hemi-pentahydrate, rehydrated desiccated mate-
`rial, dehydrated material, monohydrate and anhy-
`drate forms reveal that the dehydrate has unique
`chemical shift tensor components, distinguishing
`this form from previously identified forms. The
`phosphorus spectra reflect the changes in the local
`
`phosphono environments due to the loss of channel
`water and show the dehydrated crystal lattice
`has adopted a unit cell with two nonequivalent
`electronic environments.
`
`13C NMR Spectra
`The solid-state13C NMR spectra for dehydrated
`risedronate are compared with spectra of risedro-
`nate hemi-pentahydrate, rehydrated desiccated
`material, monohydrate and anhydrate forms in
`Figure 6. Only the isotropic peaks are shown;
`spinning sidebands were suppressed. Nonproto-
`nated carbons (C1 and C30) were identified by
`proton-dephasing experiments. Other
`carbon
`identities are based on solution state spectra of
`the free acid form. Like the 31P results, the 13C
`spectra are equivalent for dehydrated material
`created either by heating or by desiccation.
`Spectra of rehydrated desiccated material match
`spectra of the hemi-pentahydrate form.
`The hemi-pentahydrate exhibits one isotropic
`peak for each type of carbon nucleus in the
`pyridine and ethylidene moieties, consistent with
`electronically equivalent risedronate molecules in
`the unit cell. Dehydrated risedronate shows two
`isotropic peaks for the C2 methylene, the non-
`protonated C30 and at least two other pyridyl
`carbon nuclei, confirming that two nonequivalent
`electronic environments exist within the unit cell.
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 9
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`2640
`
`LESTER ET AL.
`
`Unlike 31P isotropic chemical shifts, none of the
`carbon peaks of dehydrated material is a match
`with monohydrate; both environments within the
`dehydrated material unit cell are clearly unique
`from other hydrate forms.
`
`23Na NMR Spectra
`The solid-state 23Na NMR spectra of dehydrated
`risedronate are compared with risedronate hemi-
`pentahydrate, rehydrated desiccated material,
`monohydrate and anhydrate forms in Figure 7.
`The entire spectral width is shown. Sodium nuclei
`are dominated by the electrical quadrupolar
`effect, whose magnitude reflects the local electric
`field symmetry about the nucleus. The greater the
`3D symmetry or the more spherical the electronic
`field is at the nucleus, the narrower the sodium
`peak.7 As the field becomes less spherical, the
`sodium lineshape broadens and distorts as seen
`for monohydrate versus anhydrate.
`As seen previously in both 31P and 13C spectra,
`the sodium results also show that heating or
`desiccating hemi-pentahydrate creates dehy-
`
`drated materials with equivalent spectra. Rehy-
`drated desiccated material matches the initial
`hemi-pentahydrate. Spectra from dehydrated
`material are unique from the other risedronate
`forms, agreeing with the Herzfeld–Berger analy-
`sis of the 31P spectra, and with the peak compar-
`ison among the 13C spectra.
`
`X-Ray Diffraction
`
`X-ray powder diffraction clearly discriminates
`between the fully hydrated and dehydrated forms
`of risedronate hemi-pentahydrate as shown in
`Figure 8. Upon the loss of 1 mole of water from the
`crystal system, the lattice undergoes a transition.
`This transition results in the formation of a new
`lattice configuration. By slowly heating a fully
`hydrated sample on a hot stage X-ray diffraction
`stage (Fig. 9)
`it was demonstrated that the
`transition does not proceed via a continuum of
`intermediate states. As the water leaves the
`channels, the lattice does not shift gradually.
`Instead the removal of
`the water causes a
`spontaneous lattice readjustment corresponding
`
`Figure 8. Powder Diffraction patterns for a single sample of risedronate hemi-
`pentahydrate showing: initial sample of hemi-pentahydrate (HPH); conversion by heat to
`dehydrated hemi-pentahydrate (DH-h); rehydration at room relative humidity back
`to the hemi-pentahydrate form (RH); dehydrated with desiccation (dry N2 gas) to
`dehydrated hemi-pentahydrate form (DH-d).
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 95, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2006
`
`DOI 10.1002/jps
`
`Merck Exhibit 2240, Page 10
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DEHYDRATION OF RISEDRONATE HEMI-PENTAHYDRATE: ANALYTICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION
`
`2641
`
`Figure 9. Risedronate hemi-pentahydrate (top) undergoing the complete transition to
`the dehydrated form (bottom) while being slowly heated on the hot stage XRD system.
`
`to the X-ray signature of the dehydrated hemi-
`pentahydrate. As a result, when a bulk sample is
`dried, the characteristic peaks for the dehydrated
`form grow as the corresponding peaks for the fully
`hydrated form decrease and disappear. These
`results indicate that the population of dehydrated
`form increases relative to the fully hydrated hemi-
`pentahydrate.
`Consequently, a water content corresponding
`to the theoretical value for a dihydrate would not
`indicate the presence of a dihydrate form but
`rather a mix of dehydrated and fully hydrated
`forms. Changes in unit cell dimensions associated
`with dehydration may be responsible for the
`crystal fracturing reported in the thermal analysis
`section and subsequently discussed in the micro-
`scopy and particle size sections of this report. The
`dehydrated crystal lattice has been confirmed to
`be a unique phase through indexing of the cell
`parameters. After 1 mole of water has been
`removed from the hemi-pentahydrate crystal
`lattice, the resulting lattice has changed from a
`P21nC, monoclinic cell with a volume of 2677 A˚ to a
`P-1, triclinic cell with a volume of 1223 A˚ . These
`results characterizing the dehydrated cell sym-
`metry have been confirmed by 31P and 13C SSNMR
`spectroscopy. Although dehydration of the hemi-
`pentahydrate produces a unique crystal form, the
`
`dehydrated form is metastable. Once dehydrated,
`the material will rapidly rehydrate under ambient
`conditions (>15% RH at 258C) returning to its
`original hemi-pentahydrate lattice configuration
`(Fig. 9). The only effect of the dehydration/
`rehydration process is a reduction in crystal size,
`which is shown by differences in the peak widths
`and preferred orientation observed in the powder
`pattern for the rehydrated material and confirmed
`by particle size distribution data.
`
`Particle Size/Light Microscopy
`
`Comparison of

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket