throbber
Merck Exhibit 2159, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`
`
`Memo
`To:
`
`22-Feb-2002
`Liu, Yun; Shultz, Leigh; Gandek, Thomas P.; Kwei, Gloria Y.; Ostovic, Drazen;
`Remenar, Julius F.; Kaufman, Michael J.; Armstrong, Joe D; Hansen, Karl; Palucki,
`Michael
`From: D. Zhang
`Subject: Physical characterization of L-224715 phosphate salt
`
`Summary
`
`The preliminary physical characterization was performed on L-224715 phosphate salt
`(NB# 70316-031). Unlike the tartrate and besylate salts, the phosphate displayed plate-like
`structures as primary crystals, which were packed to form agglomerates. The particle size
`distribution exhibited a main peak at ~ 74 m and a shoulder at ~ 19 m, with a mean particle
`size of 55 m. The loose and tapped density densities were 0.27 g/cm3 and 0.39 g/cm3,
`respectively, yielding a Carr s index of 31% and HR of 1.44. The drug was wettable by IPA;
`however, some changes were observed in the IPA granulated sample by DSC. Similar to the
`other two salts (tartrate and besylate), the phosphate also displayed capping/sticking upon
`compression, and changes in the compressed sample were indicated by XRPD and DSC.
`
`The preliminary physical assessment on the L-224715 phosphate salt indicated that given
`the morphology of agglomeration of plate-like crystals, the flowability of the drug has a good
`potential to be further improved upon tightening up the PSD. Since granulation and compression
`might have an effect on the drug crystallinity, the chemical stability of the amorphous form and
`the physical stability of the drug during processing should be monitored.
`
`Morphology
`
`Unlike the L-224715 besylate (rod-like) or tartrate (needle-like) salts, the phosphate salt
`displayed thin-plate-like structures as primary crystals. Most of the primary crystals were packed
`to form agglomerates of various sizes.
`
`Side-view
`
`Figure 1. SEM micrographs of L-224715-70316-031.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2159, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`
`
`Particle Size Distribution
`
`The particle size distribution was characterized by Microtrac using Isopropanol as
`flowing medium. The PSD had a main peak at ~ 74 m and a shoulder at ~19 m. The main
`peak shifted to smaller particle sizes and the lower shoulder grew upon sonication, indicating the
`breaking up of the agglomerates.
`
`L-224715-70316-031
` Sonication = 0 s
` Sonication = 30 s
` Sonication = 90 s
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8 6 4 2 0
`
`1
`
`10
`
`100
`
`Figure 2. PSD of L-224715-70316-031.
`
`Solvent and Pressure Effect
`
`L-224715-70316-031 was wettable by IPA. The solvent effect on the physical stability of
`the drug was examined by granulating L-224715 with IPA at a 50% L/S level. A decrease of 1
`°C in the endotherm was observed for the granulated sample.
`
`As to the pressure effect, similar to the other salts (tartrate and besylate), the phosphate
`also displayed capping/sticking upon compression at 22,000 psi, and changes in the compressed
`sample were observed by XRPD and DSC. Given the fact that granulation and compression
`might decrease the crystallinity of the drug, the chemical stability of the amorphous form and the
`physical stability of drug during processing should be monitored.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2159, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`
`
` L-224715 phosphate
` Granulated with IPA
` Compressed at 22,000 psi
`
`210.1 °C
`
`211.6 °C
`
`195
`
`200
`
`205
`210
`Temperature (C)
`
`215
`
`220
`
`01
`
`-1
`
`-2
`
`-3
`
`-4
`
`-5
`
` L-224715 phosphate
` Compressed at 22,000 psi
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`Heat Flow (J/g)
`
`Intensity
`
`10
`
`20
`Diffraction Angle
`
`30
`
`40
`
`Figure 2. DSC of an IPA-granulated sample, and XRPD and DSC of a compressed (22,000 psi)
`sample, compared to those of L-224715-70316-031.
`
`Table 1. Summary of the physical properties of L-224715.
`
`Morphology
`Particle Size Distribution
`Particle Size ( m)
`Son.
`0s
`30
`90s
`Surface Area [m2/g]
`Densities [g/cm3]
`
`17
`15
`14
`
`L-224715-70316-031
`plate-like primary crystals and agglomerates
`Narrow but with a lower shoulder
`Mean ( m)
`D10 ( m)
`Vol
`65
`56
`49
` 5.78 ± 0.31
`Loose = 0.27
`Tapped = 0.39
`Carr s Index = 31%
`Flowability
`HR = 1.44
`Cohesivity
`Wettability/Hydrophilicity Wettable by IPA
`
`D50 ( m)
`
`62
`53
`45
`
`D95 ( m)
`
`132
`117
`101
`
`Merck Exhibit 2159, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`
`
`Conclusions:
`
`The phosphate salt had a better morphology than the besylate and tartrate salts from the
`perspective of processing. The current lot had a marginal flow, but the flowability has a good
`potential to be improved upon tightening up the PSD. Since granulation and compression might
`have an effect on the drug crystallinity, the chemistry stability of the amorphous form and the
`physical stability of the drug during processing should be monitored.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2159, Page 5
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket