throbber
MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Title: Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV
` Category: Endocrine/Metabolic
`Target Class: dipeptidyl-peptidase IV
`Compound #:
`Disease: noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Dosage Form/Potency: To Be Determined
`
`Cross Project Function:
`Reporting Area: Pharmaceutical Research & Development
`
`Project Team:
`Sub-Group: Pharmaceutical Chemistry – Rahway
`Dept. : 854 – Pharmaceutical Research
`Author(s): Shultz, Leigh
`Department Head: Michael Kaufman
`Key Words: L-224715; phosphate salt; stoichiometry; equilibrium solubilities; Chemical stability (bulk and solution); Physical
`stability; gelatin; HPMC; mannitol; Safety Assessment formulation
`
`Summary
`The phosphate salt of L-224715 is a monobasic salt, and only one anhydrous polymorph has been observed to date.
`The salt is chemically stable in the bulk for 4 weeks and is most stable in solution between pH 2-4. No physical
`changes are observed over 20 days on stability. Stability in binary mixtures with gelatin, HPMC, and 2 grades of
`mannitol has been assessed to aid in the Phase I formuation. The recommended vehicle for Safety Assessment
`studies is 5 mM HCl, which improves stability over deionized water. All Safety Assessment dosing can be done in
`solution using this vehicle.
`
`
`
`1. Stoichiometry of L-224715 phosphate salt [NB: (60659:169, 178)]
`
`Two samples of L-224715 phosphate (70316-43) in water were analyzed by HPLC against standard solutions of L-224715 to
`determine the stoichiometry of this batch. The average salt factor calculated from the data was 0.804; the theoretical salt factor for a
`monobasic phosphate salt of L-224715 is 0.806. These values are in excellent agreement; this batch of phosphate is therefore a
`monobasic phosphate salt.
`
`2. Comparative solubilities of L-224715 phosphate salt batches in ethanol [NB: (60659:169, 178)]
`
`The equilibrium solubilities of 4 different batches of L-224715 phosphate salt in absolute ethanol were determined and are reported in
`the table below.
`
`
`Batch
`
`Solubility in EtOH
`(mg/mL L-224715)
`0.187
`0.187
`0.181
`0.196
`
`70316-25
`70316-31
`70316-35
`70316-43
`
`
`The solubilties of the 4 batches of phosphate salt are very close, indicating that they are the same polymorph.
`
`3. Chemical stability (bulk and solution) of L-224715 phosphate salt [NB: (60659:153, 162, 168, 175)]
`
`The bulk stability data for the phosphoric acid salt of L-224715 are shown in the table below. Data are reported in area % relative to
`samples stored at –20 °C.
`
`
`Bulk thermal stability of L-224715 phosphate salt
`Conditions
`Rel Area % L-224715
`1 wk 2 wk 4 wk
`102.2
`100.4
`98.9
`99.8
`99.6
`99.9
`
`40 °C/75% RH
`80 °C/amb RH
`
`
`Minimal loss of parent is observed after 4 weeks at 40 °C/75% RH; the loss is not statistically significant, and no degradates are
`observed by HPLC.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The solution stability data for the phosphate salt of L-224715 are shown in the table below. Data are reported in area % relative to
`samples stored at –20 °C.
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`Conditions
`
`water
`pH 2
`pH 4
`pH 6
`pH 8
`pH 10
`
`Solution thermal stability of L-224715 phosphate salt
`Rel Area % L-224715, 40 °C
`Rel Area % L-224715, 80 °C
`1 wk 2 wk 4 wk
`1 wk 2 wk 4 wk
`93.9
`89.8
`75.9
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`99.9
`98.1
`100.6
`99.0
`100.3
`95.4
`101.8
`93.2
`94.1
`100.9
`93.6
`90.9
`99.0
`101.6
`98.5
`24.9
`5.0
`0.4
`88.2
`81.6
`60.2
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`83.1
`62.9
`36.5
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`
`
`The phosphate salt is most stable between pH 2 and 4, similar to other salts of L-224715. Although the stability of the salt in water at
`80 °C is poor, the stability of the salt at 40 °C in water shows a marked improvement over the other salts of this compound. This is
`likely a pH effect, as the phosphate salt solutions have a lower pH after storage at 40 °C than do solutions of other salts of L-224715.
`Based on this data, the phosphoric acid salt has a distinct advantage over the benzenesulfonate salt for development. The table below
`compares the degradation (both hydrolysis and de-amination) of L-224715 in the benzenesulfonate, phosphate, and tartrate salt forms
`at 0.1 mg/mL salt in water at 40 °C.
`
`
`
`
`The data clearly indicate that the phosphate salt is much more stable in unbuffered water. This is an advantage for the phosphate salt
`should some of the salt dissolve in a formulation. Also, it should be noted that both of the major degradation processes are aided by
`increasing pH, so acidifying the formulation should increase the stability of the drug.
`
`4. Physical stability of L-224715 phophate salt [NB: (60659:160, 163-164, 166, 169-170, 172-174)]
`
`Samples of bulk phosphate salt of L-224715 (anhydrous, only known polymorph) were placed in the 25 °C/60% RH, 40 °C/amb RH,
`and 40 °C/75% RH ovens to determine the physical stability of the polymorph. Small samples were removed from the vials after 11
`and 20 days, and these samples were analyzed by DSC and TGA to determine their forms. The thermal data appear in the table below.
`
`
`Conditions
`
`unstressed
`25 °C/60% RH
`25 °C/60% RH
`40 °C/amb RH
`40 °C/amb RH
`40 °C/75% RH
`40 °C/75% RH
`
`Time
`(days)
`0
`11
`20
`11
`20
`11
`20
`
`mp onset
`(°C)
`207.51
`207.55
`207.97
`208.37
`208.54
`208.69
`207.66
`
`heat of melting
`(J/g)
`166.4
`175.7
`142.8
`151.6
`136.1
`205.5
`148.7
`
`% volatiles
`
`0.053
`0.092
`0.104
`0.092
`-0.064
`0.020
`0.092
`
`
`The phosphate salt decomposes immediately upon melting, so integration of the melt endotherm is unreliable, widely variable, and
`cannot be used to quantify crystallinity. However, overlaying the DSC and TGA data of the stressed samples with those of the
`
`
`Salt of L-224715
`
`
`
`
`
`Comparison of degradation in salts of L-224715
`Rel Area %
`Hydrolysis
`1wk 2wk 4wk
`8.9
`20.4
`47.7
`Free Base
`3.8
`7.8
`19.5
`Phosphate
`8.3
`18.2
`41.3
`Benzenesulfonate
`6.3
`13.7
`no data
`L-Tartrate Hemihydrate
`Conditions: 0.1 mg/mL salt, 40 °C, unbuffered water
`
`Rel Area %
`De-amination
`1wk 2wk 4wk
`3.8
`11.8
`28.8
`2.3
`5.1
`9.1
`3.6
`7.4
`25.3
`4.2
`6.1
`no data
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`unstressed material shows no physical changes over 20 days under the conditions studied. The samples stored at high humidity gain a
`slight amount of water on storage, but chemical stability assays have shown no degradation under these conditions.
`
`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
` A
`
` sample of L-224715 phosphate salt was lyophylized from concentrated aqueous solution in an attempt to produce amorphous
`material. XRPD of the resulting material showed only an amorphous halo. However, the material mostly recrystallized upon standing
`at ambient temperature for 16 hours. DSC of the recrystallized material shows some amorphous character, with a slight Tg at 38.4 °C.
`The melting point onset for the material was 203.54 °C (121.2 J/g), but the sample appears to be the same polymorph as the original
`crystalline material and decomposes upon melting.
`
`5. Chemical and physical stability of L-224715 phosphate salt in binary dry mixtures with gelatin powder (type B) [NB:
`(60659:160-161, 163, 166, 170-172, 180-181)]
`
`
`The chemical and physical stability of L-224715 phosphate salt (5% drug load) in binary mixtures with type B (base-cured) gelatin
`powder were monitored by HPLC and solid-state NMR, respectively. The chemical stability data are shown in the grid below.
`
`
`L-224715 Phosphate salt
`Chemical stability with gelatin
`
`Excipient used: Fisher lab grade, type B
`Lot No: 987519
`Drug lot used: 70316-25
`Drug loading: 5.2%
`NB Reference: 60659-155
`
`calibration not reliable due to overlap of gelatin and 715 at 210 nm
`
`Sample Temp (C) %RH Time (wk) Sam wt (mg) Drug wt (mg) Calc conc Calc area
`A1 gel
`5
`amb
`1
`20.32
`1.06
`0.117
`5048391
`C1 gel
`40
`amb
`1
`19.76
`1.03
`0.114
`4909262
`D1 gel
`40
`75
`1
`19.48
`1.01
`0.113
`4839698
`A2 gel
`5
`amb
`2
`20.72
`1.08
`0.120
`5147769
`C2 gel
`40
`amb
`2
`19.56
`1.02
`0.113
`4859573
`D2 gel
`40
`75
`2
`20.25
`1.05
`0.117
`5031000
`A4 gel
`5
`amb
`4
`20.24
`1.05
`0.117
`5028516
`C4 gel
`40
`amb
`4
`19.68
`1.02
`0.114
`4889387
`D4 gel
`40
`75
`4
`20.00
`1.04
`0.116
`4968889
`
`Area
`Area %
`8.41 4725583.82
`6.10 3398101.55
`5.94 3272985.83
`7.60 4060611.26
`7.97 4538837.07
`8.86 5000447.81
`8.91 4147063.76
`7.34 3526076.05
`8.60 4085671.00
`
`% Claim
`0.94
`0.69
`0.68
`0.79
`0.93
`0.99
`0.82
`0.72
`0.82
`
`detection at 210 nm, checked by detection at 260/270 nm
`
`A1 gel 260
`C1 gel 260
`D1 gel 260
`A2 gel 270
`C2 gel 270
`D2 gel 270
`A4 gel 270
`C4 gel 270
`D4 gel 270
`
`5
`40
`40
`5
`40
`40
`5
`40
`40
`
`amb
`amb
`75
`amb
`amb
`75
`amb
`amb
`75
`
`1
`1
`1
`2
`2
`2
`4
`4
`4
`
`average
`SD
`
`0.82
`0.11
`
`76.09
`68.35
`67.16
`75.49
`77.11
`80.50
`79.08
`73.44
`77.48
`
`601376.95
`411921.53
`396596.97
`529436.75
`591815.26
`661214.67
`533550.09
`441646.37
`527253.85
`
`
`
`
`The data indicate no trend for degradation of the drug in the presence of gelatin. However, the presence of gelatin in the sample
`prevents detection of the main hydrolysis degradate both at 210 and 260/270 nm. The calibration and % claim data are also unreliable
`here due to the presence of the gelatin. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn from this data at this time.
`
`The gelatin mixture was evaluated by SSNMR (19F) before and after storage at 40 °C/amb RH and 40 °C/75% RH. The overlaid –CF3
`region of the spectra is shown in the graph below.
`
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
` Gel RT
` Gel 40C/amb RH
` Gel 40C/75 RH
`
`-66
`
`-68
`
`-70
`
`-72
`
`
`
`-58
`
`-60
`
`-62
`
`-64
`
`δ (ppm)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`x106
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`
`The sample does not appear to change upon storage at 40 °C/75% RH. However, significant differences are observed in the sample
`stressed at 40 °C/amb RH. It is unclear at this time what causes these changes. The major cause for concern in this data is the fact
`that the spectrum of the unstressed material is significantly different from that of the unstressed HPMC mixture (see below), even
`though they were made from the same batch of bulk phosphate salt. This indicates that whatever physical changes occur with gelatin
`take place immediately at room temperature. Experiments to determine the nature of these changes are ongoing.
`
`6. Chemical and physical stability of L-224715 phosphate salt in binary dry mixtures with HPMC powder [NB: (60659:160-161,
`164, 170-172, 179)]
`
`
`The chemical and physical stability of L-224715 phosphate salt (5% drug load) in binary mixtures with HPMC powder were
`monitored by HPLC and solid-state NMR, respectively. The chemical stability data are shown in the grid below.
`
`
`L-224715 phosphate salt
`Chemical stability with HPMC
`
`Excipient used: USP, 6 cps
`Lot No: 23537
`Drug lot used: 70316-25
`Drug loading: 5.3%
`NB Reference: 60659-155
`
`sample prep: extracted with 0.1% H3PO4 (3x3.0 mL), syringe-filtered
`
`Sample Temp (C) %RH Time (wk) Sam wt (mg) Drug wt (mg)
`A1 HPMC
`5
`amb
`1
`20.14
`1.07
`C1 HPMC
`40
`amb
`1
`20.52
`1.09
`D1 HPMC
`40
`75
`1
`20.47
`1.08
`A2 HPMC
`5
`amb
`2
`19.95
`1.06
`C2 HPMC
`40
`amb
`2
`21.79
`1.15
`D2 HPMC
`40
`75
`2
`20.84
`1.10
`A4 HPMC
`5
`amb
`4
`20.56
`1.09
`C4 HPMC
`40
`amb
`4
`21.34
`1.13
`D4 HPMC
`40
`75
`4
`20.23
`1.07
`
`Calc conc
`0.119
`0.121
`0.121
`0.117
`0.128
`0.123
`0.121
`0.126
`0.119
`
`Area
`Calc area Area %
`5099896
`97.62 4706732.25
`5196120
`97.03 4762186.93
`5183459
`97.27 4499538.14
`5051783
`98.64 4762116.84
`5517712
`97.66 5051196.58
`5277151
`97.80 4881854.89
`5206249
`98.41 4863821.52
`5403762
`98.17 4866112.71
`5122686
`98.12 3970451.80
`
`% Claim
`0.92
`0.92
`0.87
`0.94
`0.92
`0.93
`0.93
`0.90
`0.78
`
`
`The data indicate no trend for degradation of the drug in the presence of HPMC. Only the data point at 40 °C/75% RH, 4 weeks
`shows a statistically significant deviation from the average % claim. Special attention will thus be paid to probe stability samples in
`HPMC capsules under these conditions.
`
`The HPMC mixture was evaluated by SSNMR (19F) before and after storage at 40 °C/amb RH and 40 °C/75% RH. The overlaid
`–CF3 region of the spectra is shown in the graph below.
`
`
`average
`SD
`
`0.90
`0.05
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
` HPMC RT
` HPMC 40C/amb RH
` HPMC 40C/75 RH
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`x106
`
`-58
`
`-60
`
`-62
`
`-64
`
`-66
`
`-68
`
`-70
`
`-72
`
`
`
`
`The sample appears to have changed little upon storage under either condition, though the shoulder at –63 ppm does seem to grow in
`intensity after storage at 40 °C/amb RH. Experiments are ongoing to identify the cause of the shoulder in the spectra.
`
`7. Chemical and physical stability of L-224715 phosphate salt in binary dry mixtures with mannitols [NB: (60659:164, 167, 168,
`170, 172, 182-183)]
`
`
`The chemical stability of L-224715 phosphate (10% drug load) in dry binary mixtures with mannitols was evaluated after 2 weeks by
`HPLC. The data for Pearlitol and SPI mannitol, respectively, are shown in the grids below.
`
`
`L-224715 phosphate salt
`Chemical stability with Pearlitol 200SD
`
`Excipient used: Pearlitol 200 SD
`Lot No: 5053
`Drug lot used: 70316-35
`Drug loading: 10.2%
`NB Reference: 60659-164
`
`sample prep: diluted to 20.0 mL with 0.1% H3PO4
`
`Sample Temp (C) %RH Time (wk) Sam wt (mg) Drug wt (mg) Calc conc Calc area
`A1 Pearl
`5
`amb
`1
`22.22
`2.27
`0.113
`4872846
`C1 Pearl
`40
`amb
`1
`20.08
`2.05
`0.102
`4403544
`D1 Pearl
`40
`75
`1
`20.41
`2.08
`0.104
`4475913
`A2 Pearl
`5
`amb
`2
`20.36
`2.08
`0.104
`4464948
`C2 Pearl
`40
`amb
`2
`21.23
`2.17
`0.108
`4655739
`D2 Pearl
`40
`75
`2
`22.68
`2.31
`0.116
`4973724
`A4 Pearl
`5
`amb
`4
`20.43
`2.08
`0.104
`4480299
`C4 Pearl
`40
`amb
`4
`21.09
`2.15
`0.108
`4625037
`D4 Pearl
`40
`75
`4
`21.05
`2.15
`0.107
`4616265
`
`Area
`Area %
`97.89 4008565.60
`98.41 3706919.81
`96.76 3894088.06
`96.85 3790639.36
`96.84 3922894.07
`98.38 4193858.00
`
`% Claim
`0.82
`0.84
`0.87
`0.85
`0.84
`0.84
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`
`
`
`average
`SD
`
`0.84
`0.02
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 5
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`L-224715 phophate salt
`Chemical stability with SPI mannitol
`
`Excipient used: SPI mannitol
`Lot No: 24340
`Drug lot used: 70316-35
`Drug loading: 10.3%
`NB Reference: 60659-164
`
`sample prep: diluted to 20.0 mL with 0.1% H3PO4
`
`Area
`Sample Temp (C) %RH Time (wk) Sam wt (mg) Drug wt (mg) Calc conc Calc area Area %
`A1 SPI
`5
`amb
`1
`22.56
`2.32368
`0.116184
`4995912
`98.47 4574692.10
`C1 SPI
`40
`amb
`1
`21.65
`2.22995
`0.1114975
`4794393
`95.69 4148614.43
`D1 SPI
`40
`75
`1
`20.17
`2.07751
`0.1038755
`4466647
`96.86 3886933.31
`A2 SPI
`5
`amb
`2
`21.43
`2.20729
`0.1103645
`4745674
`97.61 4244451.11
`C2 SPI
`40
`amb
`2
`24.5
`2.5235
`0.126175
`5425525
`97.77 4526441.87
`D2 SPI
`40
`75
`2
`20.89
`2.15167
`0.1075835
`4626091
`97.32 3879434.74
`A4 SPI
`5
`amb
`4
`21.48
`2.21244
`0.110622
`4756746
`C4 SPI
`40
`amb
`4
`20.67
`2.12901
`0.1064505
`4577372
`D4 SPI
`40
`75
`4
`23.13
`2.38239
`0.1191195
`5122139
`
`% Claim
`0.92
`0.87
`0.87
`0.89
`0.83
`0.84
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`
`
`No degradates are observed in any of the mannitol blends after two weeks on stability. In addition, no significant drop in % claim is
`observed with Pearlitol after two weeks, but the fact that the % claim for the 5 °C reference samples is 82-84% is troubling; it is
`possible that a drop in % claim occurs immediately rather than on stability. With SPI mannitol, the initial % claim is higher (92-89%),
`but a trend in loss of drug does seem to exist at 1 and 2 weeks. The 4-week data will be needed to confirm this trend.
`
`The 2 mannitol blends were evaluated by 19F solid state NMR before they were put on stability. The overlaid –CF3 region of the
`spectra is shown in the graph below along with the spectrum of the same batch of bulk drug for comparison.
`
`
`average
`SD
`
`0.87
`0.03
`
` lot 35 bulk drug
` 10% in Pearlitol 200SD RT
` 10% in SPI mannitol RT
`
`-66
`
`-68
`
`-70
`
`-72
`
`
`
`
`The intial spectrum of the blend with SPI mannitol can be overlaid with the spectrum of the bulk drug. However, the spectrum of the
`Pearlitol blend indicates that significant changes have occurred in the material upon mixing. The nature of these changes will have to
`be investigated further, and the blends will be assessed again by NMR after storage at 40 °C/amb RH and 40 °C/75% RH.
`
`8. Safety Assessment formulation for L-224715 [NB: (60659:173), (26180:1-3)]
`
`
`δ (ppm)
`
`-58
`
`-60
`
`-62
`
`-64
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`x106
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 6
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Solutions of L-224715 phosphate salt were made in two different dosing vehicles (deionized water and 5 mM HCl) to measure their
`pHs and monitor pH stability over 24 hours at ambient temperature. The concentrations of the solutions were based on the
`concentrations needed for dosing in Safety Assessment. The individual solutions are listed in the table below with their intial and final
`pH values.
`
`
`
`No unusual changes in the pH of the solutions were observed over 24 hours at ambient temperature. The pH of the 5 mM HCl
`solutions is in the most stable region for L-224715; quantitative chemical stability measurements (to be done in PAC) should show
`that 5 mM HCl is a superior dosing vehicle (in terms of stability) for L-224715. Note that even the high dose can be dosed as a
`solution in either vehicle.
`
`
`
`Vehicle
`
`deionized water
`deionized water
`deionized water
`deionized water
`deionized water
`deionized water
`5 mM hydrochloric acid
`5 mM hydrochloric acid
`5 mM hydrochloric acid
`5 mM hydrochloric acid
`5 mM hydrochloric acid
`5 mM hydrochloric acid
`
`Conc L-224715
`(mg/mL)
`0.40
`2.07
`4.03
`9.99
`12.27
`36.25
`0.42
`2.02
`4.03
`10.00
`12.00
`36.05
`
`pHinitial
`
`pHfinal
`
`5.59
`5.48
`5.47
`5.14
`5.01
`4.63
`2.56
`2.67
`2.82
`3.03
`3.07
`3.44
`
`6.02
`5.70
`5.67
`5.30
`5.13
`4.72
`2.65
`2.72
`2.85
`3.06
`3.10
`3.49
`
`Title: L-221869 (dipeptidyl-peptidase IV)
` Category: Endocrine/Metabolic
`Target Class: dipeptidyl-peptidase IV
`Compound #: 0726
`Disease: noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Dosage Form/Potency: To Be Determined
`
`Cross Project Function:
`
`Project Team:
`Dept. : 854 – Pharmaceutical Research
`Department Head: Michael Kaufman
`Key Words: Safety Assessment formulation; solubility; water; DMSO
`Summary
`Solutions of L-221869 tartrate were prepared in water to determine if Safety Assessment dosing could be done in
`solution with deionized water as the vehicle. Solutions are attainable at concentrations above the high dose, and
`these solutions are in the stable pH range for L-221869. The solubility of L-221869 tartrate in DMSO is greater
`than 42 mg/mL L-221869.
`
`
`Reporting Area: Pharmaceutical Research & Development
`Sub-Group: Pharmaceutical Chemistry – Rahway
`Author(s): Shultz, Leigh
`
`
`1. Safety Assessment formulation for L-221869 tartrate salt [NB: (60659:167-168, 172), (26180:4)]
`
`In order to determine if solubility of L-221869 tartrate hemi-hydrate in water would allow all SA studies to be done in solution (di
`water only), a sample of L-221869 tartrate salt (005B002, 51.85 mg) was weighed into a centrifuge tube, and 1.50 mL of di water
`were added in 0.50-mL increments. The salt did not dissolve intially, so the sample was placed on the rotator. It was removed after
`10 days, and all of the solid had dissolved. HPLC analysis of the solution indicated that no degradation had occurred over this time.
`This indicates that the solubility of L-221869-005B in water is at least 34.6 mg/mL salt (24.5 mg/mL free base equivalents).
`
`In support of Biopharmaceutical studies for L-221869, a sample was prepared in water to determine if solution was attainable. A
`sample of L-221869-005B002 (60.24 mg) was placed in a vial, and 1.00 mL of deionized water was added. The resulting suspension
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 7
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES PROGRESS REPORT
`
`MARCH 2002
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was sonicated for 25 minutes (monitored visually every 5 minutes for dissolution), resulting in complete dissolution of the solid. The
`pH of this 60.2-mg/mL solution (42.7 mg/mL free base equivalents) was 3.44, in the stable range for the drug. This concentration is
`above the high dose needed for Biopharmaceutical and Safety Assessment studies (36 mg/mL free base). Thus, all animal studies for
`L-221869 can be done in solution using deionized water as the vehicle, and no added acid will be needed to stabilize the formulation.
`
`The solubility of L-221869 tartrate hemi-hydrate in DMSO was also measured to support Safety Assessment. A sample of L-221869-
`005B002 (20.5 mg) was placed in a centrifuge tube with 0.200 mL DMSO. The sample was equilibrated overnight, after which time
`the drug had completely dissolved. The solubility in DMSO is therefore greater than 72.8 mg/mL L-221869 (102.5 mg/mL tartrate
`salt).
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`Merck Exhibit 2153, Page 8
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket