throbber
Memorandum
`To: Mahmoud Kaba
`From: Stephen Cypes
`Date: January 23, 2003
`Re: Weekly Progress Report, 01/20/03 01/24/03
`
`L-224,715
`Salt Break Step
`
`Loss in the aqueous cut has been optimized by setting the THF:Water volume ratio at 4:1 (this was detailed
`in last week s memo). However, the idea has been presented to crystallize the pure phosphate salt directly
`from the washed THF cut. This would remove a lengthy solvent switch from the overall batch time. Since
`THF is hydrophilic, the weight percent of NaCl in the final brine wash needed to be optimized to minimize
`the amount of water in the THF cut if this will be used in the pure crystallization step. An experiment was
`run to determine how NaCl content affected the amount of water in the THF cut (determined from the KF
`of the cut). The resulting relationship is shown in the graph below.
`
`Water Content in THF Cut versus NaCl Content in
`Brine Wash
`
`5.0%
`
`15.0%
`10.0%
`Weight% NaCl in Water
`
`20.0%
`
`25.0%
`
`180
`160
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`0.0%
`
`Water Content of THF Cut
`
`(mg/mL)
`
`By using a nearly saturated brine solution, the water content in the THF cut can be reduced to ~6% by
`volume.
`
`Also, as of last week the total volume needed for the salt break was 20 L/kg (16 L/kg for the THF cut and 4
`L/kg for the water cut). An experiment was run to reduce the total volume to 10 L/kg while remaining at
`4:1 by volume THF:Water. The cut was much less clear, and both cuts were a discolored-yellow due to the
`increased concentration. The final volume for the salt break will most likely be around 15 L/kg after more
`experiments are performed.
`
`L-224,715
`Pure Phospate Salt Crystallization
`
`About 30 g of free base was isolated in THF to prepare for several crystallization studies using different
`solvents. Part of this free base batch was solvent switched to tert-butanol, another part to MIBK, and the
`rest remained in THF. Angela Spartalis has presented the relationship between the polymorphs for the pure
`phosphate salt and how ethanol, the solvent used in the first campaign, interacts with the crystal to form a
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`solvate. The idea, shown in the diagram below, is to try different solvents that may not form a solvate with
`the phosphate salt and instead go directly to Form I.
`
`EtOH solvate
`
`+ EtOH
`
`- EtOH
`
`Form II
`
`>35C
`
`THF
`MIBK
`tert-butanol
`Another
`Solvent???
`???
`
`Form I
`
`>80C
`
`<80C
`
`Type A
`
`To start the crystallization studies, the solubility of phosphate salt in each of the solvents above was
`determined at different temperatures. The results are summarized in the table below.
`
`Solvent
`
`Temperature
`
`THF
`THF
`THF
`
`MIBK
`MIBK
`MIBK
`
`t-butanol
`t-butanol
`
`20C
`40C
`50C
`
`20C
`40C
`60C
`
`40C
`60C
`
`Phosphate Salt
`Solubility (mg/g)
`0.39
`0.42
`0.52
`
`0.28
`0.47
`2.36
`
`0.21
`0.46
`
`Since the solubility is extremely low in all the solvents, they all seem reasonably suitable for the
`crystallization. This week, studies with THF and MIBK have been performed in the lab based on the
`following flowsheets:
`
`THF Initial Crystallization Study
`
`MIBK Initial Crystallization Study
`
`Free Base in THF
`215 mg/g
`6 g FB in 27.9 g Solution
`(~28 mL Solution)
`Flow Rate = 14 mL/hr
`
`1.78 g 85 weight % Aqueous
`H3PO4 Added to THF to
`Make 28 mL of Solution
`Flow Rate = 14 mL/hr
`
`Free Base in MIBK
`235 mg/g
`6 g FB in 25.5 g Solution
`(~27 mL Solution)
`Flow Rate = 14 mL/hr
`
`1.78 g 85 weight % Aqueous
`H3PO4 Added to MIBK to
`Make 27 mL of Solution
`Flow Rate = 14 mL/hr
`
`HEEL:
`1.5 g Phosphate Salt
`Suspended in 20 mL THF
`
`Assume:
`~8.5 L/kg total volume
`8.95 g total (heel+formed) in vessel
`Negligible lost to supernatent
`Seed crystals are ~17% of total
`phosphate salt in vessel
`1.05 eq H3PO4 added
`
`HEEL:
`1.5 g Phosphate Salt
`Suspended in 20 mL MIBK
`
`Assume:
`~8.5 L/kg total volume
`8.95 g total (heel+formed) in vessel
`Negligible lost to supernatent
`Seed crystals are ~17% of total
`phosphate salt in vessel
`1.05 eq H3PO4 added
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

` Samples were submitted for: PSD, purity, and XRD analysis to determine crystal polymorph. Microscopy
`results of the crystal structures are shown in the pictures below (most crystals are about 20 microns along
`their longest axis):
`
`Crystallization from MIBK
`
`Crystallization from THF
`
`Next week s experiments include:
`
`Running crystallization experiment for tert-butanol.
`Stability of free base in MIBK.
`Performing salt break at 15 L/kg total volume.
`Complete characterization and comparison of
`crystallization.
`
`three solvents
`
`tested for pure step
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Memorandum
`To: Mahmoud Kaba
`From: Stephen Cypes
`Date: January 30, 2003
`Re: Weekly Progress Report, 01/27/03 01/31/03
`
`L-224,715
`Salt Break Step
`
`The current CSA Salt Break step has been optimized with regard to losses in the aqueous cuts as well as
`water content in the final THF cut. The process flowsheet for this step is shown below.
`
`2 eq KOH in H2O
`with 5 weight%
`NaCl (3 L/kg
`CSA-salt)
`
`L-715 CSA-salt in
`THF slurry (12 L/kg)
`
`Agitate 30 min.
`
`L-715 free base in
`THF solution
`
`Salts in Aqueous
`Solution
`
`Wash with 20 weight%
`NaCl aqueous solution and
`cut aqueous layer
`
`Aqueous Cut (waste)
`
`The following table summarizes the assay results for each operation in the salt break step.
`
`First Salt Break Cut
`THF Cut
`Aqueous Cut
`64.5
`0.115
`657.5
`109.6
`750
`90
`120
`--
`
`Final Brine Wash
`THF Cut
`Aqueous Cut
`70.8
`0.74
`598.6
`235.9
`650
`210
`63.3
`--
`
`Free Base Concentration
`(mg/g)
`Weight of Cut (g)
`Volume of Cut (mL)
`Water Content (mg/mL)
`Percent of Free Base
`Determined by HPLC Assay
`Mass Balance
`101%
`(HPLC Assay/True Value)
`
`99.97%
`
`0.03%
`
`99.60%
`
`0.41%
`
`102%
`
`L-224,715
`Pure Phospate Salt Crystallization
`
`Solvent screening has continued in order to identify a solvent system that would not form a solvate with the
`phosphate salt and therefore could be crystallized directly as either the Form I or Form III polymorph.
`Directly crystallizing one of these forms would greatly reduce the overall batch cycle time.
`
`40 g of free base was isolated in THF to prepare for crystallization studies using different solvents. MIBK
`was the most promising solvent this week, since it did not form a solvate with the phosphate salt and did
`not result in any amorphous material. During a reactive crystallization procedure with a heel of
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`predominately Form I material, the resulting crystals were all Form I. A second crystallization was run
`with a heel of predominately Form III material at a lower temperature. The resulting polymorph of these
`crystals is still pending. Unfortunately, it was discovered that both the free base and phosphate salt are
`unstable in MIBK, even at low temperatures. It is currently thought that a shift base reaction is occurring
`and may exclude any ketone solvent for use in this crystallization.
`
`The table below lists all solvents that have been screened thus far. Besides not allowing a solvate to form,
`the solvent must not form amorphous material, must be able to dissolve either the free base or phosphate
`salt, and must not degrade the phosphate salt.
`
`Free Base
`Soluble?
`N
`
`Phosphate
`Salt Soluble?
`Y
`
`Degrades
`Product?
`N
`
`Becomes
`Form a
`Solvent
`Amorphous?
`Solvate?
`N
`N
`Water
`N
`Y
`Methanol
`N
`Y
`Ethanol
`N
`Y
`1-Propanol
`N
`Y
`2-Propanol
`Y
`N
`t-Butanol
`Y
`N
`Cyclohexanol
`N
`Y
`Ethyl Acetate
`N
`Y
`Acetone
`N
`N
`MIBK
`N
`Y
`Butyl Ether
`N
`Y
`THF
`N
`N
`n-Hexane
`N
`N
`Cyclohexane
`N
`N
`n-Heptane
`Y
`N
`Toluene
`N
`Y
`Acetonitrile
`N
`Y
`DMF
`N
`Y
`DMAC
`?
`N
`DMSO
`?
`N
`MTBE
`N
`Y
`?
`N
`Methylene Chloride
`From the table above, there is only one solvent thus far that meets all the requirements: water. However,
`since the phosphate salt is soluble in water, this is not a viable choice for crystallization since mother liquor
`losses would be too high.
`
`N
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`Y
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`N
`N
`N
`Gels
`
`With the knowledge in the table above, I have produced the following general process for choosing a
`solvent to screen:
`Dielectric Constant above 3.0.
`Leads to a likely solvent to dissolve either free base and/or phosphate salt.
`Molecular Shape
`Six-membered rings and derivatives thereof tend not to form solvates
`Long-chained molecules tend not to form solvates
`Extremely small molecules (i.e. water) may not form solvates
`Highly branched molecules tend not to form solvates
`Eliminate all ketones due to possible degredation from shift base reaction.
`
`With this process, solvents such as methylene chloride, MTBE, DMSO, methyl benzoate, 1,2-
`dimethoxyethane and a number of other common solvents should be screened.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 5
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Next week s experiments include:
`
`Continue screening solvents for desired properties for use in pure crystallization
`Continue to update screening process based on real-time experimental results as more is
`learned about the solvent behavior with the phosphate salt
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 6
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Memorandum
`To: Mahmoud Kaba
`From: Stephen Cypes
`Date: February 6, 2003
`Re: Weekly Progress Report, 02/03/03 02/07/03
`
`L-224,715
`Rhodium Removal from Hydrogenation Stream
`
`The use of the Biotage Cartridge System to remove Rh using a fixed bed adsorber is to be studied for use in
`Campaign III, and potentially Campaign II if lab-scale development moves quickly. Ponder s End has
`successfully used Biotage s FLASH systems to remove impurities from processing streams, and this
`ultimately led to less material use and greater operator safety.
`
`Upon discussions with Chris Welch, it has been decided that Ecosorb C941 has the greatest affinity for Rh
`removal from the crude hydrog stream. I have been in contact with John Weaver at Biotage and we will be
`receiving cartridges pre-packed with C941 (as well as other resins that John thinks is appropriate to screen)
`sometime next week.
`
`I have obtained a FLASH 12+M unit from Chris Weaver as a loan. This has a 17 cc working bed volume,
`and comes with 1/16 diameter inlet and outlet tubing with male Luer Lock connections. To reduce the
`cost of ordering the entire FLASH 12+ system (~$3,500), I ordered several additional components in order
`to start lab-scale development.
`FLASH+ Start-up kit ($375) Includes a rack with additional tubing in order to facilitate
`easy collection of effluent fractions
`Male-to-female Luer lock adapter to directly attach 100cc glass syringe to inlet of packed
`bed.
`
`These items should arrive by mid-week. Experiments will begin using a syringe pump to supply constant
`flow to the packed bed and producing a breakthrough curve for Rh in C941.
`
`Also this week, using data from an experiment performed by Chris Welch, the adsorption isotherm for Rh
`on C941 was produced.
`
`L-224,715
`CSA Salt Break
`
`An additional salt break was performed under identical process conditions as described in last week s
`report. Samples were submitted to AR for official concentration results.
`
`Cut
`
`First THF
`First Aqueous
`Second THF
`Second Aqueous Wash
`
`Free Base
`Concentation
`(g/L)
`58.84
`0.06
`61.46
`0.60
`
`Percent of
`Total Free
`Base
`99.986%
`0.014%
`99.736%
`0.264%
`
`Mass
`Balance for
`Cut
`106.0%
`
`103.5%
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 7
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`L-224,715
`Pure Crystallization
`
`Solvent screening continued to determine a solvent system that would crystallize either Form I and/or Form
`III directly by not forming a solvate with the 715-phosphate salt. A summary of the most current results
`can be found in the following table.
`
`Solvent
`
`Form a
`Solvate?
`
`Becomes
`Amorphous?
`
`Free Base
`Soluble?
`
`Water
`Methanol
`Ethanol
`1-Propanol
`2-Propanol
`t-Butanol
`Cyclohexanol
`Ethyl Acetate
`Acetone
`MIBK
`Butyl Ether
`THF
`n-Hexane
`Cyclohexane
`n-Heptane
`Toluene
`Acetonitrile
`DMF
`DMAC
`DMSO
`MTBE
`Methylene Chloride
`Diethoxymethane
`Methyl Benzoate
`Isoamyl Alcohol
`
`N
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`N
`N
`Y
`Y
`N
`Y
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`N
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`N
`Y
`Y
`N
`N
`
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`Y
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`N
`
`N
`Y
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`Y
`
`Y
`Y
`Y
`
`Degrades
`Product?
`
`N
`
`N
`
`Y
`
`N
`
`Phosphate
`Salt
`Soluble?
`Y
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`N
`N
`N
`Gels
`
`Y
`N
`N
`
`Sparingly
`N
`
`Most notably, DMSO and methylene chloride formed solvates upon crystallization, a result not anticipated
`by original screening experiments run by Physical Measurements. Two new non-solvating solvents have
`been found: methyl benzoate and isoamyl alcohol. There are concerns about methyl benzoate forming
`amorphous material, and this will be confirmed with ssNMR. Isoamyl alcohol was ordered and the
`reactive crystallization will be run upon arrival of the solvent.
`
`Experiments continued with the crystallization of phosphate salt directly from water using a saturated salt
`solution as an antisolvent. Last week, this experiment was performed using a NaCl solution as the
`antisolvent. The wetcake was found to have an XRD pattern unlike any polymorph seen thus far. It was
`thought that this was due to the precipitation of the 715-HCl salt as opposed to the phosphate salt. AR is
`still confirming the identity of the salt that was precipitated in this experiment.
`
`Knowing that the 715-HCl salt may have been formed in the previous reaction, I ran the experiment again
`except this time using NaH2PO4 as the salt solution. XRD patterns of the resulting wetcake revealed a
`nearly identical pattern as the previous brine solution experiment. AR is working to confirm the identity of
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 8
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`the salt formed in this experiment through the use of titration, as well as Phosphorous NMR with Physical
`Measurements. Solubility of this salt in water will be run tomorrow to ensure it is still around 100 mg/g.
`
`Experiments for next week:
`Setup and run initial breakthrough experiments for Rh in the FLASH12+ unit.
`Screen isoamyl alcohol as a possible solvent for pure crystallization.
`Resolve issues surrounding the pure crystallization from water.
`Continue to screen for additional non-solvating solvents.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 9
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Memorandum
`To: Mahmoud Kaba
`From: Stephen Cypes
`Date: February 6, 2003
`Re: Weekly Progress Report, 02/10/03 02/14/03
`
`L-224,715
`Rhodium Removal from Hydrogenation Stream
`
`The use of the Biotage Cartridge System to remove Rh using a fixed bed adsorber is currently being
`studied. Pre-packed cartridges of Ecosorb-C941 were received from Biotage for use in the FLASH 12+M
`unit. Also, a manual fractionation unit was purchased to aid in collecting fractions for studies of Rh
`breakthrough. The experimental setup of the FLASH 12+M unit is shown in the diagram below.
`
`Small Parts, Inc.
`Male-to-Male
`Luer Lock Adaptor
`
`Syringe Pump
`Hydrog Crude
`Stream in 100 cc
`glass syringe
`
`FLASH 12+M
`Tubing Connected via
`Swagelok Fittings
`
`Fraction Collector
`
`The following procedure was performed to test the operation and Rh removal ability of the unit:
`Pre-wash C941 bed with 40 mL MeOH at 2 mL/min
`Pump 200 mL crude hydrog stream through bed at 2 mL/min. Collect fractions every 10 mL.
`Post-wash with 40 mL MeOH at 2 mL/min. Continue to collect fractions every 10 mL.
`
`A flowrate of 4 mL/min was attempted with this setup, however the syringe pump stalled (implying that the
`pressure drop over the bed was on the order of 60 psi, the pressure the syringe pump can supply for a 100
`cc syringe). Therefore, 2 mL/min is near the maximum flowrate obtainable for this experimental setup.
`
`Each of the 24 fractions is currently being screened for Rh and L-224715 freebase concentration. Rh
`sample preparations (i.e. dilution in concentrated nitric acid) is being done in our lab to facilitate less prep
`time in the heavy-metals analysis lab due to the large numbers of samples generated.
`
`Preliminary results show 100% of freebase eluting from the adsorbent bed with Rh concentrations still
`pending.
`
`
`L-224,715
`CSA Salt Break
`
`CSA salt most recently produced by Steve Rodgers was taken forward through the salt break and
`subsequently to the phosphate salt reactive crystallization step. The CSA salt used had a Rh concentration
`of 20 ppm. This salt was taken through the salt break step using procedures discussed in previous weekly
`reports. Samples of each cut from the salt break were submitted to AR for freebase, Rh and Na content
`(results still pending). The final THF cut was solvent-switched to denatured EtOH, and the free base
`simultaneously added with phosphoric acid in EtOH to a heel over 3 hours in a reactive crystallization. Rh
`level in the final phosphate salt was 4 ppm. Na content in the pure phosphate salt was 0.1 weight%.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 10
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`L-224,715
`Pure Crystallization
`
`After further experimentation this week, it appears that isoamyl alcohol (ISAA) may be a good solvent to
`either promote the transition of phosphate salt polymorph from Form II to Form I, or be a good solvent for
`a reactive crystallization process.
`
`The following table summarizes the experiments that have led to the conclusions concerning isoamyl
`alcohol:
`
`Date
`
`Person Department
`
`Experiment
`
`Results
`
`Week of 3-FEB-2003 R. Ferlita
`
`Week of 3-FEB-2003 S. Cypes
`
`Phys. Meas. Slurry pure Form I in ISAA at
`room temperature overnight
`Direct reactive crystallization
`of phosphate salt in ISAA
`
`CERD
`
`XRD show s mainly Form I w ith some
`Form III
`XRD show s mainly Form I w ith some
`Form III
`XRD show s w etcake w as all Form II to
`start (as expected). After 4 hours,
`w etcake w as still mainly Form II w ith a
`little Form I. After 24 hours mainly Form
`I w ith a little Form III.
` The last experiment run shows that the transition from Form II to Form I may be faster in ISAA as
`compared to simply heating a drycake to promote the transition. An experiment is currently being
`performed (in conjunction with CERD and Phys. Meas.) to determine the kinetics of the transition in ISAA
`at elevated temperature. Results will be available early next week.
`
`Week of 10-FEB-2003 S. Cypes
`
`CERD
`
`Re-slurry a w etcake from
`EtOH crystallization in ISAA
`at room temperature
`
`Experiments for next week:
`Continue to run experiments for Rh removal in the FLASH12+ unit.
`Determine kinetics of polymorph transition in isoamyl alcohol at different temperatures.
`Continue to look at isoamyl alcohol as a possible solvent for the reactive crystallization of
`phosphate salt in the pure step.
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 11
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Memorandum
`To: Mahmoud Kaba
`From: Stephen Cypes
`Date: February 20, 2003
`Re: Weekly Progress Report, 02/17/03 02/21/03
`
`L-224,715
`Rhodium Removal from Hydrogenation Stream
`
`The Biotage Cartridge System (a fixed bed adsorber) is continuously being studied for Rh removal from
`the crude Hydrogenation stream. The following procedure was performed to initially test the operation of
`the unit and produce breakthrough curves for L-224715 Freebase and Rh:
`Pre-wash Ecosorb C941 bed with 40 mL MeOH at 2 mL/min
`Pump 200 mL crude hydrog stream (0.3 mol% initial Rh charge) through bed at 2 mL/min.
`Collect fractions every 10 mL.
`Post-wash with 40 mL MeOH at 2 mL/min. Continue to collect fractions every 10 mL.
`
`Freebase concentration was determined in each of the fractions via HPLC. Also, each of the fractions was
`prepared for Rh analysis. The following breakthrough curves were produced based on the assay results.
`
`Breakthrough Curves for Freebase and Rh from Hydrog Crude
`Stream in Packed Column of Ecosorb C-941
`
`Displacement of M eOH
`Pre-Wash from Packed
`Bed by Hydrog Crude
`Stream
`
`Displacement of Hydrog
`Crude Stream by M eOH
`Post-Wash
`
`50
`
`150
`100
`Eluent Volume (mL)
`
`250
`200
`L-224715 Freebase
`Rhodium
`
`1.2
`
`1
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`Relative Concentration (Cout/Cin)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`There are several important features to note about these breakthrough curves:
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 12
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`The freebase eludes from the bed very quickly. This is a positive result since it shows our
`product has low affinity for the C941 resin.
`The Rh curve shows a gradual increase without breakthrough. This reveals that there are non-
`idealities in the Rh adsoprtion (perhaps slow kinetics for the adsorption?). Once more
`experiments are run at several flowrates, the non-idealities can be identified as either kinetic,
`external, or internal mass transfer related.
`The freebase concentration gradually decreases as more Rh is adsorbed onto the C941. I
`currently believe that this decrease is due to an interaction between the freebase and Rh
`(Freebase chelates with Rh?). Shane Krska is the Reaction Engineering Laboratory has seen
`product inhibition in the hydrog reaction, and this may lend some insight as to the mechanism
`of this inhibition.
`~90% of the Rh was removed from a batch of hydrog crude equal to a 20 weight% loading of
`C-941 (current process uses 25 weight% C-941 in a batch slurry to remove 78% of the Rh).
`
`Without actually seeing Rh breakthrough in the first experiment, it is still possible to predict what volume
`of hydrog crude stream can be fed to the adsorber before Rh breakthrough will occur. Beginning with a
`mass balance on a differential element of the fixed bed:
`
`Superficial Velocity, u0
`Rh Concentration in liquid, CRh
`
`Ab = Cross-Section Area of Bed
`Void Fraction in Bed
`q = Amount of Rh on C-941 (Mass/Vol)
`
`z
`
`z+z
`
`IN = OUT + ACCUMULATION
`dCzA
`Rh
`dt
`
`zRh
`
`z
`
`b
`
`b
`
`CAu
`0
`b
`
`zRh
`
`CAu
`0
`b
`
`)
`
`b
`
`dqzA
`dt
`
`b
`
` (1)
`
`1(
`
`0
`
` (2)
`
`Rearranging and taking the limit as z 0:
`
`dC
`Rh
`dt
`
`dC
`Rh
`dz
`
`u
`
`0
`
`)
`
`b
`
`dq
`dC
`
`Rh
`
`1(
`
`b
`
`,
`This partial differential can be solved using the method of characteristics by introducing a new variable,
`that represents a coordinate of constant liquid Rh concentration in the bed (i.e. the point in the bed in which
`the Rh has saturated the C-941 and is therefore the breakthrough front).
`
` (3)
`
`dd
`
`z
`
`dC
`Rh
`dz
`
`dC
`d
`
`Rh
`
`0
`
`dC
`Rh
`dt
`
`dt
`d
`
`Comparing Equations 2 and 3, it can be seen that:
`
` (4)
`
`u
`
`0
`
`)
`
`b
`
`dq
`dC
`
`Rh
`
`1(
`
`b
`
`dd
`
`z
`
`Equation 4 represents the velocity of the breakthrough front for Rh, and is a function only of the superficial
`velocity of the liquid, the void fraction in the bed, and the slope of the adsorption isotherm. The slope of
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 13
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`the adsorption isotherm was determined by slurring different quantities of C-941 in the hydrog crude
`stream at room temperature and obtaining equilibrium Rh concentrations. The following plot shows this
`isotherm.
`
`Adsorption Isotherm for Rh on Ecosorb C941
`Based on data from Chris Welch, 03-JAN-2003
`
`y = 64.2x + 0.8
`
`01234567
`
`Adsorbant Rh Concentration
`
`(mg/mL)
`
`0
`
`0.08
`0.06
`0.04
`0.02
`Liquid Rh Concentration (mg/mL)
`
`0.1
`
`Using Equation 4 and the isotherm above, it can be predicted that breakthrough will occur after ~300 mL of
`the hydrog crude batch has been eluded, in good agreement with preliminary adsorption experiments.
`
`Preliminary experiments have also began on pressure drop calculations over the fixed bed. This is
`especially important for this system since the hydrog crude stream is quite viscous. The standard pump
`that is shipped by Biotage with their FLASH-400 production-scale unit has a max discharge pressure of
`100 psig. Therefore, it may be necessary to purchase a larger pump that can produce a higher discharge
`pressure. The following graph shows experimental pressure drop values for the FLASH 12+M unit as well
`as predicted values based on the Ergun Equation.
`
`Pressure Drop over Fixed Bed Adsorber for pure Methanol
`
`Experimental Values
`
`Predicted Pressure Drop:
`Ergun Equation
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Pressure Drop over Bed (PSI)
`
`0.0
`
`0.5
`
`1.0
`
`1.5
`Flow Rate (mL/min)
`
`2.0
`
`2.5
`
`3.0
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 14
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`L-224,715
`Pure Crystallization
`
`After further studies this week, it still appears as if isoamyl alcohol (ISAA) may be a good solvent to either
`promote the transition of phosphate salt polymorph from Form II to Form I, or be a good solvent for a
`reactive crystallization process.
`
`The following table summarizes the experiments that have led to the conclusions concerning isoamyl
`alcohol:
`
`Date
`
`Person Department
`
`Experiment
`
`Results
`
`Week of 3-FEB-2003 R. Ferlita
`
`Week of 3-FEB-2003 S. Cypes
`
`Phys. Meas. Slurry pure Form I in ISAA at
`room temperature overnight
`Direct reactive crystallization
`of phosphate salt in ISAA at
`20C
`
`CERD
`
`Week of 10-FEB-2003 S. Cypes
`
`CERD
`
`Week of 17-FEB-2003 S. Cypes
`
`CERD
`
`Re-slurry a w etcake from
`EtOH crystallization in ISAA
`at room temperature
`
`Re-slurry a w etcake from
`EtOH crystallization in ISAA
`at 70C
`
`XRD show s mainly Form I w ith some
`Form III
`XRD show s mainly Form I w ith some
`Form III
`XRD show s w etcake w as all Form II to
`start (as expected). After 4 hours,
`w etcake w as still mainly Form II w ith a
`little Form I. After 24 hours mainly Form
`I w ith a little Form III.
`XRD revealed that turnover to 100%
`Form I occurs w ithin 1 hr. Remained
`100% Form I after 2 hrs. Upon cooling
`to 20C, turned back to 100% Form II do
`to slightly higher EtOH concentrations
`compared to previous experiments.
`Max allow able EtOH ~2 w eight%
`Mean PS original EtOH Wetcake = 40.8
`microns, Mean PS 1 hr ISAA (70C)
`Wetcake = 40.7 microns, PSD Identical
`betw een EtOH and ISAA, Habits
`Identical (Plates), No Amorphous
`Material in ISAA Wetcake (ssNMR)
`It has been shown that re-suspending a wetcake from an EtOH crystallization in ISAA at 70C for 1 hr will
`result in complete polymorph turnover to Form I. The logistics of either solvent switching from EtOH to
`ISAA in a slurry or performing a direct reactive crystallization in ISAA will both be studied.
`
`Week of 17-FEB-2003 S. Cypes
`
`CERD
`
`PSD, Habit and Crystallinity
`of crystals in ISAA
`
`Experiments for next week:
`Obtain a breakthrough curve for Rh removal in the FLASH-12 unit by eluding >300 mL
`hydrog crude stream in single experiment.
`Determine the cause of non-idealities in Rh breakthrough curve.
`Optimize the pure step reactive crystallization process in ISAA
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 15
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Memorandum
`To: Mahmoud Kaba
`From: Stephen Cypes
`Date: February 27, 2003
`Re: Weekly Progress Report, 02/24/03 02/28/03
`
`L-224,715
`Rhodium Removal from Hydrogenation Stream
`
`It was shown last week that the Biotage cartridge system could successfully be used to selectively remove
`Rhodium from the Hydrog crude stream more efficiently compared to a batch slurry of Ecosorb C-941.
`One of the main technological obstacles with using C-941 in the packed-bed cartridge system is the large
`pressure drop that results, even at moderate flowrates. For flowrates used in the pilot plant in the largest
`cartridge system, the pressure drop would be on the order of 200 psi, higher than the pressure rating of the
`cartridge system itself (100psi).
`
`The Ergun Equation can be used to predict pressure drop in a packed-bed, and was successfully used to
`predict the pressure drop in the C-941 cartridge (presented last week). The Ergun Equation states that the
`pressure drop is proportional to 1/Dp
` , where Dp is the mean particle diameter (about 3 microns for C-941).
`2
`Therefore, the large pressure drop (about 30 psi at 2.2 cm/min for a 15 cm long bed) is mainly attributed to
`the small particle size of the C-941.
`
`To alleviate the issue with pressure drop while maintaining high levels of Rhodium removal, another resin
`from Biotage (SN-Bio), which has identical acid-activated carbon as C-941, was screened for use in the
`cartridge. SN-Bio is an attractive alternative due to the fact that the material is classified (i.e. the PSD is
`narrow and the mean size is ~35 microns, significantly larger than C-941). The pressure drop across a
`packed cartridge of SN-Bio is compared to C-941 for methanol below. For any given pressure drop, 5x the
`flowrate results for the SN-Bio packed-cartridge. As a reference, a flowrate of 8mL/min in the lab-scale
`cartridge corresponds to a flowrate of 35L/min in the pilot-scale cartridge system.
`
`Pressure Drop over Fixed Bed Adsorber
`
`C941 - Experimental
`
`SN-Bio - Experimental
`
`0.0
`
`2.0
`
`8.0
`6.0
`4.0
`Flow Rate (mL/min)
`
`10.0
`
`12.0
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Pressure Drop over Bed (PSI)
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 16
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Since SN-Bio appears to result in a solution to the pressure drop issue, the Rhodium removal
`characteristics of this resin needed to be evaluated. By producing a slurry of different amounts of SN-Bio
`in a set volume of hydrog crude stream, the adsorption isotherm for this resin can be compared to C-941.
`The results are shown in the graph below. SN-Bio actually does a slightly better job of removing Rhodium
`from the hydrog stream as compared to C-941.
`
`Adsorption Isotherm for Rh on Ecosorb C941
`Based on data from Chris Welch, 03-JAN-2003
`
`Ecosorb C-941
`Biotage SN-Bio
`0.06
`
`0.04
`0.02
`Liquid Rh Concentration (mg/mL)
`
`0
`
`5
`4.5
`4
`3.5
`3
`2.5
`2
`1.5
`1
`0.5
`0
`
`Adsorbant Rh Concentration
`
`(mg/mL)
`
`
`
`L-224,715
`Pure Crystallization
`
`It has been shown in a number of experiments that isoamyl alcohol (ISAA) can be used to facilitate the
`formation of either pure Form I phosphate salt or a mixture of Forms I and III. So far, three methods of
`using ISAA to facilitate the polymorph turnover have been investigated. In the order in which experiments
`were performed, they are:
`Re-slurry a wetcake from an ethanol crystallization in ISAA, allow turnover to occur, and re-
`filter;
`Perform the current crystallization procedure in ethanol, solvent switch the slurry to ISAA,
`allow turnover to occur, and filter;
`Perform a reactive crystallization directly in ISAA to produce the desired polymorph.
`
`Details on the status of each of these methods follows:
`
`Re-slurry a Wetcake from Ethanol
`Experiments revealed that the maximum allowable ethanol concentration in the ISAA slurry must be <2
`weight% to achieve a turnover from Form II to Form I and/or III. Therefore, the wetcake from the ethanol
`concentration must be partially dried to an LOD of ~10 weight%, and this wetcake added to 10 L/kg ISAA.
`The flowsheet for this procedure looks like one of two methods:
`Re-slurry in 10 L/kg
`ISAA at 20C, 24
`hrs, Filter
`
`Method A (Deliver Mix of Form I and III)
`Crystallization
`Filter Wetcake, Form II
`in Ethanol
`(LOD<10%)
`
`Wetcake
`Forms I and III
`
`Merck Exhibit 2126, Page 17
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`Method B (Deliver 100% Form I)
`
`Crystallization
`in Ethanol
`
`Filter Wetcake, Form II
`(LOD<10%)
`
`Re-slurry in 10 L/kg
`ISAA at 70C, 1 hr,
`Filter
`
`Wetcake
`100% Form I
`
`Solvent Switch a Slurry from Ethanol to ISAA
`
`A slurry of large phosphate salt crystals (mean = 50 microns) was suspended in denatured ethanol. A
`vacuum distillation was performed at 50oC to solvent switch to ISAA and promote a polymorph turnover to
`100% Form I. The table below summarizes the results from this experiment.
`
`ST EP
`
`T emp
`(C )
`
`P ressure
`(to rr)
`
`EtOH
`M ass
`(g)
`
`ISA A
`M ass
`(g)
`
`P ho sphate Salt
`C o ncentratio n
`(mg/ g)
`
`M o le%
`ISA A
`
`Weight%
`ISA A
`
`C rystal
`F o rm
`
`M ean
`P article
`Size
`(micro ns)
`
`C rystal
`H abit
`
`Add 240 g Denatured EtOH to 30 g Phosphate Salt (M ix Form I and Form III). Agitate 2 hrs. to solvate.
`50.00
`Start
`50
`225
`240
`0
`111
`0%
`0%
`Form II
`Finish
`50
`225
`110
`0
`214
`0%
`0%
`Form II Undetermined
`Add 110 g Isoamyl Alcohol
`Start
`50
`155
`Finish
`50
`120
`Add 60 g Isoamyl Alcohol
`Start
`50
`115
`Finish
`50
`45
`Add 50 g Isoamyl Alcohol
`Start
`50
`40
`Finish
`50
`22
`
`34%
`45%
`
`56%
`82%
`
`85%
`96%
`
`50%
`61%
`
`71%
`89%
`
`92%
`98%
`
`Form II Undetermined
`Form II Undetermined
`
`Form II Undetermined
`Form II Undetermined
`
`Form II Undetermined
`Form I
`45.53
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`110
`70
`
`70
`20
`
`20
`4.5
`
`110
`110
`
`170
`170
`
`220
`220
`
`120
`143
`
`111
`136
`
`111
`118
`
`P

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket