throbber
Long-Term Treatment With the Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV
`Inhibitor P32/98 Causes Sustained Improvements in
`Glucose Tolerance, Insulin Sensitivity,
`Hyperinsulinemia, and ␤-Cell Glucose Responsiveness in
`VDF (fa/fa) Zucker Rats
`
`J.A. Pospisilik,1 S.G. Stafford,1 H-U. Demuth,2 R. Brownsey,3 W. Parkhouse,4 D.T. Finegood,4
`C.H.S. McIntosh,1 and R.A. Pederson1
`
`The incretins, glucose-dependent insulinotropic poly-
`peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are
`responsible for >50% of nutrient-stimulated insulin
`secretion. After being released into the circulation, GIP
`and GLP-1 are rapidly inactivated by the circulating
`enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DP IV). The use of DP
`IV inhibitors to enhance these insulinotropic hormonal
`axes has proven effective on an acute scale in both
`animals and humans; however, the long-term effects of
`these compounds have yet to be determined. Therefore,
`we carried out the following study: two groups of fa/fa
`Zucker rats (n ⴝ 6 each) were treated twice daily for 3
`months with the DP IV inhibitor P32/98 (20 mg 䡠 kgⴚ1 䡠
`dayⴚ1, p.o.). Monthly oral glucose tolerance tests
`(OGTTs), performed after drug washout, revealed a
`progressive and sustained improvement in glucose tol-
`erance in the treated animals. After 12 weeks of treat-
`ment, peak OGTT blood glucose values in the treated
`animals averaged 8.5 mmol/l less than in the controls
`(12.0 ⴞ 0.7 vs. 20.5 ⴞ 1.3 mmol/l, respectively). Concom-
`itant insulin determinations showed an increased early-
`phase insulin response in the treated group (43%
`increase). Furthermore, in response to an 8.8 mmol/l
`glucose perfusion, pancreata from controls showed no
`increase in insulin secretion, whereas pancreata from
`treated animals exhibited a 3.2-fold rise in insulin se-
`cretion, indicating enhanced ␤-cell glucose responsive-
`ness. Also, both basal and insulin-stimulated glucose
`
`From the 1Department of Physiology, University of British Columbia, Vancou-
`ver, Canada; 2Probiodrug GmbH, Halle (Saale), Germany; the 3Department of
`Biochemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; and the
`4School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R.A. Pederson, Depart-
`ment of Physiology, University of British Columbia, 2146 Health Sciences Mall,
`Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3. E-Mail: pederson@interchange.ubc.ca.
`Received for publication 28 August 2001 and accepted in revised form 9
`January 2002.
`ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; DP IV, dipeptidyl peptidase IV; GIP, glucose-
`dependent insulinotropic polypeptide-(1– 42); GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide
`1-(7-36)amide; GLP-1a, active GLP-17–36; GS, glycogen synthase; OGTT, oral
`glucose tolerance test.
`H.-U.D. is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of and a
`shareholder in Probiodrug GmbH, a pharmaceutical company in the process
`of developing a DP IV inhibitor treatment for diabetes and its complications.
`R.A.P. and C.H.S.M. are both members of a scientific advisory panel to
`Probiodrug and receive consulting fees for their participation. R.A.P. and
`C.H.S.M. also receive grant/research support from Probiodrug to support
`studies on the drug candidate P32/98 and its utility in treating diabetes and its
`complications.
`
`uptake were increased in soleus muscle strips from the
`treated group (by 20 and 50%, respectively), providing
`direct evidence for an improvement in peripheral insu-
`lin sensitivity. In summary, long-term DP IV inhibitor
`treatment was shown to cause sustained improvements
`in glucose tolerance, insulinemia, ␤-cell glucose respon-
`siveness, and peripheral insulin sensitivity, novel ef-
`fects that provide further support for the use of DP IV
`inhibitors in the treatment of diabetes. Diabetes 51:
`943–950, 2002
`
`In 1995, Kieffer et al. (1) showed glucose-dependent
`
`insulinotropic polypeptide-(1– 42) (GIP) and gluca-
`gon-like peptide 1-(-36)amide (GLP-1) to be sub-
`strates of
`the
`circulating
`enzyme dipeptidyl
`peptidase IV (DP IV) in vivo. DP IV is an ubiquitous
`ectopeptidase that preferentially cleaves oligopeptides
`with a penultimate prolyl, alanyl, or seryl residue at the
`NH2-terminus, a substrate specificity that encompasses a
`number of bioactive peptides including GIP, GLP-1, and
`the counterregulatory hormone glucagon (2,3). DP
`IV⫺mediated cleavage of GIP and GLP-1 is a rapid pro-
`cess, yielding a circulating half-life of 1–2 min for the
`parent peptides. The resultant NH2-terminally truncated
`products GIP3– 42 and GLP-19 –36amide have been shown in a
`number of studies to be inactive at the receptor level and
`thus noninsulinotropic (4,5). Subsequent studies have
`clearly established DP IV⫺mediated NH2-terminal trunca-
`tion as the primary mechanism for GIP and GLP-1 inacti-
`vation (1,6 – 8).
`Also known as the incretins, GIP and GLP-1 make up the
`endocrine component of the entero-insular (gut-pancreas)
`axis—a concept describing the neural, endocrine, and
`substrate signaling pathways between the small intestine
`and the islets of Langerhans (9). Together, the incretins
`are responsible for ⬎50% of nutrient-stimulated insulin
`release. In addition, the incretins share a number of
`non-insulin-mediated effects that contribute to effective
`glucose homeostasis. GIP and GLP-1 have both been
`shown to inhibit gastric motility and secretion (10,11),
`promote ␤-cell glucose competence (12), and stimulate
`insulin gene transcription and biosynthesis (13,14). In
`addition, GIP has been reported to play a role in the
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 51, APRIL 2002
`
`943
`
`Merck Exhibit 2113, Page 1
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DP IV INHIBITOR P32/98 IMPROVES ␤-CELL FUNCTION
`
`regulation of fat metabolism (15), and GLP-1 has been
`shown to stimulate ␤-cell differentiation and growth (16),
`as well as to restore islet-cell glucose responsiveness (17).
`We have previously shown that acute administration of
`the specific DP IV inhibitor P32/98 (isoleucyl-thiazolidine)
`in Zucker rats enhances insulin secretion and glucose
`tolerance (18), improvements that were much more pro-
`found in the diabetic, fatty animals than in their lean
`littermates (19). Balkan et al. (20) confirmed these findings
`using the DP IV inhibitor NVP-DPP728 and went on to
`provide evidence for the previously postulated stabiliza-
`tion of, and rise in, plasma active GLP-17–36 (GLP-1a) after
`inhibitor treatment. However, despite its efficacy, the use
`of DP IV inhibitors on an acute scale is unlikely to exploit
`the longer term incretin actions involving altered intracel-
`lular protein function and gene expression. It was there-
`fore hypothesized that chronic DP IV inhibitor treatment
`of diabetic animals,
`in addition to improving glucose
`tolerance, would enhance ␤-cell glucose responsiveness,
`replication, and turnover, and thus result in sustained
`improvements in ␤-cell function.
`In the present study, two groups of Vancouver diabetic
`fatty (VDF) rats were treated for 3 months with the DP IV
`inhibitor P32/98. VDF rats are a substrain of the fatty
`(fa/fa) Zucker rat, which display abnormalities character-
`istic of type 2 diabetes, including mild hyperglycemia,
`hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, hyperlipidemia, im-
`paired insulin secretion, and peripheral and hepatic insulin
`resistance (21). Parameters including body weight, food
`and water intake, and oral glucose tolerance were regu-
`larly examined to track the progression of the disease and
`study the possible therapeutic effects of the inhibitor. At
`the end of the treatment period, ex vivo fat and muscle
`insulin sensitivity were assessed, and pancreas perfusion
`was performed to measure ␤-cell glucose responsiveness.
`The results provided the first demonstration that long-term
`DP IV inhibitor treatment causes progressive and sus-
`tained improvements in glucose tolerance, insulin sensi-
`tivity, and ␤-cell glucose responsiveness.
`
`RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
`Materials. The DP IV inhibitor P32/98 (di-[2S,3S]-2-amino-3-methyl-pen-
`tanoic-1,3-thiazolidine fumarate) was synthesized, as previously described
`(22).
`Animals. We randomly assigned six pairs of male fatty (fa/fa) VDF Zucker rat
`littermates to a control or treatment (P32/98) group at 440 g body wt (age 11 ⫾
`0.5 weeks). Animals were housed on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 0600)
`and allowed access to standard rat diet and water ad libitum. The techniques
`used in this study were in compliance with the guidelines of the Canadian
`Council on Animal Care and were approved by the University of British
`Columbia Council on Animal Care, Certificate # A99-006.
`Protocol for daily monitoring and drug administration. The treatment
`group received P32/98 (10 mg/kg) by oral gavage twice daily (0800 and 1700)
`for 100 days, and the control animals received concurrent doses of vehicle
`consisting of a 1% cellulose solution. Every 2 days, body weight, morning and
`evening blood glucose, and food and water intake were assessed. Blood
`samples were acquired from the tail, and glucose was measured using a
`SureStep analyzer (Lifescan Canada, Burnaby, Canada). Food and water
`intake were measured by subtraction.
`Protocol for monthly assessment of glucose tolerance. Every 4 weeks
`from the start of the experiment, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 1 g/kg)
`was performed after an 18-h fast and complete drug washout (⬃12 circulating
`half-lives for P32/93). No 0800 dose was administered in this case. Blood
`samples (250 ␮l) were collected from the tail using heparinized capillary
`tubes, centrifuged, and stored at –20°C. In the case of the 12-week OGTT,
`blood was collected directly into tubes containing the DP IV inhibitor P32/98
`(final concentration 10 ␮mol/l) for analysis of active GLP-1 (EGLP-35K; Linco
`
`Research, St. Charles, MO). Plasma insulin was measured by radioimmuno-
`assay using a guinea pig anti-insulin antibody (GP-01), as previously described
`(23), and blood glucose was measured as described above. Plasma DP IV
`activity was determined using a colorimetric assay measuring the liberation of
`p-nitroanilide (A405 nm) from the DP IV substrate H-gly-pro-pNA (Sigma;
`Parkville, Ontario, Canada). It is important to note that the assay involves a
`20-fold sample dilution and therefore underestimates the actual degree of
`inhibition occurring in the undiluted sample when using rapidly reversible
`inhibitors such as P32/98.
`Estimations of insulin sensitivity made from OGTT data were performed
`using the composite insulin sensitivity index proposed by Matsuda and
`DeFronzo (24). Calculation of the index was made according to the following
`equation:
`
`CISI ⫽
`
`10,000
`冑(FPG 䡠 FPI)(MG 䡠 MI)
`
`where FPG and FPI are fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations,
`respectively, and MG and MI are the mean glucose and insulin concentrations,
`respectively, over the course of the OGTT.
`Protocol for 24-h glucose, insulin, and DP IV profile. To determine the
`effects of DP IV inhibition over a 24-h period, blood glucose, insulin, and DP
`IV activity levels were measured as described above, every 3 h for 24 h, 6
`weeks into the study. Drug dosing was continued at the appropriate times
`during the profile.
`Skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity. Uptake of 14C-labeled glucose in soleus
`muscle strips was measured as an indicator of skeletal muscle insulin
`sensitivity. In brief, after an overnight fast and 18 h after the last dose of
`P32/98, the animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (Somnotol;
`⬃50 mg/kg). The soleus muscles of both hindlimbs were exposed and isolated.
`After freeing the muscle by severing the proximal and distal tendons, strips of
`⬃25–35 mg were pulled from the muscle (the two outer thirds of each muscle
`were used). After being weighed, the strips were fixed onto stainless steel
`clips at their resting length and allowed to stabilize for 30 min in a
`Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer supplemented with 3 mmol/l pyruvate, con-
`tinuously gassed with 95% O2:5% CO2 and held at 37°C in a shaking water bath.
`These conditions were maintained for the duration of the experiment, unless
`otherwise stated.
`To assess glucose uptake in response to insulin, muscle strips underwent
`two preincubations (30 and 60 min) followed by a 30-min test incubation. Both
`the second preincubation and the test incubation contained 0 or 800 ␮U/ml
`insulin. The test incubation was performed in media supplemented with
`[3H]inulin (0.1 ␮Ci/ml) as a measure of extracellular space and the nonme-
`tabolizable glucose analogue [14C]-3-O-methylglucose (0.05 ␮Ci/ml) for mea-
`surement of glucose uptake. After incubation, each strip was blotted dry and
`digested with proteinase K (0.25 ␮g/ml), and the radioactivity of the muscle
`digests was measured with a liquid scintillation⫺counting dual-isotopic
`program.
`Adipose tissue insulin sensitivity. To estimate insulin sensitivity in adipose
`tissue, glycogen synthase (GS) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) levels were
`measured, as previously described (25,26). In brief, 3-cm3 samples of ependy-
`mal adipose tissue were obtained from anesthetized animals and subjected to
`a 16-min collagenase digestion (0.5 mg/ml). Recovered adipocytes were
`washed three times and allowed to stabilize for 1 h in 37°C Krebs buffer
`repetitively gassed with 95% O2:5% CO2. Then 2-ml aliquots of the adipocyte
`suspension containing 0, 100, 250, 800, and 1,500 ␮U/ml insulin were incu-
`bated for 30 min and immediately flash frozen on liquid nitrogen and stored at
`–70°C. Before ACC and GS assessment, stored samples were thawed, homog-
`enized in buffer (pH 7.2) containing 20 mmol/l MOPS, 250 mmol/l sucrose, 2
`mmol/l EDTA, 2 mmol/l EGTA, 2.5 mmol/l benzamidine, and centrifuged (15
`min at 15,000g).
`For measurement of ACC activity, 50-␮l aliquots of supernatant, preincu-
`bated in the presence or absence of 20 mmol/l citrate, were added to 450 ␮l of
`[14C]HCO3 containing assay buffer (pH 7.4; 50 mmol/l HEPES, 10 mmol/l
`MgSO4, 5 mmol/l EDTA, 5.9 mmol/l ATP, 7.8 mmol/l glutathione, 2 mg/ml BSA,
`15 mmol/l KHCO3, 150 ␮mol/l acetyl CoA). After 3 min, the reaction was
`arrested by the addition of 200 ␮l of 5 mol/l HCl. Samples were dried for 6 h,
`resuspended in 400 ␮l of distilled water, combined with 3 ml scintillation
`cocktail, and counted on a Beckman LS 6001C ␤-counter.
`GS activity was measured using a modification of a filter paper method
`(26): 25 ␮l of the cell extracts, prepared as indicated above, were added to
`assay buffer (pH 7.0; 75 mmol/l MOPS, 75 mmol/l NaF, 10 mg/ml glycogen, 2
`mmol/l UDP-[14C]glucose) held at 30°C in the presence or absence of 15
`mmol/l glucose-6-phosphate. Each reaction was stopped by spotting 50 ␮l of
`the reaction mixture onto Whatmann 3MM filter paper and immersing the
`paper in 66% ethanol. After three ethanol washes, the samples were air dried
`
`944
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 51, APRIL 2002
`
`Merck Exhibit 2113, Page 2
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`and the [14C] activity (UDP-[14C]glucose incorporation into glycogen) was
`determined.
`Protocol for pancreas perfusion. After excision of soleus and ependymal
`adipose tissue samples, the pancreas was isolated and perfused with a
`low-to-high glucose (4.4 to 8.8 mmol/l) perfusion protocol, as previously
`described (27). After exposure through a mid-line incision on the ventral
`aspect, the pancreas was isolated, all minor vessels were ligated, and a
`glucose perfusate was introduced through the celiac artery. Perfusion effluent
`was collected at 1-min intervals via the portal vein, with a perfusion rate of 4
`ml/min. Samples were stored at –20°C until analysis.
`Immunohistochemistry and ␤-cell mass determination. Pancreata were
`removed from anesthetized animals (50 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital) and
`placed directly into fixative for 48 h (44% formaldehyde, 47% distilled H2O, 9%
`glacial acetic acid). After being embedded in paraffin, 5-␮m tissue sections
`were cut, mounted onto slides, and dried ready for staining. To assess ␤-cell
`area, sections were stained first with a guinea pig anti-insulin primary
`antibody and then with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig secondary.
`Slides were developed using diaminobenzidine and counterstained with
`hematoxylin. Analyses were performed using Northern Eclipse Software
`(Empix Imaging, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), as previously described (28).
`Statistical Analysis. Student’s t test and ANOVA were used, where appro-
`priate, to test statistical significance of the data (P ⬍ 0.05). Analyses were
`performed using Prism 3.0 data analysis software (GraphPad Software, San
`Diego, CA).
`
`RESULTS
`Effects of P32/98 treatment on body weight, daily
`blood glucose, and food and water intake. VDF rats
`treated with P32/98 displayed a 12.5% (25 g) reduction in
`weight gain over the 3-month treatment period (control:
`211 ⫾ 8 g; treated: 176 ⫾ 6 g) (Fig. 1A). Measurements of
`food and water intake revealed a minor decrease in water
`intake (Fig. 1B) in the treated animals concomitant with
`unaltered food intake. Food intake over the course of the
`experiment averaged 30.0 ⫾ 0.4 and 30.4 ⫾ 0.3 g 䡠 rat⫺1 䡠
`day⫺1 in the treated and control groups, respectively. Food
`and water intake decreased over the course of the exper-
`iment, paralleling the decrease in the rate of weight gain as
`the growth of the animals began to plateau at around
`600 – 650 g (data not shown). Twice-daily monitoring of
`blood glucose revealed no differences in morning or
`evening blood glucose values between the experimental
`groups, although neither group displayed notably hyper-
`glycemic values (data not shown). Morning blood glucose
`levels over the course of the experiment averaged 5.0 ⫾
`0.1 and 5.3 ⫾ 0.1 mmol/l in the treated and control animals,
`respectively. Evening blood glucose values averaged 6.7 ⫾
`0.1 and 7.0 ⫾ 0.2 mmol/l, respectively. Hematocrit, mea-
`sured at 4-week intervals, indicated no adverse effects of
`the blood-sampling protocol used, averaging 43.4 – 45.3% in
`both groups.
`Effects of P32/98 treatment on blood glucose, insulin,
`and DP IV levels over 24 h. After 6 weeks of treatment,
`a 24-h profile of blood glucose, insulin, and DP IV activity
`levels was obtained by taking blood samples at 3-h inter-
`vals, interrupting neither treatment administration nor the
`light/dark cycle. The profile confirmed that administration
`of P32/98 caused significant inhibition of DP IV activity
`over the majority of the 24-h cycle, with at least 65%
`inhibition during the feeding cycle (Fig. 2A). The inte-
`grated blood glucose excursion in the treated animals was
`75% that of the controls, peaking at 7.7 ⫾ 0.3 mmol/l, as
`compared to 9.8 ⫾ 0.6 mmol/l for the untreated animals
`(Fig. 2B). The corresponding plasma insulin profile
`showed a decrease not only in peak insulin values, but also
`in “basal,” nonfeeding values (⬃0800 to 1800) in the
`treated animals (Fig. 2C).
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 51, APRIL 2002
`
`J.A. POSPISILIK AND ASSOCIATES
`
`intake measured in DP IV
`FIG. 1. Body weight and water
`inhibitorⴚtreated (E) or control (f) VDF rats (n ⴝ 6 in each group).
`Body weight (A), and water intake (B) were measured along with
`morning and evening blood glucose levels and food intake (not shown)
`every 2 days. *P < 0.05 vs. other group.
`
`Effects of P32/98 treatment on oral glucose toler-
`ance. The three OGTTs, performed in the absence of
`circulating P32/98 and at 1-month intervals, were used to
`monitor the progression of the disease state in the control
`animals and to document any improvements displayed in
`the treated group. The initial OGTT, administered after 4
`weeks of treatment, showed significant decreases (⬃2
`mmol/l) in basal and 45-, 60-, and 90-min blood glucose
`values in the treated group, despite overlapping plasma
`insulin excursions (Fig. 3A). Data from the second OGTT
`were very similar, with the exception that the 120-min
`blood glucose value was also significantly lowered in the
`treated group than in the control group (10.8 ⫾ 0.8 vs.
`12.3 ⫾ 0.8, respectively); once again, the insulin profiles
`were superimposable (data not shown). The final OGTT,
`performed after 12 weeks of treatment, showed a marked
`difference in glucose tolerance between the two groups,
`with significantly decreased blood glucose values ob-
`served at all time points. Peak blood glucose values in the
`treated group averaged 12.0 ⫾ 0.7 mmol/l, 8.5 mmol/l less
`than that of control animals (Fig. 3B), whereas 2-h values
`in the treated group had returned to 9.2 ⫾ 0.5 mmol/l, a
`40% reduction compared to control values. GLP-1a levels,
`measured during the final OGTT using an NH2-terminally
`
`945
`
`Merck Exhibit 2113, Page 3
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DP IV INHIBITOR P32/98 IMPROVES ␤-CELL FUNCTION
`
`FIG. 2. A 24-h profile of plasma DP IV activity (A), blood glucose (B),
`and plasma insulin (C) levels in VDF rats after 6 weeks of treatment,
`either with (E) or without (f) the DP IV inhibitor P32/98 (n ⴝ 6 in each
`group). Treated animals were administered 10 mg/kg P32/98 twice
`daily, as indicated by the arrows, and whereas the control group
`received only the 1% cellulose injection vehicle. *P < 0.05 vs. other
`group.
`
`directed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, were found
`to be unchanged (Fig. 3B). Despite this lack of altered
`GLP-1a levels, the early-phase insulin response measured
`in the treated group exceeded that of the control animals
`by 43%. However, the integrated insulin responses be-
`tween the two groups showed no significant differences.
`Analysis of the OGTT data using the composite insulin
`sensitivity index of Matsuda and DeFronzo (24) revealed a
`progressive increase in estimated insulin sensitivity of the
`treated animals relative to controls (Fig. 3C).
`Comparison of the OGTTs over the course of the
`experiment revealed a progressive decrease in both fasting
`and peak blood glucose values in animals treated with
`P32/98, improvements that were not observed in control
`animals (Fig. 4A and B). Peak insulin values did not differ
`significantly between the two experimental groups until
`the final, 12-week, OGTT, at which time the peak insulin
`levels in the treated animals exceeded those of the control
`
`946
`
`animals by an average of 43% (Fig. 4C). Plasma DP IV
`activity, measured at the start of each OGTT, was signifi-
`cantly increased in the treated group by week 8 of the
`study, and the elevation was maintained at week 12 (Fig.
`4D).
`Effects of chronic DP IV inhibitor treatment on pan-
`creatic glucose responsiveness. A low-to-high step glu-
`cose perfusion protocol was performed on the pancreata
`of half of each group of animals. The shift from 4.4 to 8.8
`mmol/l glucose perfusate caused a 3.2-fold increase in
`insulin secretory rate in the pancreata from the treated
`animals (Fig. 5). The insulin secretory rate shifted from a
`basal 570 ⫾ 170 to over 2,100 ␮U/min within 2 min of high
`glucose perfusion. The same glucose step procedure failed
`to elicit any significant response in the control pancreata
`until well over 20 min of high glucose perfusion (Fig. 5).
`Effects of chronic DP IV inhibitor treatment on mus-
`cle and fat insulin sensitivity. To further define the
`apparent improvements in insulin sensitivity observed in
`the OGTT data, assays of muscle and fat insulin sensitivity
`were performed. GS and ACC activity were measured in
`isolated adipocytes along with uptake of 14C-labeled glu-
`cose into soleus muscle strips. ACC levels in adipose from
`both experimental groups were minimal (approaching
`limits of detection), lacked insulin responsiveness, and
`showed no differences between the two groups (data not
`shown). GS activity also appeared insensitive to insulin,
`although the activity of the enzyme at all measured insulin
`concentrations was higher in the treated animals than in
`their control littermates (Fig. 6A). Soleus muscle strips
`taken from the treated animals exhibited significantly
`higher rates of glucose uptake, in both the basal and the
`insulin-stimulated states. Glucose uptake in the nonstimu-
`lated state was 22% higher in the treated rats (Fig. 6B). The
`insulin-stimulated rise in glucose uptake was enhanced in
`the treated compared to in the control group (87.5 ⫾ 10.4
`vs. 58.5 ⫾ 3.5 cpm/mg tissue at 800 ␮U/ml insulin, respec-
`tively).
`Effects of chronic DP IV inhibitor treatment on ␤-cell
`area and islet morphology. The 3-month oral DP IV
`inhibitor regimen yielded no significant differences in
`␤-cell area or islet morphology. Islets from control and
`treated animals comprised 1.51 ⫾ 0.04 and 1.50 ⫾ 0.03% of
`the total pancreatic area, respectively. Large, irregularly
`shaped islets with significant ␤-cell hyperplasia were ob-
`served in both groups, a morphology characteristic of the
`fa/fa Zucker rat.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The use of DP IV inhibitors to enhance the entero-insular
`axis has attracted much recent interest as a potential
`therapeutic strategy in the treatment of diabetes. Several
`recent studies have established the efficacy of these com-
`pounds on an acute scale (18 –20,29). However, investiga-
`tions performed on an acute scale do not exploit the
`potential benefits of long-term incretin effects, such as the
`enhancement of ␤-cell glucose sensitivity and the stimula-
`tion of ␤-cell mitogenesis, differentiation, and insulin bio-
`synthesis. Here we reported the results of the first study of
`long-term DP IV inhibitor treatment in a model of type 2
`diabetes, the VDF fa/fa rat. The results demonstrated that
`long-term DP IV inhibition arrested the progression of the
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 51, APRIL 2002
`
`Merck Exhibit 2113, Page 4
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`J.A. POSPISILIK AND ASSOCIATES
`
`FIG. 3. OGTT administered to both DP IV inhibitorⴚtreated (E) and control (f) VDF rats (n ⴝ 6 in each group) after 4 (A) and 12 (B) weeks
`of treatment. Blood glucose and plasma insulin measurements were performed in both series of tests, while the active fraction of plasma GLP-1
`was also measured at 12 weeks. The inset in B shows the integrated plasma insulin responses for the 12-week OGTT. C: Relative insulin
`sensitivity, control versus treated, corresponding to the 4- and 12-week OGTTs shown in A and B. *P < 0.05 vs. other group.
`
`fa/fa Zucker diabetic syndrome and caused a progressive
`improvement in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and
`␤-cell glucose responsiveness.
`
`Daily monitoring revealed a 12.5% decrease in body
`weight gain (4% reduction in final body weight) in the
`treated animals compared to untreated controls (Fig. 1A).
`
`FIG. 4. Comparison of fasting (A) and peak (B) blood glucose, peak plasma insulin (C), and fasting plasma DP IV activity (D) measured during
`OGTTs performed at 4-week intervals in control (f) or DP IV inhibitorⴚtreated (E) VDF rats (n ⴝ 6 in each group). *P < 0.05 vs. other group.
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 51, APRIL 2002
`
`947
`
`Merck Exhibit 2113, Page 5
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`DP IV INHIBITOR P32/98 IMPROVES ␤-CELL FUNCTION
`
`FIG. 5. Insulin release measured during perfusion of pancreata from
`VDF rats after 3 months of treatment with (E) or without (f) the DP
`IV inhibitor P32/98 (n ⴝ 3 in each group).
`
`Although not statistically significant, mean food intake in
`the treated animals averaged 0.4 g 䡠 day⫺1 䡠 rat⫺1 (41 g/rat
`over the course of the study) less than those in the control
`
`FIG. 6. Adipose tissue glycogen synthase activity (A) and uptake of
`3-O-[14C] methyl-D-glucose into soleus muscle strips (B) isolated from
`VDF rats after 12 weeks of P32/98 treatment (䡺) or a control 1%
`cellulose solution (f) (n ⴝ 6 in each group). *P < 0.05 vs.
`corresponding control value; †P < 0.01 vs. corresponding control value;
`‡statistically significant difference from basal ([insulin] ⴝ 0 ␮U/ml).
`
`948
`
`group. The cumulative 41 g/rat nonsignificant difference in
`food intake over the course of the experiment might
`partially account for the decreased weight gain in the
`treated animals. These findings rule out neither the possi-
`bility that the gastric inhibitory actions of the incretins nor
`the reported satiety effects of GLP-1 played a role in the
`decrease in weight gain.
`Monitored every 2 days, morning and evening blood
`glucose values showed no significant response to the
`inhibitor treatment, a likely reflection of two points. First,
`the blood-sampling times (0800 and 1700) corresponded to
`postabsorptive and early feeding states, respectively, with
`blood glucose values in the ranges of 4.5–5.5 and 6.0 – 8.0
`mmol/l, respectively. In light of the hypothesized, glucose-
`dependent mechanism of action of the treatment, large
`decreases in glucose values would not be anticipated at
`these glycemic levels. Second, both morning and evening
`blood samples were collected immediately before drug
`dosing, at times of minimum DP IV inhibition, when the
`potential for any acute therapeutic effects of the treatment
`were at a minimum. Both points are supported by the 24-h
`profile shown in Fig. 2.
`The unaltered postabsorptive blood glucose values not-
`withstanding, DP IV inhibitor treatment effectively re-
`duced both prandial blood glucose and blood glucose
`responses to an OGTT (Figs. 2 and 3). During the 24-h
`profile, the control animals exhibited a 105% rise in plasma
`insulin in response to a 5.2-mmol/l
`increase in blood
`glucose, whereas the treated animals displayed a 160%
`insulin response to a much smaller glucose excursion (3.0
`mmol/l). Although these differences were likely attribut-
`able, at least in part, to an acute increase in circulating
`incretin levels induced by P32/98, the pronounced early-
`phase insulin peak exhibited during the OGTT was not
`(the OGTT took place after complete drug washout). The
`latter data suggest not only an increased insulin sensitiv-
`ity, but also an enhanced ␤-cell glucose responsiveness, in
`treated animals. Ultimately, an increase in ␤-cell glucose
`responsiveness was clearly demonstrated through pan-
`creas perfusion. After exposure to an elevated (8.8 mmol/l)
`glucose perfusate, pancreata from the control animals
`showed an absence of first-phase insulin release, whereas
`those from the treated group exhibited an immediate
`3.2-fold insulin response (Fig. 5). The absence of an
`early-phase insulin release seen in the control group is
`characteristic of the VDF rat and is a hallmark of type 2
`diabetes (21). Considering the lack of altered ␤-cell area or
`islet morphology, these data suggest that long-term treat-
`ment with P32/98 causes an improvement in the ability of
`the existing ␤-cell population to sense and respond to
`increases in glucose concentration. These findings are
`consistent with the reported effects of GLP-1 on ␤-cell
`differentiation, as well as numerous reports showing the
`glucose-sensitizing effects of GIP and GLP-1 in both islets
`and immortalized ␤-cell models (30,31).
`Elevated fasting blood glucose in the face of hyperinsu-
`linemia and poor clearance of an oral glucose load are
`consistent with the hepatic and muscle insulin resistance,
`respectively, described in the fa/fa Zucker rat. Findings in
`the present study showed that DP IV inhibitor treatment at
`least partially corrected both of these metabolic devia-
`tions, suggesting improvements in both sites of insulin
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 51, APRIL 2002
`
`Merck Exhibit 2113, Page 6
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`IPR2020-00040
`
`

`

`resistance. An increased glucose-to-insulin ratio evident
`during the postabsorptive state of the 24-h profile (Fig. 2),
`as well as fasting values of the 12-week OGTT (Figs. 3 and
`4), were consistent with a decrease in insulin resistance in
`the treated animals. The latter increase in insulin sensitiv-
`ity was shown to be significant at both 4 and 12 weeks
`using the composite insulin sensitivity index of Matsuda
`and DeFronzo (24). This mathematical analysis was previ-
`ously validated (with high correlation) against the hyper-
`insulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique in 153 subjects
`with varying degrees of insulin resistance. The relative
`insulin sensitivity of the treated animals improved with
`each successive OGTT, ultimately reaching a relative
`index score 1.56 ⫾ 0.26 times that of the control animals.
`The results of the 24-h glucose/insulin/DP IV profile and
`the OGTT were corroborated by direct measurements of
`glucose uptake in soleus muscle strips, which clearly
`demonstrated improved glucose uptake in both the non-
`stimulated and the insulin-stimulated states (Fig. 6).
`Though somewhat controversial, both GIP and GLP-1 (and
`exendin-4) have been reported to increase muscle insulin
`sensitivity through the stimulation of glycogen synthesis
`and glucose uptake (32–35). In addition, a number of
`whole animal studies using GLP-1 or related GLP-1 recep-
`tor agonists have observed similar improvements in
`glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Young et al. (36)
`showed that long-term administration of the GLP-1 agonist
`exendin-4 causes glucose-lowering an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket