throbber
United States Patent (19)
`Jasper et al.
`
`(54) MAXIMALRATIO DIVERSITY COMBINING
`TECHNIQUE
`
`75) Inventors: Steven C. Jasper, Hoffman Estates;
`Mark A. Birchler, Roselle, both of
`Il.
`
`73 Assignee: Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, Ill.
`
`21 Appl. No.: 663,777
`
`22 Filed:
`
`Mar. 4, 1991
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`Continuation of Ser. No. 536,839, Jun. 12, 1990, aban
`doned.
`
`63)
`
`51) Int. Cli ............................................... H04B 1/18
`52 U.S. C. .................................... 375/100; 37.5/102;
`455/37.
`58) Field of Search ....................... 375/14, 39, 40, 98,
`375/100, 101, 102; 455/52, 133, 134, 136, 137,
`139
`
`HHHHHHHHHHHHHIII
`USOO540615A
`5,140,615
`11
`Patent Number:
`Aug. 18, 1992
`45) Date of Patent:
`
`56
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`3,633,107 1/1972 Brady .................................... 375/40
`4,577,332 3/1986 Brenig ................................. 375/100
`4,675,880 6/1987 Davarian ............................. 375/01
`4,733,402 3/1988 Monsen ............................... 375/100
`4,953,183 8/1990 Bergmans et al. .................. 375/10
`Primary Examiner-Benedict V. Safourek
`Assistant Examiner-Young Tse
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-John W. Hayes .
`57
`ABSTRACT
`A method for. implementing diversity reception to
`counteract effects of channel fading on a transmitted
`information signal. In diversity receive paths, estimates
`of complex channel gain are computed based upon pilot
`symbols inserted from time to time in the transmitted
`information symbol stream. Phase corrected and
`weighted samples from the diversity paths are summed
`prior to the decision process. The squared magnitudes
`of the diversity path channel gains are summed to pro
`vide the proper threshold adjustment.
`
`1 Claim, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`COMPLEX PILOT SYMBOL
`
`
`
`
`
`405
`
`T NOMINAL
`EvalA08
`THRESHOLD
`Ot2
`INTERPOLATION
`FILTER
`PILOT
`406
`SAVPLER
`COMPLEX CHANNEL
`CAIN ESTIVATE
`03
`
`412
`
`ADJUSTED
`
`COWPOSITE
`DOWN CONVERTER
`SIGNAL CENTERED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVER
`PULSE-SHAPING
`FILTER
`
`SYuso
`SAPER
`
`
`
`INFO. SYBOLS TO BE COPENSATED
`
`PHASE CORRECTED
`SYBOL SCALED BY
`SQUARE OF CHANNEL AWPLITUDE
`
`
`
`DETECTED
`SYBOL
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1031, Page 1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 18, 1992
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,140,615
`
`TRANSMITTER-10
`-102
`VOICE
`
`107
`
`- YES
`
`110
`
`100
`- PROR ART -
`AVC. 7
`
`DETECTOR
`
`12 N.
`OUTPUT
`
`
`
`o o o
`
`201
`PILOT SYMBOLS
`2|| || || ET || || || 3 || || || ET || || 1
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2 oo o
`2
`2.
`2
`2
`2
`22222
`2
`2
`2
`2
`4|-T
`M=8
`DATA SYMBOLS
`202
`
`A (2.2
`
`AA 6. 3
`Q PILOT SYMBOL
`
`
`
`COMPLEX
`CHANNEL
`GAIN
`
`
`
`IMAG
`
`PILO SAMPLES
`
`w
`
`INTERPOLATED
`CHANNEL GAIN
`ESTIMATES
`REAL
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1031, Page 2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 18, 1992
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,140,615
`
`COMPEX PILOT SYMBOL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`405
`
`ELA08
`INTERPOLATION
`PILOT
`FILTER
`SAPER 406
`COPLEX CHANNEL
`CAIN ESTIVATE
`403
`
`A77 6.4
`NOMINAL
`THRESHOLD
`Ot2
`
`COWPOSITE
`DOWN CONVERTER
`SIGNAL CENTERED
`A DC
`
`
`
`401
`RECEIVER
`PULSE-SHAPINC
`FILTER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`412
`
`ADJUSTED
`THRESHOLDS
`
`413
`
`DETECTED
`SYBOL
`
`SYuso
`SAPER
`407
`
`
`
`INFO, SYBOLS TO BE COPENSATED-
`
`PHASE CORRECTED
`SYBOL SCALED BY
`SQUARE OF CHANNEL AMPLITUDE
`
`PILOT
`01 o- INTERPOLATION
`FILTER
`PILOT
`SAPER
`
`601
`
`COPLEX
`CONJUGATE
`
`RX
`SIBOS
`
`DELAY
`DELAY
`
`(X)
`
`PILOT
`O1 O-INTERPOLATION
`602-N PILOT
`FILTER
`SANPLER
`
`COMPLEX
`CONJUGATE
`
`A 6.6
`
`NOMINAL
`THRESHOLD
`
`604
`
`
`
`RX2 - -
`SYBOLS
`
`- DELAY
`
`(X)
`
`G
`
`DECISION
`
`PILOT
`O1 O-INTERPOLATION
`603- PILOT
`FILTER
`SAPER
`
`sis -
`
`o2
`
`COPLEX
`CONUCATE
`
`(X)
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1031, Page 3
`
`

`

`1
`
`5
`
`MAXIMAL RATO OVERSITY COMBINING
`TECHNIQUE
`This is a continuation of application Ser. No.
`07/536,839, filed Jun. 12, 1990, and now abandoned.
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`This invention relates generally to RF communica
`tion systems, and in particular to a diversity combining
`10
`technique used to combat the effects of fading in RF
`communication systems.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`RF (radio frequency) communication systems are
`subject to fading phenomena which produce noise and
`distortion in received information signals. One ap
`proach to overcoming the effects of fading is the use of
`a diversity receiver system.
`In a diversity system, more than one receive antenna
`20
`is employed. Even if a signal fade occurs at one antenna,
`there is a finite probability that a signal of relatively
`strong amplitude will still be appearing at one or more
`of the other antennas in the diversity system. The use of
`multiple antennas allows the receiver to operate on two
`25
`or more independent versions of the transmitted signal,
`and to combine or select these signals in such a way as
`to mitigate the effects of fading. The more independent
`the fading processes associated with each branch, the
`better the combiner performance.
`A method well known in the art for combining these
`branch signals is called maximum ratio combining, or
`max-ratio. In the max-ratio technique, the branch sig
`nals are adjusted so that they are in phase, and then they
`are weighted in proportion to their individual signal-to
`noise ratios before being summed. Of course, in utilizing
`this technique, a reference of some sort must be estab
`lished in order to phase compensate the received sig
`nals. This reference is commonly established through
`the transmission of a pilot tone. A pilot tone is simply a
`signal that is transmitted at a frequency adjacent to the
`modulated signal, from which the carrier phase and
`amplitude are estimated. Unfortunately, the use of a
`pilot tone carries with it the disadvantage of an increase
`in the required transmission bandwidth, as well as a
`45
`higher peak-to-average ratio of the transmitted signal.
`A pilot tone system is also susceptible to decorrelation
`between the pilot tone and the information bearing
`signal. This can lead to errors in the phase adjustment
`and weighting processes.
`Accordingly, a need arises for a method for max-ratio
`combining in a diversity system which does not suffer
`from higher bandwidth requirements nor the decorrela
`tion and peak to average problems associated with the
`separate pilot tone technique.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The above-described need is satisfied through a
`method for implementing diversity reception to coun
`teract the effects of channel fading on a transmitted
`information signal. At a transmitter, one or more prede
`termined pilot symbols are inserted, from time to time,
`into a quadrature amplitude modulated (QAM) infor
`mation stream, and an RF carrier is modulated with the
`QAM information stream to provide a transmitted sig
`65
`nal. Within each diversity path of a receiver designed to
`receive the transmitted information signal, the received
`signal is demodulated and appropriately sampled to
`
`5,140,615
`2
`provide a sampled, demodulated signal. The pilot sym
`bol samples and information symbol samples are sepa
`rated, and the pilot symbol samples are processed at
`predetermined pilot sample times to determine estimates
`of complex channel gain at each pilot sample time.
`Since the information symbol sample rate is higher than
`the pilot symbol sample rate, the complex channel gains
`are interpolated to compute complex channel gain esti
`mates for each information symbol sample time.
`Each information symbol sample is then multiplied by
`the complex conjugate of the corresponding complex
`channel gain estimate to provide a phase corrected and
`weighted estimate of the transmitted information sym
`bol, where the weighting is approximately the square of
`the amplitude of the complex channel gain. The square
`of the amplitude of the estimated complex channel gain
`is also calculated.
`Then, operating on the outputs of the diversity re
`ceive paths, the phase corrected and weighted informa
`tion symbol estimates are summed to provide a diversity
`combined information symbol estimate. By summing
`the squares of the amplitudes of the estimated complex
`channel gains, an estimate of composite weighting fac
`tor is derived. Using the composite weighting factor, a
`set of adjusted decision thresholds is derived, and esti
`mates of the originally transmitted information symbols
`are obtained through comparing the diversity combined
`information symbol estimate to the adjusted decision
`threshold.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 illustrates a max-ratio combining technique of
`the prior art;
`FIG. 2 illustrates pilot symbols interleaved with data
`symbols in a 16-QAM information stream;
`FIG. 3 is a 16-QAM signal constellation indicating a
`predetermined pilot symbol;
`FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a receiver designed for
`operation with a 16-QAM system which phase corrects
`received symbols based on the complex channel gain
`estimate and achieves symbol detection through ad
`justed thresholds in the manner taught by the present
`invention;
`FIG. 5 illustrates interpolation of channel gain esti
`mates in between pilot symbol sample times; and
`FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating the maximal
`ratio diversity combining technique of the present in
`vention with three diversity receive paths.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`A max-ratio combining technique of the prior art is
`illustrated in FIG. 1 as generally depicted by the num
`ber 100. A voice signal (102) is applied to a transmitter
`(101) and the transmitted signal (103) is received over a
`plurality of diversity paths (104, 105 and 106). Each of
`these diversity input signals is scaled in a variable gain
`amplifier (107, 108 and 109) by an amount proportional
`to each individual signal power to noise power ratio.
`These diversity signals are adjusted so that they are in
`phase (co-phased). The co-phasing process in systems of
`the prior art is generally dependent upon a pilot tone
`included with the transmitted signal. After these co
`phased and weighted diversity signals are summed
`(110), a detector (111) yields the system's best estimate
`of the transmitted voice signal at the output (112).
`In a 16-QAM system, as contemplated by the present
`invention, the frequency domain pilot tone of the prior
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`50
`
`55
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1031, Page 4
`
`

`

`5,140,615
`3
`4.
`art is abandoned in favor of a time domain pilot symbol.
`with the square of the amplitude of the estimated com
`FIG. 2 illustrates the insertion of pilot symbols (201) in
`plex channel gain (411). The phase corrected informa
`an input data symbol stream (202).
`tion symbols that form the output of the multiplier (410)
`In a four-level modulation system as contemplated by
`are then subjected to a decision process (413) incorpo
`the present invention, both in-phase and quadrature
`rating these adjusted thresholds to yield a best estimate
`information symbols may have any one of four possible
`of the transmitted information symbol at the output
`values. If in-phase and quadrature components are plot
`(414).
`ted in rectangular coordinates, this results in an array,
`In practicing the present invention with a plurality of
`or constellation as it is often called, of 16 possible val
`diversity receive paths, the phase corrected and
`ues; thus the term "16-QAM." This signal constellation
`10
`weighted information symbol estimates from separate
`is illustrated in FIG. 3. It is often convenient, in fact, to
`receive paths (601, 602 and 603 from FIG. 6) are
`consider in-phase and quadrature symbols as represent
`summed in a summer (605) to provide a diversity com
`ing a complex number with the in-phase axis (which is
`bined information symbol estimate. An estimate of com
`labelled I in FIG. 3) analogous to the real number axis,
`posite weighting factor is derived by summing the
`and the quadrature axis (labelled Qin FIG. 3) analogous
`squares of the amplitudes of the estimated complex
`to the imaginary number axis. An arbitrary, although
`channel gains in another summer (604). The composite
`necessarily predetermined, pilot symbol is also indi
`weighting factor is multiplied by the nominal thresholds
`cated in the figure.
`to derive a set of adjusted decision thresholds, and the
`FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a receiver path designed
`diversity combined information symbol estimate which
`to process QAM information symbols and pilot symbols
`20
`is the output of the first summer (605) is subjected to a
`using the method taught by the present invention. The
`decision process (606) utilizing the adjusted decision
`receiver path is generally depicted by the number 400.
`thresholds to obtain estimates of the originally transmit
`It is considered most advantageous to implement the
`ted information symbols.
`method taught by the present invention in a digital radio
`system employing a digital signal processor (DSP).
`What is claimed is:
`25
`1. In an RF communication system using quadrature
`This, of course, is not necessary, but it makes the imple
`amplitude modulation (QAM), a method for implement
`mentation much simpler. FIG. 4 shows a composite
`ing diversity reception to counteract effects of channel
`down-converted signal centered at DC as the input to a
`receiver pulse shaping filter (401). The input symbols
`fading on a transmitted information signal, the method
`comprising the steps of:
`are then sampled by a symbol sampler (402) at a prede
`30
`termined rate, then pilot symbols and information sym
`at a transmitter:
`bols are separated and directed along different paths.
`(a) inserting, from time to time, one or more prede
`Pilot symbols are directed along path 403 while infor
`termined pilot symbols into a QAM information
`mation symbols are directed along path 404.
`stream;
`The first element depicted along the pilot symbol
`(b) modulating an RF carrier with the QAM infor
`35
`path (403) is a pilot sampler (405) which samples pilot
`mation stream to provide a transmitted signal;
`symbols at predetermined times. The sampled pilot
`within two or more diversity receive paths:
`symbols are then multiplied by the inverse of the known
`(c) receiving the transmitted signal to provide a
`pilot symbol in a mixer (406) in order to determine how
`received signal;
`the pilot symbols have been affected by the communica
`(d) demodulating and appropriately sampling the
`tion channel. The resulting estimate of the channel ef
`received signal to provide a sampled demodu
`fect is known as the complex channel gain estimate. A
`lated signal;
`pilot interpolation filter (408) provides estimates of the
`(e) separating pilot symbol samples from informa
`complex channel gain at the information symbol sam
`tion symbol samples in the sampled demodulated
`pling times. This interpolation is necessary because pilot
`45
`signal obtained in step (d);
`symbols were inserted in the information symbol stream
`(f) processing pilot symbol samples at predeter
`only at widely spaced intervals, so the information sym
`mined pilot sample times to determine estimates
`bol sampling rate is correspondingly much faster than
`of complex channel gain at each pilot sample
`the pilot symbol sampling rate.
`time;
`Turning briefly to FIG. 5, the complex channel gain
`(g) interpolating complex channel gains deter
`is plotted in rectangular coordinates around orthogonal
`mined in step (f) to compute complex channel
`real and imaginary axes. FIG. 5 illustrates interpolated
`gain estimates for each information symbol sam
`channel gain estimates between the pilot sample times.
`ple time;
`Returning to FIG. 4, information symbols which are
`(h) multiplying each information symbol sample by
`processed through the information symbol path (404),
`55
`the complex conjugate of each corresponding
`are first subject to a delay (407) to compensate for pilot
`complex channel gain estimate to provide a
`sample processing that occurs in the pilot sample path
`phase-corrected and weighted estimate of the
`(403). Each information symbol sample is multiplied in
`transmitted information symbol, where the
`a multiplier (410) by the complex conjugate of the cor
`weighting is approximately the square of the
`responding complex channel gain estimate illustrated in
`amplitude of the complex channel gain;
`block 409. The phase corrected information signal,
`(i) calculating the square of the amplitude of the
`which is an output of the multiplier (410), is still
`estimated complex channel gain;
`weighted by channel effects. However, this weighting
`factor is closely approximately by the square of the
`then, operating on outputs of said two or more diver
`amplitude of the complex channel gain illustrated in
`sity receive paths:
`() summing the phase-corrected and weighted
`block 411. In a single receiver, the nominal thresholds
`predetermined by the four possible information symbol
`information symbol estimates to provide a diver
`levels are adjusted by multiplication in a multiplier (412)
`sity combined information symbol estimate;
`
`50
`
`15
`
`65
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1031, Page 5
`
`

`

`5,140,615
`5
`(k) deriving an estimate of composite weighting
`factor by summing the squares of the amplitudes
`of the estimated complex channel gains;
`(1) using the composite weighting factor deter-
`mined in step (k) to derive a set of adjusted deci- 5
`sion thresholds; and
`(m) comparing the diversity combined information
`
`6
`symbol estimate provided in step (j) to the ad
`justed decision thresholds of step (1) to obtain
`estimates of the originally transmitted informa
`tion symbols.
`
`as
`
`O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1031, Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket