`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC ET AL,
`
` Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC ET AL,
`
` Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-00042-JRG-RSP
`
` Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion and Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant
`
`to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Dkt. No. 114.) The Court, having considered same, approves the
`
`portions of the filing that stipulate to dismissal. It is therefore ORDERED that all of
`
`Plaintiff’s claims for infringement against defendants are dismissed with prejudice except
`
`for claim 18. It is further ORDERED that Samsung’s counterclaims shall be dismissed
`
`without prejudice.
`
`The Court is of the opinion the other portions of this filing that request relief
`
`from the Court should be GRANTED, and pursuant to the Stipulation at Dkt.
`
`No. 114, the Courts enters JUDGMENT in favor of Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (jointly “Samsung”) as follows:
`
`1. Claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,868,079 is invalid due to indefiniteness;
`
`:
`2. Samsung is also awarded costs as the prevailing party under Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`54(d)(1).
`
`1 / 2
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1025, Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-00042-JRG-RSP Document 117 Filed 06/04/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1783
`
`It is further ORDERED that, as the parties have agreed, Plaintiff shall have no
`
`right to appeal the indefiniteness holding set forth above. Further, it is ORDERED that
`
`any remaining and pending motions are Denied as Moot. The clerk is directed to close
`
`this case.
`
`2 / 2
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of June, 2019.
`
`IPR2020-00038
`MM EX1025, Page 2
`
`