throbber
IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.54, and 42.55, Petitioner Apple Inc.
`
`(“Apple”) respectfully moves to seal Exhibit 1133 and the limited portion of its
`
`Petition discussing the contents of Exhibit 1133, which are being filed concurrently
`
`herewith. These materials contain highly confidential information belonging to a
`
`third party and Apple. Good cause exists for sealing the identified documents in
`
`accordance with the Board’s Default Protective Order and standards governing
`
`sealing.
`
`II. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SEALING CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION
`
`Generally, “a movant to seal must demonstrate adequately that (1) the
`
`information sought to be sealed is truly confidential, (2) a concrete harm would result
`
`upon public disclosure, (3) there exists a genuine need to rely in the trial on the
`
`specific information sought to be sealed, and (4), on balance, an interest in
`
`maintaining confidentiality outweighs the strong public interest in having an open
`
`record.” Argentum Pharms. LLC v. Alcon Research, LTD., IPR2017-01053, Paper
`
`27, 4. Here, sealing is appropriate because the information Apple seeks to seal is
`
`confidential and commercially sensitive. Specifically, Exhibit 1133 contains letters
`
`between Apple and a third party that contain discussions that are confidential and
`
`commercially sensitive to Apple and the third party. The limited portion of the
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`Petition that Petitioner seeks to seal discusses the communications in Exhibit 1133.
`
`Petitioner will file a redacted version of its Petition, redacting the limited portion of
`
`the Petition referencing Exhibit 1133. Exhibit 1133 consists almost entirely of
`
`confidential information, such that redaction would not be practical, and requires
`
`filing entirely under seal.
`
`Public disclosure of Exhibit 1133 and the portion of the Petition discussing
`
`Exhibit 1133 would cause concrete harm to Apple and the third party whose
`
`communications with Apple are reflected. Exhibit 1133 contains information about
`
`the third party’s procedures for interacting with Apple. Public disclosure of this
`
`information would cause commercial harm to Apple and the third party by revealing
`
`competitive information, and potentially affect the business relationship between
`
`those companies, as well as between each company and other companies with which
`
`they transact business.
`
`Apple believes that there is a genuine need to submit Exhibit 1133 and
`
`reference to Exhibit 1133 in the Petition to provide the PTAB and Patent Owner with
`
`information regarding Apple’s relationship with the third party who is not involved
`
`in this inter partes review.
`
`On balance, interests in confidentiality outweigh any public interest in an open
`
`record with respect to sealing Exhibit 1133 and the limited portion of its Petition
`
`discussing the contents of Exhibit 1133 in this proceeding. As explained above, the
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`documents at issue include sensitive business information relating to Apple and a
`
`third party who is not involved in this inter partes review.
`
`For these reasons, Apple respectfully requests sealing of Exhibit 1133 and the
`
`designated portion of the Petition discussing Exhibit 1133.
`
`III. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.55(a), Apple requests that the Board enter the
`
`Default Protective Order (77 FED. REG. 48756, 48771 (Aug. 14, 2012)) found in
`
`Appendix B of the Trial Practice Guide. Upon filing of the Petition and Exhibit
`
`1133, Petitioner will confer with Patent Owner Rembrandt Wireless Technologies,
`
`LP (“Patent Owner”) regarding agreement to be bound by the Default Protective
`
`Order and will notify the Board with respect to the Parties’ positions.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 5, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`
`/ Gabrielle E. Higgins /
`Gabrielle E. Higgins
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER APPLE INC.’S
`
`MOTION TO SEAL was served by Federal Express at the correspondence address
`
`of record for U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580:
`
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14TH STREET, N.W.
`SUITE 800
`WASHINGTON DC 20005
`
`
`Dated: November 5, 2019
`
`
`
`/Carolyn L. Redding/
`
` Carolyn L. Redding
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket