Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1873
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`REMBRANDT WIRELESS
`TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00025-JRG
`
`Jury Trial Requested
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`P.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 65) and P.R. 4-3,
`
`Plaintiff Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (“Rembrandt”) and Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`(“Apple”) hereby submit this Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (“Joint
`
`Statement”).
`
`There are currently two patents asserted in this litigation: U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580 (“the
`
`’580 Patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 8,457,228 (“the ’228 Patent”).
`
`1
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1113
`Apple Inc. v. Rembrandt Wireless
`IPR2020-00034
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 1874
`
`I.
`
`P.R. 4-3(a) Agreed Claim Constructions
`
`The Parties have not agreed on any constructions. However, the Parties agree that the
`
`terms that are not proposed for construction in Exhibit A do not require construction.
`
`II.
`
`P.R. 4-3(b) Proposed Constructions for Terms in Dispute
`
`See Exhibit A for a chart showing the Parties’ proposed constructions with intrinsic and
`
`extrinsic evidence supporting such constructions. All Parties reserve the right to rely upon any
`
`intrinsic or extrinsic evidence identified by any other Party, and any evidence obtained through
`
`claim construction discovery. In addition, each Party reserves the right to amend, correct, or
`
`supplement its claim construction positions and supporting evidence in response to any change
`
`of position by any other Party, or for other good cause.
`
`III.
`
`P.R. 4-3(c) Anticipated Length of Time for Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Rembrandt proposes that each side receive 30 minutes for oral argument on claim
`
`construction issues. Apple proposes that each side receive 45 minutes for oral argument on claim
`
`construction issues.
`
`IV.
`
`P.R. 4-3(d) Anticipated Witnesses at the Claim Construction Hearing
`
`No Party currently expects to call any witnesses, including expert witnesses, at the claim
`
`construction hearing.
`
`V.
`
`P.R. 4-3(e) Other Issues to Be Addressed at Claim Construction Prehearing
`Conference
`
`The Parties are not aware of any other issues at this time that might be appropriately
`
`addressed at a prehearing conference prior to the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00002
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 1875
`
`Dated: September 9, 2019
`
`For Plaintiff
`
`
`/s/ Blaine A. Larson
`Michael F. Heim (Texas Bar No. 09380923)
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`Eric Enger (Texas Bar No. 24045833)
`eenger@hpcllp.com
`Blaine A. Larson (Texas Bar No. 24083360)
`blarson@hpcllp.com
`HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, LLP
`1111 Bagby, Suite 2100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone: (713) 221-2000
`Facsimile: (713) 221-2021
`
`Demetrios Anaipakos (Texas Bar No.
`00793258)
`danaipakos@azalaw.com
`Amir Alavi (Texas Bar No. 00793239)
`aalavi@azalaw.com
`Alisa Lipski (Texas Bar No. 24075139)
`alipski@azalaw.com
`Kyril Talanov (Texas Bar No. 24075139)
`ktalanov@azalaw.com
`Louis Liao (Texas Bar No. 24109471)
`lliao@azalaw.com
`AHMAD, ZAVITSANOS, ANAIPAKOS,
`ALAVI & MENSING, P.C.
`1221 McKinney Street, Suite 3460
`Houston, TX 77010
`Telephone: 713-655-1101
`Facsimile: 713-655-0062
`
`T. John Ward, Jr. (Texas Bar No. 00794818)
`jw@wsfirm.com
`Claire Abernathy Henry (Texas Bar No.
`2405363)
`claire@wsfirm.com
`Andrea L. Fair (Texas Bar No. 24078488)
`andrea@wsfirm.com
`WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC
`1507 Bill Owens Pkwy
`Longview, TX 75604
`Telephone: (903) 757-6400
`Facsimile: (903) 757-2323
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR REMBRANDT
`WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LP
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`For Apple
`_
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith (Texas Bar No. 24001351)
`melissa@gilmansmithlaw.com
`Gilliam & Smith, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Tel: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`
`James R. Batchelder (CA Bar No. 136347)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`James.Batchelder@ropesgray.com
`Mark D. Rowland (CA Bar No. 157862)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`Mark.Rowland@ropesgray.com
`Gabrielle E. Higgins (CA Bar No. 163179)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`Gabrielle.Higgins@ropesgray.com
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
`Tel: (650) 617-4000
`Fax: (650) 617-4090
`
`Josef B. Schenker (NY Bar No. 4935185)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`Josef.Schenker@ropesgray.com
`Jolene L. Wang (NY Bar No. 5462619)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`Jolene.Wang@ropesgray.com
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1211 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036-8704
`Phone: (212) 596-9000
`Fax: (212) 596-9090
`
`David E. Sipiora (CO Bar No. 29759)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Edward J. Mayle (CO Bar No. 50920)
`(pro hac vice motion pending)
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND &
`STOCKTON LLP
`
`3
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00003
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 1876
`
`1400 Wewatta St., Ste 600
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: 303-571-4000
`Facsimile: 303-571-4321
`
`Russell A. Korn (GA Bar No. 428492)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`rkorn@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Andrew N. Saul (GA Bar No. 627607)
`(Eastern District of Texas Member)
`asaul@kilpatricktownsend.com
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND &
`STOCKTON LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Ste 2800
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: (404) 815-6500
`Facsimile: (404) 815-6555
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR
`APPLE INC.
`
`4
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00004
`
`

`

`
`
`5
`
`e.g., 186-203 (Newnes 1994)
`TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK at
`NEWNES COMMUNICATIONS
`GEOFFREY E. LEWIS,
`
`(Arnold 1999)
`TECHNIQUES at e.g., 59-96
`COMMUNICATION
`ANALOGUE AND DIGITAL
`GRAHAME SMILLIE,
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`
`
`
`
`
`Technology 2001)
`e.g., 115-70 (LLH
`PRACTICING ENGINEERS at
`EE STUDENTS AND
`(AND SOME ANALOG) FOR
`DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
`STREAMLINED COURSE IN
`DEMYSTIFIED: A
`TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`CARL NASSAR,
`
`2000)
`at e.g., 1-16 (Artech House
`MODULATION TECHNIQUES
`FUQIN XIONG, DIGITAL
`
`ELECTRONIC
`WAYNE TOMASI,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characteristics”
`may have overlapping
`wherein different families
`modulation methods,
`the QAM family of
`modulation methods and
`such as the FSK family of
`modulation techniques,
`“different families of
`
`Modern Dictionary of
`RIP0013539
`(6th ed.,1996),
`and Electronics Terms
`Dictionary of Electrical
`The IEEE Standard
`RIP0013523-6
`EnggPedia.com (2014),
`RIP0013522
`Dictionary (2012),
`Collins English
`No. 72.
`Case No. 16-1729, Dkt.
`Petition for Rehearing,
`Fed. Cir. Order Denying
`66-2 at 9, RIP00087188.
`No.16-1729, Dkt. No.
`Fed. Cir. Opinion, Case
`at 7-8, RIP00087177-8.
`213-JRG, Dkt. No. 352
`(Gilstrap), Case 2:13-cv-
`Order Denying JMOL
`RIP00087141.
`Dkt. No. 114, p.29,
`2:13-cv-213- JRG-RSP,
`Order (Payne), Case
`Claim Construction
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`modulation methods”
`the QAM family of
`modulation methods and
`such as the FSK family of
`modulation techniques,
`“different families of
`
` ’228 claim 1
` ’580 claims 1, 58
`modulation methods”
`“different types of
`a different type” /
`“modulation method [] of
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 1877
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00005
`
`

`

`at e.g., 14:2-20:8 (Feb. 10,
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. No. 291
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`e.g., ¶¶ 28, 51
`2009/091128 to Kim et al. at
`PCT Publication No. WO
`
`
`
`3:36-40
`Knoedl et al. at e.g., Col.
`U.S. Patent No. 5,966,055 to
`
`
`
`Issue 2, April 1985)
`Signal Processing (Vol. 132,
`Communications, Radar and
`Proceedings F -
`Engineering, IEE
`Telecommunications Systems
`P.N. Sargeaunt, Deep Space
`
`(Prentice Hall 1988)
`ADVANCED at e.g., 487-535
`FUNDAMENTALS THROUGH
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS:
`
`
`
`Conference Record (1992)
`Modem, MILCOM 92
`Programmable Digital
`Tracking Loops for a
`J.J. Poklemba, Digital
`
`
`
`6
`
`RIP00087233
`Language (4th ed., 2000),
`Dictionary of the English
`The American Heritage
`
`Online Dictionary,
`Merriam-Webster’s
`
`
`
`
`
`RIP0013581-4
`Networks” (2002),
`Communications and
`Stallings, W., “Wireless
`RIP0013570-80
`No. 1, July 2010),
`An Overview” (Vol. 3,
`Modulation Techniques:
`“Analog & Digital
`Sharma, D. K., et al.,
`RIP0013567-9
`(4th ed., 1990),
`Modulation and Noise”
`Transmission,
`“Information
`Schwartz, M.,
`1997), RIP0013555
`Electronics (6th ed.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`607
`4/18/10), RIP0013585-
`(05/01/04 reviewed
`Modulation Methods”
`Walker, H. R.,
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 1878
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00006
`
`

`

`materials are also designated herein as intrinsic evidence. See n. 2, infra.
`reexamination proceedings concerning the Patents-in-Suit are not intrinsic evidence, Apple identifies these materials as extrinsic evidence. These
`1 To the extent it is argued or determined that materials from the Samsung litigation, the Samsung appeal, and/or prior inter partes review and
`
`
`
`7
`
`Transcript)
`2015 Morning Trial
`at e.g., 50:24-51:4 (Feb. 13,
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. No. 300
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`(Fed. Cir. filed Mar. 18,
`Ltd. et al., No. 2016-1729,
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`Trial Transcript)
`(Feb. 12, 2015 Afternoon
`at e.g., 4:12-22, 8:21-9:6
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. No. 299
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`Transcript)1
`2015 Morning Trial
`
`
`
`
`
`RIP00087236
`Dictionary (5th ed., 2002),
`Microsoft Computer
`
`specification passages:
`suit and the following
`Claims of the patents-in-
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`
`
`
`
`2008), RIP00087239-40
`Computing (6th ed.,
`Oxford Dictionary of
`
`
`
`RIP00087232
`Language (4th ed., 2000),
`Dictionary of the English
`The American Heritage
`
`RIP00087206-87212
`collindictionary.com,
`Dictionary,
`Collins English
`
`RIP00087228
`Dictionary Online,
`Webster’s 1828
`
`RIP00087214
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 1879
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00007
`
`

`

`Decision)
`e.g., 7-12 (Final Written
`Mar. 20, 2014), Paper 47 at
`IPR2014-00518 (PTAB filed
`Wireless Technologies, LP,
`Ltd. et al. v. Rembrandt
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`Judgment)
`10-12 (Opinion and
`2016), Dkt. No. 66-2 at e.g.,
`(Fed. Cir. filed Mar. 18,
`Ltd. et al., No. 2016-1729,
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`Plaintiff-Appellee)
`18-19, 22, 32-35 (Brief for
`2016), Dkt. No. 34 at e.g.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Decision)
`e.g., 7-13 (Final Written
`June 4, 2014), Paper 46 at
`IPR2014-00892 (PTAB filed
`Wireless Technologies, LP,
`Ltd. et al. v. Rembrandt
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`(PTAB filed Mar. 20, 2014),
`IPR2014-00518 and -00519
`Wireless Technologies, LP,
`Ltd. et al. v. Rembrandt
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`p. 20.
`3/1/2011 OA Response at
`
`
`
`8.
`5:39-44, 5:47-62, Figs. 1-
`5:6, 5:16-22, 5:29-33,
`53, 4:4-26, 4:42-44, 4:55-
`2:29-33, 2:52-57, 3:40-
`‘580 Abstract, 1:27-2:20,
`
`
`
`at p.3.
`Provisional Application
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 1880
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00008
`
`

`

`9
`
`on Claim Construction)
`103, 114 (Briefing and Order
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. Nos.
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`
`
`Trial Motions)
`Order on Samsung’s Post-
`335, 340, 352 (Briefing and
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. Nos.
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`Letter Dated Dec. 10, 2018
`(PTO filed Sep. 12, 2016),
`Bremer, No. 90/013,808
`Ex Parte Reexamination of
`
`(Oral Hearing Transcript)
`Paper 46 at 7-40, 77-115
`
`
`
`
`
`Action dated Dec. 21, 2018
`Response to Final Office
`(PTO filed Sep. 12, 2016),
`Bremer, No. 90/013,809
`Ex Parte Reexamination of
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 1881
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00009
`
`

`

`10
`
`2011.
`Allowance, dated July 26,
`2011; Amendment After
`Amendment, dated May 11,
`Notice of Non-Compliant
`Final Office Action and
`Further Response to Non-
`dated March 10, 2011;
`Non-Compliant Amendment,
`2011; Response to Notice of
`Action, dated March 1,
`Response to Non-Final
`’580 Patent File History at
`
`dated February 5, 2013.
`Continued Examination,
`19, 2012; Request for
`Office Action, dated October
`Response to Non-Final
`’228 Patent File History at
`
`
`
`
`
`Figures 1-8.
`13-20, 58, 59, 70-77.
`5:57-Col. 6:29. Claims 1, 2,
`Col. 5:6; Col. 5:7-22; Col.
`Col. 3:32-Col. 4:3; Col. 4:4-
`2:63-Col. 3:27;
`2:20; Col. 2:24-62; Col.
`1 1:19-23; Col. 1: 27-Col.
`’580 Patent at Abstract; Col.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 1882
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00010
`
`

`

`n.1, supra.
`reexamination proceedings concerning the Patents-in-Suit are not intrinsic evidence, Apple also identifies these materials as extrinsic evidence. See
`2 To the extent it is argued or determined that materials from the Samsung litigation, the Samsung appeal, and/or prior inter partes review and
`
`
`
`11
`
`Transcript)2
`2015 Morning Trial
`at e.g., 14:2-20:8 (Feb. 10,
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. No. 291
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 8.
`Bremer, at Col. 7:27-8:13;
`Patent No. 7,248,626 to
`
`Figures 1-8.
`Claims 1, 6-9, 21, 41-46.
`Col. 5:32-46; Col. 6:14-58.
`4:27; Col. 4:28-Col. 5:31;
`Col. 3:23-51; Col. 3:55-Col.
`2:23; Col. 2:24-Col. 3:20;
`1 1:21-25; Col. 1: 29-Col.
`’228 Patent at Abstract; Col.
`
`4a, 4b.
`pages 2-5; Figures 1, 2, 3,
`60/067,562 at Abstract;
`Provisional Application
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 1883
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00011
`
`

`

`12
`
`Trial Transcript)
`(Feb. 12, 2015 Afternoon
`at e.g., 4:12-22, 8:21-9:6
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. No. 299
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`Transcript)
`2015 Morning Trial
`at e.g., 50:24-51:4 (Feb. 13,
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. No. 300
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`Plaintiff-Appellee)
`18-19, 22, 32-35 (Brief for
`2016), Dkt. No. 34 at e.g.,
`(Fed. Cir. filed Mar. 18,
`Ltd. et al., No. 2016-1729,
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`(Fed. Cir. filed Mar. 18,
`Ltd. et al., No. 2016-1729,
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 1884
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00012
`
`

`

`13
`
`Decision)
`e.g., 7-12 (Final Written
`Mar. 20, 2014), Paper 47 at
`IPR2014-00518 (PTAB filed
`Wireless Technologies, LP,
`Ltd. et al. v. Rembrandt
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`Judgment)
`10-12 (Opinion and
`2016), Dkt. No. 66-2 at e.g.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Decision)
`e.g., 7-13 (Final Written
`June 4, 2014), Paper 46 at
`IPR2014-00892 (PTAB filed
`Wireless Technologies, LP,
`Ltd. et al. v. Rembrandt
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`(Oral Hearing Transcript)
`Paper 46 at 7-40, 77-115
`(PTAB filed Mar. 20, 2014),
`IPR2014-00518 and -00519
`Wireless Technologies, LP,
`Ltd. et al. v. Rembrandt
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`Letter Dated Dec. 10, 2018
`(PTO filed Sep. 12, 2016),
`Bremer, No. 90/013,808
`Ex Parte Reexamination of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 1885
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00013
`
`

`

`14
`
`on Claim Construction)
`103, 114 (Briefing and Order
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. Nos.
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`
`
`Trial Motions)
`Order on Samsung’s Post-
`335, 340, 352 (Briefing and
`Mar. 15, 2013), Dkt. Nos.
`00213-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed
`Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Technologies, LP v.
`Rembrandt Wireless
`
`Action dated Dec. 21, 2018
`Response to Final Office
`(PTO filed Sep. 12, 2016),
`Bremer, No. 90/013,809
`Ex Parte Reexamination of
`
`
`
`Apple’s Supporting
`
`Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Rembrandt’s
`
`Rembrandt’s Proposed
`
`Construction
`
`Term to be Construed
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 1886
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00014
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/09/19 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 1887
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
`
`
`
`compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this notice was served on all counsel who have
`
`consented to electronic service on this the 9th day of September, 2019. Local Rule CV-
`
`5(a)(3)(A).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Blaine A. Larson
`Blaine A. Larson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00015
`
`