`Apple Inc. v. Rembrandt Wireless
`IPR2020-00034
`Page 00001
`
`
`
`i
`
`EP 0 683 586 A2
`
`2
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention generally relates to Frequency
`Shift Keying receivers in any digital data transmis-
`sion system.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Many different modulation schemes are used
`in digital
`transmission systems today. Most sys-
`tems operating in the RF frequency band use am-
`plitude modulation (AM), phase modulation (PM) or
`frequency modulation (FM), or some derivative of
`these modulation schemes. Remote RF identifica-
`
`tion (ID) systems is a growing field where modula-
`tion schemes abound. One example of a remote
`RE ID system comprises a reader which transmits
`a powering pulse to a transponder lying within the
`range of the reader. The transponder sends a mod-
`ulated data stream representative of an identifica-
`tion code or some sensor information back to the
`
`reader where the data is demodulated by the read-
`er.
`In remote RF ID systems, resilience to noise
`interference is a necessity when choosing a adula-
`tion scheme. Therefore, generally some form of
`frequency modulation is utilized due to it's greater
`resilience to noise than either amplitude or phase
`modulation schemes.
`
`One type of frequency modulation oftentimes
`used is Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), where two
`different frequencies are alternated in dependence
`upon the digital data stream comprised of high and
`low data bits that is being modulated. FSK modula-
`tion has many advantages such as ease offacilita-
`tion, noise resiliency and narrow bandwidth require-
`ments. Narrow bandwidth requirements translate
`into higher noise immunity and spectrum efficien-
`cy, both advantageous characteristics.
`In addition,
`FSK modulation works well when the two frequen-
`cies are shifted far apart from one another and
`equally as well when the two frequencies are rela-
`tively close to one another on the frequency scale.
`However, when the two frequencies are relatively
`close to one another,
`i.e. separated by 10 KHz,
`demodulation of the data received by the reader
`may be moredifficult.
`One possible method of demodulation of the
`FSK data is shown in Figure 1. The FSK response
`signal
`is
`received by antenna circuit 10 and
`heterodyned down to 21.8 KHz via mixer 22 which
`mixes the transponder mid-frequency of 129.2 KHz
`with LO source 26 of 151 KHz. The IF frequencies
`are selectively band filtered out of the range of
`frequencies coming from the output of mixer circuit
`22 by the selective either bandpass or
`lowpass
`filter 24. The band filtered signals are then selec-
`tively amplified by the amplifier 12. Those am-
`plified signals are then amplitude limited by the
`
`limiter/comparator circuit 14 and then demodulated
`by the FSK Demodulatorcircuit 58.
`A possible configuration for a demodulator 58
`and it's operation follows. A zero detector circuit 36
`combined with a timer circuit 38 performs the func-
`tion of demodulating the baseband signals to deter-
`mine which bit, respectively the low or high bit FSK
`frequency, is being sent. The demodulation can be
`performed by determining the number of zero
`crossings in a given time duration via circuit 36
`wherein the timer circuit 38 provides the time base
`reference. The amount of
`time elapsed between
`one zero crossing to another zero crossing will be
`different
`for different frequencies,
`i.e. 124.2 KHz
`and 134.2 KHz, and therefore the number of zero
`crossings in the same amount of
`time will be
`different for different frequencies. From the output
`of circuit 36 comes a train of pulses of constant
`width and various periods, depending upon how
`many zero crossings were detected, which subse-
`quently gets shaped by monoflop 16 into a well
`defined pulse. This well defined pulse is then in-
`tegrated through integrator 18 which yields dif-
`ferent D.C.
`levels. A Schmitt Trigger can be used
`to distinguish between the two D.C.
`levels and
`yield either the high or low FSK bit. Herein lies one
`of
`the problems encountered in demodulation of
`the FSK modulated data. Distinguishing between
`the low and high bit when there is little shift be-
`tween the two frequencies can proveto be difficult
`because the D.C. levels can differ very little. Since
`the D.C.
`levels can differ very little, depending
`upon the FSK shift,
`the reference setting for a
`comparator to differentiate between two D.C. levels
`is critical.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`An object of the invention is to provide a low-
`cost FSK receiver which self-calibrates itself such
`
`that demodulation of the FSK data stream is per-
`formed significantly more reliably with the least
`amount of additional cost and components and is
`easily integrateable into existing receiver systems.
`The reference setting for
`the comparator in the
`demodulator, which distinguishes between twodif-
`ferent D.C. levels to yield either a high or low bit, is
`derived from the same oscillator that is used as LO
`
`to derive the IF frequencies. Another option is to
`use the time base oscillator from the microproces-
`sor to derive a frequency base.
`In addition,
`the
`generated reference setting signal
`is subjected to
`the same FSK signal processing chain as the IF
`frequencies described above, in order to provide a
`DC reference equivalent to the mid-FSK frequency.
`This results in a drift-free and stable reference
`
`to the comparator which reduces the Inte-
`input
`grated Receiver tolerances, because drifts are can-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`50
`
`55
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00002
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00002
`
`
`
`3
`
`EP 0 683 586 A2
`
`4
`
`the components
`In other words, when all
`celled.
`which make up the invention,
`i.e. amplifiers, com-
`parators and monoflops, are part of the same in-
`tegrated circuit (IC), then when IC tolerances vary,
`these components will all vary similarly and thus
`the drifts will be transparent from one component
`relative to another.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The invention will be explained in greater detail
`with reference to an example of an embodiment
`shown in the drawings, in which:
`FIG.
`1
`is a prior art schematic diagram of the
`demodulation components of a reader.
`FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of one preferred
`embodimentof the invention.
`FIG. 3 is a spectrum analysis of the reference
`and FSK high and low bits with regards to
`Figures 2 and 5.
`FIG. 4 is a state diagram which showsthe state
`of the received signal at the inputs 14 and 14°in
`the reader of Figure 2.
`FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a second
`preferred embodiment of the invention including
`the mixer of the reader.
`
`Corresponding numerals and symbols in the
`different figures refer to corresponding parts unless
`otherwise indicated.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EM-
`BODIMENTS
`
`in the
`Those components of the demodulator,
`reader,
`that provide a drift-free stable reference
`setting for the comparator are schematically shown
`in Figure 2. The FSK signals, once received by
`antenna 10, are amplified by amplifier circuit 12,
`band-filtered by band-filter circuit 24 and demodu-
`lated by a demodulator circuit 36. Demodulator
`circuit 36 consists of two signal processing paths.
`The first signal processing path is the FSK signal
`path with the limiter/comparator circuit 14 followed
`by a monoflop 15 and an integrator 16. The second
`signal processing path is the reference signal path
`which has the same processing steps as the FSK
`signal path. The second signal processing path
`yields a single output D.C. level used as reference
`for the Schmitt trigger circuit 17.
`A more detailed explanation of the signal pro-
`cessing paths follows. Once received,
`the am-
`plified, band-filtered FSK signal
`is applied to the
`input of
`limiter/comparator circuit 14, and passed
`through a monoflop 15 which outputs a train of
`pulses of constant width and various periods, ac-
`cording to the received FSK frequencies. This train
`of pulses is then integrated by integrator circuit 16.
`Integrator circuit 16 provides a DC level
`repre-
`
`to the first
`sentative of the received FSK signal
`input of a Schmitt trigger or comparatorcircuit 17.
`The samesignal local oscillator (LO) 19 which
`derives the exciter signal
`for powering the tran-
`sponder, derives
`the
`reference
`signal
`for
`the
`schmitt trigger/comparator circuit 17. The LO signal
`of fo frequency is divided by divider 21 to provide
`two outputs, fo divided by N1 and fo divided by
`N2. Frequency signal fo divided by N1 provides a
`stable reference signal with a mid-FSK bit
`fre-
`quency of 129 KHz to the input of
`the limiter-
`comparator 14'. The reference signal then passes
`through a monoflop 15° and an integrator circuit 16"
`or is processed similarly as the above-mentioned
`channel. The output of integrator circuit 16°, pro-
`vides a stable DC reference to the second input of
`the comparator/schmitt trigger circuit 17.
`Finally,
`the comparator/schmitt
`trigger circuit
`17 distinguishes between the reference signal DC
`level and the received FSK signal DC level to yield
`either a high or
`low bit. Due to the fact that the
`components in both circuit processing paths exist
`as part of the same IC, as the tolerances of each
`IC vary characteristics of the components,
`those
`characteristics will all vary similarly.
`In this way, a
`stable DC reference frequency signal
`is
`reliably
`generated with minimal cost and with a minimal
`amount of added complexity to the IC.
`Figure 3 shows a spectrum analysis of the FSK
`low and high frequencies as well as the reference
`frequency and the originating LO frequency. Figure
`3 also shows frequencies f1', f2', and f3' which
`represent
`the baseband FSK frequencies once
`mixed down via mixer 22 of Figure 5.
`Figure 4 is a state diagram of the FSK and
`reference signals as they progress through the
`demodulation
`processing
`steps
`of
`the
`limit-
`er/comparators, the monoflops, the integrators and
`finally the comparator/schmitt trigger circuit 17 as
`shown in Figure 2. "a" shows the received FSK
`high and low frequency signals. "b" shows the FSK
`signals after having been limited by the limit-
`er/comparator circuit 14. "c" shows the limited FSK
`signals after being shaped into pulses of equal
`magnitude, width and various periods depending
`upon the frequencies of the received FSK signals
`by comparator 14 and monoflop 15.
`"d' & d"
`shows the shaped FSK pulses after having been
`integrated by integrator 16, depicting the slight
`variation between the two resulting D.C. levels, the
`D.C. level representing the FSK signal and the D.C.
`level representing the reference signal. "d' & d"
`emphasizes the need for an accurate, drift-free
`reference signal. "e" shows the high and low bits
`which result upon application of "d" and "d'" sig-
`nals to the input of comparator/schmitt trigger cir-
`cuit 17. Comparator/schmitt trigger circuit 17 com-
`pares the FSK D.C. signal level to the D.C. level of
`
`70
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00003
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00003
`
`
`
`5
`
`EP 0 683 586 A2
`
`6
`
`the reference signal and yields a high or lowbit in
`response as shownin "e".
`the embodiment
`Figure 5 is an extension of
`described in Figure 2, including the mixing portion
`of the demodulation sequence. In this embodiment,
`the received FSK signals are mixed down to an
`intermediate frequency (IF) via mixer 22 while the
`reference signal is derived from a different divider
`ratio. Both the IF FSK signals and the reference
`signal are similarly processed in the same manner
`as described above in Figure 2. The D.C. level
`delta between the reference signal D.C. level which
`results upon integration of the reference signal and
`the IF FSK signal D.C.
`level which results upon
`integration of the IF FSK signal will be similar, just
`the starting IF FSK frequency will be lower than the
`frequency of the FSK signal received.
`Although the above embodiments have de-
`scribed using the same signal generator to gen-
`erate both the exciter and the reference signals, or
`using the same signal generator to generate the
`exciter,
`the local oscillator and the reference sig-
`nals, this invention also includes demodulation sys-
`tems which use a separate signal generator for any
`and all exciter, local oscillator and reference signal
`generating functions.
`A few preferred embodiments have been de-
`scribed in detail hereinabove. It is to be understood
`
`that the scope of the invention also comprehends
`embodiments different from those described, yet
`within the scope of the claims.
`While this invention has been described with
`
`reference to illustrative embodiments, this descrip-
`tion is not
`intended to be construed in a limiting
`sense. Various modifications and combinations of
`the illustrative embodiments, as well as other em-
`bodiments of
`the invention, will be apparent
`to
`persons skilled in the art upon reference to the
`description.
`It is therefore intended that the appen-
`ded claims encompass any such modifications or
`embodiments.
`
`Claims
`
`1. A signal receiver for a digital data transmission
`system comprising:
`a signal generator for generating an exciter
`signal and a reference signal;
`an antenna for
`transmitting said exciter
`signal and receiving a received signal;
`circuitry for comparing a first input and a
`second input and yielding a digital signal
`a first circuit for demodulating the received
`signal, wherein said output of said first circuit
`is said first input to said circuitry for comparing
`the first and second inputs; and
`a second circuit for demodulating said ref-
`erence signal, wherein said output of said sec-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`50
`
`55
`
`ond circuit is said second input to said circuitry
`for comparing a first input and a second input.
`
`The receiver according to claim 1, wherein the
`or each of the first and second circuits com-
`
`for
`
`limiting said re-
`
`prise;
`a limiter/comparator
`ceived signal;
`a shaping circuit for shaping the received
`signal; and
`integrating said shaped
`an integrator for
`received signal into a voltage level.
`
`The receiver according to claims 1-2, wherein
`said received signal is an FSK signal.
`
`The receiver according to claims 1-3, wherein
`said signal generator further generates a local
`oscillator signal.
`
`The receiver according to claim 4, further com-
`prising;
`for mixing said received
`a mixer circuit
`signals with said local oscillator signal, and for
`providing intermediate frequency signals.
`
`The receiver according to claim 4-5, wherein
`said received signal
`is an intermediate fre-
`quencysignal.
`
`7.
`
`The receiver according to claims 1-6 further
`comprising;
`a divider for dividing the signal frequency
`of said signal generated by said signal gener-
`ator into a first frequency for said exciter signal
`and a second frequency for said reference
`signal.
`
`The receiver according to claim 7, wherein
`said divider provides a third frequency for said
`local oscillator signal.
`
`The receiver according to claims 1-8, wherein
`said signal generator comprises a first signal
`generator for generating said exciter signal and
`a second signal generator for generating said
`reference signal.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`The receiver according to claims 1-8, wherein
`said signal generator comprises a single signal
`generator for generating both said exciter sig-
`nal and said reference signal.
`
`The receiver according to claims 1-10, wherein
`said first and second circuits are part of the
`same integrated circuit.
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00004
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00004
`
`
`
`7
`
`EP 0 683 586 A2
`
`8
`
`for a digital
`receiving a signal
`12. A method of
`data transmission system comprising;
`generating an exciter signal and a refer-
`ence signal;
`transmitting said exciter signal and receiv-
`ing a received signal;
`demodulating said received signal to pro-
`duceafirst signal, and demodulating the refer-
`ence signal to produce a reference level;
`comparing the voltage level of said first
`signal and said reference level and generating
`a digital signal indicative of a difference in the
`voltage level of said first signal and the refer-
`encelevel.
`
`10
`
`5
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00005
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00005
`
`
`
`EP 0 683 586 A2
`
`
`
`FSK
`LOW
`
`FSK
`
`HIGH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(FOR FIG. 5)
`
`FSK
`FSK
`LOW REF. HIGH
`
`6
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00006
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00006
`
`
`
`EP 0 683 586 A2
`
`f;="LOW SIGNAL 124.2 KHz
`fo="HIGH' SIGNAL 134.2 KHz
`fy
`fg
`I
`fg
`fy
`fg
`SIGNAL
`UIA A A NINA A NANA /\_{FSK)
`MITT V VVVV V VV OV
`
`5
`nnn
`nnn
`(00
`REFERENCE OC SIGNAL AT 0°
`"FSK” DEMODULATED SIGNAL AT D
` eel
`D’
`AND — =—— =
`0
`
`_ HIGH am [| Ca
`E tov.
`
`FIG. 4
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00007
`
`IPR2020-00034 Page 00007
`
`