throbber
Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`GUARDIAN ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`__________________
`
`TYLER MILLER,
`Patent Owner
`
`__________________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent No. 10,043,188
`Issued: August 7, 2018
`Application No.: 14/721,707
`Filed: May 26, 2015
`Title: BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT SERVICE
`
`__________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION PURSUANT
`TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Paper 5, and the Board’s authorization
`
`granted February 6, 2020 (Ex. 1026, at p. 38), Petitioner Guardian Alliance
`
`Technologies, Inc. (“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the Board recognize Evan
`
`W. Talley as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding. Petitioner’s lead counsel in
`
`this proceeding is a registered practitioner and, as illustrated below, Mr. Talley is an
`
`experienced litigator with an established familiarity with this proceeding’s subject
`
`matter. Thus, there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Talley pro hac vice
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`II. TIME FOR FILING
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed no sooner than twenty-
`
`one (21) days after service of the Petition. Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron,
`
`LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper No. 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013).
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`
`This motion is authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition
`
`and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response that was mailed on October
`
`22, 2019 (Paper No. 5). Petitioner’s lead and back-up counsel are registered
`
`practitioners. Patent Owner Tyler Miller indicated during the February 6, 2020 call
`
`with the Board that it is considering opposing this motion (Ex. 1026, at p. 38:14–
`
`24).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`Where lead counsel is a registered practitioner, the Board may permit a non-
`
`registered practitioner to appear pro hac vice “upon a showing that counsel is an
`
`experienced litigating attorney and has established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in the proceeding.” 42 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); Unified Patents, IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7 (setting forth requirements for pro hac vice admission).
`
`As set forth in his Declaration submitted herewith (Ex. 1034), Mr. Talley is
`
`an experienced litigator. (Ex. 1034, at ¶¶ 3–5). He is a senior attorney with Dunlap
`
`Codding, P.C., with approximately ten years of experience representing clients in
`
`patent matters and complex, technology-related litigation. (Id. at ¶¶ 2–5). Mr. Talley
`
`has been involved in litigating patent matters through claim construction, trial, and
`
`appeal and has participated in arguing complex claim construction and invalidity
`
`issues in multiple district and appellate court proceedings. (Id. at ¶ 3). While never
`
`before seeking pro hac vice admission before the Board, Mr. Talley has been
`
`involved with and participated in multiple inter partes review proceedings before
`
`the Board, including several in which Petitioner’s lead counsel in this proceeding
`
`also served as lead counsel. (Id. at ¶ 9).
`
`Mr. Talley is also familiar with the subject matter of this proceeding. (Id. at
`
`¶¶ 4–5). He is one of the primary attorneys for Petitioner’s indemnitee, the City of
`
`Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in the related district court litigation relating to the
`
`patent at issue in this inter partes review, U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188 (“the ’188
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`Patent”) (Miller Mendel, Inc. et al. v. The City of Oklahoma City, Case No. 5:18-cv-
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`00990-JWD (W.D. Okla.)). (Ex. 1034, at ¶ 1). He has reviewed and analyzed the
`
`’188 Patent, Patent Owner’s infringement positions, and the prior art at issue in this
`
`proceeding. (Id. at ¶ 4)
`
`Based on his work in the pending district court litigation, involvement with
`
`the Petition in this proceeding, and the other facts detailed in his Declaration (Ex.
`
`1034), Mr. Talley has significant familiarity with the subject matter in this
`
`proceeding. (Ex. 1034, at ¶¶ 1, 4–5). Petitioner wishes to apply Mr. Talley’s
`
`knowledge of the patent and litigation experience by employing him as counsel in
`
`this proceeding. Admission of Mr. Talley pro hac vice will enable Petitioner to avoid
`
`unnecessary expense and duplication of work in this proceeding and between it and
`
`the co-pending litigation. Because Mr. Talley is an experienced practitioner with an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter of the proceeding, Petitioner
`
`respectfully submits that there is good cause under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) to recognize
`
`Mr. Talley as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding. (Ex. 1034, at ¶¶ 1–5).
`
`IV. DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO APPEAR
`
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is supported by the accompanying
`
`Declaration of Evan W. Talley (Petitioner Ex. 1034), as required by Unified Patents,
`
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jordan A. Sigale/
`
`By:
`Jordan A. Sigale, Reg. No. 39,028
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Dunlap Codding, P.C.
`P.O. Box 16370
`Oklahoma City, OK 73113
`Telephone: (405) 607-8600
`Facsimile:
`(405) 607-8686
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`PETITONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Description
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188 (Miller)
`
`Ex. 1002
`
`A printed publication, which is a video demonstration entitled
`
`“Background Assistant”
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2005/0033633 (LaPasta et al.)
`
`Ex. 1004
`
`A printed publication, which is the POBITS online User Manual
`
`and Technical Guide, dated 02-01-2011 and bearing a 2010
`
`copyright date
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,070,098 (Miller)
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Prosecution History for U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Prosecution History for U.S. Patent No. 9,070,098
`
`Ex. 1008
`
`Patent Owner Proposed Claim Constructions from Related
`
`Litigation
`
`Ex. 1009
`
`Declaration of Tom Ward
`
`Ex. 1010
`
`Background Solutions Website Products Page
`
`Ex. 1011
`
`Public Safety Information Bureau Website - Safetysource.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`Ex. 1012
`
`Background Solutions Website Services Page
`
`
`
`Ex. 1013
`
`Expected Practices in Background Checking: Review of the
`
`Human Resource Management Literature
`
`Ex. 1014
`
`Declaration of Kingsley Klosson
`
`Ex. 1015
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2008/0306750 (Wunder et al.)
`
`Ex. 1016
`
`CrimLink File History
`
`Ex. 1017
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,904,407 (Ritzel)
`
`Ex. 1018
`
`CandidateLink File History
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Patent Owner’s Infringement Contentions from Related
`
`Litigation
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`ADP Website - Identity Validations
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Background Solutions PowerPoint Presentation
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Compilation of Background Solutions printed publication
`
`timestamped screenshots
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Internet Archive Captures of
`
`http://www.backgroundsolutions.com/index.html
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Background Assistant™ Product Brochure
`
`
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`Listing of Challenged Claims
`
`Ex. 1026
`
`Transcript of 2.6.20 Telephonic Hearing
`
`Ex. 1027
`
`2009 Background Solutions Video Demonstration (“2009
`
`Video”)
`
`Ex. 1028
`
`Declaration of Jordan A. Sigale In Support of Petitioner’s
`
`Motion to Correct a Clerical Mistake in the Petition Under 37
`
`C.F.R. Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission § 42.104(c)
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Background Solutions Invalidity Chart 1
`
`Ex. 1030
`
`Background Solutions Invalidity Chart 2
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Correspondence between Counsel re: IPR Petition and Exhibit
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`The City of Oklahoma City’s Non-Infringement and Invalidity
`
`Contentions
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Correspondence from PO’s Counsel re: request for authorization
`
`to seek permission to request correction
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Declaration of Evan W. Talley in Support of Petitioner’s Motion
`
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) that on this 21st day of
`
`February, a true and correct copy of the foregoing materials:
`
`• Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(c); and
`
`• Petitioner’s Exhibit 1034, Declaration of Evan W. Talley in Support of
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`were served via electronic mail on the Lead and Back-Up Counsel for Patent
`
`Owner:
`
`Richard D. Mc Leod (Reg. No. 46,921) Kurt Rylander (Reg. No. 43,897)
`Mc Leod Law LLC
`RYLANDER & ASSOCIATES PC
`406 W. 12th St.
`PO Box 99
`Woodland, WA 98674
`Vancouver, WA 98660
`law@rickmcleod.com
`rylander@rylanderlaw.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/Jordan A. Sigale/
`Jordan A. Sigale, Reg. No. 39,028
`Dunlap Codding, P.C.
`P.O. Box 16370
`Oklahoma City, OK 73113
`Telephone: (405) 607-8600
`Facsimile:
`(405) 607-8686
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`8
`
`Date: February 21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket