`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`GUARDIAN ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`__________________
`
`TYLER MILLER,
`Patent Owner
`
`__________________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent No. 10,043,188
`Issued: August 7, 2018
`Application No.: 14/721,707
`Filed: May 26, 2015
`Title: BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT SERVICE
`
`__________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION PURSUANT
`TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Paper 5, and the Board’s authorization
`
`granted February 6, 2020 (Ex. 1026, at p. 38), Petitioner Guardian Alliance
`
`Technologies, Inc. (“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the Board recognize Evan
`
`W. Talley as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding. Petitioner’s lead counsel in
`
`this proceeding is a registered practitioner and, as illustrated below, Mr. Talley is an
`
`experienced litigator with an established familiarity with this proceeding’s subject
`
`matter. Thus, there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Talley pro hac vice
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`II. TIME FOR FILING
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed no sooner than twenty-
`
`one (21) days after service of the Petition. Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron,
`
`LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper No. 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013).
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`
`This motion is authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition
`
`and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response that was mailed on October
`
`22, 2019 (Paper No. 5). Petitioner’s lead and back-up counsel are registered
`
`practitioners. Patent Owner Tyler Miller indicated during the February 6, 2020 call
`
`with the Board that it is considering opposing this motion (Ex. 1026, at p. 38:14–
`
`24).
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`Where lead counsel is a registered practitioner, the Board may permit a non-
`
`registered practitioner to appear pro hac vice “upon a showing that counsel is an
`
`experienced litigating attorney and has established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in the proceeding.” 42 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); Unified Patents, IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7 (setting forth requirements for pro hac vice admission).
`
`As set forth in his Declaration submitted herewith (Ex. 1034), Mr. Talley is
`
`an experienced litigator. (Ex. 1034, at ¶¶ 3–5). He is a senior attorney with Dunlap
`
`Codding, P.C., with approximately ten years of experience representing clients in
`
`patent matters and complex, technology-related litigation. (Id. at ¶¶ 2–5). Mr. Talley
`
`has been involved in litigating patent matters through claim construction, trial, and
`
`appeal and has participated in arguing complex claim construction and invalidity
`
`issues in multiple district and appellate court proceedings. (Id. at ¶ 3). While never
`
`before seeking pro hac vice admission before the Board, Mr. Talley has been
`
`involved with and participated in multiple inter partes review proceedings before
`
`the Board, including several in which Petitioner’s lead counsel in this proceeding
`
`also served as lead counsel. (Id. at ¶ 9).
`
`Mr. Talley is also familiar with the subject matter of this proceeding. (Id. at
`
`¶¶ 4–5). He is one of the primary attorneys for Petitioner’s indemnitee, the City of
`
`Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in the related district court litigation relating to the
`
`patent at issue in this inter partes review, U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188 (“the ’188
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`Patent”) (Miller Mendel, Inc. et al. v. The City of Oklahoma City, Case No. 5:18-cv-
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`00990-JWD (W.D. Okla.)). (Ex. 1034, at ¶ 1). He has reviewed and analyzed the
`
`’188 Patent, Patent Owner’s infringement positions, and the prior art at issue in this
`
`proceeding. (Id. at ¶ 4)
`
`Based on his work in the pending district court litigation, involvement with
`
`the Petition in this proceeding, and the other facts detailed in his Declaration (Ex.
`
`1034), Mr. Talley has significant familiarity with the subject matter in this
`
`proceeding. (Ex. 1034, at ¶¶ 1, 4–5). Petitioner wishes to apply Mr. Talley’s
`
`knowledge of the patent and litigation experience by employing him as counsel in
`
`this proceeding. Admission of Mr. Talley pro hac vice will enable Petitioner to avoid
`
`unnecessary expense and duplication of work in this proceeding and between it and
`
`the co-pending litigation. Because Mr. Talley is an experienced practitioner with an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter of the proceeding, Petitioner
`
`respectfully submits that there is good cause under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) to recognize
`
`Mr. Talley as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding. (Ex. 1034, at ¶¶ 1–5).
`
`IV. DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO APPEAR
`
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is supported by the accompanying
`
`Declaration of Evan W. Talley (Petitioner Ex. 1034), as required by Unified Patents,
`
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jordan A. Sigale/
`
`By:
`Jordan A. Sigale, Reg. No. 39,028
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Dunlap Codding, P.C.
`P.O. Box 16370
`Oklahoma City, OK 73113
`Telephone: (405) 607-8600
`Facsimile:
`(405) 607-8686
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`PETITONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Description
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188 (Miller)
`
`Ex. 1002
`
`A printed publication, which is a video demonstration entitled
`
`“Background Assistant”
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2005/0033633 (LaPasta et al.)
`
`Ex. 1004
`
`A printed publication, which is the POBITS online User Manual
`
`and Technical Guide, dated 02-01-2011 and bearing a 2010
`
`copyright date
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,070,098 (Miller)
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Prosecution History for U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Prosecution History for U.S. Patent No. 9,070,098
`
`Ex. 1008
`
`Patent Owner Proposed Claim Constructions from Related
`
`Litigation
`
`Ex. 1009
`
`Declaration of Tom Ward
`
`Ex. 1010
`
`Background Solutions Website Products Page
`
`Ex. 1011
`
`Public Safety Information Bureau Website - Safetysource.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`Ex. 1012
`
`Background Solutions Website Services Page
`
`
`
`Ex. 1013
`
`Expected Practices in Background Checking: Review of the
`
`Human Resource Management Literature
`
`Ex. 1014
`
`Declaration of Kingsley Klosson
`
`Ex. 1015
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2008/0306750 (Wunder et al.)
`
`Ex. 1016
`
`CrimLink File History
`
`Ex. 1017
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,904,407 (Ritzel)
`
`Ex. 1018
`
`CandidateLink File History
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Patent Owner’s Infringement Contentions from Related
`
`Litigation
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`ADP Website - Identity Validations
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Background Solutions PowerPoint Presentation
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Compilation of Background Solutions printed publication
`
`timestamped screenshots
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Internet Archive Captures of
`
`http://www.backgroundsolutions.com/index.html
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Background Assistant™ Product Brochure
`
`
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`Listing of Challenged Claims
`
`Ex. 1026
`
`Transcript of 2.6.20 Telephonic Hearing
`
`Ex. 1027
`
`2009 Background Solutions Video Demonstration (“2009
`
`Video”)
`
`Ex. 1028
`
`Declaration of Jordan A. Sigale In Support of Petitioner’s
`
`Motion to Correct a Clerical Mistake in the Petition Under 37
`
`C.F.R. Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission § 42.104(c)
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Background Solutions Invalidity Chart 1
`
`Ex. 1030
`
`Background Solutions Invalidity Chart 2
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Correspondence between Counsel re: IPR Petition and Exhibit
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`The City of Oklahoma City’s Non-Infringement and Invalidity
`
`Contentions
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Correspondence from PO’s Counsel re: request for authorization
`
`to seek permission to request correction
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Declaration of Evan W. Talley in Support of Petitioner’s Motion
`
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent 10,043,188
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 2993.003
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) that on this 21st day of
`
`February, a true and correct copy of the foregoing materials:
`
`• Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(c); and
`
`• Petitioner’s Exhibit 1034, Declaration of Evan W. Talley in Support of
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`were served via electronic mail on the Lead and Back-Up Counsel for Patent
`
`Owner:
`
`Richard D. Mc Leod (Reg. No. 46,921) Kurt Rylander (Reg. No. 43,897)
`Mc Leod Law LLC
`RYLANDER & ASSOCIATES PC
`406 W. 12th St.
`PO Box 99
`Woodland, WA 98674
`Vancouver, WA 98660
`law@rickmcleod.com
`rylander@rylanderlaw.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/Jordan A. Sigale/
`Jordan A. Sigale, Reg. No. 39,028
`Dunlap Codding, P.C.
`P.O. Box 16370
`Oklahoma City, OK 73113
`Telephone: (405) 607-8600
`Facsimile:
`(405) 607-8686
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`8
`
`Date: February 21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`