throbber

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`GUARDIAN ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`__________________
`
`TYLER MILLER,
`Patent Owner
`
`__________________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00031
`Patent No. 10,043,188
`Issued: August 7, 2018
`Application No.: 14/721,707
`Filed: May 26, 2015
`Title: BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT SERVICE
`
`__________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF EVAN W. TALLEY IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION PURSUANT
`TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`GUARDIAN EXHIBIT 1034
`Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller
`
`

`

`
`
`1.
`
`I, Evan W. Talley, declare as follows:
`
`I am a senior attorney with the law firm of Dunlap Codding, P.C. I advise
`
`Petitioner Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. (“Petitioner”) in connection with
`
`the above-captioned inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding involving U.S. Patent
`
`No. 10,043,188 (“the ’188 Patent”). I am one of the primary attorneys for Petitioner’s
`
`indemnitee, the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in the related district court
`
`litigation (Miller Mendel, Inc. et al. v. The City of Oklahoma City, Case No. 5:18-
`
`cv-00990-JWD (W.D. Okla.)), involving the ’188 Patent.
`
`2.
`
`I have been a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Oklahoma
`
`since 2010. My Oklahoma State Bar Number is 22923. I have also been a member
`
`in good standing of the Bar of the State of Illinois since 2018. My Illinois ARDC
`
`Number is 6326128. I am also admitted to practice before numerous federal courts,
`
`including:
`
`a. U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (admitted November 2018);
`
`b. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit (admitted March 2017);
`
`c. U.S. District Court, Eastern Oklahoma (admitted November 2014);
`
`d. U.S. District Court, Western Oklahoma (admitted November 2014); and
`
`e. U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois (admitted November 2018).
`
`3.
`
`I have approximately ten years of experience in patent and complex,
`
`1
`
`
`GUARDIAN EXHIBIT 1034
`Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller
`
`

`

`technology-related litigation. I have been involved in litigating numerous patent
`
`cases across the country, including in U.S. District Courts in Oklahoma, California,
`
`Texas, Illinois, Ohio, and Minnesota, such
`
`involvement
`
`including claim
`
`construction, trial, and/or appeal. In several of these cases, I have been responsible
`
`for litigating, briefing, and arguing complex claim construction and invalidity issues.
`
`4.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I have been
`
`actively involved in the present IPR proceeding regarding the ’188 Patent. I have
`
`reviewed the ’188 Patent, the Patent Owner’s infringement positions, and the prior
`
`art being asserted in this IPR proceeding.
`
`5.
`
`Further, I have advised Petitioner on strategy regarding Petitioner’s
`
`affirmative arguments in this IPR proceeding, supervised the drafting of the Petition,
`
`and worked with Petitioner and third parties to find and identify the prior art relied
`
`on in the Petition and to draft and prepare other submissions to the Office.
`
`6.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body. I have never had an application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied. No sanction or contempt citation has been
`
`imposed against me by any court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`2
`
`
`GUARDIAN EXHIBIT 1034
`Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller
`
`

`

`8.
`
`I will agree to and will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§§ 11.19(a).
`
`9.
`
`I have not previously applied for pro hac vice admission before the Board.
`
`However, I have been involved in the preparation of submissions in the following
`
`IPR proceedings:
`
`• IPR2016-00593;
`
`• IPR2016-00594;
`
`• IPR2019-00668;
`
`• IPR2019-00669; and
`
`• IPR2019-00672.
`
`10.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true. I
`
`further declare that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patents issued
`
`thereon.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`GUARDIAN EXHIBIT 1034
`Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller
`
`

`

`Date: February 21, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`a 7
`
`Evan W. Talley
`Dunlap Codding, P.C.
`
`‘
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket