`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Friday, November 22, 2019 4:26 AM
`Rick Mc Leod; Trials
`jsigale@dunlapcodding.com; etalley@dunlapcodding.com;
`agrooms@dunlapcodding.com; arobl@dunlapcodding.com;
`dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; 'Kurt Rylander'
`RE: IPR2020-00031: Guardian Alliance Tech v Miller -
`
`Good morning Mr. Mc Leod,
`
`Unfortunately, we are still waiting for a panel to be assigned in this case.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`
`From: rick.mcleod@mail.rickmcleod.com <rick.mcleod@mail.rickmcleod.com> On Behalf Of Rick Mc Leod
`Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 3:49 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: jsigale@dunlapcodding.com; etalley@dunlapcodding.com; agrooms@dunlapcodding.com;
`arobl@dunlapcodding.com; dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; 'Kurt Rylander' <rylander@rylanderlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00031: Guardian Alliance Tech v Miller -
`
`Mr. Kellogg,
`
`Just checking in to see if there has been any change.
`
`Best Regards,
`
`Rick Mc Leod
`
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 4:10 AM
`To: Rick Mc Leod <rick.mcleod@rickmcleod.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: jsigale@dunlapcodding.com; etalley@dunlapcodding.com; agrooms@dunlapcodding.com;
`arobl@dunlapcodding.com; dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; 'Kurt Rylander' <rylander@rylanderlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00031: Guardian Alliance Tech v Miller -
`
`Counsel,
`
`This case has not yet been assigned to a panel; once it has been your request will be forwarded to the panel.
`
`Regards,
`
`
`1
`
`Tyler Miler Exhibit 2001
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`
`From: rick.mcleod@mail.rickmcleod.com <rick.mcleod@mail.rickmcleod.com> On Behalf Of Rick Mc Leod
`Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 5:56 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: jsigale@dunlapcodding.com; etalley@dunlapcodding.com; agrooms@dunlapcodding.com;
`arobl@dunlapcodding.com; dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; 'Kurt Rylander' <rylander@rylanderlaw.com>
`Subject: IPR2020-00031: Guardian Alliance Tech v Miller -
`
`To the Board:
`
`Patent Owner (Miller) requests authorization to file a five-page motion requesting the Board to cede exclusive
`jurisdiction in this matter for the correction of an alleged defect in the chain of priority of the ‘188 Patent raised by
`Petitioner (Guardian). Petitioner does not oppose the request for authorization, but desires to oppose the
`motion. Patent Owner does not oppose Petitioner filing an opposition up to five pages.
`
`
`Second, Petitioner requests authorization to file a motion to admit Evan Talley pro hac vice as back-up counsel. Patent
`Owner does not oppose the request and does not expect to oppose the admission of Mr. Talley as back-up counsel.
`
`
`Should the Board desire a conference call to discuss the matter, counsel for the parties are available at 1-5 PM Eastern
`time on 10/31, 11/4, or 11/5.
`
`Best Regards,
`
`Rick Mc Leod
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Jordan Sigale
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`2
`
`Tyler Miler Exhibit 2001
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
