throbber
From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Follow Up Flag:
`Flag Status:
`
`Hi John,
`
`Jensen, Travis <tjensen@orrick.com>
`Tuesday, December 3, 2019 4:32 PM
`John Downing
`Jonathan K. Waldrop; Rodney R. Miller; Herman, K. Patrick; Fintiv
`RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Follow up
`Flagged
`
`On our call today you asked about any PTAB rules, etc. that support Apple’s request. Section II.B.6 of the July 2019 Trial
`Practice Guide Update is informative on this subject and instructs that parties should submit district court Markman
`rulings “as soon as that determination becomes available. Preferably, the prior claim construction determination should
`be submitted with the petition, preliminary response, or response, along with explanations.” Apple believe its request is
`consistent with the PTAB’s guidance to submit Markman rulings, “along with explanations,” at the earliest
`opportunity. Absent further input from Fintiv, Apple will send the email below to the Board at 6pm PT today. Thanks,
`Travis
`
`###################
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
`
`The district court issued its Markman order on Nov. 27, 2019 for U.S. Pat. 8,843,125 (the challenged patent in IPR2020-
`00019). The parties met and conferred on Nov. 25 and Dec. 3 regarding Apple’s request to file a 5-page paper (and
`accompanying exhibits) that address how Apple contends the prior art satisfies one claim construction issued by the
`district court that was not proposed by either party. Fintiv opposes Apple’s request. Apple requests a conference call
`with the Board to address this issue. The parties are available for a call with Board on Wednesday (Dec. 4), Thursday
`(Dec. 5), and Friday (Dec. 6) before 3pm ET.
`
`From: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2019 11:37 AM
`To: Jensen, Travis <tjensen@orrick.com>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; Fintiv <Fintiv@kasowitz.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Travis,
`
`I will circulate a dial in shortly. We can make ourselves available Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, except 12-2pm
`pacific Thursday.
`
`John
`
`From: Jensen, Travis [mailto:tjensen@orrick.com]
`Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 2:20 PM
`
`1
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX2004 Page 1
`
`Christine Rehak
`

`

`To: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; Fintiv <Fintiv@kasowitz.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`John,
`
`Although we do not believe an additional meet and confer is necessary since the Board’s email raised no new issues and
`you have not identified anything new or different that we haven’t already discussed in the prior meet and confer, we are
`willing to join another call tomorrow at noon PT. Please circulate a calendar invite.
`
`In the meantime, in view of Fintiv’s stated opposition to Apple’s proposal, we renew our request that you provide
`availability for a call with the Board this Wednesday-Friday. Thanks, Travis
`
`From: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 02, 2019 2:56 PM
`To: Jensen, Travis <tjensen@orrick.com>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; Fintiv <Fintiv@kasowitz.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Travis,
`
`We believe another meet-and-confer is necessary in view of the Board’s email. Please let us know if Apple disagrees.
`
`John
`
`From: Jensen, Travis [mailto:tjensen@orrick.com]
`Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 12:58 PM
`To: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; Fintiv <Fintiv@kasowitz.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Hi John,
`
`We now have the Markman order from the district court. We’ve already met and conferred and you have stated that
`Fintiv opposes Apple’s proposal. Is there anything new or different that you believe we need to meet and confer
`about? If so, please let us know what it is and we can talk about it Tuesday at noon PT. What is your availability for a
`call with the Board next Wednesday-Friday? Thanks, Travis
`
`From: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 10:06 AM
`To: Jensen, Travis <tjensen@orrick.com>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; Fintiv <Fintiv@kasowitz.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Travis,
`
`2
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX2004 Page 2
`
`

`

`Fintiv opposes Apple’s request for leave to amend its petition.
`
`Per the Court’s order below, we are free to meet and confer again Tuesday of next week between 11-2 PST. Please let
`us know if this works for you.
`
`Thanks,
`
`John
`
`From: Trials [mailto:Trials@USPTO.GOV]
`Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:11 PM
`To: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>; Jensen, Travis <tjensen@orrick.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; T61PTABDocket <T61PTABDocket@orrick.com>; P52PTABDocket
`<P52PTABDocket@orrick.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Dear Counsel,
`
`The panel does not view this as a matter requiring immediate attention such that normal procedures for requesting a call
`with the Board cannot be followed. See Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 9-10. Accordingly, the panel instructs the
`parties to meet and confer and attempt to reach agreement on Petitioner’s request so that further communications with
`the panel on this issue can be as productive as possible. In future communications, the parties should indicate whether
`there is agreement on the request or not, and what times both parties are available to meet should a call be necessary. In
`complying with these instructions the parties are directed to 37 C.F.R. 42.100(b), which states that the Office will consider
`any claim construction determination in a civil action that is timely made of record in the proceeding
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`From: John Downing <JDowning@kasowitz.com>
`Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2019 10:38 PM
`To: Jensen, Travis <tjensen@orrick.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick
`<pherman@orrick.com>; T61PTABDocket <T61PTABDocket@orrick.com>; P52PTABDocket
`<P52PTABDocket@orrick.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2020-00019
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board:
`
`Patent Owner in the below referenced action, Fintiv, is available for a call with the Board on Tuesday (12/3) before
`2:30pm EST, Wednesday (12/4), Thursday (12/5), and Friday (12/6).
`
`3
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX2004 Page 3
`
`

`

`We are not available on the days referenced by Apple’s counsel below. Our team has reached out to Apple’s counsel to
`schedule a meet-and-confer to coordinate mutually agreeable times for a conference with the Board and learn about the
`scope of Apple’s proposed amendments.
`
`Thanks,
`
`John
`
`John Downing
`Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel. (650) 453-5426
`Fax. (650) 362-9430
`JDowning@kasowitz.com
`
`This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. Use or disclosure of this e-mail or any
`such files by anyone other than a designated addressee is unauthorized. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and
`delete this e-mail without making a copy.
`From: Jensen, Travis [mailto:tjensen@orrick.com]
`Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 1:53 PM
`To: Trials@uspto.gov
`Cc: Jonathan K. Waldrop <JWaldrop@kasowitz.com>; Rodney R. Miller <RMiller@kasowitz.com>; John Downing
`<JDowning@kasowitz.com>; Herman, K. Patrick <pherman@orrick.com>; T61PTABDocket
`<T61PTABDocket@orrick.com>; P52PTABDocket <P52PTABDocket@orrick.com>
`Subject: IPR2020-00019
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
`
`**EXTERNAL EMAIL**
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. wishes to notify the Board that the district court in Fintiv, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 6:18-CV-372-
`ADA (W.D. Tex.) issued oral claim constructions for the claim terms at issue in IPR2020-00019. Apple requests a
`conference call with the Board to seek leave to file the forthcoming Markman Order as well as a 5-page paper (and
`accompanying exhibits) that address how Apple contends the prior art satisfies one claim construction issued by the
`district court that was not proposed by either party.
`
`Apple is available Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of next week (Nov. 25-27) for a call. Despite Apple’s requests,
`Fintiv has not provided its availability for a call with the Board. Thanks, Travis
`
`Travis M. Jensen
`Partner, IP Litigation
`
`Orrick
`Silicon Valley
`
`4
`
`

`

`NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you
`received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of
`the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
`
`For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com.
`
`In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy policy at
`https://www.orrick.com/Privacy-Policy to learn about how we use this information.
`
`NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you
`received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of
`the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
`
`For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com.
`
`In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy policy at
`https://www.orrick.com/Privacy-Policy to learn about how we use this information.
`
`NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you
`received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of
`the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
`
`For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com.
`
`In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy policy at
`https://www.orrick.com/Privacy-Policy to learn about how we use this information.
`
`NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you
`received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of
`the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
`
`For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com.
`
`In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy policy at
`https://www.orrick.com/Privacy-Policy to learn about how we use this information.
`
`5
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX2004 Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket