IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-cv-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
` Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”) hereby requests that Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) serve
`
`Fintiv with its written responses to these requests for production and produce copies of the
`
`documents and things requested below, pursuant to the definitions and instructions set forth herein,
`
`at the law offices of Mann Tindel Thompson located at 913 Franklin Ave., Suite 201, Waco, TX
`
`76701. These requests for documents and things are continuing in nature. If, after producing the
`
`requested documents and things, Apple obtains or becomes aware of any further responsive
`
`documents or things, Apple must produce to Fintiv such additional documents and things, as
`
`required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e).
`
`The following definitions and instructions shall apply to all requests herein:
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 1
`
`
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-cv-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
` Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”) hereby requests that Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) serve
`
`Fintiv with its written responses to these requests for production and produce copies of the
`
`documents and things requested below, pursuant to the definitions and instructions set forth herein,
`
`at the law offices of Mann Tindel Thompson located at 913 Franklin Ave., Suite 201, Waco, TX
`
`76701. These requests for documents and things are continuing in nature. If, after producing the
`
`requested documents and things, Apple obtains or becomes aware of any further responsive
`
`documents or things, Apple must produce to Fintiv such additional documents and things, as
`
`required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e).
`
`The following definitions and instructions shall apply to all requests herein:
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-CV-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S FIRST SET OF
`REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO FINTIV, INC. (NOS. 1-28)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules
`
`of this Court, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) in the above-captioned action
`
`requests that Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”) produce the documents and things
`
`requested below that are in its possession, custody, or control, in accordance with the Definitions
`
`and Instructions below. Production shall take place within thirty (30) days of service at the
`
`Silicon Valley office of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, or any other location mutually
`
`agreed by the Parties. These requests are continuing and impose upon Plaintiff the obligations
`
`set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
`
`The following definitions apply to the instructions and requests set forth below.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The “Asserted Patent” or “The ’125 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 8,843,125.
`
`The “Asserted Claims” means the claims of the Asserted Patent that Fintiv alleges
`
`have been infringed by Apple, individually and collectively as set forth in Fintiv’s Initial
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 2
`
`
`
`RESTRICTED N 5HHCFB9KGQ 9K9G CB@K
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-CV-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE =B7)QS REPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
`PLAINTIFF :=BH=J' =B7)QG FIRST SET OF
`REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (NOS. 1-37)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`%r;WXW`VS`fs ad r8bb^Ws& hereby objects and responds to Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.te %rG^S[`f[XXtes ad
`
`r=[`f[htes& first set of requests for production of documents (Nos. 1-37).
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`
`Apple has made a reasonable investigation for information responsive to =[`f[hte requests
`
`TSeWV gba` 8bb^Wte UgddW`f ]`ai^WVYW' [`Xad_Sf[a`' S`V TW^[WX) 8bb^Wte [`hWef[YSf[a` [e
`
`a`Ya[`Y) 8bb^Wte dWeba`eWe SdW _SVW i[fZagf bdW\gV[UW fa [fe d[YZf fa dWh[eW' Uadrect,
`
`supplement, or clarify its responses at any time pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(e). Apple reserves the right to make any use of, or to introduce at any hearing or trial,
`
`information responsive to these requests that was discovered after the date of this response.
`
`By providing responses, Apple does not concede the relevancy of the subject matter of
`
`any request. Apple reserves all objections or other questions as to the competency, relevance,
`
`materiality, privilege, or admissibility in any proceeding or trial for any purpose whatsoever of
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 3
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:19-CV-1238-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS
`TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.'S
`FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO FINTIV, INC. (NOS. 1-28)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.
`
`(“Fintiv” or “Plaintiff”) responds to Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple” or “Defendant”) First Set of
`
`Requests for Production (Nos. 1-28) as follows:
`
`GENERAL OBJECTIONS
`
`1.
`
`All General Objections are hereby incorporated into each specific response. Any
`
`objection or lack of objection to any portion of a request is not to be deemed an admission.
`
`2.
`
`Fintiv objects to each and every definition, instruction, and/or request to the extent
`
`that it purports to impose duties or obligations upon Fintiv in excess of or different from the rules
`
`and obligations imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Western
`
`District of Texas, and any other rules or applicable law.
`
`3.
`
`Fintiv objects to each and every definition, instruction, and/or request as overly
`
`broad, unreasonably burdensome, and oppressive to the extent that it seeks, individually or
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 4
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-CV-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S SECOND SET OF
`REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO FINTIV, INC. (NO. 29)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules
`
`of this Court, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) in the above-captioned action
`
`requests that Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”) produce the documents and things
`
`requested below that are in its possession, custody, or control, in accordance with the Definitions
`
`and Instructions below. Production shall take place within thirty (30) days of service at the
`
`Silicon Valley office of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, or any other location mutually
`
`agreed by the Parties. These requests are continuing and impose upon Plaintiff the obligations
`
`set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
`
`The following definitions apply to the instructions and requests set forth below.
`
`1.
`
`The “Asserted Patent” or “The ’125 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 8,843,125.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 5
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:19-CV-01238-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS
`TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.'S
`SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO FINTIV, INC. (NO. 29)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.
`
`(“Fintiv” or “Plaintiff”) responds to Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple” or “Defendant”) Second Set
`
`of Requests for Production (No. 29) as follows:
`
`GENERAL OBJECTIONS
`
`1.
`
`All General Objections are hereby incorporated into each specific response. Any
`
`objection or lack of objection to any portion of a request is not to be deemed an admission.
`
`2.
`
`Fintiv objects to each and every definition, instruction, and/or request to the extent
`
`that it purports to impose duties or obligations upon Fintiv in excess of or different from the rules
`
`and obligations imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Western
`
`District of Texas, and any other rules or applicable law.
`
`3.
`
`Fintiv objects to each and every definition, instruction, and/or request as overly
`
`broad, unreasonably burdensome, and oppressive to the extent that it seeks, individually or
`
`collectively, information that is not relevant to any claim or defense of the case and therefore not
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 6
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:19-cv-01238-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, :?5'\D SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.
`
`%lG[PX]cXUUm ^a l=X]cXem& WTaTQh aT`dTbcb cWPc ;TUT]SP]c 8__[T @]R) %l;TUT]SP]cm ^a l8__[Tm& bTaeT
`
`Fintiv with its written responses to these requests for production and produce copies of the
`
`documents and things requested below, pursuant to the definitions and instructions set forth herein,
`
`at the law offices of Mann Tindel Thompson located at 913 Franklin Ave., Suite 201, Waco, TX
`
`76701. These requests for documents and things are continuing in nature. If, after producing the
`
`requested documents and things, Apple obtains or becomes aware of any further responsive
`
`documents or things, Apple must produce to Fintiv such additional documents and things, as
`
`required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e).
`
`The following definitions and instructions shall apply to all requests herein:
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`l8__[T'm l;TUT]SP]c'm lO^dm ^a lO^dam \TP]b P]S X]R[dSTb ;TUT]SP]c 8__[T @]R)'
`
`and all subsidiaries and affiliates thereof, all affiliates, related entities, parents, branches,
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 7
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-cv-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
`
`and the Local Rules of this Court, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”), hereby requests
`
`that Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) answer the following interrogatories in
`
`accordance with the Definitions and Instructions set forth below, in writing and under oath within
`
`thirty (30) days of service hereof. These interrogatories are continuing in character so as to require
`
`Apple to serve supplemental responses whenever it obtains different or additional information
`
`relating to these interrogatories, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 226(e).
`
`The following definitions and instructions shall apply to all requests herein.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`“Apple,” “Defendant,” “You” or “Your” means and includes Defendant Apple Inc.,
`
`and all subsidiaries and affiliates thereof, all affiliates, related entities, parents, branches,
`
`subsidiaries, divisions, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and all present and past officers,
`
`directors, employees, agents, consultants, attorneys, accountants, administrators, representatives,
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 8
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-CV-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S FIRST SET OF
`INTERROGATORIES TO FINTIV, INC. (NOS. 1-16)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules
`
`of this Court, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) in the above-captioned action
`
`requests that Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”) answer fully in writing and under oath
`
`the following interrogatories within 30 days from the date of service hereof.
`
`The following definitions apply to the instructions and interrogatories set forth below.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The “Asserted Patent” or “The ’125 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 8,843,125.
`
`The “Asserted Claims” means the claims of the Asserted Patent that Fintiv alleges
`
`have been infringed by Apple, individually and collectively as set forth in Fintiv’s Initial
`
`Disclosure of Asserted Claims, Accused Instrumentalities, and Infringement Contentions served
`
`on May 20, 2019.
`
`3.
`
`“Related Application Or Patent” means:
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 9
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:18-CV-372-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S SECOND SET OF
`INTERROGATORIES TO FINTIV, INC. (NO. 17)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules
`
`of this Court, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) in the above-captioned action
`
`requests that Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Fintiv”) answer fully in writing and under oath
`
`the following interrogatories within 30 days from the date of service hereof.
`
`The following definitions apply to the instructions and interrogatories set forth below.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The “Asserted Patent” or “The ’125 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 8,843,125.
`
`The “Asserted Claims” means the claims of the Asserted Patent that Fintiv alleges
`
`have been infringed by Apple, individually and collectively as set forth in Fintiv’s Final
`
`Infringement Contentions served on January 17, 2020.
`
`3.
`
`“Related Application Or Patent” means:
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 10
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:19-01238-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.’S FIRST AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES
`AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S
`FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO FINTIV, INC. (NOS. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12,
`14 & 16)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff, Fintiv, Inc.
`
`(“Fintiv” or “Plaintiff”) hereby provides its First Amended and Supplemental Responses to
`
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple” or “Defendant”) First Set of Interrogatories to Fintiv (Nos. 1, 3,
`
`4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14 & 16):
`
`GENERAL OBJECTIONS
`
`1.
`
`All General Objections are hereby incorporated into each specific response. Any
`
`objection or lack of objection to any portion of an interrogatory is not to be deemed an admission.
`
`2.
`
`Fintiv objects to each and every definition, instruction, and/or interrogatory to the
`
`extent that it purports to impose duties or obligations upon Fintiv in excess of or different from the
`
`rules and obligations imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the
`
`Western District of Texas, and any other rules or applicable law.
`
`3.
`
`Fintiv objects to each and every definition, instruction, and/or interrogatory as
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 11
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:19-cv-01238-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, INC.\D SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
`
`and the Local Rules of this Court, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc. (kG[PX]cXUUl ^a k=X]cXel), hereby requests
`
`that Defendant App[T @]R) %k;TUT]SP]cl ^a k8__[Tl& answer the following interrogatories in
`
`accordance with the Definitions and Instructions set forth below, in writing and under oath within
`
`thirty (30) days of service hereof. These interrogatories are continuing in character so as to require
`
`Apple to serve supplemental responses whenever it obtains different or additional information
`
`relating to these interrogatories, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 226(e).
`
`The following definitions and instructions shall apply to all requests herein.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`kApple'l k;TUT]SP]c'l kO^dl ^a kO^dal \TP]b P]S X]R[dSTb Defendant Apple Inc.,
`
`and all subsidiaries and affiliates thereof, all affiliates, related entities, parents, branches,
`
`subsidiaries, divisions, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and all present and past officers,
`
`directors, employees, agents, consultants, attorneys, accountants, administrators, representatives,
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 12
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL \ 3EE@C?7JD] 7J7D @?=J
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:19-cv-01238-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FINTIV, IN5']D FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fintiv, Inc.
`
`%lG\QY^dYVVm _b l=Y^dYfm& XUbURi bUaeUcdc dXQd ;UVU^TQ^d 8``\U @^S) %l;UVU^TQ^dm _b l8``\Um&
`
`respond to the following First Set of Requests for Admission separately and fully, in writing, under
`
`oath and within thirty (30) days of service of this request. These requests are continuing in
`
`character so as to require Apple to serve supplemental responses whenever it obtains different or
`
`additional information relating to these requests, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(e).
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`<QSX bUaeUcd Y^ G\QY^dYVVnc =Ybcd HUaeUcd V_b 8T]YccY_^c Yc ceRZUSd d_ Q^T Y^S_b`_bQdUc dXU
`
`following definitions:
`
`1.
`
`l8``\U'm l;UVU^TQ^d'm lO_em _b lO_ebm ]UQ^c Q^T Y^S\eTUc ;efendant Apple Inc.,
`
`and all subsidiaries and affiliates thereof, all affiliates, related entities, parents, branches,
`
`subsidiaries, divisions, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and all present and past officers,
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 13
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only / Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only - Source CodeConfidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only / Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only - Source Code
`
`Page 1
`
`·1· · · · · ·IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`·2· · · · · · FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`·3· · · · · · · · · · ·AUSTIN DIVISION
`·4
`·5· · FINTIV, INC.,
`·6· · · · · · ·Plaintiff,
`·7· · vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Civil Action No.
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1:19-cv-01238-ADA
`·9· · APPLE INC.,
`10· · · · · · ·Defendant.
`· · ·__________________________________
`11
`12
`13· · · · · · · · VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`14· · · · · · ·ONUR TACKIN, 30(B)(6), 30(B)(1)
`15· · · · · · · · · Menlo Park, California
`16· · · · · · · · Friday, February 14, 2020
`17· · · · · * CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY *
`18· · ·* CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY -
`19· · · · · · · · · · · SOURCE CODE *
`20
`21
`22
`23· ·REPORTED BY:
`24· ·TAVIA MANNING, CSR No. 13294, CLR, CCRR, RPR
`25· ·JOB NO. 176648
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide· · 877-702-9580TSG Reporting - Worldwide· · 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 14
`
`
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` AUSTIN DIVISION
` ---oOo---
`
`FINTIV, INC.,
` Plaintiff,
`vs. No. 1:19-cv-01238-ADA
`APPLE INC.,
` Defendant.
`_________________________/
`
` HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MARSHAL ALLSHOUSE
` MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA
` TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2020
`
`Stenographically Reported by:
`ANDREA M. IGNACIO, CSR, RPR, CRR, CCRR, CLR
`California CSR No. 9830
`Job No. 176650
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`IPR2020-00019
`Fintiv EX 2028 Page 15
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
