throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`IPR2019-01655
`Patent 9,098,526
`
`Patent Owner SYNKLOUD LLC’s
`Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`1
`
`

`

`Institution Decision
`
`• Proposed Grounds Instituted
`– Claims 1-3, 5-11, 13-20 as obvious over Prust and
`Major
`– Claims 1-20 as obvoius over Chaganti and Major
`
`[Institution Decision, Paper No. 13]
`
`2
`
`

`

`The ‘526 Patent
`
`•
`
`Independent Claim 1 requires
`– A wireless device comprising:
`– at least one cache storage, one wireless interface, and program code
`configured to cause the wireless device to:
`– establish a wireless link for the wireless device access to a storage space of a
`predefined capacity assigned exclusively to a user of the wireless device by a
`storage server, and
`– couple with the storage server across the wireless link to carry out a requested
`operation for remote access to the assigned storage space in response to the
`user from the wireless device performed the operation,
`– wherein the operation for the remote access to the assigned storage space
`comprises storing a data object therein or retrieving a data object therefrom,
`the storing of a data object including to download a file from a remote server
`across a network into the assigned storage space through utilizing download
`information for the file stored in said cache storage in response to the user
`from the wireless device performed the operation for downloading the file
`from the remote server into the assigned storage space.
`
`3
`
`

`

`The ‘526 Patent
`
`•
`
`Independent Claim 11 requires
`– A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising program code that,
`being executed by a wireless device, causes the wireless device to:
`– establish a wireless link for the wireless device access to a storage space of
`predefined capacity assigned exclusively by a storage server to a user of the
`wireless device;
`– couple with the storage server through the wireless link to carry out a
`requested operation for remote access to the assigned storage space in
`response to the user from the wireless device performed the operation,
`– wherein the operation for the remote access to the assigned storage space
`comprises storing a data object therein or retrieving a data object therefrom,
`the storing of the data object including to download a file from a remote
`server on a network into the assigned storage space through utilizing
`download information for the file stored in a cache storage of the wireless
`device in response to the user from the wireless device performed the
`operation for downloading the file from the remote server into the assigned
`storage space.
`
`4
`
`

`

`The ‘526 Patent
`
`• None of the prior art, either alone or in
`combination, would have taught all the
`limitations of independent claims 1 or 11, or
`the claims dependent therefrom.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`• “a storage space of a predefined capacity
`assigned exclusively to the user of a wireless
`device by a storage server”
`– requires that “the server assigns an amount of
`storage, storage to be assigned exclusively for one
`user, that amount having been set in advance of
`any interaction or negotiation between the server
`and the user.”
`
`[Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32
`
`6
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`• “coupling” (claims 1, 11, 13, 14, and 15)
`– “linking of a system’s components to form a
`relationship.”
`
`[Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32]
`
`7
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`• “storing a data object therein or retrieving an
`object therefrom”
`– Requires the device or software to provide for
`storage and retrieval.
`
`[Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32]
`
`8
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– The Combination of Prust/Major Would Not Have
`Taught:
`• “download[ing] a file utilizing download information for
`the file stored in said cache storage.”
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007 ]
`
`9
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– The Combination of Prust/Major Would Not Have
`Taught:
`• “a storage space of a predefined capacity assigned
`exclusively to a user of the wireless device by a storage
`server.”
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`10
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– The Combination of Prust/Major Would Not Have
`Taught:
`• “coupling of the wireless device with the storage
`server.”
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32 and Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`11
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– The Combination of Prust/Major Would Not Have
`Taught:
`• “a plurality of storage devices, one of the storage
`devices being configured with the storage space
`assigned exclusively to the user.”
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`12
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined Prust and Major and Reasonably Expect
`Success:
`• Prust does not teach cache and there is no reason to
`add cache to Prust.
`• Prust and Major does not teach copy-and-paste
`• The steps of performing copy-and-paste from a web
`browser’s cache in a wireless device would not have
`been obvious
`• The user (not the code) performs copy-and-paste
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`13
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined Prust and Major and Reasonably Expect
`Success:
`• URLs of data objects are not displayed by the browser
`and cannot be copied directly using copy-and-paste
`• Not all web pages are cacheable or cached
`• A user cannot tell if a web page displayed by a browser
`is from cache or stored in cache
`• Prust does not teach out-of-band download
`• Prust does not teach where the URL for the purported
`out-of-band download is obtained
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`14
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Prust and Major
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined Prust and Major and Reasonably Expect
`Success:
`• typing is impractical
`• Petitioner’s theory regarding utilizing download
`information stored in cache is far-fetched
`• The purpose of Major’s cache does not match the
`purpose of the cache of the ‘526 patent.
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`15
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– The Combination of Chaganti/Major Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “download[ing] a file utilizing download information
`for the file stored in said cache storage.”
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations, Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`16
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– The Combination of Chaganti/Major Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “a storage space of a predefined capacity assigned
`exclusively to a user of the wireless device by a storage
`server.”
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`17
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– The Combination of Chaganti/Major Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “one of the storage devices being configured with the
`storage space assigned exclusively to the user,” as
`required by dependent claims 3 and 20.
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`18
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– The Combination of Chaganti/Major Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• “obtaining and transmitting download information from
`the cache of a wireless device,” as recited in dependent
`claims 4 and 12.
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`19
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– The Combination of Chaganti/Major Would Not
`Have Taught:
`• that the wireless device remotely creates, deletes,
`moves, copies or renames a folder, as required by
`dependent claims 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, and 15.
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs. 2001, 2007]
`
`20
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined Chaganti and Major and Reasonably
`Expect Success:
`• Chaganti does not teach drag-and-drop or copy-and-
`paste using cache for out-of-band downloads.
`• The steps of performing drag-and-drop or copy-and-
`paste from a web browser’s cache in a wireless device
`would not have been obvious
`• The user (not the code) performs the drag-and-drop,
`and the copy-and-paste
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`21
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined Chaganti and Major and Reasonably
`Expect Success:
`• URLs of data objects are not displayed by the browser
`and cannot be copied directly using drag-and-drop or
`copy-and-paste
`• Not all web pages are cacheable or cached
`• A user cannot tell if a web page displayed by a browser
`is from cache or stored in cache
`• Chaganti does not teach drag-and-drop or copy-and-
`paste for out-of-band downloads
`• Chaganti does not teach where the URL for the
`purported out-of-band download is obtained
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`22
`
`

`

`None of the Claims Would Have Been Obvious Over Chaganti/Major
`
`– A POSITA Would Not Have and Could Not Have
`Combined Chaganti and Major and Reasonably
`Expect Success:
`• Major’s teachings discourage wireless device access to
`external storage
`• Combining two different cache implementations is
`difficult
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32; Jawadi Declarations Exs 2001, 2007]
`
`23
`
`

`

`Objective indicia confirm non-obviousness
`
`• License
`– Nexus to the ‘526 patent
`
`[PO Response and Sur-Reply, Paper Nos. 16 and 32]
`
`24
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`IPR2019-01655
`Patent 9,098,526
`
`END
`
`25
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket