`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 8
`Entered: March 25, 2020
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ROKU, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2019-01615
`Patent 9,716,853 B2
`___________
`
`
`Before PATRICK M. BOUCHER, MINN CHUNG, and
`SHARON FENICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FENICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ERRATA
`
`The panel modifies our Order issued on March 24, 2020 (Paper 7) as
`follows:
`On page 2 of the Order, the sentence “In its Preliminary Response,
`Patent Owner argues that the Board should apply its discretion under 35
`U.S.C. § 325(d) to deny institution of the requested proceeding because the
`Examiner considered three of Petitioner’s primary references during
`prosecution of the ’853 patent” is changed to “In its Preliminary Response,
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01615
`Patent 9,716,853 B2
`
`Patent Owner argues that the Board should apply its discretion under 35
`U.S.C. § 325(d) to deny institution of the requested proceeding because one
`of the pieces of prior art relied on in the Petition was submitted in an IDS
`and initialed by the Examiner during prosecution of the ’853 patent.”
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01615
`Patent 9,716,853 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jon Wright
`Lestin Kenton
`Daniel Block
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`Jwright-ptab@sternekessler.com
`Lkenton-ptab@sternekessler.com
`Dblock-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Benjamin S. Pleune
`Ryan W. Koppelman
`Thomas W. Davison
`James H. Abe
`Caleb J. Bean
`Derek S. Neilson
`Nicholas T. Tsui
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`ben.pleune@alston.com
`ryan.koppelman@alston.com
`tom.davison@alston.com
`james.abe@alston.com
`caleb.bean@alston.com
`derek.neilson@alston.com
`nick.tsui@alston.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`