`v.
`Universal Electronics, Inc.
`
`IPR2019-01612 - IPR2019-01613 - IPR2019-01614
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 7,589,642 - 8,004,389 - 9,911,325
`
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstratives
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`1
`
`Roku EX1038
`Roku v. Universal Electronics
`IPR2019-01612
`
`
`
`Agenda
`
`I.
`
`’642 Patent - IPR2019-01612
`
`II. ’325 Patent - IPR2019-01614
`
`III. ’389 Patent - IPR2019-01613
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`2
`
`
`
`Introduction to the Challenged Patents
`
`Alleged problem solved by Challenged Patents
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 4-5; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶28-30.
`
`’642 Patent, EX1001, 1:39-55.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`3
`
`
`
`Introduction to the Challenged Patents
`
`System of the Challenged
`Patents
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 5.
`
`’642 Patent, EX1001, FIG. 1.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`4
`
`
`
`Introduction to the Challenged Patents
`
`Embodiment 1: Transmitting a Key Code to the Remote Control
`
`’642 POR, Paper 16, 4-5;
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶17-18.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶68.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Introduction to the Challenged Patents
`
`Embodiment 2: Transmitting a Key Code to the Target Device
`
`’642 POR, Paper 16, 5-6;
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶18.
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶70.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`6
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds - IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent)
`
`Claim(s)
`1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9
`2, 22-25
`1-4, 6, 8, 9, 22-25
`
`IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent)
`References
`Mishra (EX1005) and Dubil (EX1006)
`Rye (EX1007) and Dubil
`Caris (EX1008) and Skerlos (EX1009)
`
`Ground 1
`Ground 2
`Ground 3
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 3; ’642 DI., Paper 7, 7, 35.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`7
`
`
`
`’642 Patent – Independent Claim 1
`
`Embodiment 1: Transmitting a Key Code to the Remote Control
`
`IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent) – Claim 1
`1. A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving a keystroke indicator signal from a remote
`control device, wherein the keystroke indicator signal
`indicates a key on said remote control device that a user has
`selected;
`(b) generating a key code within a key code generator
`device using the keystroke indictor signal;
`(c) modulating said key code onto a carrier signal, thereby
`generating a key code signal; and
`(d) transmitting said key code signal from said key code
`generator device to said remote control device.
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶68.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 6-8; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶31-35;
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶17-18.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`8
`
`
`
`’642 Patent – Independent Claim 2
`
`Embodiment 2: Transmitting a Key Code to the Target Device
`
`IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent) – Claim 2
`2. A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving a keystroke indicator signal from a remote
`control device, wherein the keystroke indicator signal
`indicates a key on said remote control device that a user has
`selected;
`(b) generating a key code within a key code generator
`device using the keystroke indictor signal;
`(c) modulating said key code onto a carrier signal, thereby
`generating a key code signal; and
`(d) transmitting said key code signal from said key code
`generator device to an electronic consumer device.
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶70.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 8; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶36-38;
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶18.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`9
`
`
`
`Undisputed Claim Constructions
`
`“key code”
`
`“keystroke
`indicator signal”
`
`“key code generator device”*
`
`“a code corresponding
`to the function of an
`electronic device,
`optionally including
`timing information”
`
`“a signal, distinct from a
`key code,
`corresponding to a
`pressed key [on a
`remote control]”
`
`District Court Construction:
`Subject to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`
`Function: “generate a key code”
`
`Structure: “set-top box, television, a stereo radio, a digital video disk
`player, a video cassette recorder, a personal computer, a set-top cable
`television box or a set-top satellite box and equivalents thereof.”
`
`Performing the steps of:
`“(1) identifying a codeset usable to communicate with an electronic
`consumer device” and
`
`“(2) identifying the key code corresponding to a pressed key for that
`codeset.”
`
`*Autoscan will be discussed further with reference to the ’389 patent.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 2-4; ’642 POR, Paper 16, 11-14.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`10
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 - Mishra’s Overall System
`
`Mishra teaches a remote control receiving a control code from a set-top box
`and transmitting the control code to an electronic consumer device.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 16-17; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶104-07.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, FIG. 1 (annotated).
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`11
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Mishra Teaches “Receiving a Keystroke Indicator Signal”
`
`Mishra’s RCU transmits a keystroke indicator signal.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶37.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶20.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 22; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶117-19.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`12
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Mishra Teaches “Generating a Key Code” and
`Transmitting the Key Code To the Remote Control
`
`Mishra’s STB identifies a key code each time a
`function key is pressed.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶37.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶20.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 22-23; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶120-24;
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 7-9.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶39.
`
`13
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Mishra Teaches Wirelessly Transmitting the Key Code
`
`Mishra’s STB wirelessly transmits the key code
`to the RCU.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶18.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶37.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 26; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶130-31;
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 7-9.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶39.
`
`14
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Dubil Teaches “Modulating the Key Code onto a Carrier Signal”
`
`Dubil describes modulation parameters used to
`wirelessly transmit a key code.
`
`Abbreviations
`“FSK” = Frequency-Shift Keying Modulation
`
`“biphase” = Biphase Modulation
`
`“PWM” = Pulse Width Modulation
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶127.
`
`Dubil, EX1006, 2:61-3:8; see also Dubil, EX1006, 4:33-47, 4:60-5:5.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 7, 24-25; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶34-35, 125-29.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`’642 Patent, EX1001, FIG. 5.
`
`15
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – The ’642 Patent Admits Modulation Was Well Known in the Background Section
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 24, 39; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶109, 112, 127, 156.
`
`’642 Patent, EX1001, 1:21-38.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`16
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 18-19, 24-25;
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶108-13, 125-29.
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶108.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`17
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 18-19, 24-25;
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶108-13, 125-29.
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶113.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`18
`
`
`
`Embodiment 1 – Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil
`
`Dr. Sprenger admits a POSA would have been
`motivated to use modulation.
`
`…
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶51.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 2, 9-11, 19-20, 24.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`19
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶54.
`
`
`
`Embodiment 2 - Rye’s Overall System
`
`Rye teaches transmitting a control code from a key code
`generator device to an electronic consumer device.
`
`Rye, EX1007, FIG. 2 (annotated)
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 34-35; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶153-54, 160-62.
`
`Rye, EX1007, FIG. 3 (annotated).
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`20
`
`
`
`Embodiment 2 – Rye Teaches “Receiving a Keystroke Indicator Signal”
`
`Rye’s “binary coded signal” teaches the claimed
`keystroke indicator signal.
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶23.
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶22.
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 36-37; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶163-65.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`21
`
`
`
`Embodiment 2 – Rye Teaches “Generating a Key Code” and
`Transmitting the Key Code To the Remote Control
`
`Rye’s “transceiver” generates a key code by
`identifying one in its IR code library.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 37-39, 41; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶166-72, 178-79.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶24.
`
`22
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶27.
`
`
`
`Embodiment 2 – Motivation to Combine Rye and Dubil
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 39-41; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶155-59, 173-77.
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶155.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`23
`
`
`
`Embodiment 2 – Motivation to Combine Rye and Dubil
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 39-41; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶155-59, 173-77.
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶159.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`24
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues
`
`I. Claim Construction
`A. “key code signal”
`B. “generating a key code … using the keystroke indicator signal”
`II. Mishra + Dubil
`A. Mishra Discloses the Claimed “Receiving” and “Generating”
`B. Mishra and Dubil Render Obvious the Claimed “Modulating”
`III. Rye + Dubil
`A. Rye Discloses the Claimed “Receiving” and “Generating”
`B. Rye and Dubil Render Obvious the Claimed “Modulating”
`IV.Motivation to Combine
`A. Mishra + Dubil
`B. Rye + Dubil
`
`*The Appendix addresses the dependent claims as well as the Caris + Skerlos combination.
`
`’642 POR, Paper 16.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`25
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Claim Construction
`“key code signal”
`
`Proposed Construction of “key code signal”
`
`District Court
`
`Petitioner
`
`Patent Owner
`
`“a signal containing a
`modulated key code”
`
`No Construction Needed
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Construction is Improperly
`Narrow
`
`“‘a signal containing a
`modulated key code’ excludes a
`codeset from the same signal”
`
`’642 POR, Paper 16, 12-13; ’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 3.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`26
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Claim Construction
`“generating a key code … using the keystroke indicator signal”
`
`Proposed Construction of
`“generating a key code … using the keystroke indicator signal”
`Petitioner
`Patent Owner
`
`No Construction Needed
`
`Patent Owner’s Construction is
`Improperly Narrow
`
`Plain and Ordinary Meaning but “excludes
`receiving an appliance control code and
`merely translating or converting the code
`into another format, such as an infrared
`signal”
`
`’642 POR, Paper 16, 15-16; ’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5-7.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`27
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Claim Construction
`“generating a key code … using the keystroke indicator signal”
`“Generating a Key Code” includes this embodiment.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5-7; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶16-20.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`28
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶68.
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Claim Construction
`“generating a key code … using the keystroke indicator signal”
`“Generating a Key Code” includes using a lookup table.
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1033, 180:12-14.
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1033, 177:16-178:18.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 5-7; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶16-20.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`29
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Mishra’s Keystroke Signal
`
`Mishra’s keystroke indicator signal does not already include a key code.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶20.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶37.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 7-9; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶21-27.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`30
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Mishra’s Key Code Signal
`
`Mishra is not limited to transmitting an entire codeset.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶38.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶37.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶39.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 7-9; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶21-27.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`31
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – The Combination of Mishra and Dubil
`
`Dubil provides the implementation details for Mishra’s wireless transmission of a key code signal.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, FIG. 1 (annotated).
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 9-11; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶28-34.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶34.
`
`32
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – The Combination of Mishra and Dubil
`
`Dr. Sprenger confirmed that modulation was well known and used to transmit data.
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1033, 54:19-55:3.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 9-11; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶28-34.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`33
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1033, 117:21-118:7.
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – Rye’s Keystroke Signal and Key Code Signal
`
`• Rye’s keystroke indicator signal does not already include a key code.
`• Rye is not limited to “conversion.”
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶22.
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶27.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 15-16; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶45-50.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`34
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues – The Combination of Rye and Dubil
`
`Dubil provides the implementation details for Rye’s wireless transmission of a key code signal.
`
`Rye, EX1007, FIG. 3 (annotated).
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 16-17; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶51-52.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶52.
`
`35
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil / Rye and Dubil
`
`Balancing tradeoffs does not negate a motivation to combine references.
`
`Balancing “relative advantages and
`disadvantages… amounts to an engineering
`tradeoff – a decision well within the level of
`ordinarily skilled artisans.”
`
`-In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1330 (Fed.
`Cir. 2012).
`
`“[M]ere disclosure of alternative designs
`does not teach away.”
`
`-In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1334 (Fed.
`Cir. 2012).
`
`Dr. Sprenger admits a POSA would have been
`motivated to use modulation.
`
`…
`
`Sprenger Decl., EX2003, ¶51.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 21; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶60.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`36
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil / Rye and Dubil
`
`Mishra, Rye, and Dubil are analogous art.
`
`“Two separate tests define the scope of
`analogous prior art:
`
`(1) whether the art is from the same field of
`endeavor, regardless of the problem
`addressed and,
`(2) if the reference is not within the field of
`the inventor’s endeavor, whether the
`reference still is reasonably pertinent to
`the particular problem with which the
`inventor is involved.”
`
`-Airbus S.A.S. v. Firepass Corp., 941
`F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
`
`’642 Patent, EX1001, 1:6-9.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 22, 24;
`Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶61-62, 68.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`37
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil / Rye and Dubil
`
`Mishra, Rye, and Dubil are analogous art.
`
`Mishra, EX1005, ¶1.
`
`’642 Patent, EX1001, 1:6-9.
`
`Rye, EX1007, ¶¶1-2.
`
`Dubil, EX1006, 1:4-9.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 22, 24;
`Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶¶61-62, 68.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`38
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil / Rye and Dubil
`
`Despite UEI’s continuous attempts to characterize the combinations as such, the instituted grounds
`do not rely on bodily incorporation.
`
`“The test for obviousness is not
`whether the features of a secondary
`reference may be bodily incorporated
`into the structure of the primary
`reference … but rather whether a
`‘skilled artisan would have been
`motivated to combine the teachings of
`the prior art references to achieve the
`claimed invention.’”
`
`-Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v.
`Genesis Attachments, LLC, 825 F.3d
`1373, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
`
`PO Sur-Reply, Paper 23, 18-19.
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 23-24; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶63-66.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`39
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Mishra and Dubil / Rye and Dubil
`
`Despite UEI’s continuous attempts to characterize the combinations as such, the instituted grounds
`do not rely on bodily incorporation.
`
`“The test for obviousness is not
`whether the features of a secondary
`reference may be bodily incorporated
`into the structure of the primary
`reference … but rather whether a
`‘skilled artisan would have been
`motivated to combine the teachings of
`the prior art references to achieve the
`claimed invention.’”
`
`-Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v.
`Genesis Attachments, LLC, 825 F.3d
`1373, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
`
`’642 Pet. Reply, Paper 20, 23-24; Russ Reply Decl., EX1032, ¶63-66.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`40
`
`PO Sur-Reply, Paper 23, 20.
`
`
`
`’642 Patent – All Elements Disclosed or Obvious
`
`IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`1. A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving a keystroke indicator signal from a
`remote control device, wherein the keystroke indicator
`signal indicates a key on said remote control device
`that a user has selected;
`(b) generating a key code within a key code generator
`device using the keystroke indictor signal;
`(c) modulating said key code onto a carrier signal,
`thereby generating a key code signal; and
`(d) transmitting said key code signal from said key
`code generator device to said remote control device.
`
`IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent) –
`Claim 2
`2. A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving a keystroke indicator signal from a
`remote control device, wherein the keystroke indicator
`signal indicates a key on said remote control device
`that a user has selected;
`(b) generating a key code within a key code generator
`device using the keystroke indictor signal;
`(c) modulating said key code onto a carrier signal,
`thereby generating a key code signal; and
`(d) transmitting said key code signal from said key
`code generator device to an electronic consumer
`device.
`
`’642 Pet., Paper 2, 1-2, 27; ’642 DI, Paper 7, 35.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`41
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds - IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent)
`
`Ground 1
`Ground 2
`
`Claim(s)
`1, 2, 3, 5, 7
`1-5
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent)
`References
`Rye (EX1005) and Skerlos (EX1006)
`Caris (EX1007) and Dubil (EX1008)
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 3; ’325 DI., Paper 7, 8, 36.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`42
`
`
`
`’325 Patent – Independent Claim 1
`
`Claim 1 is directed to Embodiment 2, similar to Claim 2 from the ’642 Patent.
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) – Claim 1
`1. A first device for transmitting a command to control a functional operation of a second device, the first device comprising:
`
`a receiver;
`
`a transmitter;
`
`a processing device coupled to the receiver and the transmitter; and
`
`a memory storing instructions executable by the processing device, the instructions causing the processing device to:
`generate a key code using a keystroke indicator received from a third device in communication with first device via use of the
`receiver, the keystroke indicator having data that indicates an input element of the third device that has been activated;
`format the key code for transmission to the second device; and
`
`transmit the formatted key code to the second device in a key code signal via use of the transmitter;
`wherein the generated key code comprises a one of a plurality of key code data stored in a codeset, wherein the one of the
`plurality of key code data is selected from the codeset as a function of the keystroke indicator received from the third device,
`wherein each of the plurality of key code data stored in the codeset comprises a series of digital ones and/or digital zeros, and
`wherein the codeset further comprises time information that describes how a digital one and/or a digital zero within the selected
`one of the plurality of key code data is to be represented in the key code signal to be transmitted to the second device.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 4-6, 13-14; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶104-13.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`43
`
`
`
`Additional Disputed Issues
`
`I. Rye in view of Skerlos
`A. Claim 1
`B. Motivation to Combine
`
`II. Caris in view of Dubil
`A. Claim 1
`B. Motivation to Combine
`
`*The Appendix addresses the dependent claims.
`
`’325 POR, Paper 15.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`44
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Rye discloses the claimed First, Second, and Third Devices.
`
`1. A first device for transmitting a command to control a functional operation of
`a second device, the first device comprising:
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 13-32; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶112-56.
`
`Rye, EX1005, FIGs. 2-3 (annotated).
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`45
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Rye discloses the claimed “Receiver,” “Transmitter,” “Processing Device,” and “Memory.”
`
`RF
`Receiver
`
`Processing
`Devices
`
`Memory
`
`IR
`Transmitter
`
`Memory
`
`Rye, EX1005, FIG. 3 (annotated)
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 13-19; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶112-25.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`46
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Dr. Sprenger admits that it was obvious to implement “memory storing instructions
`executable by the processing device”
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1031, 215:22-216:7.
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1031, 214:2-7.
`
`’325 Pet. Reply, Paper 19, 7; Russ Decl., EX1030, ¶¶16-20.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`47
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Rye in view of Skerlos discloses the claimed “Generate,”
`“Format,” and “Transmit” steps performed by the
`“processing device.” (See Slides 20-22.)
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`generate a key code using a keystroke indicator
`received from a third device in communication with
`first device via use of the receiver, the keystroke
`indicator having data that indicates an input element
`of the third device that has been activated;
`format the key code for transmission to the second
`device; and
`transmit the formatted key code to the second device
`in a key code signal via use of the transmitter;
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 19-27; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶126-43.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`48
`
`Rye, EX1005, ¶27; see also Rye, EX1005, ¶24.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Skerlos discloses formatting the key code, which is inclusive of modulation.
`
`’325 Patent, EX1001, FIG. 5.
`
`Skerlos, EX1006, FIGs. 1A-1C.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 22-26; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶133-42.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`’325 Patent, EX1001, FIG. 3.
`
`49
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Rye discloses selecting a key code from
`a codeset in response to receiving a
`keystroke indicator.
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`wherein the generated key code comprises a one of
`a plurality of key code data stored in a codeset,
`wherein the one of the plurality of key code data is
`selected from the codeset as a function of the
`keystroke indicator received from the third device,
`wherein each of the plurality of key code data stored
`in the codeset comprises a series of digital ones
`and/or digital zeros, and
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 27-29; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶144-48.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`50
`
`Rye, EX1005, ¶24.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Rye discloses the key code data being a
`series of digital ones and/or digital zeros
`(i.e., binary numbers).
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`wherein the generated key code comprises a one of
`a plurality of key code data stored in a codeset,
`wherein the one of the plurality of key code data is
`selected from the codeset as a function of the
`keystroke indicator received from the third device,
`wherein each of the plurality of key code data stored
`in the codeset comprises a series of digital ones
`and/or digital zeros, and
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 27-29; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶144-48.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`51
`
`Rye, EX1005, ¶27.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Dr. Sprenger admits that a binary code
`teaches “a series of digital ones and/or
`digital zeros.”
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`wherein the generated key code comprises a one of
`a plurality of key code data stored in a codeset,
`wherein the one of the plurality of key code data is
`selected from the codeset as a function of the
`keystroke indicator received from the third device,
`wherein each of the plurality of key code data stored
`in the codeset comprises a series of digital ones
`and/or digital zeros, and
`
`’325 Patent, EX1001, FIG. 3.
`
`Sprenger Depo. Tr., EX1033, 32:3-19.
`
`’325 Pet. Reply, Paper 19, 13; Russ Decl., EX1030, ¶39.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`52
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Rye in View of Skerlos
`
`Skerlos discloses timing information
`used to format the key code signal.
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`wherein the codeset further comprises time
`information that describes how a digital one and/or a
`digital zero within the selected one of the plurality of
`key code data is to be represented in the key code
`signal to be transmitted to the second device.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 29-32; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶149-56.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Skerlos, EX1006, FIGs. 1A-1C.
`
`Skerlos, EX1006, 3:20-36.
`
`53
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Rye with Skerlos
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶104.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 22-26; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶104-11, 133-42.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶109.
`
`54
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Rye with Skerlos
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 22-26; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶104-11, 133-42.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`55
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶110.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in View of Dubil
`
`Caris discloses the claimed First,
`Second, and Third Devices.
`
`1. A first device for transmitting a command to
`control a functional operation of a second device,
`the first device comprising:
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 38-53; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶166-205.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`56
`
`Caris, EX1007, FIG. 2.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in View of Dubil
`
`Caris discloses the claimed “receiver,” “transmitter,” “processing device,” and “memory.”
`
`Caris, EX1007, 4:47-51.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 38-43; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶166-83.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Caris, EX1007, FIG. 2.
`
`Bayley, EX1018, FIG. 2.
`
`57
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in view of Dubil
`
`Caris in view of Dubil discloses the claimed “generate,”
`“format,” and “transmit” steps performed by the “processing
`device.”
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`generate a key code using a keystroke indicator
`received from a third device in communication with
`first device via use of the receiver, the keystroke
`indicator having data that indicates an input element
`of the third device that has been activated;
`format the key code for transmission to the second
`device; and
`transmit the formatted key code to the second device
`in a key code signal via use of the transmitter;
`
`Caris, EX1007, 5:44-51.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 44-49; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶184-94.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Caris, EX1007, 5:60-6:3.
`
`58
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in View of Dubil
`
`Caris teaches the claimed “generating” and “transmitting.”
`
`Caris, EX1007, FIG. 2.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 44-49; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶184-94.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`Caris, EX1007, 6:53-7:5.
`
`59
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in View of Dubil
`
`Dubil discloses formatting the key code, which is inclusive of modulation.
`
`Dubil, EX1008, 2:61-3:8; see also Dubil, EX1008, 4:33-47, 4:60-5:5.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 45-48; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶188-93.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`60
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in View of Dubil
`
`Caris discloses selecting a key code
`from a codeset in response to receiving
`a keystroke indicator.
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`wherein the generated key code comprises a one of
`a plurality of key code data stored in a codeset,
`wherein the one of the plurality of key code data is
`selected from the codeset as a function of the
`keystroke indicator received from the third device,
`wherein each of the plurality of key code data stored
`in the codeset comprises a series of digital ones
`and/or digital zeros, and
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 44-45, 49-51; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶195-200.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`61
`
`Caris, EX1007, 6:53-7:5.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 – Caris in View of Dubil
`
`Dubil discloses a key code comprising a
`digital one/digital zero as well as timing
`information.
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) –
`Claim 1
`wherein the codeset further comprises time
`information that describes how a digital one and/or a
`digital zero within the selected one of the plurality of
`key code data is to be represented in the key code
`signal to be transmitted to the second device.
`
`Dubil, EX1008, 2:61-3:8; see also Dubil, EX1008, 4:33-47, 4:60-5:5
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 52-53; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶201-05.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`62
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine Caris with Dubil
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 38-39, 45-53; Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶¶166-69.
`
`Russ Decl., EX1003, ¶169.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`63
`
`
`
`’325 Patent – All Elements Disclosed or Obvious
`
`IPR2019-01614 (’325 Patent) – Claim 1
`1. A first device for transmitting a command to control a functional operation of a second device, the first device comprising:
`
`a receiver;
`
`a transmitter;
`
`a processing device coupled to the receiver and the transmitter; and
`
`a memory storing instructions executable by the processing device, the instructions causing the processing device to:
`generate a key code using a keystroke indicator received from a third device in communication with first device via use of the
`receiver, the keystroke indicator having data that indicates an input element of the third device that has been activated;
`format the key code for transmission to the second device; and
`
`transmit the formatted key code to the second device in a key code signal via use of the transmitter;
`wherein the generated key code comprises a one of a plurality of key code data stored in a codeset, wherein the one of the
`plurality of key code data is selected from the codeset as a function of the keystroke indicator received from the third device,
`wherein each of the plurality of key code data stored in the codeset comprises a series of digital ones and/or digital zeros, and
`wherein the codeset further comprises time information that describes how a digital one and/or a digital zero within the selected
`one of the plurality of key code data is to be represented in the key code signal to be transmitted to the second device.
`
`’325 Pet., Paper 2, 3; ’325 DI., Paper 7, 8, 36.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`64
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds - IPR2019-01613 (’389 Patent)
`
`Ground 1
`Ground 2
`Ground 3
`Ground 4
`Ground 5
`Ground 6
`Ground 7
`Ground 8
`
`Claim(s)
`2, 3
`4, 7-15
`5
`2, 3
`4, 11
`5, 8
`10, 12, 15
`13, 14
`
`IPR2019-01613 (’389 Patent)
`References
`Mishra (EX1005), Dubil (EX1006), and Van Ee (EX1013)
`Mishra and Dubil
`Mishral, Dubil, and Lambrechts (EX1011)
`Caris (EX1008), Skerlos (EX1009), Van Ee
`Caris and Skerlos
`Caris, Skerlos, and Lambrechts (EX1011)
`Caris, Skerlos, and Yazolino (EX1012)
`Caris, Skerlos, Yazolino, and Lambrechts
`
`’389 Pet., Paper 2, 3; ’389 DI, Paper 12, 7, 41.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`65
`
`
`
`’389 Patent – Independent Claim 2
`
`Claim 2 adds element (e) and removes the destination of the key code signal.
`
`IPR2019-01613 (’389 Patent) – Claim 2
`2. A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving a keystroke indicator signal from a remote control
`device, wherein the keystroke indicator signal indicates a key on
`said remote control device that a user has selected;
`(b) generating a key code within a key code generator device
`using the keystroke indicator signal, wherein said key code is
`part of a codeset that controls an electronic consumer
`device;
`(c) modulating said key code onto a carrier signal, thereby
`generating a key code signal;
`(d) transmitting said key code signal from said key code
`generator device; and
`(e) identifying said codeset using input from a user of said
`remote control device, wherein said codeset is identified
`when said user stops pressing a key on said remote control
`device.
`
`IPR2019-01612 (’642 Patent) – Claim 1
`1. A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving a keystroke indicator signal from a remote
`control device, wherein the keystroke indicator signal
`indicates a key on said remote control device that a user has
`selected;
`(b) generating a key code within a key code generator
`device using the keystroke indictor signal;
`(c) modulating said key code onto a carrier signal, thereby
`generating a key code signal; and
`(d) transmitting said key code signal from said key code
`generator device to said remote control device.
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`Not Evidence
`
`66
`
`
`
`’389 Patent – Independent Claim 4
`
`Claim 4 is directed to a remote control device.
`
`IPR2019-01613 (’389 Patent) – Claim 4
`4. A remote control device comprising:
`
`a receiver that receives a first key code signal, wherein
`said first ke