`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`ROKU, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2019-01612
`U.S. Patent No. 7,589,642
`_____________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “Patent Board”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-01612
`U.S. Patent No. 7,589,642
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s April 1, 2020 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 8), Petitioner Roku, Inc. (“Petitioner”) respectfully requests oral
`
`argument, which is currently scheduled for December 22, 2020. Petitioner believes
`
`that 60 minutes is an appropriate argument time for each side at the oral hearing in
`
`this case.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`• The unpatentability of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,589,642 (“the ’642 patent”) as obvious over Mishra and Dubil;
`
`• The unpatentability of claims 2 and 22-25 of the ’642 patent as
`
`obvious over Rye and Dubil;
`
`• The unpatentability of claims 1-4, 6, 8, 9, 22-25 of the ’642 patent as
`
`obvious over Caris and Skerlos;
`
`• Any issues identified in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`• Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`• Any other issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including
`
`issues raised in papers yet to be filed, such as any Motions to Exclude
`
`and Oppositions to Motions to Exclude; and
`
`• Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-01612
`U.S. Patent No. 7,589,642
`Petitioner recognizes that circumstances may require a telephonic hearing in
`
`light of the COVID-19 pandemic, subject to the Board’s guidance. If the hearing is
`
`conducted in-person, Petitioner requests the ability to use audio-visual equipment
`
`to display possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of an ELMO,
`
`computer, projector, and screen.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Lestin Kenton/
`
`Lestin L. Kenton, Reg. No. 72,314
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Roku, Inc.
`
`Date: November 10, 2020
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-01612
`U.S. Patent No. 7,589,642
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served
`
`electronically via e-mail on November 10, 2020, in its entirety on the following
`
`counsel for Patent Owner:
`
`ben.pleune@alston.com
`ryan.koppelman@alston.com
`tom.davison@alston.com
`james.abe@alston.com
`caleb.bean@alston.com
`derek.neilson@alston.com
`nick.tsui@alston.com
`
`Benjamin S. Pleune (Lead Counsel)
`Ryan W. Koppleman (Back-up Counsel)
`Thomas W. Davison (Back-up Counsel)
`James H. Abe (Back-up Counsel)
`Caleb J. Bean (Back-up Counsel)
`Derek S. Neilson (Back-up Counsel)
`Nicholas T. Tsui (Back-up Counsel)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Lestin Kenton/
`
`Lestin L. Kenton, Reg. No. 72,314
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Roku, Inc.
`
`Date: November 10, 2020
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`15835279_1.docx
`
`
`
`