throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________________________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________________________________
`ROKU, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`Case No. IPR2019-01612
`U.S. Patent 7,589,642
`
`Virtual Deposition of
`MICHAEL D. SPRENGER, Ph.D.
`Tuesday, September 15, 2020
`8:02 a.m. MST
`
`Job No.: 320996
`Pages: 1 - 250
`Reported by: Elisabeth A. Miller Lorenz, RMR, CRR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Roku EX1033
`Roku v. Universal Electronics
`IPR2019-01612
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`2
`
` Virtual deposition of MICHAEL D. SPRENGER,
`Ph.D., taken pursuant to notice, before Elisabeth
`A. Miller Lorenz, Registered Merit Reporter, Certified
`Realtime Reporter, and a Notary Public in and for the
`state of Tennessee.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
` TIMOTHY L. TANG, ESQUIRE
` LESTIN KENTON, ESQUIRE
` Sterne Kessler
` 1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
` 202.371.2600
` ttang@sternekessler.com
` lkenton@sternekessler.com
`
`ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER:
` NICHOLAS T. TSUI, ESQUIRE
` THOMAS W. DAVISON, ESQUIRE
` BENJAMIN S. PLEUNE, ESQUIRE
` 1201 West Peachtree Street
` Suite 4900
` Atlanta, Georgia 30309
` 404.881.4962
` nick.tsui@alston.com
` ben.pleune@alston.com
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`4
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S (Continued)
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
` Ashby Everhart, Audiovisual Technician
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`5
`
` C O N T E N T S
`EXAMINATION OF MICHAEL D. SPRENGER, Ph.D. PAGE
` By Mr. Tang 6
` By Mr. Tsui 242
`
` E X H I B I T S
`SPRENGER DEPOSITION EXHIBITS PAGE
` Exhibit 1 Declaration of Michael D. Sprenger 18
` Exhibit 2 '642 Patent 44
` Exhibit 3 '642 Patent, Mishra Reference 220
` Exhibit 4 '642 Patent, Rye Reference 230
` Exhibit 2100 Curriculum Vitae 242
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`6
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
` THE STENOGRAPHER: Will counsel please
`stipulate that in lieu of formally swearing in the
`witness, the reporter will instead ask the witness
`to acknowledge that their testimony will be true
`under the penalties of perjury, that counsel will
`not object to the admissibility of the transcript
`based on proceeding in this way, and that the
`witness has verified that he is in fact Dr. Michael
`D. Sprenger?
` MR. TANG: Yes.
` MR. TSUI: We agree.
`Whereupon,
` MICHAEL D. SPRENGER, Ph.D.,
`called as a witness herein, having first
`acknowledged under penalty of perjury, was examined
`and testified as follows:
` EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q Hi. How are you, Dr. Sprenger?
` A Good morning. Thank you. How are you?
` Q Good, good.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`7
`
` All right. Can you please state your
`full name for the record?
` A Yes. First name is Michael,
`M-I-C-H-A-E-L; middle name is Dominik,
`D-O-M-I-N-I-K; last name is Sprenger,
`S-P-R-E-N-G-E-R.
` MR. TANG: All right. So for the record,
`today's deposition is being conducted remotely. The
`witness, the court reporter, the examining attorney,
`and the defending attorney are all in different
`geographic locations and are conducting this
`deposition via video conference. The parties have
`stipulated that the witness may be sworn in
`remotely.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So, Dr. Sprenger, today's deposition is
`being conducted remotely; is that correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And are you in your personal residence
`right now?
` A I am.
` Q Is that in Colorado?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`8
`
` A Yes, it's in Boulder, Colorado.
` Q And can you describe your immediate
`environment for the record?
` A I am in our basement, which is the most
`quiet area in the house. You can see the dart board
`over my shoulder. It's sort of a hangout room for
`the kids, and I chose this, again, because we're
`undisturbed.
` Q And are you alone in the room right now?
` A I am alone in the room.
` Q Do you have any materials with you?
` A I have material -- the only material I
`have is my printed-out CV, which counsel instructed
`me to print out prior to the proceedings today.
` Q And so then do you have any extra notes
`that you prepared with you in advance of this
`deposition?
` A I do not. They're all in a separate
`room.
` Q And do you have any telecommunications
`devices currently enabled other than your laptop?
` A I have my mobile phone, which is on mute
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`9
`
`right now. It's about four feet away from me.
` Q And do you have any applications such as
`e-mail open or other web browsers?
` A Oh, I do. I still have the calendar open
`with the link and all the other things, the
`information about today's deposition.
` Q If you could, just close those. I think
`that would be helpful.
` A Absolutely. If you give me a moment,
`please, I'm going to just quit the application.
`Okay. Hang on. There's a spreadsheet open. Here
`we go. And a calculator. There. All right. Okay.
` Q So have you ever been deposed before?
` A I have, yes.
` Q About how many times?
` A Let's see. Once a number of years ago,
`about seven, eight years ago. More recently in a
`Markman hearing in January. And I'm thinking there
`might have been one more. I would have to think
`about it.
` Q So about a handful of times?
` A So say again, please.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`10
`
` Q About a handful of times?
` A Yes, that's a good approximation.
` Q And so what types of cases were those
`related to?
` A The first case --
` MR. TSUI: Sorry, I just caution the
`witness not to disclose any confidential
`information, but, of course, you can answer the
`question.
` THE WITNESS: Thank you for the
`clarification.
` The first case was related to a
`fiberoptic transmission technology. The second case
`was regarding video rendering and video streaming in
`a consumer electronics environment. And there might
`have been another one. I don't recall at the
`moment.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So have you been deposed by video
`conference before?
` A No, this is the first time.
` Q So give me your previous deposition
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`11
`
`experience.
` You are familiar with the deposition
`process, correct?
` A Yes, I am.
` Q All right. And so -- just so we're on
`the same page before diving into the subject matter,
`I just want to go over a few guidelines that I like
`to follow.
` So first, when I ask a question, just
`make sure you answer verbally so that the court
`reporter can record your answer.
` Is that okay?
` A Yes, that makes sense.
` Q And typically, I like to take a break
`about every hour or so.
` Does that sound reasonable to you?
` A That will work very well for me. Thank
`you.
` Q And if you need a break before that time,
`just let your attorneys know, and we'll do our best
`to find a convenient stopping point for you.
` A Okay. Will do that.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`12
`
` Q And I guess before we just take any
`breaks, if there's a pending question, I just ask
`that we finish the answer to the question before we
`go on break.
` Is that okay?
` A Yes, this makes sense.
` Q And just so we're clear, even though
`we're remote, we'll still be treating this as if we
`were in the same room. So all the same restrictions
`and requirements would also apply here.
` Does that make sense?
` A Yes, that makes sense.
` Q And to be more specific on that, you
`understand that you're not allowed to pass notes or
`any other documentation with counsel during this
`deposition, correct?
` A I understand that, yes.
` Q And for the record, that means -- notes
`include electronic means such as communications via
`phone or laptop, correct?
` A Yes, that makes sense.
` Q So, Dr. Sprenger, is there any reason
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`13
`
`that you would not be able to provide a full,
`complete, and accurate testimony here today?
` A I cannot think of any.
` Q So you understand that you're here today
`to testify regarding the declaration you submitted
`for inter partes review proceeding IPR2019-01612
`regarding the U.S. Patent No. 7,589,642, correct?
` A That is correct, yes.
` Q You have submitted declarations in two
`related proceedings, which are IPR2019-01613
`regarding U.S. Patent No. 8,004,389; and the other
`proceeding being IPR2019-01614 regarding U.S. Patent
`No. 9,911,325; is that correct?
` A Yes, these are both correct.
` Q So for ease of discussion throughout
`this -- the depositions this week, would it be okay
`if I refer to the three patents as the '642, '389,
`and the '325 patents respectively?
` A Yes, that makes sense.
` Q And so just so you're aware, we'll focus
`today on the '642 patent, but your testimony will be
`applicable and submitted in each of the proceedings
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`14
`
`I previously mentioned.
` Do you understand?
` A Yes, I understand.
` Q So before we dive into the subject
`matter, can you tell me what you did to prepare for
`your deposition today?
` A I reviewed my declaration, and I reviewed
`some of the -- I reviewed the related patents, and I
`reviewed the secondary sources.
` Q Which secondary sources are you referring
`to?
` A Secondary sources, I meant the prior art.
`I think that's the proper expression. Really, the
`patents, we internally refer to them as Mishra, Rye,
`Caris, Dubil, and Skerlos.
` Q And so about how long do you -- like how
`much time did you spend, in estimate, in total
`preparing for these depositions?
` A When you say that, do you mean over the
`past days and weeks?
` Q Yes.
` A Not -- not just from yesterday to today?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`15
`
` Q Correct.
` So for -- in the past two weeks, we'll
`say, how much time did you spend?
` A I am hard pressed to answer that. I
`would have to guess, or I could look at the time
`sheet I submitted. So -- so -- sorry.
` Q Yeah.
` Do you have a rough estimate?
` A A few dozen hours.
` Q And when were you first approached by UEI
`to provide declaratory evidence for this proceeding?
` MR. TSUI: I'll caution the witness not
`to disclose the substantive communications. You can
`give the date if you remember.
` THE WITNESS: Thank you.
` To the best of my knowledge, we had our
`first contact -- I think it was very late last year,
`end of 2019. I don't recall the exact date.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q And do you recall who approached you
`first?
` A Not at the moment. I don't recall the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`16
`
`first phone call we had with -- or who was on the
`first phone call. It was somebody from Alston &
`Bird. I don't remember his name at the moment. I'm
`sorry.
` Q So how much time did you spend preparing
`your declarations themselves?
` A Again, in terms of number of hours I put
`in?
` Q Yes.
` A Or -- okay. That's not easy for me to
`answer. This was done over a period of many weeks,
`and I'm not sure at the moment how much time on
`average I spent per day.
` Q Did you personally draft the
`declarations?
` A Counsel provided a template with the
`structure and the general outline of the
`declaration, and there were -- some legal portions
`were filled in already. And I wrote all of the
`technical material, so -- I did not type every
`single word in the deposition -- in the declaration,
`excuse me.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`17
`
` But now I own the document. We went
`through an extensive edit and review cycle.
` Q So in preparing the declaration, did you
`speak to anyone else other than your attorney?
` A I did not.
` Q All right. So now I think we're ready to
`jump into the '642 declaration. So if you have that
`handy, please feel free to pull that out.
` A So I have the box here that you shipped.
` Q Yes. I'm not sure how we marked them,
`but this will be your '642 declaration.
` A If you give me just a moment to find the
`correct document.
` Q Sure.
` MR. TANG: For the Planet Depos
`technician, this will be Exhibit 2003, if you can
`just pull that up on the screen.
` THE TECHNICIAN: Got it. Thank you.
` THE WITNESS: Okay. I have the document
`here.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q I guess we'll start --
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`18
`
` MR. TANG: Can we just mark this as
`Deposition Exhibit 1?
` (Marked Exhibit No. 1.)
` MR. TANG: Planet Depos, we're okay with
`that and everything too?
` THE TECHNICIAN: Yes, sir.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q Dr. Sprenger, the document you have in
`front of you now and what we have on the screen
`here -- if you can just scroll down a little bit --
`a little bit more -- is titled Declaration of
`Dr. Michael D. Sprenger in Support of Patent Owner's
`Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,589,642.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes, I see that.
` Q This is the same document that you have
`in front of you now, correct?
` A Yeah. The first page appears to be the
`same.
` Q So can you flip through the document just
`to confirm what you have in front of you is the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`19
`
`correct and accurate copy of what you submitted?
` A Yes. If you give me just a moment,
`please.
` Q Sure.
` A Okay. To the best of my abilities, I
`would say this is identical.
` Q And on the last page, can you confirm
`that that's your signature?
` A This is my signature indeed.
` Q So this document contains your true and
`correct opinion as far as it relates to the '642
`patent; is that correct?
` A That's correct, yes.
` Q And sitting here today, are you aware of
`any errors or corrections that need to be made to
`this document?
` A I'm not aware of anything.
` MR. TANG: So I think we can pull that
`down from the screen now.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So let's turn first to Paragraph 20 of
`your declaration.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`20
`
` A I'm looking at Paragraph 20 right now.
` Q And so in Paragraphs 20 and 21, you list
`several documents that you say you reviewed in
`preparing the declaration.
` Are there any other documents that you
`reviewed?
` A Let me quickly read to make sure I get
`the context and everything else.
` Q Please.
` A Yes, these are the documents I reviewed.
` Q Great.
` So now I'd like to turn to Paragraph 8.
` A I have Paragraph 8 here.
` Q So in Paragraph 8, it says you have over
`30 years of experience in engineering communications
`and consumer electronics, and then it lists several
`of the subject matters that -- that you're familiar
`with.
` Did you work with any remote controls in
`your 30 years of experience?
` A Yes, I have, quite extensively so. In my
`20-plus years in the telecom space, I worked for a
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`21
`
`number of telecommunications providers and network
`operators, all of which provided video services in
`various form from the early forms of what we call
`IPTV back in the day to -- excuse me -- excuse me --
`IPTV back in the day to more recent forms that are
`called OTT over the stop -- over-the-top video
`streaming. All of these technologies and products
`and services involved remote controls.
` Remote controls were viewed as very
`important because these are some of the devices that
`are essentially customer facing, and the customer
`interacts with using a remote control with the
`services that we provided. So the remote control
`and the associated graphical user interface on the
`TV was seen as very important.
` Q So then did you design any remote control
`programming systems?
` A I did not personally design a remote
`control that was going into production, in case you
`mean that. We did some experimental setups that
`were used for internal testing, try things out, some
`cases demonstration. We typically call that a
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`22
`
`sandbox environment.
` But I have very intimate knowledge of
`remote controls, the associated circuit technology,
`the kind of programming that's involved in making
`remote controls work, as well as the various
`protocols that are used in infrared and RF --
`infrared and RF remote controls.
` Q So I think I heard you mention the IPTV
`project, and I think you talk about that later on in
`Paragraph 12, I believe.
` Can you tell me about that project?
` A Yes. In the earlier days -- and I'm
`talking approximately 20 years ago, in the very
`early 2000s -- essentially all of the telecom
`operators were engaged in this kind of project.
` IPTV stands for providing TV service over
`the internet -- over an internet protocol. This is
`slightly different from the kind of video streaming
`that most consumers take advantage of today.
` Back then, the only way to really
`feasibly and reliably do this was to have a network
`operator provide the internet connectivity as well
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`23
`
`as the video service as such. So this would have to
`be a combined offer to really make this work from a
`perspective of retaining the desired quality for the
`end consumer.
` Q So -- so you're -- you're referring to
`streaming video there.
` What device received that within the
`consumer's home?
` A In the consumer's home, there would
`typically be a set-top box, a consumer set-top box
`that our end users or our subscribers, as we call
`them, would then be interacting with the set-top box
`via remote control and some form of what we call
`EPG, an electronic program guide, which is part of
`overall a GUI, a graphical user interface.
` Q Did the company that you worked for, did
`they provide those set-top boxes?
` A They did not. The network operators
`typically would procure set-top boxes from equipment
`manufacturers or we call them equipment vendors.
`Sometimes a vendor would not necessarily manufacture
`every piece of the hardware.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`24
`
` So we typically specified the exact
`requirements that our set-top box or boxes had to
`fulfill, in terms of functionality, in terms of
`potentially a road map for further upgrades, and
`potential -- in terms of power requirements, heat
`dissipation, interface, and, of course, also the
`remote control.
` Q You're saying you had to design the
`remote control for that manufacturer.
` A Sorry, can you repeat the question,
`please?
` Q Sure.
` So you're saying you had to design the
`remote control for the manufacturer.
` MR. TSUI: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: No, this was perhaps a
`misunderstanding. We did not design the remote
`control. We specified all the requirements that
`would go into a design. We would specify typically
`interfaces that would come into play, the protocols
`that are used, that's true, for the remote control,
`as well as protocols for services or signals that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`25
`
`would go into and out of the set-top box.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So providing those specifications, the
`manufacturer put the remote control together.
` A So you -- you dropped out for just a
`brief moment. I could only understand part of the
`question.
` Q Sure.
` So -- so you provided the specifications
`to the manufacturer, and the manufacturer designed a
`remote control to your specifications; is that
`correct?
` MR. TSUI: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: That's correct, yes.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q And do you know if any of those remote
`controls were programmable?
` A I don't recall at the moment. We -- we
`did look at a huge range of remote controls,
`including some of the more upscale services. When I
`say upscale, I mean more elaborate in terms of the
`kind of service offerings that typically would have
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`26
`
`the more capable remote controls associated with
`them.
` I do believe that some of these were
`programmable to some extent, but I don't recall any
`details.
` Q So I'd like to turn now to Paragraph 14
`of your declaration.
` A Paragraph 14, yes.
` Q Yes.
` This relates to your work at CableLabs;
`is that correct?
` A Let me quickly look at the declaration to
`confirm.
` Q Yes, please.
` A Yes, that's correct.
` Q And so at CableLabs, did you work on
`fiberoptic cables?
` A I did. We -- I was instrumental in
`setting up a new fiberoptic lab for testing and
`development of new fiberoptic transmission
`technologies.
` Q And were these wired or wireless
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`27
`
`technologies?
` A These are wire technologies.
` Q So then did you conduct any wireless
`communications research at CableLabs?
` A At CableLabs, I did not.
` Q So now I'd like to turn to Paragraph 29
`of your declaration.
` A Let me quickly read to make sure I
`understand the context.
` Q Sure.
` A Yes, go ahead, please.
` Q So this is in a section entitled Legal
`Principles; is that right?
` A Let me go back real quick to confirm.
` Q Sure.
` A Yes, that's correct.
` Q And Paragraph 29 is under the subheading
`called Anticipation, right?
` A That's correct, yes.
` Q And now I'd like to turn to Paragraph 31.
` A Okay. Okay. I'm looking at 31.
` Q And that is under a subheading called
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`28
`
`Obviousness, right?
` A That's correct.
` Q So what is your understanding of the
`difference between anticipation and obviousness?
` A I'm not sure I opined on that in my
`declaration. This is -- I'm able to offer technical
`opinions on technical matters. I'm unable to offer
`opinions in the matter of the law.
` Q So then did you not consider the
`difference between anticipation and obviousness when
`performing your analysis?
` A I did so in a general sense as it's --
`you know, would make sense to a layperson and the
`law such as myself.
` Q In a general sense, how did you
`distinguish obviousness from anticipation?
` A Give me a moment, please, to think about
`this.
` Q Sure.
` MR. TSUI: I'll just object to the extent
`it calls for a legal conclusion.
` THE WITNESS: Sorry, I did not hear the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`29
`
`last comment.
` MR. TSUI: I was just objecting.
` THE WITNESS: Oh, okay.
` MR. TSUI: If you didn't hear it, it was
`an objection to the extent it calls for a legal
`conclusion.
` THE WITNESS: So it says here in
`Anticipation -- this is Section B -- As properly
`construed is either found explicitly or inherently
`in a prior art reference.
` Then under Obviousness, if a prior art
`reference or references -- if it would have been
`obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at
`the time of the alleged invention, taking into
`account the scope and content of prior art, the
`differences between prior art and the claims, the
`level of ordinary skill in the art, and any
`so-called secondary considerations of
`nonobviousness.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So if I heard you correctly, you said
`that the -- one of the differences is that inherency
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`30
`
`is implied under Anticipation.
` Did I hear that correctly?
` MR. TSUI: Object to form and
`mischaracterizes.
` THE WITNESS: Could you repeat your
`question, please?
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q Sure.
` If I heard you correctly, it sounded like
`you said inherency was under the subheading of
`Anticipation; is that correct?
` MR. TSUI: Same objection and calls for a
`legal conclusion.
` THE WITNESS: That's what it says here
`in -- in Section B under Anticipation.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q And so can I turn you to Paragraph 4 of
`your declaration?
` A Sorry, say the number again, please.
` Q Sure. Paragraph 4.
` A 4, yes. I'm looking at Paragraph 4.
` Q And so you've provided a table here that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`31
`
`says the basis of each of these three grounds is
`obviousness.
` Do you see that?
` A I see that, yes.
` Q There's nothing you want to change about
`this table; is that correct?
` MR. TSUI: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: I don't want to change
`anything.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So based on this table, what you've
`written here, you applied obviousness to your
`analysis; isn't that correct?
` MR. TSUI: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Based on the table, yes.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q So I'd like to turn to Paragraph 31 now.
` A I'm looking at 31.
` Q All right. And you have a bullet point
`in the middle of this paragraph that starts with
`No. 4 that says that you considered any so-called
`considerations of nonobviousness.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`32
`
` Do you see that?
` A No. 4, any so-called secondary
`considerations of nonobviousness, yes.
` Q And you didn't determine that any
`secondary conditions existed here; is that right?
` MR. TSUI: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: I'm not sure I understand
`the question.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q Did you consider any secondary conditions
`when analyzing the condition?
` A When you say secondary conditions,
`meaning secondary considerations?
` Q Yes, consideration.
` A As in -- okay. I'm still not sure I
`understand the question. I'm sorry.
` Q So -- well, looking at Paragraph 31,
`right, you have any so-called secondary
`considerations of nonobviousness, and then you list
`a few examples, I believe, after that.
` Do you see that?
` A I see that, yes.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`33
`
` Q So did you make any analysis related to
`those factors, we'll say, in your analysis?
` A I did, yes.
` Q Can you tell me which ones?
` A Not specifically. They're -- at this
`point. They're all in the declaration, so we would
`have to go through case by case.
` Q I'd like you to now turn to Paragraph 32,
`and if you'd like to review that as well, please
`feel free.
` A 32, yes.
` Q So in this paragraph, you say that to
`combine two references there must be a reason to
`combine the references, right?
` MR. TSUI: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Sorry, there was a brief
`audio dropout on my side. If you could restate the
`question, please.
`BY MR. TANG:
` Q Sure, sure.
` So in this paragraph, you say that to
`combine two references there must be a reason to
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`

`

`Transcript of Michael D. Sprenger, Ph.D.
`Conducted on September 15, 2020
`
`34
`
`combine the references,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket