`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. _____
`Filed: August 10, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`ROBERT BOSCH, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`MONUMENT PEAK VENTURES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2019-01473
`Patent No. 6,654,507
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO MOVE DUE DATES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2019-01473
` Patent No. 6,654,507
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner provide notice to the Board that they have
`
`stipulated to move Due Dates 2 and 3 in order to allow completion of the terms of
`
`an executed settlement agreement. The parties now stipulate that Due Date 2 is being
`
`moved from August 17, 2020 to September 17, 2020, and Due Date 3 is being moved
`
`from September 24, 2020, to October 15, 2020.
`
`The revised dates are reflected in the attached Amended Due Date Appendix
`
`below.
`
`Dated: August 10, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
` By: /Lionel M. Lavenue/
`Lionel M. Lavenue (Reg. No. 46,859)
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Robert Bosch, LLC
`
` By: /Tarek N. Fahmi/
`Tarek N. Fahmi (Reg. No. 41,402)
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Monument Peak Ventures, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2019-01473
` Patent No. 6,654,507
`
`JOINT STIPULATED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`
`DUE DATE 1…………………………………………………………May 28, 2020
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2………………………………...August 17, 2020 September 17, 2020
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3……………………………….September 24, 2020 October 15, 2020
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend
`(or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)1
`DUE DATE 4……………………………………………………..October 15, 2020
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`DUE DATE 5..………………………………………………..…November 5, 2020
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 6………..…………………………………………November 12, 2020
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`Request for prehearing conference
`
`
`
`
`1 If Patent Owner files neither a reply to Petitioner’s opposition to the MTA nor a
`revised MTA, the parties are directed to Section B(3) above.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 7…………………………………………………..November 19, 2020
`
` Case IPR2019-01473
` Patent No. 6,654,507
`
`
`
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 8…………..………………………………………December 9, 2020
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2019-01473
` Patent No. 6,654,507
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on August 10,
`
`2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION TO MOVE
`
`DUE DATES was served electronically on August 10, 2020, on counsel of record
`
`for the Patent Owner as follows:
`
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi (Reg. No. 41,402)
`tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`Jonathan Tsao (Reg. No. 61,241)
`jonathan.tsao@ascendalaw.com
`
`patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`2150 N First St., Suite 420
`San Jose, CA 95131
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 10, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` By:/Daniel E. Doku/
`Daniel E. Doku
`Litigation Clerk
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garret & Dunner, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`