throbber
CASE IPR2019-01279
`Patent No. 8,510,407
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC.,
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., and
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`DODOTS LICENSING SOLUTIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`CASE IPR2019-01279
`Patent No. 8,510,407
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`PERRY M. GOLDBERG UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Under 37 CFR § 42.10(c) and in response to the authorization provided by
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`(“Board”) in the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (Paper Number 3,
`
`entered July 11, 2019) (“Notice”) and by email dated March 10, 2020, Patent
`
`Owner DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC (“DoDots”) respectfully moves for Perry
`
`M. Goldberg to appear pro hac vice on its behalf, as back-up counsel, before the
`
`Board in IPR2019-01279. This motion follows the guidelines set forth in
`
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, entered October 15, 2013 (“Order”).
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`Under the Order, the following statement of facts shows that good cause
`
`exists for the Board to recognize Mr. Goldberg pro hac vice.
`
`Lead counsel for this proceeding, Lewis E. Hudnell, III, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Registration No. 51,185).
`
`Mr. Goldberg is an experienced litigation attorney, and has been involved in
`
`numerous patent infringement cases in federal District Courts across the country.
`
`He has experience in various aspects of patent infringement matters including
`
`trials, Markman hearings, and summary judgment hearings. Mr. Goldberg is a
`
`member in good standing of the California Bar, and is admitted to practice before
`
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the United States
`
`District Courts for the Northern and Central District of California. Mr. Goldberg
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`has not been suspended or disbarred from practice, never had any application for
`
`admission to practice denied, nor had any sanctions or contempt citations imposed
`
`against him.
`
`Mr. Goldberg is lead counsel for DoDots in a co-pending litigation DoDots
`
`Licensing Solutions LLC v. Lenovo Holding Company Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-
`
`00098-MN, pending in the United States District Court for the District of
`
`Delaware. This litigation involves U.S. Patent No. 8,510,407 (“the ’407 Patent”),
`
`the same patent at issue in this proceeding, as well as two other patents in the same
`
`family as the ’407 Patent. In his role as lead litigation counsel in that case, Mr.
`
`Goldberg has reviewed and is familiar with the ’407 Patent and the related patents,
`
`and is familiar with the legal and factual issues in that case. He also has studied
`
`the Petition and the prior art references relied upon by the Petitioners. As such,
`
`Mr. Goldberg has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`Mr. Goldberg has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.,
`
`and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Mr. Goldberg is concurrently applying to appear pro hac vice in IPR2019-
`
`00988 and IPR2019-01278. Mr. Goldberg has not applied to appear pro hac vice
`
`before the Board in connection with any other proceedings.
`
`DoDots has expended significant financial resources in the co-pending
`
`litigation with Mr. Goldberg as counsel, and DoDots wishes to continue using Mr.
`
`Goldberg in this proceeding.
`
`As such, DoDots respectfully submits that there is good cause for the Board
`
`to recognize Mr. Goldberg as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`II. Affidavit or Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`This Motion for pro hac vice admission is accompanied by a Declaration of
`
`Mr. Goldberg as required by the Order (Ex. 2001).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Reg. No. 51,185
`Hudnell Law Group P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real
`Suite 180
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`T: 650-564-7720
`F: 347-772-3034
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC
`
`VICE ADMISSION OF PERRY M. GOLDBERG UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`was served on March 10, 2020 on the Petitioners by filing this document through
`
`the Patent Review Processing System as well as e-mailing a copy to
`
`charanjit.brahma@troutman.com and dustin.weeks@troutman.com.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`(Special Counsel to Progress LLP)
`
`Reg. No. 51,185
`Hudnell Law Group P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real
`Suite 180
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`T: 650-564-7720
`F: 347-772-3034
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket