throbber
Paper 15
`Entered: December 13, 2019
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`___________
`
`Case IPR2019-01186
`Patent 7,039,435 B2
`___________
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, STACY B. MARGOLIES, and
`SCOTT E. BAIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01186
`Patent 7,039,435 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On December 6, 2019 the parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate (Paper
`13, “Joint Motion”), a settlement agreement (Exhibit 2034, “Agreement”), and a
`Joint Request to Keep [the Agreement] Separate Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74 (Paper 14, “Joint Request”).
`In the Joint Motion, the parties state that they have settled their dispute
`regarding the challenged patent, pursuant to the Agreement. Joint Motion 1. The
`parties further state that the district court has dismissed the claims relating to the
`challenged patent in the case between the parties, Bell Northern Research, LLC v.
`Huawei Device Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-1784-CAB-BLM (Doc. No.
`128). Joint Motion 2–3. The parties also assert that there are no “public interest or
`other factors [that] weigh against termination of this proceeding.” Id. at 2.
`This case is in its preliminary stages and we have not yet decided whether to
`institute an inter partes review. Accordingly, we have not “decided the merits of
`the proceeding” prior to the parties’ request for termination. 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
`The foregoing factors weigh in favor of granting the Joint Motion. We discern no
`factors weighing against termination of the proceeding. Accordingly, we grant the
`Joint Motion.
`Similarly, we determine that, under the circumstances, it is appropriate to
`treat the Agreement as business confidential information kept separate from the file
`of the challenged patent. We, therefore, also grant the Joint Request.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`For the foregoing reasons, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate is GRANTED, and the
`proceeding is hereby terminated; and
`
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2019-01186
`
`Patent 7,039,435 B2
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request to Keep Separate is
`GRANTED, and the Agreement shall be treated as business confidential
`information and kept separate from the file of the ’435 patent.
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Michael T. Hawkins
`Craig Deutsch
`Sangki Park
`Christopher Hoff
`Jason W. Wolff
`Kim Leung
`Jennifer Huang
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`hawkins@fr.com
`deutsch@fr.com
`spark@fr.com
`hoff@fr.com
`wolff@fr.com
`leung@fr.com
`jjh@fr.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Steven W. Hartsell
`Alexander E. Gasser
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`shartsell@skiermontderby.com
`agasser@skiermontderby.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket