`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`and ERICSSON INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2019-011161
`Patent 7,016,676 B2
`
`
`_________________
`
`
`PETITIONER MICROSOFT
`CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Ericsson Inc., who filed a petition in IPR2020-00376, has been joined as a
`petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01116
`Patent 7,016,676
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order dated
`
`December 4, 2019 (Paper 9), Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Petitioner”)
`
`respectfully requests oral argument, currently scheduled for September 9, 2020.
`
`Pursuant to the USPTO’s notice regarding PTAB oral hearings occurring after
`
`March 13, 2020, Petitioner intends to participate via remote video and/or
`
`telephonically, unless the USPTO further notifies otherwise. Petitioner requests
`
`authorization to present demonstrative slides during oral argument and to the extent
`
`a live hearing is conducted, Petitioner requests the ability to use audio-visual
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and
`
`screen for PowerPoint display.
`
`Petitioner specifies, without intent to waive consideration of any issue not
`
`requested, the following issues to be argued:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`the interpretation of certain claim limitations of U.S. Patent 7,016,676
`
`(“the ’676 patent”);
`
`the public availability of the prior art references cited in the Petition;
`
`and
`
`the grounds of unpatentability of claims 1 and 2 of the ’676 patent
`
`presented in the Petition including:
`
`o
`
`whether claims 1 and 2 are unpatentable under Section 103 over
`
`HomeRF (Ex. 1006);
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01116
`Patent 7,016,676
`whether claims 1 and 2 are unpatentable under Section 103 over
`
`HomeRF in view of HomeRF Tutorial (Ex. 1008);
`
`whether claims 1 and 2 are unpatentable under Section 103 over
`
`HomeRF in view of HomeRF Liaison Report (Ex. 1009); and
`
`whether claims 1 and 2 are unpatentable under Section 103 over
`
`o
`
`o
`
`o
`
`Lansford (Ex. 1012).
`
`Petitioner reserves the right to address any arguments presented by Patent
`
`Owner and any other issues about which the Board wishes to hear argument during
`
`any oral hearing in this proceeding.
`
`Petitioner requests 60 minutes to address all issues for this proceeding.
`
`Dated: July 21, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Derrick W. Toddy/
`Derrick W. Toddy (Reg. No. 74,591)
`derrick.toddy@klarquist.com
`Andrew M. Mason (Reg. No. 64,034)
`andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`Todd M. Siegel (Reg. No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Microsoft Corporation
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01116
`Patent 7,016,676
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on July 21, 2020, a true and correct copy of
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served on counsel for Uniloc 2017
`
`LLC via electronic mail as follows:
`
`Ryan Loveless – Lead Counsel
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`Brett Mangrum – Back-up Counsel
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`James Etheridge – Back-up Counsel
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`Jeffrey Huang – Back-up Counsel
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Derrick W. Toddy/
`Derrick W. Toddy (Reg. No. 74,591)
`derrick.toddy@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Microsoft Corporation
`
`Certificate Of Service
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
