throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`GOPRO, INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN USA, INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`CELLSPIN SOFT, INC.
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-01108
`U.S. Patent No. 9,258,698
`
`
`DECLARATION OF KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GoPro/Garmin
`EX. 1022, Page 1
`
`

`

`I, Karineh Khachatourian, declare the following:
`
`Case No. IPR2019-01108
`U.S. Patent No. 9,258,698
`
`
`1.
`
` I am a partner in the law firm of Rimon P.C., working as the
`
`managing partner of the firm’s office in Palo Alto, California.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the California Bar.
`
`3. My California Bar member number is 202634.
`
`4.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`6.
`
`I have never had any court or administrative body impose sanctions or
`
`contempt citations against me.
`
`7.
`
`I have applied to appear pro hac vice in the following Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board (“PTAB”), or United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(“USPTO”), proceedings in at least the last three years: IPR2015-01078, IPR2015-
`
`01080, IPR2017-01070, IPR2017-01071, IPR2017-01391, IPR2017-01392,
`
`IPR2017-01393, IPR2017-01405, IPR2017-01406, IPR2017-01409, IPR2017-
`
`01410, IPR2018-00401, and IPR2019-01107.
`
`8.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title
`
`37 of the C.F.R.
`
`
`
`1
`
`GoPro/Garmin
`EX. 1022, Page 2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2019-01108
`U.S. Patent No. 9,258,698
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`9.
`
`Code of Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq., the
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`10.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney, with over twenty years of
`
`experience in many patent infringement litigations in District Courts across the
`
`country, including experience with fact and expert document and deposition
`
`discovery, claim construction, Markman hearings, motion practice, and trials and
`
`hearings. I have represented Petitioner GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or “Petitioner”) in
`
`patent litigation and IPR matters for approximately six years.
`
`11.
`
`I have been lead counsel for Petitioner GoPro, Inc. in the ongoing
`
`litigation captioned Cellspin Soft, Inc., v. GoPro Inc., Case No. 4:17-cv-05939
`
`(N.D. Cal.) (filed Mar. 2, 2018) (“the co-pending litigation”) since its inception
`
`and have been actively involved in all aspects of the co-pending litigation, which
`
`relates to and involves the same patent at issue in this proceeding. I am familiar
`
`with the subject matter of the claimed invention and was involved in a validity
`
`challenge at the district court level based on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (“Section 101”). I
`
`have also been involved in Cellspin’s appeal of the district court order invalidating
`
`the patent at issue based on Section 101. Moreover, Petitioner has hired me to
`
`represent it in this Petition because of my litigation and PTAB experience. I also
`
`
`
`2
`
`GoPro/Garmin
`EX. 1022, Page 3
`
`

`

`participated in the preparation of GoPro’s Petition, and I am familiar with the prior
`
`Case No. IPR2019-01108
`U.S. Patent No. 9,258,698
`
`
`art references based on that preparation.
`
`12. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an email exchange
`
`I had with John Edmonds, counsel for Patent Owner, wherein he stated that
`
`Cellspin does not oppose my application.
`
`13.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements are made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Dated: July 15, 2019
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`/ Karineh Khachatourian /
`Karineh Khachatourian
`Rimon, P.C.
`2479 E. Bayshore Rd. Suite 210
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 223-7785
`Fax: (650) 223-7785
`
`
`
`3
`
`GoPro/Garmin
`EX. 1022, Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`GoPro/Garmin
`EX. 1022, Page 5
`
`

`

`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`John Edmonds <jedmonds@ip-lit.com>
`Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:20 AM
`Karineh Khachatourian; PTO-Edmonds; Steve Schlather; vpearce@orrick.com
`David Xue; Jennifer Bailey
`RE: IPR2019-01108
`
`Karineh,
`
`Cellspin does not oppose.
`
`Regards,
`
`John Edmonds
`713.364.5291
`jedmonds@ip-lit.com
`
`From: Karineh Khachatourian <karinehk@rimonlaw.com>  
`Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 04:24 PM 
`To: John Edmonds <jedmonds@ip‐lit.com>; PTO‐Edmonds <pto‐edmonds@ip‐lit.com>; Steve Schlather <sschlather@ip‐
`lit.com>; vpearce@orrick.com 
`Cc: David Xue <david.xue@rimonlaw.com>; Jennifer Bailey <jennifer.bailey@eriseip.com> 
`Subject: IPR2019‐01108 

`Hello: 

`We plan on filing my pro hac vice application in the Panasonic IPR. I presume there is no opposition, but please let me 
`know if I am mistaken. Thank you. 
`
`1
`
`GoPro/Garmin
`EX. 1022, Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket