throbber
Parting Thought
`
`Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether: an emerging solvent in topical
`dermatology products
`
`David W Osborne, PhD
`
`TOLMAR Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA
`
`Summary
`
`Background The solvent diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGEE) is currently used in
`over 500 cosmetic products and has enabled the formulation of a topical 5% dapsone
`gel for the treatment of acne. It is anticipated that this common cosmetic ingredient will
`be a component in numerous future prescription topical products approved for the US
`market. Dermatologists are already treating patients that apply products containing
`5–40% of this solvent multiple times each day.
`Aims To provide dermatologists a review of this solvent’s safety and tolerance in addi-
`tion to describing how it interacts with the stratum corneum, sebum, and resident
`microflora.
`Methods To critically review technical and patent literature that provides insight into
`this novel solvent.
`Results Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether when used in a 99.9+% pure pharmaceutical
`grade is safe and well tolerated. Up to half of the applied solvent crosses the skin’s barrier
`and becomes systemic. For certain drug actives, this solvent provides for an intracu-
`taneous depot. This solvent has not demonstrated any inherent antimicrobial properties
`but was found to be mildly inhibitory toward Propionibacterium acnes.
`Conclusions This safe, well-tolerated solvent is already used in many cosmetics and will
`become an ingredient in an increasing number of prescription products. Its ability to
`modify the skin delivery of actives it is formulated with (or formulation components that
`are applied just shortly before or after) make it important for dermatologists to have an
`understanding of this emerging solvent.
`
`Keywords: acne, barrier function, topical administration, drug delivery formulation
`
`Introduction
`
`Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGEE) is a liquid
`with a long history of use in cosmetic and over-the-
`counter topically applied products. DEGEE is the official
`United State Pharmacopeia name for this solvent,
`although cosmetic products list this ingredient on their
`
`Correspondence: D W Osborne, PhD, Vice President, Product Development,
`TOLMAR Inc., 701 Centre Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. E-mail:
`dosborne@tolmar.com
`
`Accepted for publication September 1, 2011
`
`labels as ethoxydiglycol in accordance with the Inter-
`national Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI)
`Dictionary. Both official names refer to the pharmaceu-
`tical ⁄ cosmetic solvent having the trade name TRAN-
`SCUTOL. The first FDA-approved prescription drug
`product to contain DEGEE was 5% dapsone topical gel.
`Other prescription topical products that contain DEGEE
`either have been approved or are currently under
`development. It is anticipated that this excipient will be
`a component of a significant number of dermatology
`products approved in coming years. It is the goal of this
`review to: (i) summarize the established safety and
`
`324
`
`Ó 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 10, 324–329
`
`1
`
`AMN1009
`
`Mylan (IPR2019-01095) MYLAN1009, p. 001
`
`

`

`tolerance data for DEGEE; (ii) introduce dermatologists to
`the properties of this solvent that makes it a preferred
`choice for dermatology products; and (iii) review what is
`known about how DEGEE interacts with the stratum
`corneum, sebum, and resident microflora.
`
`Chemistry, nomenclature, and purity
`
`With the molecular formula of CH3CH2OCH2CH2OCH2-
`CH2OH and a molar mass of 134.17, DEGEE is a solvent
`with many commercial applications that only relatively
`recently include use in topical products. The IUPAC
`name is 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy) ethanol [CAS Number 111-
`90-0] and has been used as an industrial solvent for
`many years under the trade names Carbitol, Dioxitol,
`Poly-solve DE, and Dowanal DE. DEGEE is compatible
`with alcohol, propylene glycol, and oleic acid, but is not
`mutually soluble with vegetable oils or mineral oil
`according to the TRANSCUTOL Technical Bruochure.1
`Atenolol, griseofulvin, clebopride, dexamethasone, and
`ivermectin are pharmaceutical actives listed as being
`successfully formulated using TRANSCUTOL.1 It
`is
`important to note that the industrial grades of this
`solvent are contaminated with relatively high levels of
`ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol. Toxicology studies
`completed on DEGEE prior to the 1990s used material
`that was at best 98% pure, with many of the observed
`adverse effects being attributed to the toxicity of the
`ethylene glycol impurity. USP-NF grades of DEGEE for
`use in pharmaceutical products contain not more than
`50 lg ⁄ g 2-methoxyethanol, not more than 160 lg ⁄ g
`2-ethoxyethanol, not more than 620 lg ⁄ g ethylene
`glycol, and not more than 150 lg ⁄ g diethylene glycol.2
`To put these numbers in perspective 500 lg ⁄ g is the
`same as 500 ppm or 0.05 weight percent. Thus,
`pharmaceutical DEGEE has >99.9% purity. The primary
`supplier in the US for pharmaceutical grade DEGEE is
`Gattefosse using the trade name TRANSCUTOL-P.
`
`Use of DEGEE in topically applied products
`
`Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether is commonly used as
`a solvent
`for topical products, with pharmaceutical
`formulators taking advantage of its ability to modify skin
`penetration and the cosmetic industry using it to alter
`product rub-in and feel. The Environmental Working
`Group’s ‘‘Skin Deep’’ cosmetic safety database (cosmet-
`icsdatabase.com)
`listed 509 products
`that contain
`DEGEE when accessed during the summer 2011.3
`DEGEE has been a favorite excipient for formulators of
`sunless tanning products because it spreads easily
`without streaking. These products often contain high
`
`DEGEE: an emerging solvent • D W Osborne
`
`concentrations of DEGEE (20–40%) and can be applied
`frequently to large skin surface areas. DEGEE is also
`contained in a wide range of hair coloring products that
`are rinse-off applications. Although some of
`these
`products are known to be irritating, DEGEE itself is not
`considered the source of irritation. However, DEGEE by
`virtue of its solvent properties may promote the delivery
`of other excipients that are contained in the product that
`are irritating to the skin.
`The Scientific Committee on Consumer Products
`(SCCP)
`issued an opinion on DEGEE in December
`2006.4 This opinion provides an excellent toxicological
`evaluation summary of DEGEE. Animal testing shows
`that DEGEE produces little repro- or hematotoxicity. Two
`negative in vivo mutagenicity studies and the structure
`of the substance caused the SCCP to not expect that
`DEGEE will have relevant mutagenic potential. A series
`of Gatteffosse reports cited in the SCCP review indicate
`that: (i) neat DEGEE dosed at 0.020 mL per about
`50 mm2 of human volunteer skin (occluded for 48 h)
`was well tolerated (n = 10); and (ii) use of Marzulli and
`Maibach’s method with 24 adult volunteers concluded
`that no pathological irritation or sensitization reaction
`significant to a cutaneous intolerance was noted.
`Although an adequate carcinogenicity study has not
`been published, a 40% DEGEE in water solution was
`orally administered to female rats for 92 weeks and male
`rats for 100 weeks as one of the control arms for the
`development of 5% dapsone topical gel.5 DEGEE used at
`this concentration was found to not be carcinogenic.
`The 5% dapsone topical gel vehicle, which contained
`25% DEGEE, was used as a control in a hairless mouse
`photocarcinogenicity study.6 In this 52-week study,
`male and female albino hairless Crl:SKH1-hrBR mice
`were dosed topically with product or vehicle and then
`given a cumulative UV dose of 600 Robertson–Berger
`units (RBU) per week. A total of 400 RBU approximate
`one minimum erythema dose in previously untanned
`human skin. In this study, the 5% dapsone topical gel
`vehicle containing 25% DEGEE demonstrated tumor
`growth essentially identical to untreated control animals
`when both groups received 600 RBU ⁄ week. As all
`animals in this carcinogenicity model develop tumors
`from the UV exposure, the study showed that DEGEE
`does not cause an increase in the number of tumors, nor
`does it cause the tumors to develop sooner. The 5%
`dapsone topical gel vehicle also contains water, <1%
`carbopol 980 gelling agent, and 0.2% methyl paraben
`that is pH adjusted with NaOH.
`The Scientific Committee on Consumer Products
`issued opinion on DEGEE4 provided a detailed synopsis
`of three well-conducted in vitro studies on percutaneous
`
`Ó 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 10, 324–329
`
`325
`
`2
`
`Mylan (IPR2019-01095) MYLAN1009, p. 002
`
`

`

`Dapsone has negligible water solubility and is generally
`poorly soluble in the oils and solvents that are estab-
`lished inactive ingredients in FDA-approved topical
`products. Dapsone does have reasonable alcohol and
`glycol solubility, but the addition of even small amounts
`of water results in the rapid and dramatic precipitation
`of the dissolved dapsone. Building upon recent formu-
`lation success,9 the solubility of dapsone was tested in
`DEGEE and found to be remarkably high. More impor-
`tantly, blends of water and DEGEE produced a solubility
`profile (Fig. 1) that could be exploited for the treatment
`of acne when formulating an active having both
`antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties.
`The formulation strategy for how DEGEE might be an
`advantage in a formulation for the topical treatment of
`acne is described in US patents 5,863,56010 and
`6,060,085,11 Ideally, a topical antimicrobial would be
`primarily delivered into the pilosebaceous unit, with
`only minimal active crossing of the skin barrier. Intact
`stratum corneum lines the upper third of the piloseba-
`ceous unit, and it is into this upper third of the hair
`follicle that the sebaceous duct secretes sebum. Thus, a
`need exists for an acne treatment
`that maximizes
`antimicrobial drug levels in the upper third of the
`pilosebaceous unit. Additionally, when an anti-inflam-
`matory agent is used to treat acne, it is important to
`increase the level of drug that will cross the intact
`stratum corneum lining the upper third of the piloseba-
`ceous unit. By definition, inflammation is the response of
`the viable epidermis to irritants and sensitizers. To
`reduce the amount of inflammation, the active pharma-
`ceutical must penetrate past the stratum corneum and
`
`10%
`20%
`30%
`% Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether in Water (wt/wt)
`
`40%
`
`6%
`
`5%
`
`4%
`
`3%
`
`2%
`
`1%
`
`% Dissolved Dapsone (wt/wt)
`
`0%
`
`0%
`
`Figure 1 Dapsone solubility as a function of increasing percentage
`of diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGEE) blended with water.
`
`DEGEE: an emerging solvent • D W Osborne
`
`DEGEE absorption through excised human skin. Carbon-
`14 radiolabeled DEGEE was formulated at 5% and 10%
`DEGEE concentrations in a shampoo formulation, at
`15% DEGEE in a hydro-alcoholic gel formulation, and at
`2%, 5%, and 10% DEGEE in a Oil-in-Water (O ⁄ W)
`emulsion formulation. The shampoo formulation was
`applied to the skin for 30 min and then ‘‘rinsed-off’’.
`Twenty-four hours after initial application 21.6% of the
`applied dose had been absorbed (epidermis + dermis
`+ receptor fluid) for the 5% DEGEE shampoo compared
`with 17.5% of the applied dose for the 10% DEGEE
`shampoo. The hydro-alcoholic gel was studied with and
`without occlusion. In two studies without occlusion
`51.0% and 44.9% of the applied dose of DEGEE was
`absorbed, but only about 50% of the radioactivity was
`recovered. This was attributed to evaporation of radio-
`labeled DEGEE. When the hydroalcoholic gel was applied
`under occlusion, average recovery was 92% with 51.5%
`of the applied dose of DEGEE being absorbed. For the
`O ⁄ W emulsion, the studies completed without occlusion
`had about 50% total radioactivity recovery compared
`with about 90% recovery for the occluded samples. For
`the 2% emulsion, the percent of applied dose absorbed
`was 43.2% and 45.6% for the two experiments nonoc-
`cluded and 55.9% for the occluded study. For the 5%
`emulsion, results were 56.1% and 44.4% nonoccluded
`and 63.8% occluded compared with the 10% emulsion
`having percent of applied dose absorbed values of 50.4%
`and 51.6% nonoccluded and 56.4% occluded. As seen, a
`significant amount of the DEGEE applied to the skin
`becomes systemic. Fortunately, DEGEE’s low systemic
`toxicity results in a margin of safety (MOS) score of 102
`as calculated by the SCCP, where the MOS is the no-
`observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) divided by the
`systemic exposure dose (SED) following topical applica-
`tion. This MOS score means that dosing of the 2% DEGEE
`emulsified formulation will result in blood levels about
`100 times lower than the blood level at which DEGEE
`first causes observable adverse effects. Although hair
`dyes and sunscreens may have MOS scores above 500,7
`the primary requirement for drugs is that the MOS be
`above one.8
`
`Advantages of DEGEE as a solvent: the
`dapsone example
`
`Although DEGEE was used in cosmetic and hair care
`products for a number of years, the first use of this
`solvent in a pharmaceutical product was 5% dapsone
`topical gel. A quick review of the history of 5% topical
`dapsone development demonstrates the advantages of
`DEGEE as a solvent for topical dermatological products.
`
`326
`
`Ó 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 10, 324–329
`
`3
`
`Mylan (IPR2019-01095) MYLAN1009, p. 003
`
`

`

`inflammatory events.
`interfere with the cascade of
`Ideally, delivery of an anti-inflammatory for acne
`requires that steady-state levels be sustained. By adjust-
`ing the ratio of dissolved dapsone to particulate dapsone,
`the amount of active crossing the epithelium (dissolved
`dapsone)
`to treat
`inflammation was optimized with
`regard to the amount of active agent targeted to remain
`within the follicle (particulate dapsone) to reduce the
`levels of Propionibacterium acnes. Although rigorous
`scientific proof of this optimization was not available in
`the mid-1990s, it is now well established that particles
`>10 nm in diameter will accumulate in the hair follicle
`openings, especially after rub-in.12
`Thus, the use of a novel excipient, DEGEE, allowed
`optimization of
`the ratio of dissolved to particulate
`dapsone by carefully selecting the ratio of DEGEE and
`water. For the 5% dapsone gel, approximately one-third
`of the dapsone is dissolved and two-thirds of the dapsone
`is suspended as uniformly dispersed drug particulates.
`Despite a relatively high amount of dispersed dapsone,
`the product does not feel gritty during rub-in. This is
`partly because of the dapsone crystalline particulates
`inherently forming flat plates that tend to break apart
`during the shear of rubbing-in the product. The particle
`size is controlled and monitored throughout the shelf-life
`of the product. In addition, a third factor was found to
`significantly impact the feel of the product. Water is
`more volatile than DEGEE; thus, as the 5% dapsone
`topical gel
`is being applied, evaporation of water
`effectively increases
`the ratio of DEGEE to water.
`Increased DEGEE improves the solubility of dapsone,
`further reducing particle size as the product is being
`rubbed-in. Having the better solvent being less volatile
`avoids having the drug active precipitate on the surface
`of the skin, even at a 5% level of drug loading. For this
`reason, properly formulated aqueous DEGEE gels will not
`leave a visible drug residue on patients.
`
`DEGEE as a skin penetration modifier
`
`Many studies evaluating DEGEE as a skin penetration
`modifier have shown that DEGEE enhances a permeant’s
`solubility in the skin without significantly influencing
`the diffusivity of the permeant in the skin, that is,
`stratum corneum.13–16 For the permeants dexametha-
`sone and hydrocortisone, the presence of DEGEE resulted
`in enhanced skin retention although the permeability
`and therefore the systemic uptake were significantly
`decreased.17 This effect has been called the intracuta-
`neous depot and can be conceptualized as DEGEE
`increasing the reservoir capacity of the stratum corne-
`um. Thus, although DEGEE is a skin penetration
`
`DEGEE: an emerging solvent • D W Osborne
`
`modifier, it is not accurate to describe DEGEE as a skin
`penetration enhancer. Solvents such as ethanol and
`propylene glycol are penetration enhancers18 that when
`used at sufficient concentrations increase the penetra-
`tion of dissolved drugs. Although enhancement ranges
`from minimal to dramatic, use of these solvents univer-
`sally enhances skin penetration. In contrast, DEGEE may
`increase penetration or it may significantly decrease
`systemic uptake of a dissolved drug. When formulating
`with DEGEE, it is difficult to predict how this solvent will
`modify skin penetration of drugs contained in the
`formulation.
`A review of the literature on the effect of DEGEE on
`skin permeation19,20 provides a number of
`in-vitro
`studies using excised animal skins and infinite dose
`applications (>5–8 lL ⁄ cm2 of skin surface area) show-
`ing that DEGEE increases the amount of permeant that
`crosses the skin. These penetration enhancement factors
`often do not translate into meaningful
`increases in
`delivery when the product progresses into the clinic. In
`vitro infinite dose animal skin studies tend to bias high
`the enhancement factors for any solvent that can extract
`the lipids from the stratum corneum. As excess product
`resides for hours on the skin surface, skin lipids
`are extracted and the barrier properties of the skin
`are reduced by a mechanism that cannot occur when
`a clinically relevant dose of product is rubbed into the
`skin.
`
`Does DEGEE have activity in the treatment of
`acne?
`
`When the topical dapsone clinical trial results were first
`published,21 the 40–42% reduction for inflammatory
`lesions for the vehicle seemed high, especially when
`compared to adapalene 0.1% cream in which one of the
`pivotal clinical trials reported only a 6% reduction in
`inflammatory lesions for the vehicle control group (17%
`reduction in inflammatory lesions
`for
`the active
`group).22 The vehicle for topical dapsone is <1%
`carbomer, water, 25% DEGEE, and a standard amount
`of methyl paraben. Carbomer gels containing methyl
`paraben have been used for over 40 years in pharma-
`ceutical and OTC products without any mention of
`activity in the treatment of acne. If the dapsone vehicle
`has activity in acne, it is likely that this activity will be
`linked to the 25% DEGEE in the formulation. To
`determine whether DEGEE has activity in acne,
`it is
`necessary to first compare the topical dapsone vehicle
`effect with other recently approved acne products. Is a
`40–42% reduction in inflammatory lesions for a topical
`vehicle unexpectedly high? Next, data on the microbial
`
`Ó 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 10, 324–329
`
`327
`
`4
`
`Mylan (IPR2019-01095) MYLAN1009, p. 004
`
`

`

`DEGEE: an emerging solvent • D W Osborne
`
`properties of DEGEE will be summarized, and finally the
`unique interaction between DEGEE and skin lipids will be
`discussed.
`Does
`the ACZONE vehicle have activity in the
`treatment of acne? Based on package insert information
`for four recently approved acne products,23–26 each of
`these product vehicles had percent reduction in inflam-
`matory lesions at 40% or higher. The vehicle effect seen
`for ACZONE is not sufficiently different from other topical
`acne product vehicles to conclude that the ACZONE
`vehicle has activity in the treatment of acne.
`Does DEGEE have antimicrobial activity against
`P. acnes and therefore have activity in the treatment of
`acne? Some of the solvents used to dissolve pharmaceu-
`tical actives have well-established antimicrobial activity,
`and formulators use this information to develop self-
`preserving products or products that have minimum
`levels of a single preservative. Most notable is benzoyl
`alcohol, which has been used as an inactive ingredient
`at concentrations as high as 50% in an FDA-approved
`topical gel.27 Benzyl alcohol levels of 1–3% are adequate
`to fully preserve a topical product. Likewise, propylene
`glycol when used at concentrations around 20% is fully
`effective as a preservative for molds and yeast. When
`DEGEE was first selected as the solvent system for a
`topical dapsone gel, the potential preservative properties
`were thoroughly evaluated using the USP preservative
`efficacy test28 in which gram-positive, gram-negative,
`molds, and yeasts are inoculated into the product to
`assure that bacterial colony-forming units are quickly
`reduced, while molds and yeasts are not allowed to
`propagate. DEGEE repeatedly showed inertness with
`regard to microbial growth. DEGEE did not provide any
`bacterialcidal, bacterialstatic, or microbial
`inhibition
`with regard to the USP test organisms. Likewise, using
`a time-kill assay against P. acnes, a 10% aqueous
`solution of DEGEE showed only a slight inhibitory effect
`at 48 and 72 h.29 In summary, in-vitro microbiology
`testing does not indicate that DEGEE has significant
`antimicrobial activity.
`Does the unique interaction between DEGEE and skin
`lipids lead to activity in the treatment of acne? Exper-
`imentally, this question is very difficult to answer. As
`described in the skin penetration modifier section afore-
`mentioned, DEGEE blends very well with lipids of the
`skin. Although the epidermal lipids filling the intercel-
`lular spaces of the stratum corneum are different from
`lipids of sebaceous origin;30 from a penetration and
`blending with DEGEE perspective, skin surface lipids and
`epidermal
`lipids will both be very compatible with
`DEGEE. This ability of DEGEE to partition into and blend
`with skin lipids to change the physical properties of the
`
`lipids could impact the formation of acne lesions. DEGEE
`may fluidize the lipids and thus retard the formation of
`microcomedones. If DEGEE keeps the lipids from ‘‘gluing
`together’’
`the desquamated keratinocytes,
`then the
`number of plugged follicles and subsequently the num-
`ber of
`inflammatory lesions would be reduced. This
`would explain how a solvent known to partition into
`skin lipids could have activity in the treatment of acne.
`Although this mechanistic description is in agreement
`with the physical chemical properties of DEGEE, it is only
`speculation at this point.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether is a safe and well-
`tolerated solvent that has been an ingredient in cosmetic
`products for many years and in the last 5 years has
`become an FDA-approved inactive ingredient in prescrip-
`tion topical dermatology products. This molecule tends to
`penetrate the skin well with up to half of the applied
`concentration becoming systemic after topical applica-
`tion. The ability of DEGEE to dissolve active pharmaceu-
`tical ingredients not soluble in propylene glycol or alcohol
`make it a highly useful pharmaceutical excipient. DEGEE
`does not appear to possess significant antimicrobial
`properties, but may blend with skin lipids in a way that
`reduces microcomedone formation. Dermatologists will
`find that in the near future, this solvent will be a key
`component to many of the cosmetic and prescription
`products that their patients use on a daily basis.
`
`References
`
`1 Lipid Excipients for Topical Drug Delivery. Available at:
`http://www.gattefosse.com/media/document/lipid_
`excipients_for_topical_drug_delivery.pdf [Accessed on
`August 24, 2011].
`2 USP-NF National Formulary 29th edition monograph entitled
`Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether. Official beginning May 1,
`2011. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville,
`MD.
`3 EWG’s Skin Deep Cosmetics Database. Available at:
`http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/ingredient/702287/
`ETHOXYDIGLYCOL/ [Accessed on July 13, 2011].
`4 Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), 2006,
`Opinion on diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGEE).
`Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/
`committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_082.pdf [Accessed on
`July 13, 2011].
`5 Aczone [package insert]. Irvine, CA: Allergan, Inc; 2009.
`6 Osborne DW, inventor; QLT USA, Inc., assignee. Protectant
`for UV-induced skin damage. United States patent
`7,399,462, 2008 July 15.
`
`328
`
`Ó 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 10, 324–329
`
`5
`
`Mylan (IPR2019-01095) MYLAN1009, p. 005
`
`

`

`7 Walters KA, Brain KR. How dermal absorption estimates
`are used in risk assessment. In: JE Riviere, ed. Dermal
`Absorption Models in Toxicology and Pharmacology. Boca
`Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006: pp. 135–57.
`8 Roberts MB. Nothing is Without Poison. Hong Kong: The
`Chinese University Press; 2002: pp. 33.
`9 Kaminester LH, Pariser RJ, Pariser DM et al. A double-
`blind, placebo-controlled study of topical tetracaine in the
`treatment of herpes labialis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;
`41: 996–1001.
`10 Osborne DW, inventor; ViroTex Corporation, assignee.
`Composition and methods for topical application of thera-
`peutic agents. United States patent 5,863,560, 1996
`September 11.
`11 Osborne DW, inventor; ViroTex Corporation, assignee.
`Composition and methods for topical application of thera-
`peutic agents. United States patent 6,060,085, 2000 May 9.
`12 Prow TW, Grice JE, Lin LL et al. Nanoparticles and micro-
`particles for skin drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2011;
`63: 470–91.
`13 Bonina FP, Montenegro L. Effects of some non-toxic pene-
`tration enhancers on in vitro heparin skin permeation
`from gel vehicles. Int J Pharm 1994; 111: 191–6.
`14 Puglia C, Bonina F, Trapani G et al. Evaluation of in vitro
`percutaneous absorption of lorazepam and clonazepam
`from hydro-alcoholic gel formulations. Int J Pharm 2001;
`228: 79–87.
`15 Godwin DA, Kim NH, Felton LA. Influence of Transcutol
`CG on the skin accumulation and transdermal perme-
`ation of ultraviolet absorbers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm
`2002; 53: 23–7.
`16 Otto A, Wiechers JW, Kelly CL et al. Effect of penetration
`modifiers on the dermal and transdermal delivery of drugs
`and cosmetic active ingredients. Skin Pharmacol Physiol
`2008; 21: 326–34.
`17 Panchagnula R, Ritschel WA. Development and evalua-
`tion of an intracutaneous depot formulation of cortico-
`steroids using transcutol as a cosolvent: in vitro, ex vivo
`
`DEGEE: an emerging solvent • D W Osborne
`
`and in vivo rat studies. J Pharm Pharmacol 1991; 43:
`609–14.
`18 Thong HY, Zhai H, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration
`enhancers: an overview. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2007;
`20: 272–82.
`19 Javadzadeh Y, Hamishehkar H. Enhancing percutaneous
`delivery of methotrexate using different types of surfac-
`tants. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2011; 82: 422–6.
`20 Liu H, Li S, Wang Y et al. Effect of vehicles and enhancers
`on the topical delivery of cyclosporine A. Int J Pharm
`2006; 311: 182–6.
`21 Draelos ZD, Carter E, Moloney JM et al. Two randomized
`studies demonstrate the efficacy and safety of dapsone gel,
`5% (Aczone) for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am
`Acad Dermatol 2007; 56: 439. e1–439.e10.
`22 Differn 0.1% Cream [package insert]. Fort Worth, TX: Gal-
`derma Laboratories, L.P.; 2004.
`23 Differn 0.3% Gel [package insert]. Fort Worth, TX: Galderma
`Laboratories, L.P.; 2007.
`24 Ziana [package insert]. Scottsdale, AZ: Medicis; 2009.
`25 Benzaclin [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: Dermik Labora-
`tories; 2010.
`26 Clindagel [package insert]. Fort Worth, TX: Galderma Labo-
`ratories, L.P.; 2007.
`27 Inactive Ingredient Search for Approved Drug Products.
`Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/
`iig/getiigWEB.cfm [Accessed on July 13, 2011].
`28 Sutton SVW, Porter D. Development of the antimicrobial
`effectiveness test as USP Chapter <51>. PDA J Pharm Sci
`Technol 2002; 6: 300–11.
`29 Godowski KC, Dunham J, Osborne DW. Anti-P. acnes
`activity of proguanil. Poster presented at: American
`Society for Microbiology General Meeting; May 21–24,
`2011; New Orleans, LA.
`30 Osborne DW, Hatzenbuhler DA. The influence of skin
`surface lipids on topical formulations. In: DW Osborne,
`AH Amann, eds. Topical Drug Delivery Formulations. New
`York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1990: pp. 69–86.
`
`Ó 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 10, 324–329
`
`329
`
`6
`
`Mylan (IPR2019-01095) MYLAN1009, p. 006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket