`ted.dane@mto.com
`PETER E. GRATZINGER (SBN 228764)
`peter.gratzinger@mto.com
`ZACHARY M. BRIERS (SBN 287984)
`zachary.briers@mto.com
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90071-3426
`Telephone: (213) 683-9100
`Facsimile:
`(213) 687-3702
`
`Attorneys for Google LLC and YouTube LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
`
`REALTIME ADAPTIVE
`STREAMING LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`GOOGLE LLC, and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`DEFENDANTS’ PRELIMINARY
`ELECTION OF ASSERTED PRIOR
`ART
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`GOOGLE’S ELECTION OF PRIOR ART
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s October 25, 2018 Scheduling Order (ECF No. 36),
`Defendants Google LLC and YouTube, LLC (collectively “Google”) elect to assert
`the prior art references listed below. Google hereby incorporates by reference the
`objections, statements and reservations of rights made in its Invalidity Contentions
`regarding the deficiencies in Plaintiff Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC’s
`(“Realtime”) infringement contentions. In particular, Google notes that Realtime’s
`infringement contentions fail to identify “the priority date to which each asserted
`claim allegedly is entitled,” N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 3-1(f), stating only that each of
`the asserted claims is “entitled to priority dates at least as early as” the filing date of
`the first related patent application. See Invalidity Contentions at 3. In the event that
`Realtime makes arguments or produces evidence in support of conception and
`reduction to practice dates earlier than the effective filing dates shown on the face of
`the Asserted Patents, Google reserves the right to rely on earlier versions of the
`references listed below, or to modify its elected prior art references. Google further
`reserves the right to assert alternative references in Amended Invalidity Contentions
`in accordance with N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 3-6.
`Google reserves the right to rely on any prior art references disclosed
`pursuant to N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 3-4 and any admissions regarding the prior art or
`state of the art made in the Asserted Patents themselves for purposes of any tutorial,
`background explanation of the technology at issue, to show the state of the art
`relating to the inventions claimed in the Asserted Patents, including any motivation
`to combine the prior art, or to rebut any denial by Realtime that one or more claim
`elements were known in the prior art.
`A.
`The Fallon Patents
`Google elects to assert the following prior art references with respect to U.S.
`Patent Nos. 8,934,535 (“the ’535 patent”); 7,386,046 (“the ’046 patent); and
`9,769,477 (“the ’477 patent” and, collectively, “the Fallon patents”).
`1. Anigbogu (’535, ’477, ’046)
`
`GOOGLE’S ELECTION OF PRIOR ART
`
`-1-
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`2. Beyda (’477, ’046)
`3. Bocheck (’535, ’477, ’046)
`4. Brooks (’535, ’477)
`5. Chu (’535)
`6. Couwenhoven (’046)
`7. Dvir (’535, ’477)
`8. Dye (’535)
`9. Franaszek (’477)
`10. Gao-Takahashi System (’477, ’046)
`11. Hsu (’535)
`12. H.263 (’477)
`13. Imai (’535, ’477, ’046)
`14. Ishii (’535)
`15. Microsoft NetMeeting System (’535, ’477, ’046)
`16. Pauls (’535, ’477, ’046)
`17. Pian (’046)
`18. Rynderman (’046)
`19. Su (’535, ’046)
`20. Voois (’477, ’046)
`The ’777 Patent
`B.
`Google elects to assert the following prior art references with respect to U.S.
`Patent No. RE46,777 (“the ’777 patent”).
`1. Carlson
`2. Henry
`3. Keesman
`4. Mitsubishi System
`5. Ramchandran
`6. Sullivan & Wiegand
`
`GOOGLE’S ELECTION OF PRIOR ART
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`
`
`
`
`7. Sugiyama
`8. Syu
`9. Wen
`10. Winger
`C. The ’298 Patent
`Google elects to assert the following prior art references with respect to U.S.
`Patent No. 9,578,298 (“the ’298 patent”).
`1. Cho
`2. Cowan
`3. H.264 Standard
`4. JVT-AF11r2
`5. Karppinen
`6. Lei
`7. Mashitani
`8. Tian
`9. RealD System
`10. Suh II
`
`
`
`DATED: February 8, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`
`TED DANE
`PETER A. DETRE
`PETER E. GRATZINGER
`ZACHARY M. BRIERS
`
`By:
`/s/ Zachary M. Briers
`ZACHARY M. BRIERS
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC and
`YouTube, LLC
`
`GOOGLE’S ELECTION OF PRIOR ART
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
