Case 2:18-cv-03629-GW-JC Document 56 Filed 05/02/19 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1461
`
`
`MARC A. FENSTER (Bar No.
`181067)
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`REZA MIRZAIE (Bar No. 246953)
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`BRIAN D. LEDAHL (Bar No.
`186579)
`bledahl@raklaw.com
`PAUL KROEGER (Bar No. 229074)
`pkroeger@raklaw.com
`C. JAY CHUNG (Bar No. 252794)
`jchung@raklaw.com
`PHILIP X. WANG (Bar No. 262239)
`pwang@raklaw.com
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard
`12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-6991
`
`Attorneys for Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`
`
`
`
`TED DANE (Bar No. 143195)
`ted.dane@mto.com
`ZACHARY M. BRIERS (Bar No. 287984)
`zachary.briers@mto.com
`BRIAN J. SPRINGER (Bar. No. 309094)
`brian.springer@mto.com
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90071-3426
`Telephone: (213) 683-9100
`Facsimile:
`(213) 687-3702
`
`PETER A. DETRE (Bar No. 182619)
`peter.detre@mto.com
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`560 Mission Street
`Twenty-Seventh Floor
`San Francisco, California 94105-3089
`Telephone: (415) 512-4000
`Facsimile:
`(415) 512-4077
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC
`and YouTube, LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
`
` Case No. 2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
`CASE PENDING INTER PARTES
`REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`Judge: Hon. George H. Wu
`
`
`
`REALTIME ADAPTIVE
`STREAMING LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC, and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING INTER PARTES
`REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`1 of 5
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1019
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-03629-GW-JC Document 56 Filed 05/02/19 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:1462
`
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC (“Plaintiff”) asserts
`the following five patents against Defendants Google LLC and YouTube, LLC
`(collectively, “Defendants”): U.S. Patent Nos. 7,386,046; 8,934,535; 9,578,298;
`9,769,477; and RE46,777 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”);
`WHEREAS, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United
`States Patent and Trademark Office has instituted inter partes review (“IPR”) of
`four of the five Asserted Patents, which account for 30 of the 32 patent claims
`asserted by Plaintiff in this action, as detailed on Exhibit A hereto (“Instituted
`IPRs”);
`WHEREAS, several additional petitions for IPR of the Asserted Patents
`remain pending with the PTAB, including a petition challenging the asserted claims
`in the remaining Asserted Patent, as detailed on Exhibit A hereto (“Pending IPRs”);
`WHEREAS, Defendants may file with the PTAB additional petitions for IPR
`of the Asserted Patents (“Google IPRs”), which Defendants must file within a “year
`after the date on which” Defendants were “served with a complaint alleging
`infringement of the patent,” 35 U.S.C. § 315(b);
`WHEREAS, to avoid unnecessary expenditure of judicial and party resources,
`Plaintiff and Defendants desire to stay this action until the PTAB issues final written
`decisions in the Instituted IPRs, the Pending IPRs, and any Google IPRs;
`WHEREAS, the Court has not yet construed the disputed claim terms in this
`action and the parties have not engaged in substantial discovery;
`WHEREAS, staying this action pending the IPRs will allow the PTAB to
`issue decisions on whether the challenged patent claims are unpatentable given the
`prior art grounds set forth in the petitions.
`NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by
`Plaintiff and Defendants as follows:
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING INTER PARTES
`REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2 of 5
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-03629-GW-JC Document 56 Filed 05/02/19 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:1463
`
`
`1. Subject to the Court’s approval, this case shall be stayed until the PTAB
`issues final written decisions with respect to each of the Instituted IPRs,
`the Pending IPRs, and any Google IPRs;
`2. The parties shall file a status report within ten (10) business days of the
`date on which the PTAB issues its final written decision with respect to the
`last pending IPR; and
`3. All deadlines in the case are stayed and all hearings in the case are
`vacated.
`
`
`DATED: May 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED: May 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`
`TED DANE
`PETER A. DETRE
`PETER E. GRATZINGER
`ZACHARY M. BRIERS
`BRIAN J. SPRINGER
`
`By:
`/s/ Zachary M. Briers
`ZACHARY M. BRIERS
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC and
`YouTube LLC
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`By:
`/s/ C. Jay Chung
`C. JAY CHUNG
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING INTER PARTES
`REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`3 of 5
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-03629-GW-JC Document 56 Filed 05/02/19 Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:1464
`
`
`I, Zachary M. Briers, hereby attest that all signatories listed, and on whose
`behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the
`filing.
`
`
`DATED: May 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Zachary M. Briers
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING INTER PARTES
`REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`4 of 5
`
`

`

`Case}P:18-cv-03629-GW-JC Document 56 Filed 05/02/19 Page 5of5 Page ID #:1465
`
`ExhibitA
`1
`
`2||The “Instituted IPRs”are listed in the chart below:
`
`IPR Case Name
`
`Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Sling TV, LLC etal. v. Realtime
`Adaptive Streaming LLC
`Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`
`°535 patent
`
`°477 patent
`
`°777 patent
`
`°298 patent
`
`°535 patent
`
`IPR2018-01630
`
`°477 patent
`
`IPR No. Challenged Patent
`°477 patent
`
`The “Pending IPRs”are listed in the chart below:
`
`IPR Case Name
`
`Challenged Patent
`
`Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Arris Solutions, Inc. v. Realtime
`Adaptive Streaming LLC
`Comcast Cable Communications,
`LLC v.Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Google LLC v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Comcast Cable Communications,
`LLCv. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`Comcast Cable Communications,
`LLC v. Realtime Adaptive
`Streaming LLC
`
`IPR2019-00209
`
`°046 patent
`
`IPR2019-00674
`
`°535 patent
`
`IPR2019-00684
`
`°535 patent
`
`IPR2019-00748
`
`°535 patent
`
`IPR2019-00760
`
`°535 patent
`
`IPR2019-00786
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDINGINTER PARTES
`REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`5-
`
`2:18-CV-03629-GW-JC
`
`5 of 5
`
`