`
`_________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC USA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_________________
`Case IPR2019-01026
`Patent 6,993,049
`_________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01026
`Patent 6,993,049
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order dated
`
`December 4, 2019 [Paper 8], Petitioner Microsoft Corporation respectfully requests
`
`oral argument, currently scheduled for September 10, 2010.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the USPTO’s notice regarding PTAB oral hearings occurring after
`
`March 13, 2020, Petitioner intends to participate via remote video and/or
`
`telephonically, unless the USPTO further notifies otherwise. Petitioner requests
`
`authorization to present demonstrative slides during oral argument and, to the extent
`
`a live hearing is conducted, Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual
`
`equipment to display those demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector
`
`and screen for PowerPoint display.
`
`Petitioner specifies, without intent to waive consideration of any issue not
`
`requested, the following issues to be argued:
`
`• The interpretation of certain claim limitations of U.S. Patent
`
`6,993,049;
`
`• The Grounds of unpatentability presented in the Petition, including:
`
`o Whether claims 11 and 12 are unpatentable under Section 103
`over Larsson (Exhibit 1004), the Bluetooth Specification
`
`(Exhibit 1005), and RFC826 (Exhibit 1006); and
`
`o Whether claims 11-12 are unpatentable under Section 103 over
`802.11 (Exhibit 1007).
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01026
`Patent 6,993,049
`Petitioner reserves the right to address any arguments presented by Patent
`
`Owner and any other issues about which the Board wishes to hear argument during
`
`any oral hearing in this proceeding.
`
`Petitioner requests 60 minutes to address all issues for this proceeding.
`
`Dated: July 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Andrew M. Mason/
`Andrew M. Mason (Reg. No. 64,034)
`andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`Todd M. Siegel (Reg. No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`Joseph T. Jakubek (Reg. No. 34,190)
`joseph.jakubek@klarquist.com
`John M. Lunsford (Reg. No. 67,185)
`john.lunsford@klarquist.com
`Sarah E. Jelsema (Reg. No. 70,804)
`sarah.jelsema@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01026
`Patent 6,993,049
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on July 14, 2020, a true and correct copy of
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served on counsel for Uniloc 2017
`
`LLC via electronic mail as follows:
`
`
`
`Ryan Loveless – Lead Counsel
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`Brett Mangrum – Back-up Counsel
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`James Etheridge – Back-up Counsel
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`Jeffrey Huang – Back-up Counsel
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`
`
`By: /Andrew M. Mason/
`Andrew M. Mason (Reg. No. 64,034)
`andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`Todd M. Siegel (Reg. No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`Joseph T. Jakubek (Reg. No. 34,190)
`joseph.jakubek@klarquist.com
`John M. Lunsford (Reg. No. 67,185)
`john.lunsford@klarquist.com
`Sarah E. Jelsema (Reg. No. 70,804)
`sarah.jelsema@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Page 1
`
`