throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., INSTAGRAM, LLC, and WHATSAPP INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00925
`Patent 8,209,634
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 141(c) and 319, and 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a), notice is
`
`Case IPR2019-00925
`Attorney Docket No: 21828-0048IP1
`
`hereby given that Patent Owner Blackberry Limited hereby appeals to the United
`
`States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Written Decision in
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00925 entered October 1, 2020 (Paper 38) (“Final Written
`
`Decision”) by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”), and from all
`
`underlying orders, decisions, rulings, and opinions related thereto and included
`
`therein. This appeal is timely under 35 U.S.C. § 142 and Rule 15(a)(1) of the
`
`Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), the expected issues on appeal
`
`include, but are not necessarily limited to:
`
`1.
`
`The Board’s decision that claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 16, and 17 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,209,634 (Ex. 1001) were shown to be unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Ording, Abiko, and Dvorak;
`
`2.
`
`The Board’s decision that claims 6, 12, and 18 were shown to be
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Ording, Abiko, Dvorak,
`
`and McPherson;
`
`3.
`
`The constitutionality of the appointment of the Administrative Patent
`
`Judges who presided over this inter partes review;
`
`4.
`
`The Board’s interpretation of the prior art;
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`5.
`
`The Board’s legal errors in undertaking the aforementioned
`
`Case IPR2019-00925
`Attorney Docket No: 21828-0048IP1
`
`obviousness analysis;
`
`6.
`
`The Board’s findings that conflict with the evidence of record or are
`
`otherwise not supported by substantial evidence;
`
`7.
`
`The Board’s failure to consider evidence of record fully and properly;
`
`and
`
`8.
`
`All other issues decided adversely to Patent Owner in any orders,
`
`decisions, rulings, and opinions underlying or supporting the Final Written
`
`Decision.
`
`Per 35 U.S.C. § 142 and 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(1), this notice is being filed
`
`with the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and a copy is also being
`
`filed with the Board. Per Federal Circuit Rule 15(a)(1) and 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(2),
`
`Patent Owner is also sending a paper copy of this Notice of Appeal to the Clerk of
`
`the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and paying the fee set forth in
`
`Federal Circuit Rule 42.
`
`
`Date: December 3, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Michael T. Hawkins/
`Michael T. Hawkins, Reg. No. 57,867
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza, 60 South Sixth St.
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: (612) 337-5070 F: (612) 288-9696
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00925
`Attorney Docket No: 21828-0048IP1
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on December 3,
`
`2020, a complete and entire copy of this Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal was
`
`provided via email to the Petitioners by serving the email correspondence address
`
`of record as follows:
`
`Heidi L. Keefe
`Andrew C. Mace
`Mark R. Weinstein
`Yuan Liang
`Cooley LLP
`Attn: Patent Group
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 700
`Washington, DC 20004
`Email: hkeefe@cooley.com
`Email: amace@cooley.com
`Email: mweinstein@cooley.com
`Email: yliang@cooley.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jessica K. Detko/
`Jessica Detko
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(612) 337-2516
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00925
`Attorney Docket No: 21828-0048IP1
`
` hereby certify that, in addition to being filed electronically through the
`
` I
`
`
`
`Board’s E2E System, the original version of the foregoing Notice of Appeal was
`
`filed by hand on December 3, 2020, with the Director of the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office, at the following address:
`
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`c/o Office of the General Counsel
`Madison Building East, 1 OB20
`600 Dulany Street
`Alexandria, VA 22314-5793
`
`
`I hereby certify that on December 3, 2020, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Notice of Appeal, along with a copy of the Final Written Decision, was
`
`filed electronically with the Clerk’s Office of the United States Court of Appeals
`
`for the Federal Circuit, at the following address:
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`717 Madison Place, N.W., Suite 401
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 3, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Michael T. Hawkins/
`Michael T. Hawkins, Reg. No. 57,867
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket