`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OMNI MEDSCI, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`____________________
`
`IPR2019-00916
`Patent No. 9,651,533 B2
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00916
`
`
`
`
`
`In accordance with the Board’s July 1, 2020 Order Granting Requests for
`
`Oral Argument (Paper 33), Petitioner Apple Inc. hereby files its demonstrative
`
`exhibits for oral arguments.
`
`
`
`Dated: July 13, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ching-Lee Fukuda
`Reg. No. 44,334
`Sidley Austin LLP
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019
`clfukuda@sidley.com
`(212) 839-7364
`
`Thomas A. Broughan III
`Reg. No. 66,001
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`tbroughan@sidley.com
`(202) 736-8314
`
`Backup Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Registration No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`(202) 736-8914
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00916
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`1
`
`
`
`Grounds
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`2
`
`
`
`’533 Patent: Claim 5
`
`’533 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 5
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`3
`
`
`
`’533 Patent: Claim 5
`Only one limitation is disputed
`
`’533 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 29:51-55
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 5
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`4
`
`
`
`Lisogurski’s System
`
`Annoated Lisogurski
`Ex. 1011, Fig. 1; Ex. 1003 (Anthony
`Decl. ¶ 98.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`5
`
`
`
`Lisogurski Is Configured To Increase an LED’s Pulse Rate
`
`Lisogurski
`Ex. 1011
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 25:49-55; Pet. at 32; Reply at 10
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 33:53-58; Reply at 11
`
`0
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 35:28-31; Pet. at 36; Reply at 7, 9
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`6
`
`
`
`Lisogurski Is Configured To Increase SNR
`
`Lisogurski
`Ex. 1011
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 25:49-55; Pet. at 32; Reply at 10
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 9:46-57; Pet. at 31
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 9:46-57; Pet. at 31
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`7
`
`
`
`Omni Agrees Lisogurski Is Configured To Increase an LED’s Pulse Rate
`
`MacFarlane Deposition
`Ex. 1060
`
`{{
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`Ex. 1060 (MacFarlane Depo) at 59:1-5; Reply at 7
`
`{{
`
`Paper No. 23 (Resp.) at 22; Reply at 7
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`8
`
`
`
`Omni Admits Lisogurski’s Cardiac Cycle Modulation Increases SNR
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`{{
`
`Paper No. 23 (PO Resp.) at 15
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`9
`
`
`
`Apple’s Expert: Increasing Lisogurski’s Firing Rate Increases SNR
`
`Lisogurski
`Ex. 1011
`
`Anthony Declaration
`Ex. 1003
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 33:56-58; Reply at 11
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 35:25-31; Pet. at 36; Reply at 7, 9
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1003 (Anthony Decl.) at ¶116; Pet. at 36; Reply at 11
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`10
`
`
`
`Omni’s Expert: Increasing an LED’s Pulse Rate Generally Increases SNR
`
`MacFarlane Deposition
`Ex. 1060
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1060 (Mac Farlane Depo.) at 39:12-17; Reply at 4
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`11
`
`
`
`Omni’s Expert: Increasing an LED’s Pulse Rate Generally Increases SNR
`
`MacFarlane Deposition
`Ex. 1060
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1060 (Mac Farlane Depo.) at 37:13-38:3; Reply at 5
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`12
`
`
`
`Omni’s Expert Tried to Change Answer After Talking to Counsel
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1060 (Mac Farlane Depo.) at 81:4-18; Reply at 4-5
`
`Ex. 1060 (Mac Farlane Depo.) at 85:9-20; Reply at 5
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`13
`
`
`
`Omni’s Expert Could Only Identify “Hypothetical” Counter Examples
`
`* * *
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1060 (Mac Farlane Depo.) at 84:5-13; Sur-Reply at 10
`
`Ex. 1060 (Mac Farlane Depo.) at 83:5-84:4; Reply at 5
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`14
`
`
`
`Federal Circuit Case Law
`
`The Federal Circuit “explained long ago that ‘apparatus
`claims cover what a device is, not what a device does.’”
`ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., 903 F.3d 1354, 1361
`(Fed. Cir. 2018);
`
`“It is well settled that patentability of apparatus claims
`must depend upon structural limitations and not upon
`statements of function.” Application of Michlin, 256 F.2d
`317, 320 (C.C.P.A. 1958).
`
`“It is well settled that an [apparatus] that ‘that sometimes,
`but not always, embodies a claim[] nonetheless’” satisfies
`the claim. Broadcom Corp. v. Emulex Corp., 732 F.3d
`1325, 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`15
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`Is the claim limited to a device that intends to increase SNR?
`
`Claim 5
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 29:51-55
`
`Board
`
`Omni
`
`a light source…, wherein at least one of the
`light emitting diodes is capable of having
`its pulse rate increased to increase a
`signal-to-noise ratio
`
`a light source…, where the light source is
`configured to increase the pulse rate of at
`least one of the light emitting diodes to
`increase the signal-to-noise ratio
`
`Paper No. 16 (Inst. Dec.) at 10
`
`Paper No. 23 (PO Resp.) at 13
`
`The claim language and proposed constructions specify:
`• an action that the device must take, and
`{{
`• a result of that action
`
`Paper No. 27 (Pet. Reply) at 6-7
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`16
`
`
`
`Lisogurski Is Configured To Increase SNR
`
`Lisogurski
`Ex. 1011
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 9:46-57; Pet. at 31
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 9:46-57; Pet. at 31
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 25:49-55; Pet. at 35; Reply at 10
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`17
`
`
`
`Carlson Describes Techniques to Increase SNR
`
`Carlson
`Ex. 1009
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at ¶ [0010]; Pet. at 24
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`18
`
`
`
`Carlson Teaches that Ambient Light Noise Is Variable and
`Occurs at Certain Frequencies
`
`Carlson
`Ex. 1009
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at ¶ [0068]; Pet. at 37-38; Reply at 14
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at ¶ [0069]; Pet. at 37-38; Reply at 14-15, 20
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`19
`
`
`
`Carlson Teaches Increasing Pulse Rate to a
`Higher Frequency to Increase SNR
`
`Carlson
`Ex. 1009
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at ¶ [0020]; Reply at 14
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`20
`
`
`
`Apple’s Expert: a POSA Would Have Modified Lisogurski
`Based on Carlson
`
`Anthony Declaration
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1003 (Anthony Decl.) at ¶120; Pet. at 37-38
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`21
`
`
`
`Apple’s Expert: a POSA Would Have Modified Lisogurski
`Based on Carlson
`
`Anthony Declaration
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`***
`
`Ex. 1003 (Anthony Decl.) at ¶83; Pet. at 24-25
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`22
`
`
`
`Omni’s Arguments about Carlson Choosing a Single Frequency Are
`Irrelevant
`
`{{
`
`Paper No. 27 (Pet. Reply) at 19-20
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`23
`
`
`
`Carlson Teaches Using Higher Pulse Rates
`
`Carlson
`Ex. 1009
`
`* * *
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at ¶ [0069]; Pet. at 37-38; Reply at 14-15, 20
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`24
`
`
`
`Carlson Teaches Changing the Pulse Frequency
`
`Carlson
`Ex. 1009
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at ¶ [0020]; Reply at 14
`
`Ex. 1009 (Carlson) at Claim 10; Reply at 15
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`25
`
`
`
`Lisogurski’s System
`
`Institution Decision
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`26
`
`
`
`The Institution Decision Accurately Captured
`the Petition’s Unpatentability Theory
`
`Institution Decision
`
`{{
`
`Paper No. 16 (Inst. Dec.) at 36; Reply at 20
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`27
`
`
`
`’533 Patent
`
`’533 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 29:51-55
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 5:11-15
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`28
`
`
`
`Institution Decision Acknowledges Scant Written Description
`Support for Contested Limitation
`
`Institution Decision
`
`Paper no. 16 (Inst. Dec.) at 10
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`29
`
`
`
`Omni’s Alleged Written Description Support
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1001 (’533 Patent) at 16:54-58; Paper No. 23 (PO Resp.) at 12
`
`Ex. 2120 at ¶ [0073]; Paper No. 23 (PO Resp.) at 12
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 2121 at ¶ [0045]; Paper No. 23 (PO Resp.) at 12
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`30
`
`
`
`Lisogurski’s system is configured to adjust
`an LED’s pulse rate according to a cardiac cycle
`
`Lisogurski
`Ex. 1011
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 31:11-15; Reply at 10
`
`Ex. 1011 (Lisogurksi) at 9:46-52; Reply 18; Pet. at 22
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`31
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Omni Admits that Lisogurski Teaches Varying a Pulse Rate to Track a Cardiac Pulse Improves SNR
`
`Paper No. 32 (PO Sur-Reply) at 15
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Paper No. 23 (PO Resp.) at 15
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`32
`
`
`
`533 Patent: Claims 5 and 13
`
`’533 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 5
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 13
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`33
`
`
`
`533 Patent: Claims 8-9 and 16-17
`
`’533 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claims 8-9
`
`{{
`
`’533 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claims 16-17
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1061
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE - Apple Inc. V. Omni MedSci, Inc., IPR2019-00916
`
`34
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 13th day of July, 2020, copies of this Petitioner’s
`
`Demonstrative Exhibits have been served in its entirety by e-mail on the following
`
`counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Thomas A. Lewry
`John S. LeRoy
`Robert C. J. Tuttle
`John M. Halan
`Christopher C. Smith
`Andrew Turner
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`OMSC0110IPR2@brookskushman.com
`
`Dated:
`
`July 13, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
