throbber
Case 1:18-cv-00826-WCB Document 69 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1459
`
`
`March 26, 2019
`
`VIA E-FILING
`The Honorable William C. Bryson
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`717 Madison Place, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20439
`
`
`Re:
`
`Ingenico, Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC, C.A. No. 18-826 (WCB)
`
`
`Dear Judge Bryson:
`
`I write on behalf of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff IOENGINE, LLC (“IOENGINE”)
`
`in the above-referenced matter. On October 9, 2018, Plaintiff Ingenico Inc. and Counterclaim
`Defendants Ingenico Inc., Ingenico Corp. and Ingenico Group S.A. (collectively, “Ingenico”) filed
`a Motion to Dismiss IOENGINE’s Counterclaims (D.I. 26, the “Motion”). As part of the Motion,
`Ingenico argued that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over Ingenico Group S.A. (“Ingenico
`France”) (D.I. 27 at 1). On January 25, 2019, after full briefing and argument, the Court denied
`Ingenico’s Motion, pending jurisdictional discovery as to Ingenico France (D.I. 55 at 23). In
`accordance with the Court’s Order, on February 12, 2019, IOENGINE served special requests for
`production of documents regarding jurisdiction and special interrogatories regarding jurisdiction
`on Ingenico France (D.I. 64).
`
`
`Three days before Ingenico France should have provided responses to the jurisdictional
`discovery served by IOENGINE, on March 11, 2019, counsel for Ingenico alerted counsel for
`IOENGINE (but not the Court) that Ingenico France would no longer be contesting jurisdiction;
`instead, Ingenico France would consent to personal jurisdiction for the purposes of this lawsuit.
`On March 12, 2019, counsel for IOENGINE responded and proposed that in light of Ingenico
`France’s consent to jurisdiction, Ingenico France should answer IOENGINE’s Counterclaims by
`March 26, 2019, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(a)(4), which provides
`for a responsive pleading 14 days after disposition of a Rule 12 motion. Notwithstanding the fact
`that IOENGINE’s Counterclaims were filed on August 17, 2018 (D.I. 12) and that Ingenico Inc.
`and Ingenico Corp. filed their answers to such Counterclaims on March 11, 2019 (D.I. 68), counsel
`for Ingenico France refused to file its answer to the Counterclaims by March 26, 2019, or to
`provide a date certain by which Ingenico France would file an answer. The parties met and
`conferred on this issue on March 22, 2019, and as of the date of this filing, Ingenico France has
`refused to provide IOENGINE with a date certain by which it will file its answer. Ingenico France
`has likewise refused to provide IOENGINE with a date certain by which it will produce its core
`technical documents pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Delaware Default Standard for Discovery.
`
`Once it withdrew its motion and consented to jurisdiction, Ingenico France had an
`obligation under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to answer the Counterclaims and to fulfill
`its obligations under the Local Rules. It has not done so. Ingenico France’s response has been
`that it needs more time to comply because of the “March holiday season” in France; but Ingenico
`France has had the Counterclaims for more than seven months, consented to jurisdiction more than
`two weeks ago, and undoubtedly knew that it would be consenting to jurisdiction (or that there
`was a strong likelihood it would do so) for some time prior to that. Although IOENGINE maintains
`
`
`
`Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00879 (US 9,059,969)
`Exhibit 2046
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-00826-WCB Document 69 Filed 03/26/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1460
`The Honorable William C. Bryson
`March 26, 2019
`Page 2
`
`that Ingenico France should have filed its answer to IOENGINE’s Counterclaims within fourteen
`days of withdrawing its Motion, IOENGINE respectfully requests that the Court order Ingenico
`France to answer IOENGINE’s Counterclaims by April 1, 2019 and to provide its core technical
`document production pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Delaware Default Standard for Discovery by
`April 8, 2019.
`
`
`We are available at the Court’s convenience should Your Honor have any questions.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`
`cc:
`
`Clerk of Court (via CM/ECF)
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF)
`
`Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00879 (US 9,059,969)
`Exhibit 2046
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket