throbber
This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Biol. Chem., Vol. 385, pp. 409–413, May 2004 • Copyright 䊚 by Walter de Gruyter • Berlin • New York
`
`Short Communication
`
`The Btk inhibitor LFM-A13 is a potent inhibitor of Jak2
`kinase activity
`
`kinase (Erk1/2) pathways but also tyrosine kinases like
`Lyn, a member of the Src-family, and Bruton’s tyrosine
`kinase (Btk), a member of the Tec-family (Chin et al.,
`1998; Schmidt et al., 2004).
`Tec-family members harbour an N-terminal pleckstrin
`homology (PH) domain, a proline-rich (PR) domain, a
`SRC homology 3 (SH3) domain, a Src homology 2 (SH2)
`domain and a kinase domain (SH1). Upon membrane
`recruitment via its PH domain, activation of Tec-family
`members occurs through phosphorylation of tyrosine
`residues in the kinase domain by Src kinases (amino acid
`551 in Btk; Rawlings et al., 1996). This phosphorylation
`event is believed to release the intramolecular interaction
`between the PR and the SH3 domain, thereby releasing
`the kinase domain from structural restraints (Andreotti et
`al., 1997; Brazin et al., 2000). Trans-phosphorylation
`results in activation of the kinase and subsequent auto-
`phosphorylation of a tyrosine residue within the SH3
`domain (amino acid 223 in Btk; Rawlings et al., 1996).
`Both membrane recruitment and kinase activation are of
`paramount importance for Btk function (Kurosaki and
`Kurosaki, 1997; Nisitani et al., 1999; Saito et al., 2001).
`Btk has been shown to play a role in phospholipaseC-
`g1/2 activation (Takata and Kurosaki, 1996; Fluckiger et
`al., 1998; Rawlings, 1999) and cytoskeleton organisation
`via WASP (Guinamard et al., 1998). Furthermore, it has
`been shown that Tec and Jak1 are able to cross-phos-
`phorylate each other, indicating that Tec family kinases
`may have a modulatory effect on Jak kinases or vice ver-
`sa (Takahashi-Tezuka et al., 1997; Yamashita et al., 1998).
`To analyse the role of Btk in EpoR signalling, we used
`the chemical compound a-cyano-b-hydroxy-b-methyl-
`N-(2,5-dibromophenyl)propenamide or in short LFM-A13.
`This inhibitor was reported to bind specifically to the cat-
`alytic pocket of the Btk kinase domain and not of other
`related tyrosine kinases like Jak1, Jak3 and Src kinases
`(Mahajan et al., 1999). Erythroid progenitors (cell line R10)
`were factor deprived in the presence and absence of
`100 mM LFM-A13, the recommended concentration for
`this inhibitor (Mahajan et al., 1999), and subsequently
`stimulated with Epo or left unstimulated. Cells treated
`with LFM-A13 during starvation did not show any abnor-
`malities with respect to cell shape and viability compared
`to untreated cells (data not shown). While Epo efficiently
`induced phosphorylation of the EpoR, Jak2, Btk, Stat5
`and Erk1/2, this was significantly reduced in the pres-
`ence of 100 mM LFM-A13 (Figure 1A, B). The co-immu-
`noprecipitating bands in the EpoR immuno-precipitate
`representing Stat5 and Shc (Figure 1A; identified by spe-
`cific antibodies) were absent when cells were pre-treated
`with LFM-A13. Thus LFM-A13 severely impairs EpoR
`phosphorylation and the recruitment of proteins. Since
`
`Emile van den Akker1,a, Thamar B. van Dijk1,b,
`Uwe Schmidt2,c, Lamberto Felida1, Hartmut
`Beug2, Bob Lo¨ wenberg1 and Marieke von
`Lindern1,*
`1 Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, P.O. Box
`1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`2 Institute of Molecular Pathology, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 7,
`A-1030 Vienna, Austria
`
`* Corresponding author
`e-mail: m.vonlindern@erasmusmc.nl
`
`Abstract
`
`LFM-A13, or a-cyano-b-hydroxy-b-methyl-N-(2,5-di-
`bromophenyl)propenamide, was shown to inhibit Bru-
`ton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk). Here we show that LFM-A13
`efficiently inhibits erythropoietin (Epo)-induced phospho-
`rylation of the erythropoietin receptor, Janus kinase 2
`(Jak2) and downstream signalling molecules. However,
`the tyrosine kinase activity of immunoprecipitated or in
`vitro translated Btk and Jak2 was equally inhibited by
`LFM-A13 in in vitro kinase assays. Finally, Epo-induced
`signal transduction was also inhibited in cells lacking Btk.
`Taken together, we conclude that LFM-A13 is a potent
`inhibitor of Jak2 and cannot be used as a specific tyro-
`sine kinase inhibitor to study the role of Btk in Jak2-
`dependent cytokine signalling.
`
`Keywords: cytokine signalling; erythropoiesis; tyrosine
`kinase.
`
`Cytokine receptors are devoid of intrinsic kinase activity
`and require the association with cytoplasmic tyrosine
`kinases to transmit signals upon ligand binding. Janus
`tyrosine kinase 2 (Jak2) activity is crucial for most cyto-
`kine receptors including the erythropoietin receptor
`(EpoR; Parganas et al., 1998). Epo binding to the EpoR
`induces a conformational change which juxtaposes the
`associated Jak2 kinases resulting in cross-phosphoryla-
`tion, activation and subsequent phosphorylation of the
`EpoR and induction of multiple signalling intermediates
`(for review see Wojchowski et al., 1999). These include
`signal transducer and activator of transciption 5 (Stat5),
`protein kinase B (PKB), the mitogen-activated protein
`
`Present addresses:
`a Institut Curie, Centre Universitaire, Baˆ t. 110, F-91405 Orsay,
`France
`Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus MC, NL-
`000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`Institute of Immunology, University of Vienna, A-1235 Vienna,
`ustria
`
`c A
`
`b 3
`
`

`

`410 E. van den Akker et al.
`
`IP, Erythroid cell line R10
`+
`+
`Epo:
`-
`+
`-
`
`LFM-A13:
`
`150 kDa -
`
`100 kDa - ~ ♦ Stat5
`
`75 kDa - .. ♦ EpoR
`
`A
`
`EpoRIP
`
`anti-pTyr
`
`50 kDa -
`
`anti-EpoR
`
`♦ Sh e
`
`Jak21P
`
`Btk IP
`
`B
`
`anti-Stats
`
`anti-She
`
`I anti-pTyr . b I
`
`anti-Jak2 ....... -
`
`I anti-pTyr
`anti-Btk
`
`WCL, Erythroid cell line 1/11
`+
`+
`+
`
`-
`-
`
`Epo:
`LFM-A13:
`
`-
`C
`
`J
`
`~;;;~i~;;,;;;
`anti-p-Statsl
`anti-Stats I •
`j J j
`-
`
`anti-p-Erk
`
`anti-Erk
`
`Figure 1 Epo-induced phosphorylation of EpoR, Jak2, Btk,
`Stat5 and Erk1/2 is inhibited by pre-treatment with 100 mM LFM-
`A13.
`R10 cells were factor deprived in plain Iscoves medium (Invitro-
`gen, Breda, The Netherlands) for 4 h in the presence or absence
`of LFM-A13 (100 mM) and subsequently stimulated with Epo
`(5 U/ml for 10 min; 40–80=106 cells/ml) at 378C. Ten volumes
`of ice-cold PBS were added to stop the reaction. Preparation of
`cell extracts,
`immunoprecipitations, SDS-polyacrylamide gel
`electrophoresis and Western blots were performed as described
`by van Dijk et al. (2000).
`(A) The EpoR, Jak2 and Btk were immunoprecipitated to analyse
`Epo-induced phosphorylation on Western blots. The upper pan-
`els represent anti-phosphotyrosine stained blots; the lower pan-
`els represent the same blots re-probed with the antibody used
`in the immunoprecipitation (anti-EpoR, anti-Jak2 and anti-Btk)
`as indicated. In the EpoR immunoprecipitate the position of size
`markers is indicated and arrows indicate the EpoR and known
`proteins co-immunoprecipitating. Btk (lower band) is indicated
`with an arrow in the Btk immunoprecipitate. (B) In the upper
`panels, Stat5 and Erk1/2 phosphorylation was detected with
`phospho-specific antibodies in whole cell lysates, lower panels
`represent the total amount of Stat5 and Erk1/2 detected with
`anti-Stat5 and anti-Erk1/2, respectively. Antibodies against the
`murine EpoR (噛SC-697), Erk1/2 (噛SC-94), Stat5 (噛SC-836) and
`phosphotyrosine (PY99, 噛SC-7020) were purchased from Santa
`Cruz (tebu-bio, Heerhugowaard, The Netherlands), phospho-
`specific Erk1/2 (噛9106L) from Cell signalling (Westburg, Leus-
`den, The Netherlands), antibodies against mouse Jak2
`(噛06–255), phospho-specific Stat5 (噛05–495) from Upstate Bio-
`technology (Campro-Scientific, Veenendaal, The Netherlands).
`Recombinant human Epo was a kind gift from Ortho Biotech
`(Tilburg, The Netherlands). LFM-A13 was manufactured by
`Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) as described by Mahajan et al.
`(1999).
`
`we found that Btk is required for efficient signal trans-
`duction by the ligand-activated EpoR (Schmidt et al.,
`2004), we expected LFM-A13 to inhibit Epo-induced sig-
`nal transduction.
`However,
`the strong effect of LFM-A13 on Epo-
`induced signalling could also be due to direct inhibition
`of Jak2 by LFM-A13. To investigate whether LFM-A13
`could act directly on Jak2, Btk and Jak2 were immuno-
`precipitated from lysates of factor-deprived cells and
`subjected to in vitro kinase assays in the presence of
`increasing amounts of LFM-A13. Surprisingly, the kinase
`activity of Btk and Jak2 (auto-phosphorylation) appeared
`to be inhibited with similar dose-response curves. Both
`kinases were already inhibited at 10 mM LFM-A13, while
`complete inhibition occurred at 200 mM LFM-A13 (Figure
`2A). The same results were obtained when Btk and Jak2
`were immunoprecipitated from Epo-stimulated cells (Fig-
`ure 2B). Epo stimulation leads to Btk and Jak2 phospho-
`rylation, resulting in a lower pool of non-phosphorylated
`Btk or Jak2, hence explaining the lower auto-phospho-
`rylation in the Epo-stimulated lanes. These data suggest
`that LFM-A13 directly inhibits Jak2 kinase activity.
`However, it could still be possible that the effect of
`LFM-A13 on Jak2 is mediated by Btk. If both proteins
`interact with each other, the presence of Btk in the Jak2
`immunoprecipitate could affect Jak2 auto-phosphoryla-
`tion. To rule out Btk interference in the in vitro kinase
`assay, we used in vitro transcription/translation (ITT) to
`synthesise recombinant Jak2 that was subsequently
`subjected to an in vitro kinase assay in presence or
`absence of LFM-A13. Expression of Jak2 was detected
`by immunoblotting using anti-Jak2 antibodies. Jak2 was
`
`A
`
`Btk IP, Jak2 IP,
`in vitro autophosphorylation
`
`LFM-A13 (µM ):
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`100
`
`200 1000
`
`[32P]-Btk
`
`[32P]Jak2
`
`B
`
`Btk IP, Jak2 IP,
`in vitro autophosphorylation
`
`LFM-A13:
`Epo (5U/ml):
`
`-
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`[ 32P]-Btk
`
`[ 32P]Jak2
`
`Figure 2 LFM-A13 inhibits in vitro auto-phosphorylation of Btk
`and Jak2.
`(A) Jak2 and Btk were immunoprecipitated from factor-depleted
`erythroid progenitors (R10) and tested for auto-phosphorylation
`in an in vitro kinase assay. Sepharose G beads (Sigma, Zwy¨ n-
`drecht, The Netherlands) with immunoprecipitated Jak2 and Btk
`complexes were split into 6 equal portions and subsequently
`subjected to an in vitro kinase assays as described by von Lin-
`dern et al. (2000) in the presence of increasing concentrations
`LFM-A13 as indicated on the top. (B) Jak2 and Btk were immu-
`noprecipitated from cells non-stimulated (y) or Epo-stimulated
`(q; 5 U/ml) and similarly subjected to an in vitro kinase assay.
`100 mM LFM-A13 was added to precipitates from stimulated
`cells.
`
`

`

`A
`
`Jak2 IP, Western blot
`
`A
`
`IP, Erythroid BM-derived cell lines
`
`LFM-A13 inhibits Jak2 kinase activity 411
`
`Jak2 template :
`
`anti-Jak2
`
`+
`
`R10
`control
`
`B
`
`Jak2 IP,
`in vitro autophosphorylation
`
`LFM-A13:
`Jak2 template:
`[32P]Jak2
`
`+
`+
`+
`- - - - - - -
`
`Figure 3 LFM-A13 inhibits auto-phosphorylation of recombi-
`nant Jak2 produced by in vitro transcription/translation (ITT).
`The in vitro transcription/translation was carried out using the
`TnT䊛 T7 coupled reticulocyte lysate system (噛L4611; Promega,
`Leiden, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s
`protocol.
`(A) Jak2 was immunoprecipitated from ITT reactions in the
`absence (lane1) or presence (lane2) of Jak2 template or from the
`erythroid progenitor cell line R10 and analysed for their presence
`on Western blots using an anti-Jak2 antibody. (B) To test the
`effect of LFM-A13 on recombinant Jak2, immunoprecipitated
`ITT Jak2 was subjected to an in vitro kinase assay in the
`absence and presence of 100 mM LFM-A13 (lanes 2 and 3). Lane
`1 represents Jak2 immunoprecipitate on ITT-lysate with no Jak2
`template present.
`
`only present when the template was added to the ITT
`and the mobility of recombinant Jak2 was the same as
`immunoprecipitated Jak2 when compared to the ery-
`throid progenitor cell
`line R10 (Figure 3A). Auto-phos-
`phorylation of in vitro synthesised Jak2 in an in vitro
`kinase assay was fully inhibited by 100 mM LFM-A13
`(Figure 3B). This proves that LFM-A13 directly inhibits
`Jak2 kinase activity.
`Finally, we tested the effect of LFM-A13 in cells devoid
`of Btk.
`Immortalised cultures of erythroid progenitors
`established from Btky or Btkwt, p53-deficient bone mar-
`row cells, were factor deprived in the presence or
`absence of 100 mM LFM-A13 and stimulated with Epo or
`left unstimulated. Epo-induced phosphorylation of the
`EpoR is impaired in Btk-deficient cells (Schmidt et al.,
`2004; Figure 4A). However, the remaining Epo-induced
`phosphorylation of the EpoR is still blocked by LFM-A13.
`Importantly, Epo-induced phosphorylation of Jak2, Stat5
`and Erk1/2, was clearly inhibited by 100 mM LFM-A13 in
`Btk-deficient cells (Figure 4A, B), providing further evi-
`dence that LFM-A13 directly affects Jak2, independently
`of Btk. Finally, we tested whether LFM-A13 still showed
`some of its alleged specificity. COS cells were transfect-
`ed in duplo with the kinases Jak2, Tec, Btk and Lyn. Half
`of the cells were treated with LFM-A13, the other half left
`untreated. Cell lysates were harvested and examined for
`auto-phosphorylated kinase by Western blotting. LFM-
`A13 inhibited auto-phosphorylation of Jak2, Tec and Btk,
`but it did not affect Lyn kinase auto-phosphorylation (Fig-
`ure 5). Thus, LFM-A13 does not inhibit the activity of all
`tyrosine kinases.
`Both Jak2 and Tec-family kinases, including Btk, are
`prominent cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases in hematopoietic
`cells which co-operate in signalling pathways activated
`by e.g. cytokine receptors, the B cell receptor and the
`
`Btk-
`
`+
`
`Epo:
`LFM-A13:
`
`-
`-
`
`+
`+
`
`anti-Jak2
`
`Btkwt
`+
`+
`+
`anti-pTyr '---=----------'I I Jak2 IP
`I
`
`anti-pTyr
`anti-EpoR !=I =::::!!!!!!!!!!!!::::========!I EpoR IP
`
`B
`
`WCL, Erythroid BM-derived cell lines
`
`Epo:
`LFM-A13:
`
`anti-Erk
`
`anti-p-Stat5 I
`l:t
`anti-Stat5
`anti-p-Erk I
`Ira:
`
`+
`
`-
`l a I I
`
`+
`+
`
`I
`I I
`I
`I
`
`Figure 4 LFM-A13 inhibits Jak2, Stat5 and Erk1/2 phospho-
`rylation in Btk-deficient erythroid progenitor cells.
`The murine erythroid cell lines 2B6 (Btkwt) and 3G4 (Btky) were
`established from p53-deficient mouse bone marrow of wt and
`Btk-deficient mice, respectively, as previously described (von
`Lindern et al., 2001; Schmidt et al., 2004). These Btk-deficient
`cells were factor-depleted in the presence and absence of
`100 mM LFM-A13 as indicated and stimulated with Epo (5 U/ml;
`10 min) where indicated.
`(A) The EpoR and Jak2 proteins were immunoprecipitated and
`assayed for tyrosine phosphorylation wanti-p-Tyr (PY99); upper
`panelsx and for the presence of the EpoR and Jak2 by specific
`antibodies. (B) Lysates of the Btky cells (3G4) were assayed on
`Western blots using phospho-specific antibodies for Stat5 or
`Erk1/2. The lower panels indicate the same blots re-probed with
`anti-Stat5 or anti-Erk1/2 antibodies to check for equal loading.
`
`WCL, COS cells
`Btk
`--
`+
`
`Jak2 Tee
`+
`- +
`-
`
`-
`
`LFM-A 13:
`
`Jak2 ♦
`Btk ♦
`Tee ♦
`Lyn ♦
`
`Lyn
`- +
`
`150
`100
`75
`
`50
`
`Figure 5 LFM-A13 inihibits Jak2, Tec and Btk, but not Lyn
`auto-phosphorylation in COS cells.
`COS cells were transfected with pSG5-based expression plas-
`mids encoding Jak2, Tec, Btk or Lyn, using calcium-phosphate
`precipitates as previously described (Van Dijk et al., 2000). Two
`dishes were used for each construct and LFM-A13 (100 mM) was
`added 24 h after transfection to one of the dishes. Forty-eight
`h after transfection the cells were lysed and total cell lysates
`were examined for phosphorylated proteins on a Western blot
`using the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody PY99 (anti-pTyr). The
`kinases expressed in COS cells are indicated on top of the lanes,
`the position of the kinases is indicated by arrows. The position
`and of size markers is indicated at the right hand side (molecular
`mass in kDa).
`
`

`

`412 E. van den Akker et al.
`
`Fc´ receptor (Qiu et al., 2000). Moreover, Jak1 and Tec
`can associate and cross-phosphorylate each other (Tak-
`ahashi-Tezuka et al., 1997) and we recently demonstrat-
`ed that Btk similarly associates with Jak2 (Schmidt et al.,
`2004). Since lack of Btk impairs EpoR signalling, the
`effect of LFM-A13 on Epo-induced signal transduction
`was initially expected. However, since LFM-A13 inhibited
`intrinsic auto-phosphorylation of cellular or recombinant
`Jak2 in in vitro kinase assays and significantly decreased
`Epo-induced Jak2 phosphorylation in cells lacking Btk,
`we conclude that LFM-A13 directly inhibits Jak2 phos-
`phorylation independent of its effect on Btk.
`It was previously reported that the kinase activity of
`Jak1 and Jak3, close homologues of Jak2, was not inhib-
`ited by high concentrations (139 to 278 mM) of LFM-A13
`in in vitro kinase assays (Mahajan et al., 1999). Impor-
`tantly,
`the sequences of the kinase domains of Jak
`kinases are highly conserved. LFM-A13 incorporation
`into the catalytic site of Btk requires hydrogen bonds
`between the side chain of LFM-A13 and Arg525 and Asp539
`of Btk and a hydrophobic pocket for the aromatic ring.
`The kinase domains of Btk and Jak kinases both contain
`arginine and aspartic acid residues at comparable posi-
`tions, but there are several differences regarding the
`hydrophobic pocket trapping the aromatic ring of LFM-
`A13. Mahajan et al. (1999) discussed the consequences
`of these differences with respect to LFM-A13 binding
`affinity, but complete understanding of these affinities is
`still elusive. Jak1 and Jak3 kinase activity was shown to
`be unaffected by LFM-A13 (Mahajan et al., 1999) but no
`data was shown for Jak2, leaving open the possibility
`that Jak2 is the exception in the Jak kinase family with
`respect to LFM-A13 sensitivity.
`In conclusion, we have shown that LFM-A13 is not
`specific for Btk but also inhibits Jak2 kinase activity in
`vitro and in vivo. LFM-A13 is proposed to be a useful
`anti-leukaemic and anti-thrombotic agent (Uckun, 2002,
`2003). Although the successful use of STI571 to treat
`chronic myelogenous leukaemia proves that an inhibitor
`does not necessarily need to be specific in order to be
`effective (Mauro, 2002), it is important that its specificity
`is known. Using LFM-A13 to elucidate the role of Btk in
`signal transduction of Jak2-dependent cytokine recep-
`tors could result in wrong conclusions due to simulta-
`neous inhibition of Jak2 and Btk by LFM-A13.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`The authors thank Rudi Hendriks for providing the Btk- and p53-
`deficient mice bone marrow, and Martine Parren-van Amelsvoort
`for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants
`from the Dutch Cancer Society (EUR 1999–2064), the Nether-
`lands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO 901-08-338),
`the European Union (HPRN-CT-2000-00083), a fellowship of the
`Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) to T.B.vD. and a fellowship
`of the Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences to M.vL.
`
`References
`
`Andreotti, A.H., Bunnell, S.C., Feng, S., Berg, L.J. and Schreiber,
`S.L. (1997). Regulatory intramolecular association in a tyro-
`sine kinase of the Tec family. Nature 385, 93–97.
`
`Brazin, K.N., Fulton, D.B. and Andreotti, A.H. (2000). A specific
`intermolecular association between the regulatory domains
`of a Tec family kinase. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 607–623.
`Chin, H., Arai, A., Wakao, H., Kamiyama, R., Miyasaka, N. and
`Miura, O. (1998). Lyn physically associates with the erythro-
`poietin receptor and may play a role in activation of the Stat5
`pathway. Blood 91, 3734–3745.
`Fluckiger, A.C., Li, Z., Kato, R.M., Wahl, M.I., Ochs, H.D., Long-
`necker, R., Kinet, J.P., Witte, O.N., Scharenberg, A.M. and
`Rawlings, D.J.
`(1998). Btk/Tec kinases regulate sustained
`increases in intracellular Ca2q following B-cell receptor acti-
`vation. EMBO J. 17, 1973–1985.
`Guinamard, R., Aspenstrom, P., Fougereau, M., Chavrier, P. and
`Guillemot, J.C. (1998). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Wis-
`kott-Aldrich syndrome protein by Lyn and Btk is regulated by
`CDC42. FEBS Lett. 434, 431–436.
`Kurosaki, T. and Kurosaki, M. (1997). Transphosphorylation of
`Bruton’s tyrosine kinase on tyrosine 551 is critical for B cell
`antigen receptor function. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15595–15598.
`Mahajan, S., Ghosh, S., Sudbeck, E.A., Zheng, Y., Downs, S.,
`Hupke, M. and Uckun, F.M. (1999). Rational design and syn-
`thesis of a novel anti-leukemic agent targeting Bruton’s tyro-
`wa-cyano-b-hydroxy-
`sine
`kinase
`(BTK),
`LFM-A13
`b-methyl-N-(2,5-dibromophenyl)propenamidex.
`J.
`Biol.
`Chem. 274, 9587–9599.
`Nisitani, S., Kato, R.M., Rawlings, D.J., Witte, O.N. and Wahl,
`M.I. (1999). In situ detection of activated Bruton’s tyrosine
`kinase in the Ig signaling complex by phosphopeptide-spe-
`cific monoclonal antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96,
`2221–2226.
`Parganas, E., Wang, D., Stravopodis, D., Topham, D.J., Marine,
`J.C., Teglund, S., Vanin, E.F., Bodner, S., Colamonici, O.R.,
`van Deursen, J.M., Grosveld, G. and Ihle, J.N. (1998). Jak2
`is essential for signaling through a variety of cytokine recep-
`tors. Cell 93, 385–395.
`Rawlings, D.J. (1999). Bruton’s tyrosine kinase controls a sus-
`tained calcium signal essential for B lineage development
`and function. Clin. Immunol. 91, 243–253.
`Rawlings, D.J., Scharenberg, A.M., Park, H., Wahl, M.I., Lin, S.,
`Kato, R.M., Fluckiger, A.C., Witte, O.N. and Kinet, J.P. (1996).
`Activation of BTK by a phosphorylation mechanism initiated
`by SRC family kinases. Science 271, 822–825.
`Saito, K., Scharenberg, A.M. and Kinet, J.P. (2001). Interaction
`between the Btk PH domain and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-
`trisphosphate directly regulates Btk. J. Biol. Chem. 276,
`16201–16206.
`Schmidt, U., van den Akker, E., Parren-van Amelsvoort, M.,
`Litos, G., de Bruijn, M., Gutie´ rrez, M., Hendriks, R., Ellmeier,
`W., Lo¨ wenberg, B., Beug, H. and von Lindern, M. (2004). Btk
`is required for an efficient response to erythropoietin and for
`SCF-controlled protection against TRAIL in erythroid progen-
`itors. J. Exp. Med., 199, 785–795.
`Takahashi-Tezuka, M., Hibi, M., Fujitani, Y., Fukada, T., Yama-
`guchi, T. and Hirano, T. (1997). Tec tyrosine kinase links the
`cytokine receptors to PI-3 kinase probably through JAK.
`Oncogene 14, 2273–2282.
`Takata, M. and Kurosaki, T. (1996). A role for Bruton’s tyrosine
`kinase in B cell antigen receptor-mediated activation of phos-
`pholipase C-g 2. J. Exp. Med. 184, 31–40.
`van Dijk, T.B., van Den Akker, E., Amelsvoort, M.P., Mano, H.,
`Lowenberg, B. and von Lindern, M. (2000). Stem cell factor
`induces phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase-dependent Lyn/Tec/
`Dok-1 complex formation in hematopoietic cells. Blood 96,
`3406–3413.
`von Lindern, M., Parren-van Amelsvoort, M., van Dijk, T., Deiner,
`E., van den Akker, E., van Emst-de Vries, S., Willems, P.,
`Beug, H. and Lowenberg, B. (2000). Protein kinase C a con-
`trols erythropoietin receptor signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 275,
`34719–34727.
`
`

`

`von Lindern, M., Deiner, E.M., Dolznig, H., Parren-Van Amels-
`voort, M., Hayman, M.J., Mullner, E.W. and Beug, H. (2001).
`Leukemic transformation of normal murine erythroid progen-
`itors: v- and c-ErbB act through signaling pathways activated
`by the EpoR and c-Kit in stress erythropoiesis. Oncogene 20,
`3651–3664.
`Wojchowski, D.M., Gregory, R.C., Miller, C.P., Pandit, A.K. and
`Pircher, T.J. (1999). Signal transduction in the erythropoietin
`receptor system. Exp. Cell. Res. 253, 143–156.
`
`LFM-A13 inhibits Jak2 kinase activity 413
`
`Yamashita, Y., Watanabe, S., Miyazato, A., Ohya, K., Ikeda, U.,
`Shimada, K., Komatsu, N., Hatake, K., Miura, Y., Ozawa, K.
`and Mano, H. (1998). Tec and Jak2 kinases cooperate to
`mediate cytokine-driven activation of c-fos transcription.
`Blood 91, 1496–1507.
`
`Received October 6, 2003; accepted February 5, 2004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket