throbber
European Journal of Neurology 2006, 13: 604–610
`
`doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01292.x
`
`Oral fumaric acid esters for the treatment of active multiple sclerosis: an
`open-label, baseline-controlled pilot study
`
`S. Schimrigka,b, N. Brunea,b K. Hellwiga, C. Lukasa, B. Bellenberga, M. Rieksa,b, V. Hoffmanna,
`D. Po¨ hlaua and H. Przunteka,b
`aDepartment of Neurology and bFumarate Study Group for Multiple Sclerosis (FSGMS), St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum,
`Germany
`
`Keywords:
`fumaric acid esters, mag-
`netic resonance imaging,
`multiple sclerosis, open-
`label study
`
`Received 22 March 2005
`Accepted 13 June 2005
`
`An exploratory, prospective, open-label study of fumaric acid esters (FAE, Fuma-
`dermÒ) was conducted in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
`(RRMS). The study consisted of the following four phases: 6-week baseline, 18-week
`treatment (target dose of 720 mg/day), 4-week washout, and a second 48-week
`treatment phase (target dose of 360 mg/day). Ten patients with an Expanded Dis-
`ability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 2.0–6.0 and at least one gadolinium-enhancing
`(Gd+) lesion on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans parti-
`cipated in the study. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), blood chemistry/
`hematology, electrocardiogram, and urinalysis. The primary efficacy outcomes were
`number and volume of Gd+ lesions. Other clinical outcomes included EDSS score,
`ambulation index (AI), and nine-hole peg test (9-HPT). Effects of FAE on intracellular
`cytokine profiles, T-cell apoptosis, and soluble adhesion molecules were also assessed.
`Three patients withdrew during the first 3 weeks of the study because of side effects,
`non-compliance, and follow-up loss. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal
`symptoms and flushing; all AEs were reported as mild and reversible. FAE produced
`significant reductions from baseline in number (P < 0.05) and volume (P < 0.01) of
`Gd+ lesions after 18 weeks of treatment; this effect persisted during the second
`treatment phase at half the target dose after the 4-week washout period. EDSS scores,
`AI, and 9-HPT remained stable or slightly improved from baseline in all patients.
`Measures of T-cell function demonstrated alterations in cytokines and circulating
`tumor necrosis factor. The results of this exploratory study suggest that further studies
`of FAE in patients with MS are warranted.
`
`Introduction
`
`Multiple sclerosis (MS), a major cause of chronic dis-
`ability in young adults, is pathologically characterized
`by focal areas of demyelination and axonal loss in the
`central nervous system (CNS). Although the etiology of
`MS is uncertain, several lines of evidence indicate that
`autoimmune response plays a central role in the
`development of MS lesions. First, myelin breakdown
`products have been detected in macrophages in MS
`lesions and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS pa-
`tients [1,2]. Secondly, MS lesions have many features of
`a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction [3], and dem-
`onstrate the following: increased levels of lymphokines
`and cytokines [interferon (IFN)-c, tumor necrosis fac-
`tor (TNF)-a, interleukin (IL)-1]; activated CD4+ and
`
`Correspondence: Sebastian Schimrigk, MD, Department of Neurol-
`ogy, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstrasse 56,
`44791 Bochum, Germany (tel.: 0049-(0)234-509-1; fax: 0049-(0)234-
`509-2740; e-mail: sebastian.k.schimrigk@rub.de).
`
`CD8+ T cells; mononuclear phagocytes (macrophages,
`microglia, and monocytes) expressing variable levels of
`class
`II major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
`antigens; and upregulation of leukocyte and vascular
`adhesion molecules (VCAM)-1 [4–7]. Thirdly, CSF of
`MS patients shows intrathecal synthesis of immuno-
`globulins with restricted heterogeneity [8] and an
`increased frequency of autoreactive T cells that secrete
`IFN-c in response to myelin proteins [9]. Fourthly,
`agents with immunomodulatory properties, such as
`IFNb have been shown to reduce lesion formation,
`decrease the frequency of relapses, and slow the pro-
`gression of disability in MS [10–12].
`Fumaric acid esters (FAE) influence several aspects
`of immune functions that are thought to be involved in
`MS. FAE therapy has been shown to induce T-helper
`(Th)2-like cytokines (e.g. IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) [13,14]
`to induce apoptosis in activated T cells [13] and to
`downregulate
`intracellular
`adhesion molecules
`(ICAM)-1 and VCAM expression [15]. A reduction in
`these cellular adhesion molecules may lead to reduced
`
`604
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 001
`
`

`

`migration of lymphocytes across endothelial barriers
`into surrounding tissues, an important event in MS [6].
`FumadermÒ (Fumapharm, Muri, Switzerland), a FAE
`formulation, is approved in Germany for the treatment
`of severe chronic plaque psoriasis [16–21]. The efficacy
`and safety of oral FAE (FumadermÒ) were investigated
`in a baseline-controlled, open-label pilot study of
`patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS).
`
`Methods
`
`Patients
`
`Ten patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were
`eligible for enrollment if they were 18–55 years of age,
`had a definite diagnosis of RRMS [22], and had at least
`one relapse within the year prior to enrollment. In
`addition, patients had at least one active lesion on
`magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans and a
`baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score
`of 2.0–6.0. Patients were excluded from the study if they
`had any of the following: an infection, a chronic
`inflammatory disease other than MS, a history of drug
`or alcohol abuse, a disease exacerbation or corticoster-
`oid treatment within 30 days, or immunosuppressive or
`immunomodulatory therapy within 12 weeks of enroll-
`ment. Patients who were pregnant or breastfeeding were
`also excluded. The study protocol was approved by the
`local ethics committee, and all patients were counseled
`regarding current treatment guidelines for MS, inclu-
`ding the use of IFNb and glatiramer acetate.
`
`Study design and assessments
`
`This was a prospective, open-label, baseline-controlled
`exploratory study conducted at St Josef Hospital at
`Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany. Patients were
`followed for a total of 70 weeks. The study was com-
`posed of the following four phases: a 6-week baseline
`phase (weeks )6 to 0), an 18-week treatment phase
`(weeks 0–18), a 4-week washout (no treatment) phase
`(weeks 19–22), followed by a second 48-week treatment
`phase (weeks 23–70). At the beginning of each treat-
`ment phase, the FAE dose was slowly up-titrated over
`9 weeks to minimize gastrointestinal side effects. The
`maximum daily number of tablets of FAE administered
`was six per day in the first treatment phase (720
`mg/day) and three per day (360 mg/day) in the second
`treatment phase.
`Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of
`adverse events, physical and neurologic examinations,
`blood
`chemistry/hematology,
`electrocardiogram
`(ECG), and urinalysis. The primary efficacy outcomes
`were the number and volume of gadolinium-enhancing
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS European Journal of Neurology 13, 604–610
`
`Oral FAE for the treatment of active MS
`
`605
`
`(Gd+) lesions. Clinical outcomes included EDSS score,
`ambulation index (AI), and nine-hole peg test (9-HPT).
`The effects of FAE on intracellular cytokine profiles,
`T-cell apoptosis, and soluble adhesion molecules were
`also assessed. A physical examination, EDSS, AI, and
`9-HPT were performed at screening, baseline, and at
`weeks 3, 6, 12, 18, 22, 46, and 70. MRI brain scans were
`performed at screening, baseline, and at weeks 12, 18,
`22, 46, and 70. Adverse events were recorded through-
`out the study. Serum chemistries, ECG, and urinalysis
`were performed at screening, baseline, and at weeks
`1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46, 52, 58, 64, and 70.
`
`Study drug
`Fumaric acid ester tablets (FumadermÒ, Fumapharm,
`Muri, Switzerland) were composed of the following:
`ethylhydrogenfumarate-Ca salt 67 mg, ethylhydrogen-
`fumarate-Mg salt 5 mg, dimethylfumarate 30 mg,
`ethylhydrogenfumarate-Zn
`salt
`3 mg
`(Fumaderm
`initialÒ); and dimethylfumarate 120 mg, ethylhydro-
`genfumarate-Ca salt 87 mg, ethylhydrogenfumarate-
`Mg salt 5 mg, ethylhydrogenfumarate-Zn salt 3 mg
`(Fumaderm forteÒ).
`
`MRI protocol
`
`All MRI scans were performed using a 2-Tesla Bruker
`Tomikon S200 scanner (Bruker Medizintechnik GmbH,
`Ettlingen, Germany).
`Initial T1-weighted (time of
`repetition (TR) ¼ 800 ms, time of echo (TE) ¼ 17 ms)
`brain scans, 3-mm-thick axial slices with a spatial
`resolution of 0.98 mm, were acquired. Each scan was
`composed of 44 contiguous interwoven images. Triple
`dose (0.3 mmol/kg body weight) Gd-diethylenetriamine
`pentaacetic acid (Gd-DPTA, MagnevistÒ, Schering
`AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered for higher
`lesion detection sensitivity [23]. After a 7-min delay,
`Gd+ T1-weighted scans were then performed using the
`same parameters as for the native scan. Image data
`were converted to an 8-bit grayscale tiff-format, provi-
`ding maximum available contrast. Data analysis was
`performed using customized Image ToolÒ scripts for
`semi-automated image data utilization (UTHSCSA
`Image Tool program, University of Texas Health Sci-
`ence Center, San Antonio, TX, USA; http://ddsdx.
`uthscsa.edu/dig/itdesc.html). Two independent radiol-
`ogists detected and counted Gd+ lesions by comparing
`native T1 images to post-contrast T1 images. The
`radiologists involved in these assessments were blinded
`to the treatment status of the patients. To determine
`the approximate volume of each Gd+ lesion, a
`semi-automated local
`threshold procedure counted
`enhancing pixels to within a maximum of 1/e-of-
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 002
`
`

`

`606
`
`S. Schimrigk et al.
`
`maximum contrast to non-enhancing pixels of the le-
`sion environs. Questionable cases were discussed with a
`third senior radiologist who was also blinded with
`regard to the treatment status of patients in the study.
`
`Cytokine expression and apoptotic rate
`
`The intracellular expression of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-c,
`TNF-a, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-b was
`examined in the CD4+ lymphocyte population [24,25].
`Total T lymphocytes were prepared for flow cytometry
`and stained with anti-CD4 antibodies plus antibodies
`against one of the cytokines of interest or Annexin V as a
`marker for apoptosis. Briefly, peripheral blood mono-
`nuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from venous blood
`samples collected in heparinized tubes using a FICOLL
`gradient
`(FICOLLpaque,
`Pharmacia, Uppsala,
`Sweden). Cells were washed in RPMI 1640 medium with
`10% fetal calf serum (FCS) separated and cell density was
`adjusted to 2 · 106/ml. PBMCs were stimulated with
`phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin
`in the presence of monensin (ICS-KIT; Ho¨ lzel Diag-
`nostica, Laboserv GmbH, Giessen, Germany) to block
`cytokine secretion [25]. Following a 5-h incubation
`(37°C, 7% CO2), PBMCs were washed twice with Hank’s
`balance salt solution (HBSS) and fixed (4°C). Fixed
`PBMCs were washed and treated with a permeabilizing
`agent for 12 h. Intracellular staining for TNF-a, IFN-c,
`IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-b was performed using spe-
`cific monoclonal antibodies. Cells were counter stained
`with an antibody specific for the CD4 cell surface marker
`(Becton Dickinson, Immunotech, Ho¨ lzel, Germany) to
`identify CD4+ cells. Stained cells were analyzed using a
`FACScan flow cytometer and cellquest software (Becton
`Dickinson). Expression of sICAM-1 was measured using
`an ELISA specific for sICAM (Medgenix, Laboratories,
`Rungis, France). All lymphocytes were identified by flow
`cytometry and then cells positive for both CD4 and
`cytokines of interest were quantified.
`
`Statistical analyses
`
`Number and volume of Gd+ lesions were analyzed
`using nonparametric Wilcoxon tests. Differences were
`considered statistically significant at a P-value of 0.05.
`Overall, seven MRI scans were performed per patient.
`Results from the two baseline scans were averaged.
`
`Results
`
`Patients
`
`Patient demographic and baseline characteristics are
`presented in Table 1. Of the 10 patients enrolled, six
`
`Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients
`(n ¼ 10)
`
`Characteristic
`
`Sex, n (%)
`Female
`Age (years)
`Median
`Range
`Relapse rate (preceding 12 months)
`Median
`Range
`Years since first event
`Median (years)
`Range
`EDSS
`Median
`Range
`AI
`Median
`9-HPT
`Median (right)
`Median (left)
`Number of Gd+ lesionsa
`Mean
`Range
`
`5 (50)
`
`29
`28–38
`
`2
`1–3
`
`4.5
`1–11
`
`2.0
`2.0–4.5
`
`2
`
`22
`21
`
`11
`2–39
`
`AI, Ambulation Index; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale;
`9-HPT, nine-hole peg test; Gd+, gadolinium-enhancing.
`aCalculated based on n ¼ 7.
`
`completed the 70-week study. One patient was excluded
`because of an unplanned pregnancy at week 46; data
`obtained from this patient were included up to the time
`of withdrawal. Three other patients discontinued
`treatment, one each because of side effects and a lack of
`compliance; the third was lost to follow-up.
`
`Safety and tolerability
`
`The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal
`symptoms (diarrhea, cramps, nausea) and flushing
`(Table 2). Mild (6/7) to moderate (1/7) gastrointestinal
`adverse events were experienced by almost all patients
`during the initial phase of this study; however, these
`events decreased continually in all patients after
`6 weeks. Administration of antacids was necessary in
`
`Table 2 Overall adverse events (n ¼ 7)
`
`Adverse
`event
`
`Gastrointestinal
`Flushing
`Elevated liver enzyme levels
`Lymphopenia
`Vertigo
`Eosinophilia
`Headache
`Increased perspiration
`
`Number of
`patients
`
`6
`5
`4
`3
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS European Journal of Neurology 13, 604–610
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 003
`
`

`

`Oral FAE for the treatment of active MS
`
`607
`
`*P < 0.018 vs. baseline
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`–100
`
`Lesion load (in pixel volume; 1 pixel = mm3)
`
`Baseline Week 12 Week 18
`
`Week 22
`
`Week 46
`
`Week 70
`
`Study visits
`
`Figure 2 Total lesion load of Gd+ lesions calculated for all
`lesions detected at baseline and at weeks 12, 18, 22, 46, and 70.
`Numbers presented represent total volume of Gd+ lesions
`detected on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans as
`determined following conversion of images into 8-bit grayscale
`format for quantification. Bars represent median volume of
`Gd+ lesions; at week 70, only six patients were examined.
`
`Table 3 Clinical outcomes
`
`Outcome
`
`Baseline
`
`Week
`12
`
`Week
`18
`
`Week
`22
`
`Week
`46
`
`Week
`70a
`
`EDSS (median)
`AI (median)
`9-HPT (median;
`in s; right)
`9-HPT (median;
`in s; left)
`
`2.0
`2.0
`22
`
`2.0
`2.0
`20
`
`1.5
`1.0
`20.5
`
`1.5
`1.0
`17
`
`1.5
`1.0
`18
`
`1.5
`1.0
`19
`
`21
`
`20.5
`
`20.5
`
`18
`
`19
`
`19
`
`AI, Ambulation Index; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale;
`9-HPT, nine-hole peg test.
`an ¼ 6.
`
`course of the study (Table 3). Similarly, there was
`improvement in functional tests using the 9-HPT at
`18 weeks, which was sustained to 70 weeks. The AI also
`improved over the course of the study. The median AI
`score improved from 2.0 at baseline to 1.0 at 18 weeks,
`and this improvement was sustained until 70 weeks;
`however,
`these changes did not achieve statistical
`significance.
`Relapse occurred during treatment in two patients
`at weeks 18 and 46. In both cases, the EDSS score
`increased by 0.5. Both patients were treated with intra-
`venous corticosteroids (1000 mg methylprednisolone
`i.v. for 3 days), which resulted in complete remission.
`
`several cases. One patient discontinued because of the
`gastrointestinal effects of FAE. A transient elevation of
`liver enzyme levels (up to twofold) occurred in four
`patients, but these elevations were not sufficient to
`mandate withdrawal from the study. During therapy,
`one patient presented at a single visit with an eosino-
`philia of 15% of all leukocytes, which reverted to a
`slight elevation (4–6%) within the next weeks. All other
`side effects were generally mild and transient, needing
`no further treatment and decreasing within the first
`12 weeks of treatment.
`
`MRI
`
`A significant reduction in the number of Gd+ lesions
`was already observed following 18 weeks of FAE
`treatment, with a further reduction after 70 weeks of
`treatment (Fig. 1). The mean number of Gd+ lesions
`decreased from 11.28 (range 2–39) at baseline to 0.28
`(range 0–1) at the end of the 70-week study (P < 0.02).
`The mean number of lesions at weeks 12, 18, and 22 was
`4.3 (range 0–10), 1.5 (range 0–4), and 0.57 (range 0–3),
`respectively. Similarly, median Gd+ lesion volume was
`significantly decreased from 244.5 mm3 (range 25–649)
`at baseline to 26.1 mm3 (range 0–57) after 18 weeks of
`FAE therapy (P < 0.018) (Fig. 2). The lesion volume
`continued to decrease to 8.6 mm3 (range 0–56) at
`22 weeks, and this
`reduction was maintained to
`2.14 mm3 (range 0–9) at 70 weeks (P < 0.018).
`
`Clinical outcomes
`
`The six patients who completed the study demonstrated
`a stable or slightly improved EDSS score over the
`
`*P < 0.02 vs. baseline
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Week 22
`Baseline Week 12 Week 18
`Study visits
`
`Week 46
`
`Week 70
`
`16
`
`14
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8 6 4 2 0
`
`–2
`
`Number of Gd+ lesions
`
`Figure 1 Mean number of Gd+ lesions from T1-weighted mag-
`netic resonance imaging scans performed at baseline and at weeks
`12, 18, 22, 46, and 70.
`
`in
`The expression of Th2 cytokine, such as IL-10,
`CD4+ lymphocytes,
`increased during
`treatment
`
`Cytokine expression and apoptosis
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS European Journal of Neurology 13, 604–610
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 004
`
`

`

`608
`
`S. Schimrigk et al.
`
`Figure 4 Rate of apoptosis in CD4+ T-cell population over the
`course of the study. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline.
`
`Discussion
`
`This report describes the first evaluation of FAE for the
`treatment of patients with RRMS. The study period
`included more than 3400 patient-days of observation.
`Treatment of psoriasis with FAE has been associated
`with mild to moderate gastrointestinal side effects [19],
`although in patients with psoriasis these effects are
`generally mild and subside with time on therapy. In this
`preliminary study, FAE therapy was well tolerated by
`patients with MS. Side effects were similar to those
`experienced by patients treated with FAE for psoriasis
`and included gastrointestinal
`symptoms
`(diarrhea,
`cramps) and flushing.
`A significant decrease from baseline was seen in
`both the number and volume of Gd+ lesions starting
`after 18 weeks of
`treatment. All clinical measures
`(EDSS, AI, and 9-HPT) either remained stable or
`showed improvement during the study, which further
`supports the MRI findings. However, the interpret-
`ation of these results is limited by the small number of
`patients in this study. The fact that FAE treatment
`reduced brain lesions to a degree that reached statis-
`tical significance in a study with a small number of
`patients is encouraging and suggests that larger trials
`to determine the efficacy of FAE in patients with MS
`should be conducted. Additional MRI measurements
`to detect brain atrophy and new MRI techniques that
`provide greater sensitivity for the detection of brain
`lesions [26] may provide insight into the potential ef-
`fects of FAE on disease activity in patients with
`RRMS. Given the baseline-controlled nature of this
`study,
`the possibility that patients were recruited
`during a period of high disease activity must be
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS European Journal of Neurology 13, 604–610
`
`Figure 3 Expression of Th1- and Th2-like cytokines examined in
`CD4+ T cells by flow cytometry. (a) Expression levels of inter-
`leukin-10 over the course of the study. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline. (b)
`Expression levels of interferon-c over the course of the study. No
`significant differences from baseline levels were observed at any
`time point.
`
`(Fig. 3a). Increases in IL-10 levels at weeks 24 and
`(P < 0.05)
`28 were
`statistically significant
`com-
`pared with baseline. In contrast, the expression of
`Th1-type cytokines such as IFN-c was not significantly
`affected (Fig. 3b). The rate of apoptosis increased
`in both the total lymphocyte population and CD4+
`lymphocyte population, from 7% at baseline to 11%
`at week 6 (Fig. 4). In the total lymphocyte population
`the apoptotic rate was 12% at baseline and increased
`to 17% at week 6 (not shown). The increases in
`apoptotic rates were not sustained, and by week 12 the
`rate of apoptosis had returned to baseline levels in
`lymphocyte population and CD4+
`both the total
`population.
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 005
`
`

`

`considered. A 6-week baseline period was included to
`control for this possibility. The fact that EDSS scores
`were stable throughout the study suggests that patients
`did not experience a period of at least clinically high
`disease activity during the baseline phase where all
`patients were clinically stable and have had a mini-
`mum of 30 days without corticosteroid treatment at
`study entry.
`Commonalities exist between MS and psoriasis in
`terms of immune function changes that may explain
`the efficacy of FAE in both psoriasis and MS. For
`example, the balance between the production of pro-
`inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines may be
`important to both diseases. In this regard, it is inter-
`esting to note that treatments beneficial to both dis-
`eases also affect this balance. In one study, the clinical
`benefits of FAE in psoriasis, as measured by the Pso-
`riasis Area and Severity Index, were associated with
`reductions in IFN-c and leukocytes [27]. In vitro sti-
`mulation of T cells in the presence of monomethyl-
`fumarate, the metabolic product of dimethylfumarate,
`enhanced IL-4 production in primed CD4/CD45RO+
`T cells [13]. Cytokines play a central role in the
`immune-mediated processes that contribute to axonal
`degeneration and neuronal dysfunction in MS [28]. The
`evaluation of
`intracellular cytokine expression in
`CD4+ T cells in the present study suggests that FAE
`therapy may shift cytokine responses, increasing the
`production of potentially beneficial cytokines such as
`IL-10. Although there was a significant limitation in
`the present study due to the relatively small number of
`patients involved, the changes observed in IL-10 and
`apoptotic rates suggest that FAE therapy may posi-
`tively influence cytokine responses in CD4+ cells. This
`possibility is also supported by recent results that FAE
`therapy has shown positive results in an animal model
`of MS, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
`(EAE) [29].
`In summary, FAE treatment was well tolerated in
`patients with MS and a reduction in disease activity, as
`measured by MRI brain scans and a beneficial shift in
`cytokine expression in the CD4+ lymphocyte popula-
`tion, was observed. These results suggest that further
`studies using larger patient populations are warranted
`to evaluate the efficacy of FAE alone, or as add-on to
`current therapy, on relapse rate and disease progression
`in patients with MS.
`
`AuthorsÕ contributions
`
`SS wrote the first draft of the article, which was circu-
`lated to the other authors. All authors checked the
`pertinent references and contributed to the scientific
`content of the article.
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS European Journal of Neurology 13, 604–610
`
`Oral FAE for the treatment of active MS
`
`609
`
`Conflict of interest
`
`The study was supported by Fumapharm AG, Switzer-
`land, in the form of unconditional research grants.
`
`References
`
`1. Cohen SR, Herndon RM, McKhann GM. Radioimmu-
`noassay of myelin basic protein in spinal fluid. An index
`of active demyelination. New England Journal of Medicine
`1976; 295: 1455–1457.
`2. Prineas JW, Kwon EE, Goldenberg PZ, Cho ES, Sharer
`LR. Interaction of astrocytes and newly formed oligo-
`dendrocytes
`in resolving multiple
`sclerosis
`lesions.
`Laboratory Investigation 1990; 63: 624–636.
`3. Traugott U, Reinherz EL, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis.
`Distribution of T cells, T cell subsets and Ia-positive
`macrophages in lesions of different ages. Journal of Neuro-
`immunology 1983; 4: 201–221.
`4. ffrench-Constant C. Pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.
`Lancet 1994; 29: 271–275.
`5. Hartung HP, Reiners K, Archelos JJ, et al. Circulating
`adhesion molecules and tumor necrosis factor receptor in
`multiple sclerosis: correlation with magnetic resonance
`imaging. Annals of Neurology 1995; 38: 186–193.
`6. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weins-
`henker BG. Multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of
`Medicine 2000; 343: 938–952.
`7. Lassmann H, Ransohoff RM. The CD4-Th1 model for
`in
`re-appraisal. Trends
`multiple sclerosis: a crucial
`Immunology 2004; 23: 132–137.
`8. Walsh MJ, Tourtellotte WW. Temporal invariance and
`clonal uniformity of brain and cerebrospinal IgG, IgA,
`and IgM in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Experimental
`Medicine 1986; 163: 41–53.
`9. So¨ derstro¨ m M, Link H, Sun JB, et al. T cells recognizing
`multiple peptides of myelin basic protein are found in
`blood and enriched in cerebrospinal fluid in optic neuritis
`and multiple sclerosis. Scandinavian Journal of Immuno-
`logy 1993; 37: 355–368.
`10. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon
`beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple scler-
`osis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized,
`double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1993;
`43: 655–661.
`11. Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA, et al. Intramuscular
`interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing
`multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 1996; 39: 285–294.
`12. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by
`Interferon b-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis)
`Study Group. Randomised
`double-blind
`placebo-
`controlled study of interferon b-1a in relapsing/remitting
`multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1498–1504.
`13. de Jong R, Bezemer AC, Zomerdijk TP, van de Pouw-
`Kraan T, Ottenhoff TH, Nibbering PH. Selective stimu-
`lation of T helper 2 cytokine responses by anti-psoriasis
`Journal
`of
`agent monomethylfumarate. European
`Immunology 1996; 26: 2067–2074.
`14. Ockenfels HM, Schultewolter T, Ockenfels G, Funk R,
`Goos M. The antipsoriatic agent dimethylfumarate im-
`munomodulates T-cell cytokine secretion and inhibits
`cytokines of the psoriatic cytokine network. British Jour-
`nal of Dermatology 1998; 139: 390–395.
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 006
`
`

`

`610
`
`S. Schimrigk et al.
`
`15. Vandermeeren M, Janssens S, Borgers M, Geysen J. Di-
`methylfumarate is an inhibitor of cytokine-induced E-
`selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in human
`endothelial cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research
`Communications 1997; 234: 19–23.
`16. Bayard W, Hunziker T, Krebs A, Speiser P, Joshi R.
`Peroral long-term treatment of psoriasis using fumaric
`acid derivatives. Hautarzt 1987; 38: 279–285.
`17. Kolbach DN, Nieboer C. Fumaric acid therapy in psori-
`asis: results and side effects of 2 years of treatment.
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1992;
`27: 769–771.
`18. Altmeyer PJ, Matthes U, Pawlak F, et al. Antipsoriatic
`effect of fumaric acid derivates. Results of a multi-
`center double-blind study in 100 patients. Journal of
`the American Academy of Dermatology 1994; 30:
`977–981.
`19. Altmeyer P, Hartwig R, Matthes U. Efficacy and
`safety profile of fumaric acid esters in oral
`long-term
`therapy with severe
`treatment
`refractory psoriasis
`vulgaris. A study of 83 patients. Hautarzt 1996; 47:
`190–196.
`20. Mrowietz U, Christophers E, Altmeyer P. Treatment of
`psoriasis with fumaric acid esters: results of a prospective
`multicentre study. British Journal of Dermatology 1998;
`138: 456–460.
`21. Prinz JC. The role of T cells in psoriasis. Journal of the
`European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2003;
`17: 257–270.
`
`22. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic
`criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research
`protocols. Annals of Neurology 1983; 13: 227–231.
`23. Filippi M, Yousry T, Campi A, et al. Comparison of triple
`dose versus standard dose gadolinium-DTPA for detec-
`tion of MRI enhancing lesions in patients with MS.
`Neurology 1996; 46: 379–384.
`24. Andersson U, Hallden G, Persson U, Hed J, Moller G,
`DeLey M. Enumeration of IFN-gamma-producing cells by
`flow cytometry. Comparison with fluorescence microscopy.
`Journal of Immunological Methods 1988; 112: 139–142.
`25. Jung T, Schauer U, Heusser C, Neumann C, Reiger C.
`Detection of intracellular cytokines by flow cytometry.
`Journal of Immunological Methods 1993; 159: 197–207.
`26. Zivadinov R, Bakshi R. Role of MRI in multiple sclerosis
`I: inflammation and lesions. Frontiers in Bioscience 2004;
`9: 665–683.
`27. Litjens NHR, Nibbering PH, Barrois AJ, et al. Beneficial
`effects of fumarate therapy in psoriasis vulgaris patients
`coincide with downregulation of type 1 cytokines. British
`Journal of Dermatology 2003; 148: 444–451.
`28. Imitola J, Chitnis T, Khoury SJ. Cytokines in multiple
`from bench to bedside. Pharmacology and
`sclerosis:
`therapeutics 2005; 106: 163–177.
`29. Gold R, StadelmannC, Linker R, Diem R, Ba¨ hr M, Bru¨ ck
`W. Neue Erkenntnisse zur Pathogenese der multiplen
`Sklerose. Potential fu¨ r die Erweiterung der therapeutis-
`chen Optionen. Deutsches Arzteblatt 2005; 102: A1204–
`A1210.
`
`Ó 2006 EFNS European Journal of Neurology 13, 604–610
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1018, p. 007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket