throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`SAWAI USA, INC. AND
`
`SAWAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
`
`Petitioners,
`
`V.
`
`BIOGEN MA, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`Patent No. 8,399,514
`
`Inter Partes Review IPR2019-00789
`
`DECLARATION OF TATSUFUMI HIRAMATSU IN SUPPORT OF
`
`PETITIONERS’ RESPONSE REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF
`
`REAL PARTY-IN-INTEREST
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 001
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 001
`
`

`

`I, Tatsufumi Hiramatsu, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I either have personal knowledge of the facts
`
`stated in this
`
`Declaration or believe them to be true based on my experience, review of
`
`business records, or information I have otherwise received in the course of my
`
`duties.
`
`2.
`
`Sawai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (“Sawai Japan”) is a publicly traded
`
`Japanese company.
`
`3.
`
`Sawai, USA, Inc. (“Sawai USA”) is incorporated in the state of
`
`Delaware. Sawai USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sawai Japan. Sawai
`
`USA is the holder of Abbreviated New Drug Application No. 210285 (“ANDA
`
`210285,” “Sawai USA’s ANDA,” or the “ANDA”), which seeks marketing
`
`approval in the United States for delayed release dimethyl fumarate capsules.
`
`4.
`
`Sawai America Holdings, Inc. (“Sawai America Holdings”) is a
`
`Delaware corporation. Sawai America Holdings is a wholly owned subsidiary of
`
`Sawai Japan.
`
`5.
`
`Sawai America, LLC (“Sawai America”) is a Delaware limited
`
`liability company. Sawai America is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sawai
`
`America Holdings.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Stason Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Stason”) is a California corporation.
`
`Upsher—Smith Laboratories, LLC (“Upsher-Smith”) is a Minnesota
`
`2 S
`
`awai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 002
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 002
`
`

`

`limited liability company. Upsher-Smith is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sawai
`
`America.
`
`8.
`
`Sumitomo Corporation is a publicly traded Japanese company. To
`
`the best of my knowledge, Sumitomo Corporation has a number of wholly
`
`owned subsidiaries, one of which is Sumitomo Corporation of Americas
`
`(“SCOA”).
`
`9.
`
`Sawai America Holdings is the majority owner (80%) of Sawai
`
`America. SCOA is the minority owner (20%) of Sawai America.
`
`10.
`
`I am Senior Director, Corporate Strategy for Uspher-Smith LLC.
`
`(“Upsher-Smith”). Upsher—Smith currently pays my salary. Before December
`
`11th, 2017, I was Specialist for “Sawai Japan”.
`
`Sawai USA’s ANDA and the Delaware Litigation
`
`11.
`
`Sawai USA, through its agent Stason, submitted ANDA No. 210285
`
`seeking to market
`
`in the United States dimethyl
`
`fumarate delayed release
`
`capsules. Sawai USA was (and continues to be) the sole named applicant for, and
`
`owner of all right and title to, Sawai USA’sANDA.
`
`12. As part of filing the ANDA, Sawai USA submitted a Paragraph IV
`
`Certification to the FDA, indicating that US. Patent Nos. 6,509,376; 7,320,999;
`
`7,619,001; 7,803,840; 8,759,393; and 8,399,514 (“the ’514 patent”) are invalid
`
`and not infringed. In connection with that Certification, Sawai USA, by its
`
`3
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 003
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 003
`
`

`

`outside counsel, served, among others, Biogen MA, Inc. (“Biogen”) with a
`
`Paragraph IV Notice Letter, which provided a detailed legal and factual basis
`
`supporting the invalidity of the 6,509,376; 7,320,999; 7,619,001; 7,803,840;
`
`8,759,393; and 8,399,514 patents. Stason was named in Sawai USA’s ANDA
`
`and the Paragraph IV Notice Letter as an agent in the United States authorized to
`
`accept service of process for Sawai USA in connection with ANDA No. 210285 .
`
`Stason also had a role in the development of the products described in ANDA
`
`No. 210285.
`
`13.
`
`On June 30, 2017,
`
`in response to the Paragraph IV Notice Letter,
`
`Biogen sued both Sawai USA and Sawai Japan in the US. District Court for the
`
`District of Delaware, alleging infringement of, among other patents, the ’514
`
`patent (the “Delaware Litigation”).
`
`14.
`
`On October 16, 2017, Sawai USA and Sawai Japan filed their
`
`Answer and Counterclaims asserting, among other things, that the ’5 14 patent is
`
`invalid and not
`
`infringed. The Delaware Litigation remains pending against
`
`Sawai USA and Sawai Japan. All aspects of the Delaware Litigation are
`
`controlled, overseen and paid for by either Sawai Japan or Sawai USA.
`
`The Pending IPR Proceeding
`
`15.
`
`On or about February 2019, Sawai Japan and Sawai USA decided to
`
`prepare a petition for inter partes review of the ’514 patent. That decision was
`
`4
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 004
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 004
`
`

`

`solely made by Sawai Japan and Sawai USA. Neither Sumitomo Corporation
`
`nor SCOA had any involvement in that decision making process.
`
`16.
`
`On March 5, 2019, Sawai Japan and Sawai USA filed: (i) a petition
`
`for inter partes review of the ’514 patent; and (ii) a motion for joinder with a
`
`pending inter partes review filed by Mylan Pharmaceuticals,
`
`Inc., Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Biogen MA, Inc, IPR2018-01403 (together the “IPR
`
`Proceeding"). All aspects the IPR Proceeding are controlled, overseen and paid
`
`for by Sawai Japan.
`
`17.
`
`It is my understanding that on April 5, 2019, Biogen MA, Inc. filed
`
`an Opposition to the Motion for Joinder, wherein it cited a press release (Ex.
`
`2001) and website (Ex. 2002), alleging that Sumitomo Corporation “meets the
`
`criteria of an RPI as it has ‘management participationm in Upsher-Smith. Biogen
`
`Opposition, p. 9.
`
`Neither Sumitomo Corporation Nor SCOA Have Any Role in Sawai USA’s
`ANDA, the Delaware Litigation, or the IPR Proceeding
`
`18. Neither Sumitomo Corporation nor SCOA have any control,
`
`influence, decision-making authority, or otherwise participate in any actions
`
`regarding Sawai USA’s ANDA, the Delaware Litigation, or the IPR Proceeding.
`
`19.
`
`In January 2018, SCOA — not Sumitomo Corporation — became a
`
`20% minority owner of Sawai America. Sawai America is in turn the 100%
`
`owner of Upsher—Smith.
`
`5
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 005
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 005
`
`

`

`20.
`
`Sawai Japan and Sawai USA are n_ot owned or controlled in any
`
`way by Upsher-Smith, SCOA, or Sumitomo Corporation.
`
`21.
`
`Upsher—Smith is wholly owned by Sawai America. Sawai America
`
`is owned by a majority owner (Sawai America Holdings - 80%) and a minority
`
`owner (SCOA - 20%). Sumitomo Corporation owns 100% of SCOA. Sawai
`
`Japan owns 100% of Sawai America Holdings. Upsher-Smith does not control,
`
`nor does it have the ability to control, in any way the decision making process of
`
`either Sawai Japan or Sawai USA in the Delaware Litigation or the IPR
`
`Proceeding. Nor does Upsher-Smith pay any bills relating to these proceedings.
`
`Rather, Sawai USA intends to engage Upsher-Smith in the future through a
`
`license and supply agreement to sell the products approved under Sawai USA’s
`
`ANDA No. 210285.
`
`22. Sawai Japan or Sawai USA are, and continue to be, the only entities
`
`responsible for directing, controlling, and funding all aspects of the Delaware
`
`Litigation and the IPR Proceeding. Every decision relating to these proceedings
`
`was, and is, under the control and direction of either Sawai Japan or Sawai USA.
`
`Sawai Japan remains the only entity that has paid and pays all filing fees or legal
`
`expenses associated with the Delaware Litigation and the IPR Proceeding.
`
`23. Neither Sumitomo Corporation nor SCOA Sumitomo has ever
`
`exercised any control over the Delaware Litigation and the IPR Proceeding.
`
`6
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 006
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 006
`
`

`

`24.
`
`There are no unified actions between Sawai USA, Sawai Japan and
`
`either Sumitomo Corporation or SCOA with respect to either the Delaware
`
`Litigation or the IPR Proceeding.
`
`25. No Sumitomo Corporation or SCOA officer or director,
`
`in their
`
`capacity as such, has ever acted on behalf of Sawai USA or Sawai Japan in
`
`connection with the Delaware Litigation or
`
`the IPR Proceeding. Neither
`
`Sumitomo Corporation nor SCOA has ever paid any of the legal fees associated
`
`with Delaware Litigation or the IPR Proceeding and is not obligated to provide
`
`either Sawai USA or Sawai Japan with any legal support for these matters.
`
`26.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and that these statements were made with the knowledge that
`
`willful false statements are punishable under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the US.
`
`Code.
`
`7
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 007
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 007
`
`

`

`Dated:
`
`'1“ {7V
`
`lél’lfl
`
`10[6{
`
`Tfl—L ‘ W fiU“ 'k\( 6'1»
`
`Tatsufumi Hiramatsu
`
`8 S
`
`awai (IPR2019-00789) EX. 1060, p. 008
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789) Ex. 1060, p. 008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket