throbber
Volume 22
`
`Number 2, Part 1
`February 1990
`
`10. Girardin E, Dayer JM, Paumer L. Cyclosporine for juve-
`nile dcrmatomyositis [Letter]. .1 Pediatr 1988;112:165-6.
`11. Mikatsch MJ, Bach J F, Cooradia HM, et a1. Cyclosporine-
`associated nephropathy in patients with autoimmune dis~
`eases. Klin Wochenschr 1988;66:43-7.
`12. Myers BD. Cyclosporine—associated chronic nephropathy.
`N Engl J Med 1984;311:699-705.
`
`Fumaric acid therapy for psoriasis: A randomized,
`double-blind, placebo-controlled study
`
`Wieke M. Nugteren-Huying, MD,a
`Jan Gerrit van der Schroeff, MD,a Jo Hermans, PhD,b
`and Dick Suurmond, MDa Ieiden, The Netherlands
`
`During the past few years, fumaric acid therapy for
`psoriasis has gained interest among Dutch and German
`patients. This treatment was empirically devised by the
`German chemist Schweclcendiek1 and further developed
`by the German physician Schz'ifer.2 Fumaric acid therapy
`is based on the following principles: (1) oral treatment
`with monoethyl and dimethyl esters of fumaric acid, (2)
`topical treatment with monoethylfumarate, and (3) a diet
`that forbids the consumption of nuts, spices, wines, and
`distilled products of wine. Because controlled studies have
`not been reported, we decided to investigate the clinical
`efficacy and side effects of fumaric acid therapy.
`
`Patients and methods. Thirty-nine psoriasis patients (12
`women and 27 men), ranging in age from 20 to 73 years (mean
`44 years), entered the study. The patients had to fulfill the fol-
`lowing criteria: (1) involvement of at least 10% of the body sur-
`face, (2) stable disease, (3) normal kidney and liver function, (4)
`no cardiac or gastrointestinal problems, and (5) no current
`pregnancy. The patients were randomly assigned to three
`groups. Group 1 was treated orally with emetic-coated tablets
`containing 120 mg dimethylfumarate, 87 mg calcium monoet-
`hylfumarate, 5 mg magnesium monoethylfumarate, and 3 mg
`zinc monoethylfumarate. Group 2 was treated orally with
`enteric—coated tablets containing 284 mg octyl hydrogen fuma-
`rate, 5 mg magnesium monoethylfumarate, and 3 mg zinc m0-
`noethylfumarate. Group 3 was given orally administered pla-
`cebo tablets. All tablets (provided by Fumapharm AG, Muri,
`Switzerland) had the same appearance, size, and color. The
`deuble-blind treatment lasted 16 weeks for each patient. The
`dosage schedule called for a gradual increase from one to six
`tablets daily. All patients received topical treatment with 5%
`salicylic acid in white petrolatum. From 2 weeks before treat-
`ment until the end of the study, no other antipsoriatic therapy
`was allowed. All patients were asked to follow strictly the dietary
`
`From the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital,8 and the
`Department of Medical Statistics, University of Leiden.b
`Reprint requests: J. G. van der Schroell, MD, Department of Derma-
`tology, University Hospital, PO. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The
`Netherlands.
`
`16/4/13804
`
`Brief communications 311
`
`guidelines associated with fumaric acid therapy (avoidance of
`nuts, spices wines, and distilled products of wine). Extent and
`activity of skin disease were assessed by estimating the percent-
`age of body surface affected with psoriasis and by scoring the
`degree of infiltration and scaling of the plaques (from 0, no in-
`filtration or scaling; to 8, very severe infiltration or scaling). The
`following laboratory investigations were performed: erythrocyte
`sedimentation rate; leukocyte differential count; and determi-
`nation of levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, urea, creatinine,
`AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT), lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline
`phosphatase, gamma glutamyltransferase, total bilirubin, glu-
`cose, and protein. Urinalysis for levels ofglucose and protein and
`24-hour creatinine clearance rate were also performed. Statis-
`tical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test,3 a
`nonparametric analysis of variance.
`
`Results. At baseline no significant differences were
`found among the three groups with regard to sex ratio,
`age, type and duration of psoriasis, extent and severity of
`the skin lesions, and preceding antipsofiatic therapy. Of
`39 patients, 34 completed the study. In the patients
`treated with the combination of monoethyl fumarate and
`dimethylfumarate (group 1, n = 12), the mean percent-
`age of the body surface affected with psoriasis was
`reduced from 21% (at baseline) to 6.7% after 16 weeks.
`This effect was significantly different from the results ob-
`tained in patients of groups 2 (n = 10) and 3 (n= 12)
`(p < 0.01). After 16 weeks of treatment, the mean scores
`for infiltration and scaling were significantly lower in pa-
`tients in group 1 than those in groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.01 ).
`In group 1, six patients showed complete clearance and
`three showed improvement. In group 2 no such results
`were observed, and in group 3 only one patient showed
`improvement.
`The main side effects of the treatment in group 1 were
`flushing (12 patients), diarrhea (13), fatigue (7), and
`nausea (6). One patient became ill as a result of renal in-
`sufficiency. In group 2 diarrhea was the main side effect
`(12 patients). Laboratory investigations showed a tran-
`sient rise in liver function tests in group 1 (eight patients)
`and in group 2 (four). The patient in group 1 in whom a
`reversible renal insufficiency developed showed a rise of
`serum creatinine up to 238 pmol/ L and a 51% reduction
`in the 24-hour creatinine clearance rate. Other abnor-
`
`malities observed in group 1 were transient eosinophilia
`(five patients) and lymphopenia (four).
`Discussion. The results of this study show that oral
`treatment with tablets containing a combination of dim-
`ethyl fumarate and monoethylfumarate may be effective
`in the treatment of psoriasis. This treatment may provide
`a new alternative for patients with severe psoriasis. The
`drawback of fumaric acid therapy may be its side effects.
`Carefully administered,
`low-dose regimens, however,
`may overcome this problem. Further studies with regard
`to the treatment’s long-term therapeutic effects, toxicity,
`and mode of action are needed.
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), EX. 1029, p. 001
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1029, p. 001
`
`

`

`312 Brief communications
`
`REFERENCES
`
`l. Schweckcndiek W. Heilung von Psoriasis vulgaris. Med
`Monatsschr 1959;13:103-4.
`2. Sehz’ifer GN. Fumarséturc lindert die Schuppenfiechte. Se-
`lecta 1984;15:1260—1.
`3. Glantz SA. Primer of biostatistics. New York: McGraw-
`Hill, 1981;269-31l.
`
`Pimou’de in delusions of parasitosis
`
`J. Timothy Damiani, MD,a Franklin P. Flowers, MD,b
`and Douglas K. Pierce, MDb Cross City and
`Gainesville, Florida
`
`Delusions of parasitosis is a type of monosymptomatic
`hypochondriac psychosis (MHP). In MHP the patient’s
`sole complaint focuses on a single delusion. For some, the
`delusion may be their belief in the abnormal shape of their
`face; for others it may take the form of a fantasized odor
`emitted from their body. Dermatologists frequently deal
`with patients who bring a jar full of debris and claim that
`these are creatures that infest their scalp, limbs, or orifices
`(Fig. 1). What seems to set these patients apart is that
`beyond their delusion they are normal, or at least within
`acceptable bounds.
`
`Case report. A 71-year-old white woman had an 8-month
`history of burning and itching of the scalp. She had been treated
`without success with antibiotics and shampoos. Physical exam-
`ination revealed keratotic papules and a few areas of patchy
`alopecia. Results of laboratory studies revealed no significant
`abnormality. Prurigo nodularis was diagnosed and the patient
`was treated with oral doxepin, 25 mg, taken at bedtime.
`Shortly thereafter, she reported “something crawling under
`my scalp" and was convinced thatsome bugs were either “dead"
`or “moving around” on her scalp. The doxepin was discontinued
`and she was treated with oral pimozide, 1 mg, twice a day. In-
`one month the patient was much improved although she still had
`a burning sensation of the scalp. The dosage of pimozide was
`increased to 2 mg twice a day and the complaints subsided. She
`discontinued her medication at 6 months and the delusions re-
`
`turned. Pimozide, 2 mg, twice a day was given again and the
`patient’s symptoms were under control for an additional year.
`
`Discussion. Pimozide is approved for the treatment of
`chronic schizophrenia and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome
`but has also been found effective in the treatment of
`
`MHP.“6 In addition, Duke5 found that patients who had
`postherpetic neuralgia with neurotic excoriations, symp-
`toms of delusions of parasitosis, or both also benefited
`
`From the US. Public Health Service, Cross City,“ and the Division of
`Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Florida College of
`Medicine, Gainesville.”
`Reprint recruests: Franklin P. Flowers, MD, Division of Dermatology,
`University of Florida, Box J-277, .lHMHC, Gainesvillc, FL 32610.
`16/1/13805
`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`
`
`Fig. 1. Patients with delusions of parasitosis may bring
`in assorted scale and debris to “prove that they are
`infested.”
`
`from pimozide. Only patients with severe pain and no
`other complaint did not benefit from the drug.4 However,
`Hamaun7 observed pimozide to be effective in a case of
`onychotillomania.
`Contraindications to pimozide include vascular insuf—
`ficiency of the central nervous system, blood dyscrasias,
`Parkinson’s disease, prolonged congenital QT syndrome,
`cardiac dysrhythmias, or drugs that prolong the QT
`interval. Pimozide also reduces the convulsive threshold
`
`and should be used with caution in persons with epilepsy.
`Its safety has not been established in children or pregnant
`women.
`
`Acute and transient adverse effects include extrapyra-
`midal reactions (restlessness, dystonia, parkinsonism).
`Tardive dyskinesia is a serious reaction; elderly patients
`receiving high—dose therapy are at greatest risk. This may
`be irreversible after long-term use of the drug. However,
`fine vermicular movements of the tongue may be an early
`sign of tardive dyskinesia; if the medication is stopped at
`that time, the syndrome may disappear. Electrocardio»
`graphic changes have been reported with prolongation of
`QT interval, T-wave changes, and the appearance of
`U waves. Sudden unexpected deaths and grand mal sei-
`zures have occurred at doses greater than 20 mg/day.
`Dosage, after a baseline electrocardiogram, should be
`begun at 1 to 2 mg/day in divided doses. Dosage may be
`increased every other day; however, doses greater than 0.2
`mg/kg/day or 10 mg/day are not recommended. In no
`case should the dose exceed 0.3 mg/kg/day or 20
`mg/day.3
`Gould and Gragg9 recommended that, in a patient who
`has delusions of parasitosis, the role of the dermatologist
`should be to rule out other causes of pruritus that may
`contribute in some way to the delusion. Any attempt at
`referral to a psychiatrist will be often resisted. In fact, it
`may even alienate a patient who has already chosen the
`type of treatment he or she wants or will accept.
`Munro2 recommends that all patients with diagnoses
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), EX. 1029, p. 002
`
`Sawai (IPR2019-00789), Ex. 1029, p. 002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket