`
`original article
`
`The Complement Inhibitor Eculizumab
`in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria
`
`Peter Hillmen, M.B., Ch.B., Ph.D., Neal S. Young, M.D., Jörg Schubert, M.D.,
`Robert A. Brodsky, M.D., Gerard Socié, M.D., Ph.D., Petra Muus, M.D., Ph.D.,
`Alexander Röth, M.D., Jeffrey Szer, M.B., B.S., Modupe O. Elebute, M.D.,
`Ryotaro Nakamura, M.D., Paul Browne, M.B., Antonio M. Risitano, M.D., Ph.D.,
`Anita Hill, M.B., Ch.B., Hubert Schrezenmeier, M.D., Chieh-Lin Fu, M.D.,
`Jaroslaw Maciejewski, M.D., Ph.D., Scott A. Rollins, Ph.D.,
`Christopher F. Mojcik, M.D., Ph.D., Russell P. Rother, Ph.D., and Lucio Luzzatto, M.D.
`
`A BS TR AC T
`
`BACKGROUND
`We tested the safety and efficacy of eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody
`against terminal complement protein C5 that inhibits terminal complement activa-
`tion, in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
`
`METHODS
`We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3
`trial. Patients received either placebo or eculizumab intravenously; eculizumab was
`given at a dose of 600 mg weekly for 4 weeks, followed 1 week later by a 900-mg
`dose and then 900 mg every other week through week 26. The two primary end
`points were the stabilization of hemoglobin levels and the number of units of
`packed red cells transfused. Biochemical indicators of intravascular hemolysis and
`the patients’ quality of life were also assessed.
`
`RESULTS
`Eighty-seven patients underwent randomization. Stabilization of hemoglobin levels
`in the absence of transfusions was achieved in 49% (21 of 43) of the patients as-
`signed to eculizumab and none (0 of 44) of those assigned to placebo (P<0.001).
`During the study, a median of 0 units of packed red cells was administered in the
`eculizumab group, as compared with 10 units in the placebo group (P<0.001). Ecu-
`lizumab reduced intravascular hemolysis, as shown by the 85.8% lower median area
`under the curve for lactate dehydrogenase plotted against time (in days) in the eculi-
`zumab group, as compared with the placebo group (58,587 vs. 411,822 U per liter;
`P<0.001). Clinically significant improvements were also found in the quality of life,
`as measured by scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-
`Fatigue instrument (P<0.001) and the European Organization for Research and
`Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Of the 87 patients, 4 in the ecu-
`lizumab group and 9 in the placebo group had serious adverse events, none of which
`were considered to be treatment-related; all these patients recovered without se-
`quelae.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Eculizumab is an effective therapy for PNH. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00122330.)
`
`From Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds,
`United Kingdom (P.H., A.H.); National
`Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethes-
`da, MD (N.S.Y.); Saarland University Med-
`ical School, Homburg-Saarland, Germany
`(J. Schubert); Sidney Kimmel Comprehen-
`sive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Bal-
`timore (R.A.B.); Hôpital Saint-Louis and
`INSERM, Paris (G.S.); Radboud Univer-
`sity Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Neth-
`erlands (P.M.); University Hospital of
` Essen, Essen, Germany (A.R.); Royal Mel-
`bourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne,
`Australia (J. Szer); St. George Hospital,
`London (M.O.E.); City of Hope National
`Medical Center and Beckman Research
`Institute, Duarte, CA (R.N.); St. James’
`Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin
`(P.B.); Federico II University, Naples
`(A.M.R.); the Institute of Transfusion Med-
`icine, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
`(H.S.); Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston,
`FL (C.-L.F.); Taussig Cancer Center, Cleve-
`land Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (J.M.);
`Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Cheshire, CT
`(S.A.R., C.F.M., R.P.R.); and Istituto To-
`scano Tumori, Florence, Italy (L.L.). Ad-
`dress reprint requests to Dr. Hillmen at
`the Department of Haematology, Leeds
`General Infirmary, Great George St., Leeds
`LS1 3EX, United Kingdom, or at peter.
`hillmen@nhs.net.
`
`N Engl J Med 2006;355:1233-43.
`Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`1233
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`1
`
`AMG1012
`
`
`
`T h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dic i ne
`
`Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobin-
`
`uria (PNH), an uncommon form of hemo-
`lytic anemia, results from the clonal expan-
`sion of hematopoietic stem cells that have somatic
`mutations in the X-linked gene PIG-A.1,2 PIG-A mu-
`tations cause an early block in the synthesis of
`glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors, which
`tether many proteins to the cell surface. Conse-
`quently, the blood cells in patients with PNH have
`a partial deficiency (type II) or a complete defi-
`ciency (type III) of GPI-linked proteins.
`Intravascular hemolysis is a prominent feature
`of PNH and is the consequence of the absence of
`the GPI-linked complement regulatory protein
`CD59.3,4 CD59 blocks the formation of the termi-
`nal complement complex (also called the mem-
`brane-attack complex) on the cell surface, thereby
`preventing erythrocyte lysis and in vitro platelet
`activation.5-8 Excessive or persistent intravascular
`hemolysis in patients with PNH causes anemia,
`hemoglobinuria, and complications related to the
`presence of plasma free hemoglobin, including
`thrombosis, abdominal pain, dysphagia, erectile
`dysfunction, and pulmonary hypertension.9-12 In-
`deed, the symptoms in PNH are often dispropor-
`tionate to the degree of anemia. Many patients
`with this disease are dependent on transfusions.
`Currently, there is no therapy that effectively re-
`duces intravascular hemolysis or improves the
`symptoms in patients with PNH.
`Eculizumab (Soliris, Alexion Pharmaceuticals)
`is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed
`against the terminal complement protein C5.13 In
`a preliminary, 12-week, open-label clinical study
`involving 11 patients with PNH, eculizumab re-
`duced intravascular hemolysis and the patients’
`transfusion requirements.14 However, this two-
`center, uncontrolled study did not have a control
`group or predefined criteria for the administra-
`tion of a transfusion, such as a predefined hemo-
`globin level at which transfusions were adminis-
`tered or a prespecified number of units of packed
`red cells for a given hemoglobin level.
`We report the results of the phase 3 Transfu-
`sion Reduction Efficacy and Safety Clinical Inves-
`tigation, a Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind,
`Placebo-Controlled, Using Eculizumab in Parox-
`ysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (TRIUMPH)
`study, which investigated whether eculizumab
`stabilized hemoglobin levels and reduced trans-
`fusion requirements in 87 transfusion-dependent
`patients with PNH during 6 months of treatment.
`
`Intravascular hemolysis and the quality of life
`were also assessed.
`
`Me thods
`
`Patients
`The trial consisted of a 2-week screening period,
`an observation period of up to 3 months, and a
`26-week treatment period. Patients 18 years of age
`or older who had received at least four transfu-
`sions during the previous 12 months were eligi-
`ble. A PNH type III erythrocyte proportion of 10%
`or more, platelet counts of at least 100,000 per
`cubic millimeter, and lactate dehydrogenase levels
`that were at least 1.5 times the upper limit of the
`normal range were also required. Concomitant
`administration of erythropoietin, immunosup-
`pressive drugs, corticosteroids, coumarins, low-
`molecular-weight heparins, iron supplements, and
`folic acid were permitted, provided that the doses
`were constant before and throughout the study.
`Because persons who have a genetic deficiency of
`terminal complement proteins have an increased
`risk of neisserial infections, all patients were vac-
`cinated against Neisseria meningitidis with the use
`of locally approved vaccines. The protocol was
`approved by the institutional review board at
`each center, and all patients gave written informed
`consent.
`Patients receiving transfusions who had a
`mean hemoglobin level greater than 10.5 g per
`deciliter before transfusion during the 12 months
`before entry into the study or who had received
`another investigational drug within 30 days be-
`fore the first visit were excluded. Patients who
`had a complement deficiency, an active bacterial
`infection, or a history of meningococcal disease
`and those who had undergone bone marrow
`transplantation were also excluded.
`An individualized transfusion algorithm was
`calculated for each patient on the basis of the
`history of transfusions during the previous 12
`months; the written algorithm documented the
`number of units of packed red cells to be trans-
`fused for given hemoglobin values and served as
`a prospectively determined guide for transfusion
`during the observation and treatment periods.
`Before randomization, eligible patients were ob-
`served for up to 13 weeks. Patients who did not
`require a transfusion during the observation pe-
`riod were considered ineligible. A transfusion ad-
`ministered to a patient who had a hemoglobin
`
`1234
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`2
`
`
`
`eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
`
`level of 9 g per deciliter or less with symptoms
`or 7 g per deciliter or less with or without symp-
`toms qualified the patient for the study (qualify-
`ing transfusion) and established the hemoglobin
`set point. This set point was required for the pri-
`mary efficacy variable and was individualized for
`each patient.
`
`Study Design
`Randomization was performed centrally in a 1:1
`ratio without blocking and with stratification ac-
`cording to the number of units of packed red cells
`transfused during the past year; patients were as-
`signed, by means of an interactive voice–response
`system, to receive either placebo or eculizumab
`within 10 days after the administration of the
`qualifying transfusion. Patients received infusions
`of 600 mg of eculizumab or placebo every week
`(±2 days) for 4 weeks, followed 1 week (±2 days)
`later by 900 mg of eculizumab or placebo, and
`then by a maintenance dose of 900 mg of eculi-
`zumab or placebo every 2 weeks (±2 days) through
`week 26.
`
`global health status and functioning scales and
`lower scores on the symptom scales and single-
`improvement)16;
`item measures
`indicating
`changes in lactate dehydrogenase levels from
`baseline through week 26; and the presence of
`thrombosis. Other prespecified measurements
`included the pharmacokinetics, pharmacody-
`namics, and immunogenicity of eculizumab. The
`time to the first transfusion during the treat-
`ment period and the proportion of PNH type III
`blood cells were assessed.
`
`Safety
`Adverse events related to study infusions and vi-
`tal signs (assessed at each of the 17 study visits
`during treatment), the results of biochemical analy-
`ses and blood counts (assessed at 9 visits), and find-
`ings on electrocardiograms (assessed at 3 visits)
`were documented. Adverse events were coded with
`the use of preferred terms from the Medical Dic-
`tionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (www.
`msso.org/MSSOWeb/index.htm) and tabulated as
`incidence rates in the two study groups.
`
`Clinical Efficacy
`The two primary end points were the stabiliza-
`tion of hemoglobin levels, defined as a hemoglo-
`bin value that was maintained above the level at
`which the qualifying transfusion was adminis-
`tered, in the absence of transfusions during the
`26-week treatment period, and the number of
`units of packed red cells transfused during that
`period. The trigger for the administration of trans-
`fusions during the study remained unchanged:
`patients received transfusions when they had symp-
`toms resulting from anemia and their hemoglo-
`bin levels reached the individualized, predeter-
`mined set point. Prespecified secondary end points
`included transfusion independence; hemolysis, as
`measured by the lactate dehydrogenase value for
`the area under the curve from baseline to 26 weeks;
`and changes in the level of fatigue, as assessed
`from baseline to 26 weeks with the use of the
`Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-
`Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) instrument (scores can
`range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating
`improvement in fatigue).15 Prespecified explor-
`atory analyses included assessment of the quality
`of life with the use of the European Organization
`for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of
`Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (scores can
`range from 0 to 100, with higher scores on the
`
`Statistical Analysis
`The planned sample size of 75 patients provided
`the study with a statistical power of 82%, at an
`alpha level of 0.05, to detect an increase of 35 per-
`centage points (i.e., a change from 20% to 55%)
`in the rate of the stabilization of hemoglobin lev-
`els and a reduction in the median number of units
`of packed red cells transfused from 6 to 2 (±2).
`For the two primary end points, the analyses
`were performed according to the intention-to-
`treat principle with the use of data on all 87 pa-
`tients who underwent randomization; stabiliza-
`tion of hemoglobin levels was analyzed with the
`use of Fisher’s exact test, and the total number of
`units of packed red cells transfused was analyzed
`with the use of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. To
`assess the effect of treatment on whether or not
`transfusions were required, Fisher’s exact test
`was used. The log-rank test was used to compare
`the time to the first transfusion in the two groups.
`The area under the curve for lactate dehydroge-
`nase was compared between the two groups with
`the use of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
`Fatigue was assessed according to the scoring
`guidelines for the FACIT-Fatigue instrument.17
`The assessment of the quality of life was based
`on the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores and was conduct-
`ed as described previously.18 Changes in scores
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`1235
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`3
`
`
`
`T h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dic i ne
`
`on the FACIT-Fatigue instrument and the EORTC
`QLQ-C30 instrument from baseline through week
`26 were analyzed with the use of a mixed model,
`with baseline scores as the covariate, treatment
`and time as fixed effects, and the patient identi-
`fier as a random effect. Changes in the levels of
`lactate dehydrogenase, PNH type III erythrocytes,
`and hemoglobin from baseline through week 26
`were analyzed with the use of the same mixed
`model. All reported P values are two-sided and
`were not adjusted for multiple analyses. The inci-
`dence rates of adverse events were compared with
`the use of Fisher’s exact test. No interim analyses
`were performed, and blinding regarding the re-
`sults was maintained until the end of the study.
`The authors and the sponsor were jointly re-
`sponsible for the trial design and the development
`of the protocol. Data were collected by an elec-
`tronic case-report form with the use of InForm
`software (version 4.0, Phase Forward) and were
`analyzed by the sponsor. The decision to publish
`
`Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.
`
`Characteristic
`
`Sex — no.
`
`Male
`
`Female
`
`Age — yr
`
`Median
`
`Range
`
`Duration of PNH — yr
`
`Median
`
`Range
`Reticulocyte counts — per mm3
`Median
`
`Range
`
`Placebo Group
`(N = 44)
`
`Eculizumab Group
`(N = 43)
`
`15
`
`29
`
`35
`
`20
`
`23
`
`41
`
`18–78
`
`20–85
`
`9.2
`
`0.5–38.5
`
`4.3
`
`0.9–29.8
`
`204,400
`
`206,600
`
`45,400–556,200
`
`40,200–570,400
`
`History of aplastic anemia — no. (%)
`
`12 (27)
`
`History of myelodysplastic syndrome
`— no. (%)
`
`0
`
`History of thrombosis — no. (%)
`
`8 (18)
`
`Total no. of thrombotic events
`
`Use of erythropoietin — no. (%)
`
`Use of cyclosporine — no. (%)
`
`Use of anticoagulant agents (couma-
`rins or heparins) — no. (%)
`
`Use of corticosteroids or androgenic
`steroids — no. (%)
`
`11
`
`0
`
`1 (2)
`
`11 (25)
`
`12 (27)
`
`6 (14)
`
`2 (5)
`
`9 (21)
`
`16
`
`3 (7)
`
`1 (2)
`
`21 (49)
`
`12 (28)
`
`the trial data and final decisions on the content
`of the manuscript rested with Dr. Hillmen in
`consultation with the other authors. The manu-
`script was prepared by Dr. Hillmen, with sub-
`stantial review and comments by the other au-
`thors. All authors had access to the primary data
`and take responsibility for the veracity and com-
`pleteness of the data reported.
`
`R esults
`
`Patients’ Characteristics
`Of a total of 115 patients with PNH who under-
`went screening, 87 (35 men and 52 women) at 34
`sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, and
`Australia who received a qualifying transfusion,
`met the inclusion criteria and did not meet any of
`the exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to
`eculizumab (43 patients) or placebo (44 patients)
`between October 2004 and June 2005. At each of
`16 sites one patient underwent randomization, at
`each of 6 sites two patients underwent random-
`ization, and at each of 12 sites 3 or more patients
`underwent randomization. There were no signifi-
`cant differences in the baseline characteristics of
`the patients in the two groups (Table 1).
`Of 87 patients who underwent randomization,
`85 completed the trial (see the Supplementary
`Appendix, available with the full text of this ar-
`ticle at www.nejm.org). Two patients in the ecu-
`lizumab group did not complete the trial, one
`because traveling to the study center was incon-
`venient and the other because of pregnancy; these
`patients were included in the analyses. Ten pa-
`tients in the placebo group discontinued infu-
`sions because of a perceived lack of efficacy but
`remained in the study for monitoring, as pre-
`specified in the protocol, and were included in
`the analyses.
`
`Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
`In 42 of 43 patients in the eculizumab group, a
`900-mg dose of eculizumab every 2 weeks (±2
`days) completely blocked serum hemolytic activ-
`ity, as assessed by a presensitized erythrocyte
`hemolytic assay,14 throughout the study period.
`In one patient, therapeutic trough levels of eculi-
`zumab were not maintained.
`
`Effect on Hemolysis
`The effect of eculizumab on chronic intravascu-
`lar hemolysis was demonstrated by an immediate
`
`
`
`1236
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`4
`
`
`
`eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
`
`(1 week) and sustained decrease in lactate dehy-
`drogenase levels (Fig. 1A). In the eculizumab
`group, the mean (±SE) lactate dehydrogenase
`level decreased from 2199.7±157.7 U per liter at
`
`baseline to 327.3±67.6 U per liter at 26 weeks,
`whereas in the placebo group the levels remained
`elevated, with values of 2258.0±154.8 U per liter
`at baseline and 2418.9±140.3 U per liter at 26
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`Level (U/liter)
`
`Lactate Dehydrogenase
`
`Screening
`period
`
`No. of Patients
`Placebo group
`Eculizumab group
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Placebo
`
`P<0.001
`
`Eculizumab
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`14
`Week
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`44
`43
`
`43
`43
`
`44
`43
`
`44
`43
`
`43
`43
`
`43
`43
`
`43
`43
`
`42
`41
`
`43
`41
`
`44
`40
`
`42
`40
`
`44
`41
`
`Eculizumab
`
`P<0.001
`
`Placebo
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`PNH Type III Erythrocytes (%)
`
`Screening
`period
`
`No. of Patients
`Placebo group
`Eculizumab group
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`14
`Week
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`44
`43
`
`44
`42
`
`42
`43
`
`42
`41
`
`Figure 1. Levels of Lactate Dehydrogenase and PNH Type III Erythrocytes during Treatment with Eculizumab.
`Panel A shows the degree of intravascular hemolysis according to the mean levels of lactate dehydrogenase from
`baseline (week 0) to week 26 in the two study groups. The dashed line indicates the upper limit of the normal range
`for lactate dehydrogenase (normal range, 103 to 223 U per liter). In the eculizumab group the mean level of lactate
`dehydrogenase was reduced to just above the upper limit of the normal range at week 26; of 41 patients in this
`group who completed the study, 15 had levels within the normal range. In the placebo group, all patients had levels
`at least five times above the upper limit of normal at week 26. Panel B shows the mean proportion of PNH type III
`erythrocytes in patients in the two groups. Screening occurred up to 3 months before week 0. P values are from
`a mixed analysis-of-covariance model from baseline through week 26. I bars indicate the standard error.
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`1237
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`5
`
`
`
`T h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dic i ne
`
`weeks (P<0.001). The median value of the areas
`under the curve for lactate dehydrogenase plot-
`ted against time (in days) was 85.8% lower in the
`eculizumab group than in the placebo group
`(58,587 vs. 411,822 U per liter; P<0.001). A sec-
`ond biochemical measure of hemolysis, the serum
`level of aspartate aminotransferase, also showed
`significant improvement with eculizumab, as com-
`pared with placebo (data not shown).
`The reduction in intravascular hemolysis in the
`eculizumab group resulted in an increase in PNH
`type III erythrocytes (Fig. 1B) from a mean of
`28.1±2.0% at baseline to 56.9±3.6% at week 26.
`The proportion of PNH type III erythrocytes in
`patients in the placebo group remained constant
`(35.7±2.8% before treatment and 35.5±2.8% at
`26 weeks, P<0.001 for the comparison with the
`eculizumab group and the placebo group). The
`proportion of PNH type III granulocytes and
`monocytes did not change significantly between
`the two groups (data not shown).
`
`Clinical Efficacy
`Primary End Points
`The two primary efficacy end points were the
`stabilization of hemoglobin levels and the num-
`ber of units of packed red cells transfused. At the
`end of the treatment period, 49% of patients in
`the eculizumab group (21 of 43) had levels of he-
`moglobin that remained above the prespecified
`set point (median, 7.7 g per deciliter for both
`groups) in the absence of transfusions, whereas
`
`stabilization of hemoglobin levels did not occur in
`any patient in the placebo group (P<0.001) (Table
`2). By week 26, the median number of units of
`packed red cells transfused per patient was 0 in
`the eculizumab group and 10 in the placebo
`group (P<0.001), whereas the mean number of
`units of packed red cells transfused was 3.0±0.7
`and 11.0±0.8, respectively. In the 6-month period
`before the study, the median number of units of
`packed red cells transfused per patient was 9.0 in
`the eculizumab cohort and 8.5 in the placebo
`cohort, and the mean number of units of packed
`red cells transfused was 9.6±0.6 and 9.7±0.7, re-
`spectively. The mean hemoglobin levels changed
`from 10.0±0.2 g per deciliter and 9.7±0.2 g per
`deciliter in the eculizumab group and the placebo
`group, respectively, at baseline to 10.1±0.2 g per
`deciliter and 8.9±0.2 g per deciliter, respectively,
`at week 26 (P<0.001, by mixed-model analysis).
`The median time to the first transfusion was
`significantly longer in eculizumab-treated patients
`than in patients who received placebo (P<0.001)
`(Fig. 2). Transfusion independence was achieved
`in 51% of patients in the eculizumab group (22
`of 43) and 0% of those in the placebo group
`(0 of 44, P<0.001). By week 26, the total number
`of units of packed red cells transfused was 131
`in the eculizumab group and 482 in the placebo
`group (Table 2). By contrast, during the 6 months
`before the study, the total number of units trans-
`fused was 413 in the eculizumab group and 417
`in the placebo group.
`
`Table 2. Stabilization of Hemoglobin Levels and the Number of Units of Packed Red Cells Transfused
`during Treatment.*
`
`Primary End Point
`
`Before Treatment†
`
`During Treatment
`
`P Value
`
`Placebo
`Group
`
`Eculizumab
`Group
`
`Placebo
`Group
`
`Eculizumab
`Group
`
`Patients with stabilized hemoglobin levels (%)
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`0
`
`49
`
`<0.001‡
`
`Packed red cells transfused
`(units/patient)
`
`Median
`
`Interquartile range
`
`Mean
`
`Total
`
`8.5
`
`7–12.5
`
`9.7±0.7
`
`417
`
`9.0
`
`6–12
`
`9.6±0.6
`
`413
`
`10
`
`6–16
`
`0
`
`0–6
`
`11.0±0.8
`
`3.0±0.7
`
`482
`
`131
`
`<0.001§
`
`* Plus–minus values are means ±SE. NA denotes not applicable.
`† Transfusion data obtained during 12 months before treatment were normalized to a value equivalent to the value for
`a 6-month period.
`‡ The P value is for the comparison between groups during treatment, calculated with the use of a two-tailed Fisher’s ex-
`act test.
`§ The P value is for the comparison between groups during treatment, calculated with the use of the Wilcoxon rank-sum
`test.
`
`1238
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`6
`
`
`
`eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
`
`Eculizumab
`
`Placebo
`
`P<0.001
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`Patients Remaining Transfusion Independent (%)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`14
`Week
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`No. at Risk
`Placebo group
`Eculizumab group
`
`44
`43
`
`44
`41
`
`36
`41
`
`30
`39
`
`23
`37
`
`13
`36
`
`7
`36
`
`6
`32
`
`3
`32
`
`1
`31
`
`0
`27
`
`0
`27
`
`0
`26
`
`0
`26
`
`0
`24
`
`0
`22
`
`Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Curves for the Time to the First Transfusion during Treatment.
`The P value for the comparison of times to the first transfusion between the two groups was calculated by the log-
`rank test.
`
`Quality of Life
`Assessments of the quality of life were performed
`with the use of two instruments, the FACIT-Fatigue
`instrument and the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument.
`Patients in the eculizumab group had a mean
`increase (improvement) in scores on the FACIT-
`Fatigue instrument of 6.4±1.2 points from baseline
`to week 26, whereas in the placebo group the mean
`score decreased by 4.0±1.7 points during this pe-
`riod, for a total difference between the two groups
`of 10.4 points (Fig. 3). A mixed-model analysis of
`covariance was performed that showed a signifi-
`cant difference between the two groups (P<0.001).
`With respect to the EORTC QLQ-C30 instru-
`ment, the eculizumab group had significant
`improvements in scores on the scale for global
`health status, on all five scales for functioning,
`on two of three symptom scales, and on three of
`six single-item measures, as compared with the
`placebo group (P≤0.01 for each scale and mea-
`sure) (Table 3).
`
`Safety
`No patients died during the study. Serious ad-
`verse events were reported in 13 patients: 4 in the
`
`eculizumab group and 9 in the placebo group
`(Table 4). No serious adverse events were consid-
`ered to be treatment-related; all these patients re-
`covered without sequelae. The most common ad-
`verse events reported in the eculizumab group were
`headache, nasopharyngitis, back pain, and nausea.
`Headache and back pain occurred more frequent-
`ly in the eculizumab group than in the placebo
`group. The number of headaches that occurred was
`similar in the two groups after the first 2 weeks
`of therapy. There were no significant differences
`in the incidence rates between the two groups for
`any reported adverse event. A single thrombosis
`occurred in a patient in the placebo group.
`One patient in each of the two groups had de-
`tectable levels of antibodies against eculizumab.
`The levels were low, were detected at a single
`visit, and in the patient receiving eculizumab,
`the antibodies did not affect complement inhi-
`bition.
`
`Discussion
`
`Patients with PNH have chronic intravascular he-
`molysis with acute exacerbations. Anemia and the
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`1239
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`7
`
`
`
`T h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dic i ne
`
`Eculizumab
`
`Placebo
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`8
`
`46
`
`2 0
`
`
`
`–2
`
`–4
`
`–6
`
`Change from Baseline in Fatigue Score
`
`No. of Patients
`Placebo group
`Eculizumab group
`
`41
`43
`
`39
`41
`
`41
`43
`
`41
`43
`
`40
`43
`
`Week
`
`40
`42
`
`36
`36
`
`39
`41
`
`Figure 3. Change in Fatigue Scores from Baseline to Week 26.
`Week 0 (baseline) represents the end of the observation period, within 10 days after the patient’s receipt of the
`qualifying blood transfusion. Fatigue scores are therefore higher (indicating less fatigue) at week 0 than at the initial
`screening visits (data not shown). Values for the change from baseline (dashed line) represent means. A positive
`change from baseline indicates an improvement in fatigue and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsen-
`ing in fatigue. I bars indicate the standard error.
`
`need for transfusions to sustain hemoglobin lev-
`els occur frequently, as does deterioration of the
`patient’s quality of life. In this study, in approxi-
`mately half the patients treated with eculizumab,
`the end points of stabilization of hemoglobin lev-
`els and transfusion independence were reached,
`whereas none of the patients in the placebo group
`reached either of these end points. The median
`time to the first transfusion was 4 weeks in the
`placebo group and more than 6 months in the
`eculizumab group. The overall rate of transfu-
`sion was reduced by 73% in the eculizumab group.
`Even among patients receiving eculizumab in
`whom transfusion independence was not reached,
`the number of units of packed red cells transfused
`was reduced by 44%, as compared with patients
`in the placebo group (data not shown).
`Intravascular hemolysis is central to the oc-
`currence of serious coexisting conditions in
`patients with PNH and contributes to the risk of
`death among these patients.9,12 Lactate dehydro-
`genase, a biochemical marker of hemolysis, was
`immediately reduced from approximately 10 times
`the upper limit of the normal range to normal
`
`levels or to just above normal levels in all patients
`in the eculizumab group. Residual low-level he-
`molysis in some patients despite terminal-com-
`plement blockade may be caused by an inherent
`decrease in the survival of PNH type III erythro-
`cytes19 or may be due to the fact that these cells
`are opsonized with C3b, which mediates extra-
`vascular clearance through the reticuloendothe-
`lial system.
`Before treatment with eculizumab, the hemo-
`globin levels were maintained by transfusion.
`Therefore, the stabilization of hemoglobin levels
`with a concomitant cessation of or reduction in
`the number of transfusions indicates an increase
`in endogenous erythrocyte mass. The reduction in
`hemolysis with eculizumab results in a new
`steady-state hemoglobin level, as determined by a
`balance of the underlying bone marrow dysfunc-
`tion, the increased half-life of PNH erythrocytes
`because of eculizumab therapy, and the new level
`of transfusions (if any) required.
`For most patients with PNH, the quality of life
`is impaired, and the impairment has been attrib-
`uted not only to anemia but also to excessive in-
`
`1240
`
`n engl j med 355;12 www.nejm.org september 21, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on January 13, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`8
`
`
`
`eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
`
`Table 3. Change in the Quality of Life during Treatment.*
`
`Scale
`
`Global health status scale
`
`Functioning scales
`
`Role
`
`Social
`
`Cognitive
`
`Physical
`
`Emotional
`
`Symptom scales
`
`Fatigue
`
`Pain
`
`Nausea and vomiting
`
`Single-item measures
`
`Dyspnea
`
`Loss of appetite
`
`Insomnia
`
`Financial difficulties
`
`Constipation
`
`Diarrhea
`
`Mean Change in Score from Baseline
`to Week 26†
`
`Placebo Group
`
`Eculizumab Group
`
`Absolute Difference
`
`P Value‡
`
`−8.5
`
`−6.9
`
`2.0
`
`−6.1
`
`−3.5
`
`−3.7
`
`10.0
`
`5.3
`
`2.8
`
`8.9
`
`3.3
`
`4.9
`
`0.0
`
`0.0
`
`5.7
`
`10.9
`
`17.9
`
`16.7
`
`7.9
`
`9.4
`
`7.5
`
`−16.9
`
`−12.3
`
`−0.4
`
`−7.9
`
`−10.3
`
`−7.9
`
`−10.3
`
`−6.3
`
`4.8
`
`19.4
`
`24.8
`
`14.7
`
`14.0
`
`12.9
`
`11.2
`
`26.9
`
`17.6
`
`3.2
`
`16.8
`
`13.6
`
`12.8
`
`10.3
`
`6.3
`
`0.9
`
`<0.001
`
`<0.001
`
`0.003
`
`0.002
`
`<0.001
`
`0.008
`
`<0.001
`
`0.002
`
`0.06
`
`<0.001
`
`<0.001
`
`0.01
`
`0.19
`
`0.20
`
`0.15
`
`* The quality of life was assessed with the EORTC QL

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site