throbber
Journal of Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy (1985) 10,73-77.
`
`.
`HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY OF
`BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDES-VARIATION IN COMMERCIAL
`PREPARATIONS
`
`Melvin R. Euerby*
`Quality Control Laboratory, Deparrment of Pharmacy, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicesrer LEI 5 WW, U . K.
`
`SUMMARY
`High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been used to iden-
`tify and determine the various alkyl benzyldimethylammonium chloride
`homologues (Cro to C, 6 ) present in commercial benzalkonium chloride
`preparations. The assay is especially suited for routine quality control work
`since it has proved to be quick and easily reproducible. It has been found
`that there can be a large degree of variation in the quality of differing
`benzalkonium chloride sources.
`
`I N T R O D U C T I O N
`Benzalkonium chloride is a mixture of n-alkyl benzyldimethylammonium chlorides
`with n-alkyl varying from C, to CIS. It is apparent that, depending on the source
`of origin, batches of benzalkonium chloride can contain differing amounts of each
`homologue. This has severe implications in that the relative amounts of the different
`alkyl benzyldimethylammonium chloride homologues can greatly affect both the anti-
`microbial spectrum and activity of the benzalkonium chloride (1-4). It is therefore
`important to be able to determine the proportion of the homologues, in order to
`standardize the preservative activity of benzalkonium chlorides. Looking at the
`British, European and United States Pharmacopoeias, only the latter sets limits on the
`percentage of C,, and C,, homologues (not less than 400, and 20y0 of the C,, and
`C,, homologues respectively and together they must comprise at least 70°0 of the
`total benzalkonium chloride content). All three Pharmacopoeias determine the
`benzalkonium chloride total content by the addition of a known excess of iodide to the
`sample. The quaternary ammonium iodide is removed by shaking with chloroform
`and the excess iodide is then titrated by an iodate method. The calculation makes the
`assumption that the average molecular weight for the mixtures is equivalent to that of
`the C, homologue. However, since the average molecular weight of some commercial
`samples has been shown to correspond more closely to the C,, or C , homologues ( 5 ) ,
`this method does not give sufficient accuracy.
`
`'Present address: The School of Pharmacy, The University of London, Brunswick Square, London.
`
`73
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2042
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00694
`Page 1
`
`

`

`M. R . Euerby
`74
`It is extremely likely that samples may pass the BP and EP specifications but have
`widely differing preservative activity. The disadvantage with the current USP specifi-
`cation for determining the percentage of the homologues is that it employs a compli-
`cated microhydrogenation followed by gas chromatography of the resulting n-alkyl
`dimethy lamines.
`It was obvious that a quick and easy determination of both the total content and
`relative proportions of the homologues was required for routine quality control pur-
`poses. There are many examples in the literature of non-official methods for assaying
`benzalkonium chlorides, though many are unable to assess the proportion of homo-
`logues (6-9) and many others tend to be unsuitable for routine work ( 5 , lo), the only
`exceptions are the two HPLC methods. The first method was designed specifically for
`determining benzalkonium chlorides in the presence of alkaloids and polymeric
`substrates (1 1) in contrast to the second method which simply determined them in
`very dilute aqueous solutions (12).
`It was therefore decided to re-examine the second HPLC method (12) with a view to
`comparing it to the BP and EP official method and to assess the variability of the
`relative proportions of the homologues from differing suppliers/manufacturers of
`dilute ophthalmic solutions O.O29bw/v, strong 500; w/v solutions and concentrated
`solid forms.
`
`M E T H O D
`
`Apparatus and materials
`A Spectra-Physics SP8700 solvent delivery system, Pye-Unicam PU 4020 uv
`detector, Spectra-Physics SP 4270 computing integrator and Rheodyne 7125 valve
`injector fitted with a 100 p1 loop were used.
`The alkyl benzyldimethylammonium chloride homologues used in constructing the
`calibration curves were obtained from the United States Pharmacopoeia Commission.
`
`HPLC conditions
`Mobile phase-acetonitrile/O-lM sodium acetate (adjusted to pH5 with glacial acetic
`acid) 40:60, continuous degassing with helium
`Flow rate-1.5 ml/min
`absorption at 262 nm and 0.32 AUFS
`Detection-UV
`Spherisorb 5CN (125 cm, 4.6 mm i.d.) 5 p
`Column-'Hichrom'
`Sample and standard preparation. The standard reference solution 0.02°,w/v was
`made up as follows: USP Benzalkonium chloride standard lO",w/v (1 ml) was made
`up to 500ml with HPLC water and stored in the dark. Commercial samples were
`diluted with HPLC water to a h a 1 concentration of 0~02°,w/v and subjected to
`HPLC analysis.
`
`R E S U L T S AND D I S C U S S I O N
`Slight modifications of the method, as described in the literature (12), gave excellent
`separation of the Cloy ClZ, C,, and C,, homologues in an analysis time of 11 min (Fig.
`la). The relative SDs were found to be _+4.2700, _+0.62",, _+0.78", and _f2.42",,
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2042
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00694
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Vuriarion in benzalkonium chlorides
`b
`
`C
`
`75
`
`- c
`
`0
`
`12
`
`0
`
`16
`
`0
`
`16
`
`M l n
`Fig. 1. Typical chromatogram of the separation of homologues in benzalkonium chlorides: (a) USP
`reference standard (b) Sample E (c) Co-chromatogram of (a) and (b).
`
`for the C,o, C,,, C,, and C,, homologues respectively, quantification being by
`comparison of the sample and standard peak areas. As expected, the C,, and C,,
`homologues gave lower relative standard deviations compared to the C,, and C,,
`because C,, and C,, contribute to a larger extent to the total benzalkonium
`chloride content. T h e area under the peak for each homologue responded linearly with
`concentration within the range examined.
`Variation in the proportion of homologues is possible from different sources of
`benzalkonium chlorides (5, 10, 12), therefore commercial 0~02",w/v, 509,w/v and
`solid benzalkonium chloride preparations were purchased and subjected to the above
`assay procedure. As can be seen from Table 1, three different batches from the same
`manufacturer (A) contained roughly the same proportion of the homologues, with the
`
`C, , predominating, illustrating good batch to batch consistency. A similar distribu-
`tion of the homologues was noted for manufacturer B, suggesting a common source of
`benzalkonium chloride with manufacturer A. Samples from manufacturers C and D
`show a predominance of the C , , homologue but are qualitatively different from each
`other and from samples A and B. The sample from manufacturer D failed to comply
`with the USP specification since it contained less than 2096 of the C , , homologue.
`In sharp contrast to samples A-D, the commercial sample E was shown to contain
`three peaks which did not correspond to the Cloy C,,, C,,, and c16 homologues (Figs
`Ib & c) hence failing the USP specification, even though it was marketed as USP
`quality. The supplier later admitted that the product contained the C,, and C,,
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2042
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00694
`Page 3
`
`

`

`76
`
`M . R. Euerby
`
`Table 1. Comparison of commercial batches of benzalkonium
`chlorides
`
`Manufacturer
`
`Percentage of homologue Total content
`C , , C , , c,, c,,
`"
`
`0
`
`A (Batch 1)
`(Batch 2)
`(Batch 3)
`
`B
`C
`D:
`Es:
`
`71.1 24.6 -
`4.3
`2.2
`68.1 25.9
`3.8
`69.2 26.0
`1.5
`3.3
`71.6 24.4 -
`4.0
`- 59.0 41.0 -
`48.8 18.0 19.3
`7.7
`- - - -
`
`0.0187*
`0.0195
`0.0216
`49.5t
`99.7
`91.4
`
`*0.0193nn BPC assay.
`t50.60; BP assay.
`:Possibly contains 6.2O, of the C, homologue.
`$44.3?& BP assay.
`
`homologues instead of the required C,, and C14. The remaining peak has yet to be
`identified.
`It can be seen from 'Table 1 that, not unexpectedly, the HPLC results deviated by
`2-30,
`from those of the BPC method for benzalkonium chloride lozenges, which
`employs a titration with sodium lauryl sulphate after complexation with dimethyl
`yellow in the presence of chloroform, and the BP method for total benzalkonium
`chloride content.
`The HPLC analysis for the total content and proportion of the homologues in
`various benzalkonium chloride preparations has been shown to be quick, easy to use,
`reliable and ideally suited to routine quality control uses. In addition the method is
`ideal for differentiating between sources of benzalkonium chlorides using the relative
`proportions of each homologue. From the above findings it is suggested that the BP
`and EP adopt a specification (the USP gas chromatography method or a similar HPLC
`assay as described), to determine the proportion of each homologue in order to
`standardize the widely varying benzalkonium chloride products presently on the
`market.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Valko, E.I. & DuBois, A.S. (1944) The antibacterial action of surface-active cations. Journal of Bac-
`teriology, 47, 15-25.
`2 . Valko, E.I. & DuBois, A.S. (1945) Correlation between antibacterial power and chemical structure of
`higher alkyl ammonium ions. Journal of Eacteriologv, 50,481490.
`3. Hooperheide, J.C. (1945) The germicidal properties of certain quaternary ammonium salts with
`special reference to ceryltrimethylammonium bromide. Journal of Bacteriology, 49,277-289.
`4. Giles, R., Daoud, N.N., Gilbert, P. & Dickinson, N.A. (1983) Benzalkonium chloride: BP, EP or
`USPlJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 35,l IOP.
`5. Daoud, N.N., Crooks, P.A., Speak, R. 81 Gilbert, P. (1983) Determination of benzalkonium
`chloride by chemical ionization mass spectroscopy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 72,290-292.
`6. Auerbach, M.E. (1943) Germicidal quaternary ammonium salts in dilute solution. A colorimetric
`assay method. Analytical Chemistry, 15,492493.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2042
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00694
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Variation in benzalkonium chlorides
`77
`7. Chatten, L.G. & Okamura, K.O. (1973) Assay of quaternary ammonium compounds in various
`dosage forms by acid-dye method. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 62, 1328-1 33 1.
`8. Ballard, C.W., Isaacr, J. & Scott, P.G.W. (1954) The photometric determination of quaternary
`ammonium salts and of certain amines by compound formation wirh indicators. Journal of Pharmacy
`and Pharmacology, 67,971-985.
`9. Colichman, E.L. ( 1947) Photocolorimetric method for determination of quaternary ammonium salts.
`Analyrical Chemistry, 19,430-431.
`10. Jennings, E.C. & Mitchner, H. (1967) Modified Hofmann degradation for the analysis of
`n-alkylbenzyldimethylammonium chlorides by gas chromatography 11. Journal of Pharmaceutical
`Science, 56, 1595-1598.
`11. Marsh, D.F. & Takakashi, T. (1983) Determination of benzalkonium chloride in the presence of
`interfering alkaloids and polymeric substrates by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromaro-
`graphy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 12,521-525.
`12. Meyer, R.C. (1980) Determination of benzalkonium chloride by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid
`chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 69, 1148-1 150.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2042
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00694
`Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket