throbber
COMMUNICATION
`
`www.rsc.org/chemcomm | ChemComm
`
`Surfactant mediated oxygen reuptake in water for green aerobic
`oxidation: mass-spectrometric determination of discrete intermediates
`to correlate oxygen uptake with oxidation efficiencyw
`
`Naisargee Parikh, Dinesh Kumar, Sudipta Raha Roy and Asit K. Chakraborti*
`
`Received 10th August 2010, Accepted 19th November 2010
`DOI: 10.1039/c0cc03166f
`
`A novel strategy of catalytic green aerobic oxidation by
`surfactant-mediated oxygen reuptake in water offers a new
`dimension to the applications of surfactants to look beyond as
`solubility aids and a conceptual advancement in understanding
`the role of surfactants in aquatic organic reactions through mass
`spectrometry guided identification of discrete intermediates.
`
`Aerobic oxidation offers environmentally benign chemistries
`as toxic and corrosive stoichiometric oxidants (e.g., peracids,
`iodoxyarenes, hydroperoxides or metallic oxidants such as lead
`tetraacetate, ceric ammonium nitrate etc.) can be replaced by
`dioxygen directly. However, this needs dioxygen activation1 by
`various chemical models2 and has a long-standing interest. A
`non-heme and transition-metal
`free model of dioxygen
`activation for green aerobic oxidation processes remains
`unexplored and is a challenging task. The adverse effect of
`chemical processes on the environment has put a thrust on
`sustainable development3 with major focus on the use of green
`reaction media.4 Water is most preferred on the basis of solvent
`selection guide of the pharmaceutical industry5 and its use in
`organic reactions has gained momentum.6 Yet its use is
`currently limited due to poor aqueous solubility of organic
`compounds and efforts are made to overcome the problem by
`using surfactants.7 However, the general assumption that ions
`in dissolved water have a strong effect on the bulk properties of
`liquid water led us to consider the role of surfactants beyond a
`solubility aid. Herein we report surfactant-induced direct
`fixation/activation of aerial oxygen by oxygen reuptake in
`water
`for
`an efficient
`strategy
`for
`green oxidation
`demonstrating that the role of surfactants extends beyond
`the solubility enhancing property.
`We followed the cyclocondensation of benzaldehyde 1
`(2.5 mmol) with 2-aminothiophenol 2 (2.5 mmol) in water in
`the presence and absence of surfactant by GCMS (Scheme 1).8z
`Sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (SDOSS) showed 100%
`conversion to the desired 2-phenylbenzothiazole 3a (96%
`isolated yield after purification) and was found to be the best
`promoter. Other surfactants afforded a mixture of 3a and the
`2-phenylbenzothiazoline 3b with the 3a : 3b selectivity varying
`from 41 : 59 to 98 : 2 (3a was obtained in 32–91% yield after
`purification). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium
`
`Department of Medicinal Chemistry, National Institute of
`Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67,
`S. A. S. Nagar, Punjab 160 062, India.
`E-mail: akchakraborti@niper.ac.in; Fax: +91 (0)172-2214692
`w Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed
`experimental procedures and scanned spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/
`c0cc03166f
`
`deoxycholate (SDC) were found to be the next best effective
`catalysts and exhibited 3a : 3b selectivities of 98 : 2 and 95 : 5
`and afforded 3a in 91 and 87% yields, respectively. Further
`studies on the optimization of the critical amount of SDOSS
`and the reaction time, revealed that the use of 5 mol% of
`SDOSS afforded 100% conversion to 3a after 1 h at rt. The use
`of lesser quantities of SDOSS resulted in accumulation of some
`amount (4–15%) of 3b.8 Elaborative GCMS studies on the
`SDOSS-catalysed reaction of 1 and 2 revealed that the use of
`water has two beneficial effects: (i) acceleration of the rate of
`cyclocondensation of 1 with 2 to form 3b and (ii) enhancement
`of the rate of oxidation of 3b to 3a and that there is
`enhancement of oxygen transporter ability of water through
`oxygen uptake/reuptake mediated by SDOSS in accelerating
`the oxidative conversion of benzothiazoline to benzothiazole.8
`To establish oxygen reuptake/activation as a specific role of
`the surfactant we measured the oxygen uptake property/ability
`of the surfactants to find any correlation between the oxygen
`uptake and the observed 3a : 3b selectivities (Fig. 1).8z
`The oxygen content/uptake was found to be in higher
`amounts in the presence of SDOSS, SDS and SDC than that
`of the others8 and followed the order SDOSS > SDS > SDC
`which is in parallelism with the 3a : 3b selectivities observed in
`carrying out the cyclocondensation of 1 with 2 in water in the
`presence of these surfactants. A good correlation was also
`observed between the optimal oxygen content/uptake and the
`effective concentration/amount of SDOSS (Fig. 2). Maximum
`oxygen count/uptake was observed with 5 mol% of SDOSS
`which is evidently the critical micellar concentration to obtain
`the maximum conversion to benzothiazole.
`The role of the surfactant for oxygen activation/reuptake
`can be visualised by the formation of the non-covalent adducts
`A and B, as exemplified in the case of SDOSS and SDS,
`respectively, (Fig. 3).
`The oxygen activation/fixation9 occurs via a cooperative
`hydrogen bond network involving (i) one hydrogen of water
`and the oxyanionic site of sulfonate/sulfate group of SDOSS/
`SDS due to a labile hydrogen bond network at the surface of
`water10 and the propensity of the anion of alkali metal salts to
`form hydrogen bonds with water molecules,11 (ii) the other
`hydrogen of the water molecule and one of the oxygen atoms
`of OQO, akin to proton assisted O–O bond scission in
`
`Scheme 1 Surfactant-induced reaction of 1 with 2 in water.
`
`This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
`
`Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1797–1799
`
`1797
`
`Published on 03 December 2010. Downloaded by Reprints Desk on 3/12/2020 6:01:32 PM.
`
`View Article Online
`
` / Journal Homepage
`
` / Table of Contents for this issue
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2317
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 1
`
`

`

`(ESI MS) has the ability to efficiently generate ions of non-
`covalent species in the gas phase15 and is the frontline
`biochemical
`research
`tool
`to
`study
`non-covalent
`interactions.16 We recently demonstrated ‘ion fishing’ by
`MALDI and ESI MS to detect/identify non-covalently
`formed supramolecular assemblies of small molecules.17
`The total ion chromatogram (TIC) under (+ve) ESI MS (on
`linear ion trap) of aliquots of samples from a stock solution of
`5 mol% (with respect to the aldehyde used for reaction)
`of SDOSS exhibited ion peaks at m/z 495.57, 494.58, 493.56
`as [A + H]+, [A]+ and [A H]+, respectively.8 Further
`structural proof of the ion of m/z 494.57 was obtained by the
`MS–MS (MS2) that resulted in daughter ions [A H]+,
`[A C8H17]+ and [A 2C8H17 + H]+ at m/z 493.52, 381.36
`and 269.24, respectively.8 The characteristic ion peaks observed
`in the TIC of similar MS experiments on SDS indicated the
`involvement of B.8 More convincing evidences were obtained
`from the +ve ESI HRMS (on Q-TOF). The TIC (Fig. 4a)
`exhibited ion peaks at m/z 495.2469, 494.3898 and 493.3865
`corresponding to [A + H]+, [A]+ and [A H]+, respectively.
`The MS2 (Fig. 4b) of the ion of m/z 494.3898 resulted in daughter
`ions at m/z 493.3865, 467.2043 [SDOSS + Na]+, 381.2597
`[A C8H17]+ and 355.0814 [SDOSS + Na C8H17 + H]+.
`The poor catalytic ability of other surfactants can be
`accounted for their inefficiency to form the oxygen adduct
`and was demonstrated by the fact that when an aqueous soln
`(5 mol%) of Tween 80 and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide
`(CTAB), as representative surfactants that afforded poor
`conversion to benzothiazole, were subjected to (+ve) ESI
`MS, no ion peak corresponding to the respective oxygen
`adduct could be detected in the TIC. Additionally, these
`surfactants also showed inferior oxygen uptake, as measured
`with the microelectrode.
`It was reasonably conceived that the catalytic efficiency of
`SDOSS should correspond to the amount/concentration of
`the oxygen adduct formed/present during the course of the
`reaction. Hence the estimation of the oxygen adduct was
`performed by measuring the ion current (represented by peak
`area)18 of ions at m/z 492.5–496.5 using a fixed amount (10 mL)
`
`Fig. 4 (a) (+ve) ESI HRMS TIC of sample of 5 mol% SDOSS in 1 : 1
`MeCN–water. (b) MS2 of ion at m/z 494.3898 (TIC Fig. 4a).
`
`Fig. 1 Oxygen uptake by different surfactants.
`
`Fig. 2 Oxygen uptake with varying amounts of SDOSS.
`
`Fig. 3 The oxygen adducts of SDOSS (A) and SDS (B).
`
`cytochrome P450,12 followed by (iii) charge–charge interaction
`between the electron deficient
`(due to hydrogen bond
`formation of the other oxygen atom with the water molecule)
`oxygen atom of OQO and the oxygen lone pair of electrons in
`the SQO of SDOSS/SDS. The oxygen atom of one of the SQO
`groups forms a bridgehead through the bifurcated13 hydrogen
`bond with water and provides rigidity to the structure. The
`absence of
`such hydrogen bonds and charge–charge
`interaction network in organic solvents explains the poor
`conversion and low 3a : 3b selectivity observed in these
`solvents. Although a clear solution of SDOSS is formed in
`these solvents they are not conducive for oxygen uptake/
`reuptake due to the absence of the desired co-operative non-
`covalent hydrogen bond interactions. This further suggests
`that the role of SDOSS in aqueous medium extends beyond
`as its function as a solubility enhancer. These structures mimic
`the protein environment of water-assisted dioxygen activation
`for heme metabolism14 and constitute a non-heme and
`transition metal-free model.
`In support of oxygen activation/uptake by SDOSS we
`planned to detect/identify the actual catalytic species (oxygen
`spectrometry
`adduct A). Electrospray ionisation mass
`
`1798
`
`Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1797–1799
`
`This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
`
`Published on 03 December 2010. Downloaded by Reprints Desk on 3/12/2020 6:01:32 PM.
`
`View Article Online
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2317
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 2
`
`

`

`with EtOAc (5 mL). An aliquot portion (500 mL) of the supernatant
`EtOAc layer was taken out and subjected to GCMS to observe the
`benzothiazoline : benzothiazole selectivity of 2 : 98. Determination
`of oxygen uptake by surfactants: In a blank experiment ultrapure
`water (1 mL) (27 1C, 18.2 O) was taken into the cuvette of the
`Oxygraph and the oxygen content was recorded (0–5 min) at 70 rpm.
`Following a similar procedure the oxygen content/uptake of 1 mL
`freshly prepared 0.01 M solution of the surfactant in ultrapure water
`(27 1C, 18.2 O) was recorded. The actual oxygen content was
`determined by subtracting the blank reading from the corresponding
`1.
`reading of the analyte solution at 5 min and normalised to nmol mL
`Determination of ion current of the oxygen adduct of SDOSS: An
`aliquot portion (10 mL) of a solution of SDOSS (0.022 g) in 5 mL of
`water–acetonitrile (1 : 1) was subjected to (+ve) ESI MS (linear ion
`trap) and the ion current was determined by measuring the area of the
`ion peak corresponding to the oxygen adduct of SDOSS.
`
`issue on dioxygen activation by metalloenzymes and
`1 Special
`models, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 465; J. M. Bollinger and
`C. Krebs, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2007, 11, 151.
`2 Fe (II) complexes: S. Hong, Y.-M. Lee, W. Shin, S. Fukuzumi and
`W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 13910; Au–TiO2/gold
`cluster cations: S. M. Lang, T. M. Bernhardt, R. N. Barnett,
`B. Yoon and U. Landman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 8939;
`Pd species: J. M. Keith and W. A. Goddard III, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
`2009,
`1416; Multi-Ru-substituted
`polyoxymetalates:
`131,
`A. E. Kuznetsov, Y. V. Geletii, C. L. Hill, K. Morokuma and
`D. G. Musaev, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6844; Cu-catalyst:
`B. Zhang and N. Jiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 28.
`3 M. Poliakoff and P. Licence, Nature, 2007, 450, 810.
`4 C. Capello, U. Fischer and K. Hungerbu¨ hler, Green Chem., 2007, 9,
`927.
`5 K. Alfonsi, J. Colberg, P. J. Dunn, T. Fevig, S. Jennings,
`T. A. Johnson, H. P. Kleine, C. Knight, M. A. Nagy,
`D. A. Perry and M. Stefaniak, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 31.
`6 Organic Synthesis in Water, ed. P. A. Grieco, Blackie Academic and
`Professional, London, 1998; C. J. Li and T. H. Chang, in Organic
`Reactions in Aqueous Media, Wiley, New York, 1997; N. Azizi and
`M. R. Saidi, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3649; S. V. Chankeshwara and
`A. K. Chakraborti, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 3259; G. L. Khatik,
`R. Kumar and A. K. Chakraborti, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2433;
`A. K. Chakraborti, S. Rudrawar, K. B. Jadhav, G. Kaur and
`S. V. Chankeshwara, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 1335, and references
`therein.
`7 G. Sharma, R. Kumar and A. K. Chakraborti, Tetrahedron Lett.,
`2008, 49, 4269, and references therein.
`8 See supporting information (ESIw).
`9 The polar head group of a charged alkyl surfactant is oriented at
`the air/water
`interface. D. K. Hore, D. K. Beaman and
`G. L. Richmond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9356.
`10 N. Galamba and B. J. Costa Cabral, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
`17955.
`11 I. A. Heisler and S. R. Meech, Science, 2010, 327, 857.
`12 A. R. Groenhof, A. W. Ehlers and K. Lammertsma, J. Am. Chem.
`Soc., 2007, 129, 6204.
`13 T. Steiner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 48.
`14 T. Kamachi and K. Yoshizawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
`10686.
`15 J. B. Fenn, M. Mann, C. K. Meng, S. F. Wong and
`C. M. Whitehouse, Science, 1989, 246, 64.
`16 G. Siuzdak, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1994, 91, 11290.
`17 A. K. Chakraborti and S. Raha Roy, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3866;
`A. K. Chakraborti and S. Raha Roy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
`6902; A. K. Chakraborti, S. Raha Roy, D. Kumar and P. Chopra,
`Green Chem., 2008, 10, 1111.
`18 Z. B. Alfassi, R. E. Hui, B. L. Milman and P. Neta, Anal. Bioanal.
`Chem., 2003, 377, 159.
`
`Fig. 5 Ion current of the species at m/z 492.5–496.5 measured using
`different amounts of SDOSS.
`
`of stock solutions containing various amounts of SDOSS.8z A
`good correlation was observed between the ion current and the
`critical amounts of SDOSS required for the formation of the
`benzothiazole (Fig. 5). An increasing trend of the ion current
`was observed with an increase in the concentration of SDOSS
`from 1–4 mol%. A sharp increase in the ion current was
`observed in changing the amount of SDOSS from 4 to
`5 mol%. An optimum value of the ion current was obtained
`for the sample of the 5 mol% solution that also corresponds to
`the critical concentration/amount of SDOSS required to
`obtain the best conversion (100%) to 3a.
`In conclusion, the novel findings of catalytic aerial oxygen
`reuptake in aqueous medium offers a new dimension to the
`chemistry of surfactants to look beyond them as simply
`solubility aids. The identification of the non-covalent adduct
`as a discrete species in dioxygen activation and estimation/
`correlation of oxygen activation/uptake as a function of the
`ion current of the catalytic species makes the basis for rational
`selection of a surfactant for aerobic oxidation in aqueous
`medium and provides a non-heme and transition metal-free
`model for dioxygen activation under ambient conditions.
`Further implication of these findings is that it would provide
`insight into the microenvironment of reverse micelles that
`enable them to carry out various reactions in confinement,
`and the microscopic origin of the role of surfactants as
`solubility aids, and as to whether gaseous uptake is the
`prerequisite in imparting the solubility enhancing property of
`these materials!
`Financial support from DST, New Delhi, India (no. SR/S1/
`OC-33/2008) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors D. K.
`and S. R. R. thank CSIR, New Delhi, India for senior research
`fellowships.
`
`Notes and references
`z Typical procedures. Determination of benzothiazoline : benzothiazole
`selectivity
`during
`cyclocondensation
`of
`benzaldehyde
`with
`2-aminothiophenol in the presence of surfactant: To a magnetically
`stirred suspension of SDOSS (0.044 g, 5 mol%) in water (5 mL) was
`added benzaldehyde (0.21 g, 2 mmol) and 2-aminothiophenol (0.25 g,
`2 mmol) and the mixture was stirred magnetically at rt. After
`completion of reaction (TLC, 1 h), the reaction mixture was diluted
`
`This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
`
`Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1797–1799
`
`1799
`
`Published on 03 December 2010. Downloaded by Reprints Desk on 3/12/2020 6:01:32 PM.
`
`View Article Online
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2317
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket